N.Y. Times probe finds no Al-Qaeda link to Benghazi raidN.Y. Times...

Dec 28, 2013 Full story: USA Today 570

A New York Times probe of the deadly attack on the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi in 2012 found no involvement by Al-Qaeda or other international terrorists groups.

Full Story
First Prev
of 29
Next Last
Cat74

Romeoville, IL

#1 Dec 28, 2013
The NYTimes is trying to save the Benghazi babe from disaster, but it won't work. We already have the truth, and Hillary, and Obama both lied to save their own skin. There are several Congressional Investigations going on that will dispel any garbage the Times puts out.

Since: Dec 07

Athens, TX

#2 Dec 28, 2013
Sooo……….the NY Times is claiming that al queda wasn’t involved….this changes the fact that hillary and obama lied in the the Rose Garden about the cause of Benghazi, they got Susan Rice to lie about it, lied to the UN about it, Two former Navy Seals ignored stand down orders and tried to rescue Stevens but, the smoke was too thick. Four Americans
died because of a broken mission to run guns. Hillary and Obama were
fully aware of a gun running mission for Syrian rebles and ran for the hills when it resulted in the death of Stevens. Later they helped concoct the "cover" story. It gives the OK for the continued stifling of survivors testifying……………………

But because it “wasn’t” al queda………that makes all the lies OK?

Well……there ya have it!!
radiofreeamerica

Tarpon Springs, FL

#3 Dec 28, 2013
Oh,well,that settles it.obama will certainly allow the NYT to resolve all U.S. security issues in the future.You can sleep soundly tonight ...your NYT is on guard.
sandy1

New City, NY

#4 Dec 28, 2013
That liberal rag can lie all they want, it won't save cankles clinton's campaign in anyway whatsoever.

Since: Dec 07

Athens, TX

#5 Dec 28, 2013
radiofreeamerica wrote:
Oh,well,that settles it.obama will certainly allow the NYT to resolve all U.S. security issues in the future.You can sleep soundly tonight ...your NYT is on guard.
At least Kerry is on the job now!! And when he gets back from Israel.........he'll turn himself in for a medal!!
radiofreeamerica

Tarpon Springs, FL

#6 Dec 28, 2013
Bluebonnets-Thistle wrote:
<quoted text>
At least Kerry is on the job now!! And when he gets back from Israel.........he'll turn himself in for a medal!!
LOL!!!
Cat74

Romeoville, IL

#7 Dec 28, 2013
The American people deserve better then this group of nitwits. There is an election next November. If you are not registered, please register, and please vote for the best people for the jobs.
Chucky Clapping

Nha Trang, Vietnam

#8 Dec 28, 2013
Bluebonnets-Thistle wrote:
<quoted text>
At least Kerry is on the job now!! And when he gets back from Israel.........he'll turn himself in for a medal!!
do U cheering Kerry Condors or mocking that Swift yatchin free duty?!!;-0h, so U liked the Off# of Coacher?!! ready for NFL playing off??;)
Cat74

Bolingbrook, IL

#9 Dec 29, 2013
This story was debunked before breakfast. The Times needs new writers.
Eric Gustafson

Newport News, VA

#10 Dec 29, 2013
The Republicans for the last year plus have been parading the deaths of Ambassador Stevens for political gain, and the NYT has published the result of their extensive investigation.

Billions wasted in phony hearings, thousands of doctored documents leaked by Issa and the conclusion is as was expected the total built up on Benghazi was a sham, Fool's paradise looking for the scandal that never was.

This information released by the Times only moves Hillary Clinton two steps closer to the White House and cast serious doubts on the Republicans hold on the majority in the House of Representatives in 2014

The GOP look like utter idiots chasing the ghost of Benghazi wasting valuable time that could have been used best at working out details of a Jobs program.

The Republican spending cuts is the cause of the murder of Ambassador Steven, there's nothing the GOP can dream up to change that narratives, especially after it's been exposed that Benghazi and the mythical scandal was a created lie..........
kuda

Cincinnati, OH

#11 Dec 29, 2013
Eric Gustafson wrote:
The Republicans for the last year plus have been parading the deaths of Ambassador Stevens for political gain, and the NYT has published the result of their extensive investigation.
Billions wasted in phony hearings, thousands of doctored documents leaked by Issa and the conclusion is as was expected the total built up on Benghazi was a sham, Fool's paradise looking for the scandal that never was.
This information released by the Times only moves Hillary Clinton two steps closer to the White House and cast serious doubts on the Republicans hold on the majority in the House of Representatives in 2014
The GOP look like utter idiots chasing the ghost of Benghazi wasting valuable time that could have been used best at working out details of a Jobs program.
The Republican spending cuts is the cause of the murder of Ambassador Steven, there's nothing the GOP can dream up to change that narratives, especially after it's been exposed that Benghazi and the mythical scandal was a created lie..........
Yes but we must remember never to underestimate the extremist right wing fringe's eagerness or ability to create and adhere tenaciously to scenarios that defy realities the don't like. Sadly, they can usually be found embarrassing themselves huddled together trying to hide with their heads buried in sand.
sandy1

New City, NY

#12 Dec 29, 2013
Anybody buying into the NYT BS needs their head examined. According to former analyst for the CIA Fred Fleitz this politicized article was an effort to revive this already discredited theory that a video was behind the attacks. They claim the main leader behind the attacks did not have terrorist links, but the leader participated in a convoy of trucks in Benghazi 6-12 where they were flying the black radical islam flag. By the way this article is based on interviews with Libyans who of course will deny everything because the fear arrest and prosecution.Al Queada has also changed tactics. It is now a decentralized org that relys on affiliated orgs and other franchises. It is encouraging terrorist attacks through this decentralized org. That should have been discussed in this article so the readers would understand the real threat.

