On the fight against terrorism in Russia

Nov 23, 2012 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: Examiner.com

According to the Russian Ministry of Defense, "Terrorism has become part of day-to-day life and a relatively stable social phenomenon." It poses, what the defense ministry calls a "growing threat to the security of many countries and their citizens, causes significant political, economic and moral damage, brings stress to lots of people and takes ... (more)

Comments
1 - 11 of 11 Comments Last updated Dec 30, 2012

“Liberalism”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Nov 23, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Russia will have security only if abolish obligatory service and make army professional as USA, and only if become liberal country and become part of eu-nato.
Peace

Japan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
Dec 26, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Russia needs a strong security force.

“Ethically confused ”

Since: Feb 10

Culturally aware

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
Dec 26, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Russia's security needs to be handled by Russians. Obligatory service is sadly needed to be reinstated in the US, the youth is in desperate need of this

“Hello. America? It's me.”

Since: Oct 12

Rostov-na-Donu

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
Dec 27, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

european2012 wrote:
Russia will have security only if abolish obligatory service and make army professional as USA, and only if become liberal country and become part of eu-nato.
Why would we? Why do we need NATO and the EU? Prior to 1990, we read about terrorists only in American newspapers =) Army she always professional. And just as there are in every army reservists / recruits.
History on Parade

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
Dec 27, 2012
 
european2012 wrote:
Russia will have security only if abolish obligatory service and make army professional as USA, and only if become liberal country and become part of eu-nato.
I'm sorry to be the bearer of bad tidings but, apart from the many dedicated professionals in our services, we have out of necessity acquired the nasty habit of recruiting foreigners, gang members and low level criminals into our service's rank and file, much like colonial France's infamous Foreign Legion.

“Liberalism”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6
Dec 29, 2012
 
Obligatory service is fascist tradition, and is the basic reason that youngs and minorities are against the State.

Except those, obligatory service cost much, not offer security, and is danger for security.

“Ethically confused ”

Since: Feb 10

Culturally aware

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7
Dec 29, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

european2012 wrote:
Obligatory service is fascist tradition, and is the basic reason that youngs and minorities are against the State.
Except those, obligatory service cost much, not offer security, and is danger for security.
Spoken like a coward to afraid to protect his own country, There is nothing wrong with instilling pride in ones own country. The USSR was a Communist country who practiced forced conscription and Communism is diametrically the direct opposite of Fascism. Even as strange as Putin's Russia is politically it is still technically a democracy.
Small Town America UGX

Barnegat, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8
Dec 29, 2012
 
Sticking your neck out wrote:
<quoted text>Spoken like a coward to afraid to protect his own country, There is nothing wrong with instilling pride in ones own country. The USSR was a Communist country who practiced forced conscription and Communism is diametrically the direct opposite of Fascism. Even as strange as Putin's Russia is politically it is still technically a democracy.
Disagree. Russia, under the USSR and Putin is not "technically" a democracy. It is still a dictatorship in all it's evilness and corruption.
I note that you are still an avid supporter of the Putin dictatorship.

“Hello. America? It's me.”

Since: Oct 12

Rostov-na-Donu

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9
Dec 29, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Small Town America UGX wrote:
<quoted text>
Disagree. Russia, under the USSR and Putin is not "technically" a democracy. It is still a dictatorship in all it's evilness and corruption.
I note that you are still an avid supporter of the Putin dictatorship.
Excuse me, why do you think that Putin is a dictator? And why Angela Merkel is not a dictator, or Obama is not a dictator?

“Ethically confused ”

Since: Feb 10

Culturally aware

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10
Dec 30, 2012
 
Leonid-Rostow wrote:
<quoted text>Excuse me, why do you think that Putin is a dictator? And why Angela Merkel is not a dictator, or Obama is not a dictator?
Well said
Oliver Cromwell

Cleveleys, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11
Dec 30, 2012
 
Small Town America UGX wrote:
<quoted text>
Disagree. Russia, under the USSR and Putin is not "technically" a democracy. It is still a dictatorship in all it's evilness and corruption.
I note that you are still an avid supporter of the Putin dictatorship.
Thats what gets me about you Clowns,any Country you don't like isn't a Democracy,whether it is or not,if you think your Country is a Democrcy you'r deluded.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••