Rep. Peter King Calls on FBI to put h...

Rep. Peter King Calls on FBI to put him under Close Surveillance and Profile Redheads

There are 34 comments on the Juan Cole story from Apr 21, 2013, titled Rep. Peter King Calls on FBI to put him under Close Surveillance and Profile Redheads. In it, Juan Cole reports that:

"Let's not be politically correct," the congressman told surprised agents. "I have a long history as a material supporter of terrorism.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Juan Cole.

First Prev
of 2
Next Last
Jake

Ithaca, NY

#25 Aug 12, 2013
James wrote:
<quoted text>
The UK paid for all supplies from the US until Lend Lease, which did not arrive until June 1941 - after the Battle of Britain and Hitler's invasion of Russia.
In the event of a successful German invasion of the British Isles the Royal Navy was to continue the war from Canada, Iceland, Gibraltar, Malta, the Suez Canal and South Africa.
Well the supplies were delivered to prevent the English from starving. What difference does it make if it was paid for?
The Royal Navy could not protect the convoys, but they were to continue the war from remote locations. What does that tell you, it certainly does NOT suggest to me that the Brit politicians at the time thought they could hold England if the Germans invaded.
Jake

Ithaca, NY

#26 Aug 12, 2013
Robert wrote:
<quoted text>
Japan did not attack the USA.
Hawaii was not part of the US until 1959.
Sorry Robert, Hawaii was declared a United States territory in 1898. It was declared a state as ou state in 1959.
Anything else genius?
Francis

Walsall, UK

#28 Aug 13, 2013
Jake wrote:
<quoted text>
Well the supplies were delivered to prevent the English from starving. What difference does it make if it was paid for?
The Royal Navy could not protect the convoys, but they were to continue the war from remote locations. What does that tell you, it certainly does NOT suggest to me that the Brit politicians at the time thought they could hold England if the Germans invaded.
Churchill was going to release millions of tons of anthrax in the event of a German invasion.
Francis

Walsall, UK

#29 Aug 13, 2013
Jake wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry Robert, Hawaii was declared a United States territory in 1898. It was declared a state as ou state in 1959.
Anything else genius?
Invading Hawaii did not make it US territory.

I'm so glad about all the US servicemen who burned at Pearl Harbor on 7th December 1941.

The Japanese were 100% in the right.
Francis

Walsall, UK

#30 Aug 13, 2013
Worthington wrote:
<quoted text>
Twice the scummy Brits have gotten us involved in war with their
German cousins. Historians now lay most of WW1 blame on England.
They could have had peace after Dunkirk. Waiting for us. Now
England is a social cesspool. The trash from their former empire.
And the degenerates are letting in more.
*Did the massive loss of fit and aggressive males in two wars damage their gene pool?
What kind of wimps let this situation develop? What flaw in europoid thinking?
The German Empire declared war on France and Russia in 1914.
Jake

Ithaca, NY

#32 Aug 26, 2013
Francis wrote:
<quoted text>
Churchill was going to release millions of tons of anthrax in the event of a German invasion.
Really? And kill his fellow countrymen? What kind of fool are you?
Render the land useless? Wow, can I sell you some real estate. It has a really pretty bridge between Manhattan and Brooklyn.
Frank Gallagher

Faversham, UK

#33 Aug 27, 2013
Jake wrote:
<quoted text>
Really? And kill his fellow countrymen? What kind of fool are you?
Render the land useless? Wow, can I sell you some real estate. It has a really pretty bridge between Manhattan and Brooklyn.
Churchill ordered the garrison at Singapore to die fighting rather than surrender.

The main reason why Hitler invaded the Soviet Union in June 1941 was because Churchill had brought millons of tons of anthrax from the United States.
Clive

Dover, UK

#35 Sep 2, 2013
Jake wrote:
<quoted text>
Well the supplies were delivered to prevent the English from starving. What difference does it make if it was paid for?
The Royal Navy could not protect the convoys, but they were to continue the war from remote locations. What does that tell you, it certainly does NOT suggest to me that the Brit politicians at the time thought they could hold England if the Germans invaded.
There was never any chance of Germany invading the UK in 1940.

Hermann Goering, Karl Donitz, Adolf Galland, Wilhelm Keitel and Gerd von Rundstedt all admitted Operation Sea Lion could not succeed.
Maidstone is an engaylish

Nanjing, China

#36 Sep 27, 2013
Without the USA you would be typing in German, Russian or more than likely..not at all you limey war loser
Jeremiah

Bilston, UK

#37 Sep 27, 2013
Maidstone is an engaylish wrote:
Without the USA you would be typing in German, Russian or more than likely..not at all you limey war loser
Germany never intended to even try to invade the UK, and the Soviets had no interests in western Europe.

Anyway the UK started World War II.
Wot a mess

Nanjing, China

#38 Sep 27, 2013
I think that you will find that Germany attacked and bombed the UK during WW2, blitzing London and other UK cities killing thousands of British.
Wot a mess

Nanjing, China

#39 Sep 27, 2013
Hitler refered to the English as the "Jews of Europe". Oh he had it in for the English all right.
Wot a mess

Nanjing, China

#40 Sep 27, 2013
The head of M16 was a spy for Russia and even ran there to escape when the Americans found him out. Yes England was small potatoes but the Russians wouldn't have said no. As they wanted France, Italy etc.
Jeremiah

Bilston, UK

#41 Sep 27, 2013
Wot a mess wrote:
I think that you will find that Germany attacked and bombed the UK during WW2, blitzing London and other UK cities killing thousands of British.
The London Blitz was in direct response to the bombing of Germany by the RAF.

And the UK declared war on Germany.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Terrorism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Rumsfeld: Obama made right move on bin Laden raid (May '11) 4 hr Michael Jackson S... 19
News Why should Australians fear from Muslims? (Dec '07) 11 hr MUQ 46,779
News Osama Bin Laden reportedly calls Obama 'powerle... (Sep '09) May 25 Duchess of Westmi... 44
News Gadhafi: U.S. should seek peace with bin Laden (Feb '09) May 23 TrumpSIAH 52
News Bin Laden son-in-law arrested in Jordan is brou... (Mar '13) May 20 Pilot Suicide 68
News Muslims connect with their Adirondack neighbors... May 20 RealTech 2
News Canadian parents claim they received exact same... May 19 no surprize 1
More from around the web