'The War Is Not Over'

'The War Is Not Over'

There are 276625 comments on the Los Angeles Times story from Sep 12, 2006, titled 'The War Is Not Over'. In it, Los Angeles Times reports that:

WASHINGTON - President Bush led the nation on Monday in marking the fifth anniversary of the Sept.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Los Angeles Times.

rider

Ishpeming, MI

#289245 Jul 27, 2013
ABs wrote:
<quoted text>
My comments...sure, I'll be your huckleberry...
Have a query for you...ready? If you were head of the evil inside perpetrators of the skull and bones one world government secret society of malcontent billionaire godless capitalistic illuminadas and you plotted to demo these buildings, wouldn't you NOT want it to look like demolition if at all possible to avoid having to explain and answer all the questions? And second question, what was so significantly going on WTC7 that it had to be stopped?
You haven't figured it out yet! They all knew 9-11 was coming, some representing good knew the American public is only ones that can demand justice, which is coming very slowly. WTC 7 was the smoking gun set up by those trying to wake the sheep to the facist neo-cons. Mark my words 7 will not go away and will be the take down of the PNAC Neo-cons. Murder has no statute of limitations. The people are awakening!
MUQ

Qatif, Saudi Arabia

#289246 Jul 27, 2013
rider wrote:
<quoted text> You haven't figured it out yet! They all knew 9-11 was coming, some representing good knew the American public is only ones that can demand justice, which is coming very slowly. WTC 7 was the smoking gun set up by those trying to wake the sheep to the facist neo-cons. Mark my words 7 will not go away and will be the take down of the PNAC Neo-cons. Murder has no statute of limitations. The people are awakening!
You are right!! WTC-7 is the Key to the whole riddle!!

The evidence of WTC-1 and WTC-2 was in the dust from the crash site.

Yet NIST and other agencies, ignored both of them!!

Strange sort of investigation this!!
MUQ

Dammam, Saudi Arabia

#289247 Jul 27, 2013
911 Reasons why 9/11 was (probably) an inside job. PART-: 7

http://rt.com/Top_News/2009-09-12/911-reason-...

The devil is in… the dust

44.“At the microscopic level, if you examine the granular structure of the steel, one can detect the presence of an element that is not normally present,” said Marini.“And it is there in substantial qualities. It is sulfur.”
Professor Steven Jones, a member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, after examining samples of the dust collected from residents (from different locations around the city), provided the shocking reason for the high levels of sulfur found in the steel beams: the existence of thermite, a powerful material that is often employed in detonations.
45.“We are quite certain where this molten metal comes from,” the physicist explained in the documentary film Zero.“It comes from a material called thermite, which is made up of aluminum powder, iron oxide and sulfur.”
According to Jones,“the presence of thermite in the dust samples implies that someone had to place the thermite near the steel columns in order to cut through them.”
In other words, Jones is describing what is commonly known as a controlled demolition.
In addition to thermite, Jones said that his team detected large amounts of barium in the dust particles as well.
46.“This is very interesting,” he said,“because barium nitrate and sulfur are part of the military patent on what is known as thermate (thermite with sulfur and barium nitrate added). Barium is a very toxic metal, so one would not expect it to be present in the large concentrations that we see.”
In several of the available photos from Ground Zero, some of the protruding steel columns that survived the collapse have straight downward cuts that seem to lend credence to Jones’s chilling theory.

Your comments Mr. AB s?
Hot doggie

United States

#289248 Jul 28, 2013
rider wrote:
<quoted text> You haven't figured it out yet! They all knew 9-11 was coming, some representing good knew the American public is only ones that can demand justice, which is coming very slowly. WTC 7 was the smoking gun set up by those trying to wake the sheep to the facist neo-cons. Mark my words 7 will not go away and will be the take down of the PNAC Neo-cons. Murder has no statute of limitations. The people are awakening!
you're a Weiner-Spritzer
Citizen org

Brooklyn, NY

#289249 Jul 28, 2013
henry wrote:
<quoted text>
The silence after more than one atomic incidence will be deadly. Believe it or not. Natural calamities force will have the utmost death toll all over the world. These Forces are under way: silent Killers.
The Nuclear Bunker Buster
http://tinyurl.com/8gfwtc
http://www.ucsusa.org/nuclear_weapons_and_glo...