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#13 Dec 29, 2013
radiofreeamerica wrote:
Oh,well,that settles it.obama will certainly allow the NYT to resolve all U.S. security issues in the future.You can sleep soundly tonight ...your NYT is on guard.
The NYT's is in a financial mess and is willing to do or say anything to keep their kingdom in the liberal sanctuary called NY. The home of an impeached President, rapist and abuser of women and the liberals hold him as their highest trophy. I must admit, they don't have much to pick from. Hey though, what does it matter.

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#14 Dec 29, 2013
kuda wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes but we must remember never to underestimate the extremist right wing fringe's eagerness or ability to create and adhere tenaciously to scenarios that defy realities the don't like. Sadly, they can usually be found embarrassing themselves huddled together trying to hide with their heads buried in sand.
IMPEACHED CLINTON TO SWEAR IN NYC MAYOR,

what a class act liberals are.

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#15 Dec 29, 2013
Cat74 wrote:
The American people deserve better then this group of nitwits. There is an election next November. If you are not registered, please register, and please vote for the best people for the jobs.
DNC sends email defending Obama from impeachment possibility...

The DNC, which recently expanded its political tactics to include boycotting independent news outlets, previously supported the last president to be impeached: Bill Clinton.

Obama’s staff changed key talking points on the 2012 Benghazi terrorist attack; his Internal Revenue Service targeted conservative groups during the 2012 election cycle; and Obama personally lied to the American people when he told them that they could keep their existing doctors and health insurance plans under Obamacare.

Obama’s expansion of executive branch authority is “setting the stage for something very dangerous in the future” according to Republican Rep. Justin Amash.

IT IS CLEAR THE LIBS ARE FEELING LESS THAN COMFORTABLE ABOUT 2014.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2013/12/28/dnc-sends-e...
bottlecap

Orlando, FL

#16 Dec 29, 2013
Bluebonnets-Thistle wrote:
Sooo……….the NY Times is claiming that al queda wasn’t involved….
The NY Times is to the FASCIST OLIGARCHY what Pravda was to the Communists----a PROPAGANDA Organ.

Pure subterfuge. The terrorist group Ansar al-Shariah was identified as the perpetrators within an hour after the attack started.

It took an Extensive Probe by the NY Times to find out what the STATE Department knew in less than an hour??? ha ha ha
stormy

Bridgeport, WV

#17 Dec 29, 2013
NYT is just letting all you dems. know they are smoothing over the
Benghazi deaths for Hillarys run for president. You will forget
by 2016 as you did for Obama in 2013 won't you???? They
are NOW counting on you to place the first woman in our WH as
you did first black??? Just throw some crumbs and a dem will
vote for anyone but a republican......We as a country know the
lengths you will go. All I can see is this country going to hell !
Thanks...... Maybe Obama will finish us off and you won't get
the chance to see old Hill take over.

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#18 Dec 29, 2013
The NYT's was guilty of releasing classified information a couple of times putting our American soldiers in Harms Way. They should level the building..........calling all Saudi's.
Wall Street Government

Sebastian, FL

#19 Dec 29, 2013
Well then , why don't the teabaggers at FAUX, send a reporter(ette) over to Benghazi to "investigate" this?

They haven't sent ONE.

Even NBC sent a girl.

Now they whine from the peanut gallery, while doing nothing but scream like little girls.

Rannity is the head cheerleader.

Poor teabaggers.

“Yeah, but...”

Since: Sep 11

MILKY WAY

#21 Dec 29, 2013
stormy wrote:
NYT is just letting all you dems. know they are smoothing over the
Benghazi deaths for Hillarys run for president. You will forget
by 2016 as you did for Obama in 2013 won't you???? They
are NOW counting on you to place the first woman in our WH as
you did first black??? Just throw some crumbs and a dem will
vote for anyone but a republican......We as a country know the
lengths you will go. All I can see is this country going to hell !
Thanks...... Maybe Obama will finish us off and you won't get
the chance to see old Hill take over.
At this point, what difference does it make? The graves of Ambassador Stephens and the other 3 killed at Benghazi are mere bumps in the road.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 29
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Terrorism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Cheney again defends interrogation techniques 18 min positronium 333
Ukraine Needs New Security Guarantees 34 min NAZTY Ukraine 11
Why should Australians fear from Muslims? (Dec '07) 3 hr Neville Thompson 45,967
A foreign policy based on Lies and Fabrications 3 hr MuwatnEri 4
D.C. outraged over Sony's 'The Interview' decision 7 hr serfs up 12
Guantanamo still far from closed 16 hr wsj 26
"Enough is enough": Pakistan-U.S. rift continues (Dec '11) 19 hr shinningelectr0n 13
More from around the web