A few points.<quoted text>your wrong. They'd of toppled not fallen into their own foot print. What about the central columns then? They didn't pancake - the pancake theory is balls. Only Americans believe that one, its only Americans who still think it was a genuine event & not a false flag.
1000's of architects have stood together to say that it is IMPOSSIBLE for the WTC to collapse due to fire from airplane fuel and even if it was, how do you explain Tower 7? No plane hit that, just a few small office fires. Fact - all office furniture BY LAW must be fire retardant, just like furniture must be BY LAW if the premises are rented out. They're very strict about this kind of thing, more so in the compensation crazy USA.
There will always be those that believe the fable which is the Official Account of 9/11 - that hijackers crashed the planes into the towers! There will always be those that won't be swayed and would put their lives on it being an inside job, and I'm one if them.
Far too many coincidences
The $2.3 Trillion that was declared 'missing and unaccounted for' on 9/10 and forgotten about because of the twin towers.
The towers were having work done on them for months prior to 9/11 in the dead of night. They were planting the thermite and charges etc, ready for when the plane hit and set the chain of events off.
Fact - steel would not weaken in just 1 hour at 1200 degrees, you can test this yourself at home by simply taking a normal steel dinner knife, light the gas ring on your cooker and place the knife directly over the or even within the flame. This heat is greater than that of what was produced for a matter of minutes whilst the fuel burned up.
You can leave the knife there over night for 8/10 hours & I guarantee that it will not melt! Leave it for a week, it still won't melt, yet 20 days after the destruction of the towers, there was rivers of molton larva underneath the rubble.... Explain this to me please? How can that be possible that a simple fire caused the first ever steel constructed building to collapse, the other 2 following the 1st into the history books.
The towers were made of solid steel, girders some 8" thick - it had a grid like structure made of steel, built and designed to withheld a hit from a large passenger jet. A passenger jet is made from aluminium which is very light, thin and which is so flimsy that they break up when not landing properly, if a plane hits a tree, the tree would not be uprooted, the plane takes the brunt and it breaks up, the wings snap off - the body breaks in half and the whole thing falls to bits. Flying a jet into the tower would (should) of been like a paper plane hitting a wall. The only damage would of been done by the engines.
Fact - the plane we saw hit tower 2 had something underneath it that is alien to a passenger jet, there was also a flash at the point of impact. This is all on film and can't be denied, too many films of it from all angles.
No one really saw the first plane hit, there is only one known clip of it so we can't really say with conviction, like we can with the 2nd plane, which was not a passenger jet from any airline I know of.
A great many firemen reported hearing explosions. These guys are professional firemen and know what an explosion sounds like.
The fire retardant furniture still burns. Key words: Still Burns.
The firemen did hear explosions but could have been because of the plane crashing into the buildings causing havoc on the electrical / fuse boxes throughout the towers.
You are 100% correct about the missing 2.3 trillion inside the Pentagon.
The Congress has been appropriating funds to the Pentagon for Decades and decades and a portion of it is unknown and nobody in Congress knows where it goes.
The Pentagon is America's sacred cash cow costing taxpayers trillions in waste and fraud.
Yet the Corporate Fox News and Corporate Mainstream media never talks about the corruption inside the Pentagon.