Do you really think the ark could have fitted every species; two of a kind; male and female?<quoted text>
It has nothing to do with keeping the flocks enthralled and everything to do with bringing the truth to someone. Don't you think it strange that so many groups have a story to tell in relation to the flood? Have you ever considered that they are based on the original story from the bible?
That ship must be the size of Australia and India combined!
What about those which had male and female organs?
How about the diversity that we see before us if Noah had to abandon certain animals.
If all animals unloaded themselves after the ark rested on land; why do we not see this diaspora. In fact we only see such a diaspora of "bridges" of animals from different continents that were once connected. We see this genetically, and the fact that the continents fit together like a jig saw. Again, imagine the mess if all these animals came from Noah's ark when all the landmass was joined.
We should be seeing a huge, massive concentration of these fossils at a particular area on earth; paleontologists only need to follow the breadcrumbs and get more and more fossils deposits per square metres and arrive at the supposed location.
And humans, the most intelligent and adaptable creatures.... Absolutely no fossil record, "archaeology" from this "civilised" culture which had developed complex language and mathematical accumen to measure the dimensions of these tiny ark to fit all the animals of earth.