=========

Asteroid 1998 QE2 to sail past Earth 9x larger than cruise ship
May 28, 2013 / http://tinyurl.com/q9u47e6
On May 31, 2013, asteroid 1998 QE2 will sail serenely past Earth, getting no closer than about 3.6 million miles (5.8 million kilometers), or about 15 times the distance between Earth and the moon.
And while QE2 is not of much interest to those astronomers and scientists on the lookout for hazardous asteroids, it is of interest to those who dabble in radar astronomy and have a 230-foot (70-meter)- or larger - radar telescope at their disposal.
http://www.tgdaily.com/space-features/71892-a...
Citizen org

Brooklyn, NY

#289251 Jul 28, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Ans.
I am not talking about the 9/11 commission and its report which was a “Political Report”…. and made to accommodate “both parties”.
I am asking about the “full scale investigation report” on fall of WTC-1, WTC-2 and WTC-7 which was conducted by NIST and other federal agencies.
These were done by experts and they should have analyzed in depth about the actual factors that lead to the “spectacular collapse” of these towers.
But they also provided a “lop sided” report not doing their job and “misleading people” by saying that “Single jet strikes and fuel generated fires” were the “sole reason” for collapse of these towers.
They told a lie and people are not coming forward to challenge their lies, they do not want to hear the truth about 9/11 and that is the “prevaling mood” on this and every media outlet of western countries.
PS:
Do not give weightage to the “routine warnings” which CIA / FBI and outgoing presidents issue regarding “danger” to USA from groups like Al Qaeda , Taliban etc.
By doing so, they have “fulfilled their salaries”… no one asks why their 99 warnings were false and when 100th proves true, they jump “We warned you so, we warned you”“We did warn you”!!
What I am saying that 9/11 was “too big” a thing to be arranged by Al Qaeda acting alone.
These plain strikes were not the “real reason” why WTC-1 and WTC-2 collapsed and why WTC-7 “Had” to collapse.
It was a much deeper conspiracy and stakes were much higher than “poor” Al Qaeda could handle.!!
The cover up is mostly to protect the United States government for failing on September 11, 2001.( NORAD ) Bush and Cheney.

Common sense tells me the weight of the top floors gave in and collapsed on top of all the rest of the building.

The same principle with WTC 7.

The weight of debris and fire from 1 & 2 caused the collapse of 7.

Something to ponder MUQ.

New York City Firefighters & Police are some of the largest and most knowledgeable in the world who lost their own brothers and sisters on 9/11/01.

All these years later, WHERE ARE THE THOUSANDS AND THOUSANDS OF NYPD AND FDNY?

Why are they quiet about what you are saying?
spocko

Oakland, CA

#289254 Jul 28, 2013
rider wrote:
Cause Of Death http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =3u3JSEqNtlgXX
Right-Wingnuz do not learn very much from the lessons of history. The Hollywood version of the War of Independence is a straightforward fight between heroic Patriots and wicked, Nazi-like Redcoats. The reality was quite different. This was indeed a civil war which divided social classes and even families. And the worst of the violence did not involve regular British troops, but was perpetrated by rebel colonists (liberals) against their countrymen who remained loyal to the crown (conservatives). Overall, something like one in five of the white population of British North America remained loyal to the crown during the war. The irony, of course, is that having won their independence in the name of liberty, the American colonists went on to perpetuate slavery in the southern states.
spocko

Oakland, CA

#289255 Jul 28, 2013
Why the GOPer’s rhetoric is so wrong headed
http://www.sfgate.com/news/politics/article/E...
endtimeNews

AOL

#289256 Jul 28, 2013
.

ISRAEL to give POPE "Custody" of Temple Mount --

http://youtu.be/Qt9kEQB4ti8

.
John_Schuylkill County_Pa

Sunbury, PA

#289257 Jul 28, 2013
spocko wrote:
Why the GOPer’s rhetoric is so wrong headed
http://www.sfgate.com/news/politics/article/E...
I see it the other way. If the lower middle class isn't digging into their savings they are scrapping pennies to pay for gasoline, electric, sewerage, heat or cooling. For the poor that transfers into higher rents. i see an administration bent on keeping energy high.

It's back to the day when folks picked huckleberries and coal to survive
spocko

Oakland, CA

#289258 Jul 28, 2013
"What to the Slave is the Fourth of July?"
America is false to the past, false to the present, and solemnly binds herself to be false to the future.
Your celebration is a sham; your boasted liberty, an unholy license; your national greatness, swelling vanity; your sounds of rejoicing are empty and heartless; your denunciations of tyrants, brass fronted impudence; your shouts of liberty and equality, hollow mockery; your prayers and hymns, your sermons and thanksgivings, with all your religious parade, and solemnity, are, to him, mere bombast, fraud, deception, impiety, and hypocrisy - a thin veil to cover up crimes which would disgrace a nation of savages.

Go where you may, search where you will, roam through all the monarchies and despotisms of the old world, travel through South America, search out every abuse, and when you have found the last, lay your facts by the side of the everyday practices of this nation, and you will say with me, that, for revolting barbarity and shameless hypocrisy, America reigns without a rival:
There is not a nation on the earth guilty of practices, more shocking and bloody, than are the people of these United States, at this very hour."
- Frederick Douglass, 5 July 1852
spocko

Oakland, CA

#289259 Jul 28, 2013
John_Schuylkill County_Pa wrote:
<quoted text>I see it the other way. If the lower middle class isn't digging into their savings they are scrapping pennies to pay for gasoline, electric, sewerage, heat or cooling. For the poor that transfers into higher rents. i see an administration bent on keeping energy high.
It's back to the day when folks picked huckleberries and coal to survive
Of course you do -- wingnuz morons are always quick to note that when Barack Obama took office, gasoline prices were $1.95 a gallon. But they neglect to mention the U.S. economy had spiraled into a depression. When your hero George W. Bush took office in 2001, gasoline sold for an average of $1.45 a gallon. In the summer of 2008, his last year in office, prices exceeded $4.50. In reality, presidents have nothing or little to do with near-term fluctuations in gas prices.
Citizen org

Brooklyn, NY

#289260 Jul 28, 2013
John_Schuylkill County_Pa wrote:
<quoted text>I see it the other way. If the lower middle class isn't digging into their savings they are scrapping pennies to pay for gasoline, electric, sewerage, heat or cooling. For the poor that transfers into higher rents. i see an administration bent on keeping energy high.
It's back to the day when folks picked huckleberries and coal to survive
THE GAS-GUZZLER LOBBY STOPS TIME
Is There a Model-T in Your Future?
http://tinyurl.com/yob53q
http://www.ww4report.com/node/4158

Who Killed the Electric Car? New Documentary Looks at the Mysterious Disappearance of the EV-1/ http://tinyurl.com/ysmbvn April 13th, 2007
General Motors has been at the center of one of the nation's largest controversies over clean emissions-cars. In 1996 the company introduced the EV-1 electric car in California and Arizona. Hundreds of the electric cars were soon on the road. Then they all disappeared. The mystery behind their disappearance is the subject of the documentary “Who Killed the Electric Car?” We’re joined by the film’s director Chris Paine, and Chelsea Sexton, a former GM employee who worked on the EV-1 electric car.
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl...

GREASECAR VEGETABLE FUEL SYSTEMS
http://tinyurl.com/6th4e
http://www.greasecar.com

When Clinton left Office, Gasoline Was $1.46 / gallon

When Bush stole the election gas went up up and way up

GAS WAR - an idea that WILL work

Here's the idea: Boycott Exxon / Mobil

For the rest of this year, DON'T purchase ANY gasoline from the two biggest companies (which now are one), EXXON and MOBIL. If they are not selling any gas, they will be inclined to reduce their prices. If they reduce their prices, the other companies will have to follow suit.

P.S. I know spocko OPEC.

lol
MUQ

Dammam, Saudi Arabia

#289261 Jul 29, 2013
Citizen wrote:
01. The cover up is mostly to protect the United States government for failing on September 11, 2001.( NORAD ) Bush and Cheney.

02. Common sense tells me the weight of the top floors gave in and collapsed on top of all the rest of the building.

The same principle with WTC 7.

The weight of debris and fire from 1 & 2 caused the collapse of 7.

03. Something to ponder MUQ.

New York City Firefighters & Police are some of the largest and most knowledgeable in the world who lost their own brothers and sisters on 9/11/01.

All these years later, WHERE ARE THE THOUSANDS AND THOUSANDS OF NYPD AND FDNY?

Why are they quiet about what you are saying?
Ans.

01. The cover up is to stop investigating any thing about 9/11, to reveal its "real planners" and "real culprits". Osama and Al Qaeda are only "red herring".

02. The "Common Sense" that weight of top floors caused the building to collapse is called "pan caking".

2A. It is "simplest and most natural sounding solution to most laymen"…. But those in business and those who are professionals, "know" that a 110 story building just does not "pan cake" because top 20 floor' weight just descends on lower floor.

2B. Why the steel columns of lower floor' did not provide any resistance? The fall was "almost free fall", as if lower floors just collapsed "before" the top lead arrived, this is the standard technique for "planned demolition".

2C. WTC-7, a 47 story building does not collapse "after 8 hours" of WTC falling just because debris fell on it, it should have collapsed "along with WTC because of heavy debris falling on it.

2D. And then why the officials are "so tight lipped" about their investigations? Why they destroyed the evidence at site? Why they recycled the Steel so quickly?

2E. There are so many "smoking guns" in official NIST investigations , that show a conspiracy and cover up.

2F. Truth is the thing which is always same and does not change with time.

03. NYPD and their "silence" :

This is not for me to answer, many be their "nationalism" and their "patriotism" has silenced their conscience.

Why only NYPD, every department in USA has accepted their shame and incompetence on the day of 9/11, nothing made sense on that day!!

Laws of science, Engineering, Metallurgy, Structure, all were "suspended" on that day!!
MUQ

Dammam, Saudi Arabia

#289262 Jul 29, 2013
911 Reasons why 9/11 was (probably) an inside job. PART-: 8

http://rt.com/Top_News/2009-09-12/911-reason-...

Danish scientists confirm presence of nano-thermite

47. In a separate study, Neils Harrit from the University of Copenhagen, together with eight of his fellow colleagues, provides conclusive evidence for the prevalence of explosive material in dust samples from 9/11.
48. The study (entitled “Active Thermite Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe”), draws the conclusion that “the red layer of the red/gray chips we have discovered in the WTC dust is active, unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nano-technology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material.”
49. During an interview with RT in July, Harrit said he also believed that “conventional explosives were used in abundance” in the collapse of the buildings.
“We suggested… to the National Institute of Standards and Technology that they should look for traces of explosives and they have refused to do so every time,” said Harrit.“They have not investigated it.”

50. The simple question must be: why? After all, 9/11 represented the largest crime scene in modern history; should not all of the possibilities be thoroughly examined? Why is NIST not interested in knowing if explosives were used in combination with the suicide missions of the hijackers? After all, is it not plausible that the terrorists rigged the building with explosives just in case the airliners missed, or failed, to bring down their targets? Rigging a building with explosives, although certainly no simple feat, would not have been any more challenging than hijacking four aircraft with worse than amateur pilots suddenly in charge of navigating the aircraft.
51. Moreover, conventional explosives were tried once before. It could not have escaped NIST’s attention that on February 26, 1993, a 1,500 lb (680 kg) bomb was detonated in the underground garage section of the North Tower. The terrorists had anticipated that the force of the bomb would topple the North Tower onto the South Tower. The crude attempt failed, of course, but given the testimony of hundreds of witnesses who reported feeling explosions below the buildings during the attacks of 9/11, it seems incredible, and even suspicious, that this angle was never explored by the government agency.
Harrit then goes on to discuss the presence of molten iron in the collapse site.
52.“The thermite reaction produced molten iron. Now the molten iron was pouring out of one of the towers. Molten iron was in pools in the rubble after 9/11. For weeks and months the surface temperature was 735 degrees after three days of showers. It took them three months to put out the fire, which was declared officially extinguished on December 20. Now this is some kind of fire. This was a witch’s brew of nano-thermite chemistry for three months!”

Your comments Mr. AB s?
Citizen org

Brooklyn, NY

#289263 Jul 29, 2013
MUQ wrote:
911 Reasons why 9/11 was (probably) an inside job. PART-: 8
http://rt.com/Top_News/2009-09-12/911-reason-...
Danish scientists confirm presence of nano-thermite
47. In a separate study, Neils Harrit from the University of Copenhagen, together with eight of his fellow colleagues, provides conclusive evidence for the prevalence of explosive material in dust samples from 9/11.
48. The study (entitled “Active Thermite Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe”), draws the conclusion that “the red layer of the red/gray chips we have discovered in the WTC dust is active, unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nano-technology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material.”
49. During an interview with RT in July, Harrit said he also believed that “conventional explosives were used in abundance” in the collapse of the buildings.
“We suggested… to the National Institute of Standards and Technology that they should look for traces of explosives and they have refused to do so every time,” said Harrit.“They have not investigated it.”
50. The simple question must be: why? After all, 9/11 represented the largest crime scene in modern history; should not all of the possibilities be thoroughly examined? Why is NIST not interested in knowing if explosives were used in combination with the suicide missions of the hijackers? After all, is it not plausible that the terrorists rigged the building with explosives just in case the airliners missed, or failed, to bring down their targets? Rigging a building with explosives, although certainly no simple feat, would not have been any more challenging than hijacking four aircraft with worse than amateur pilots suddenly in charge of navigating the aircraft.
51. Moreover, conventional explosives were tried once before. It could not have escaped NIST’s attention that on February 26, 1993, a 1,500 lb (680 kg) bomb was detonated in the underground garage section of the North Tower. The terrorists had anticipated that the force of the bomb would topple the North Tower onto the South Tower. The crude attempt failed, of course, but given the testimony of hundreds of witnesses who reported feeling explosions below the buildings during the attacks of 9/11, it seems incredible, and even suspicious, that this angle was never explored by the government agency.
Harrit then goes on to discuss the presence of molten iron in the collapse site.
52.“The thermite reaction produced molten iron. Now the molten iron was pouring out of one of the towers. Molten iron was in pools in the rubble after 9/11. For weeks and months the surface temperature was 735 degrees after three days of showers. It took them three months to put out the fire, which was declared officially extinguished on December 20. Now this is some kind of fire. This was a witch’s brew of nano-thermite chemistry for three months!”
Your comments Mr. AB s?
MUQ, this is the correct link for your article.

Your links do not work.

http://rt.com/usa/911-attack-reasons-towers/
Citizen org

Brooklyn, NY

#289264 Jul 29, 2013
FOR MUQ:

1. That is totally ludicrous because Rumsfeld was in the Pentagon at the time the plane crashed into it.

2. FBI special agent John O'Neill just started security at WTC and died for it.

3. Losing Brothers and Sisters trumps Nationalism.

==========

FBI agent John O’Neill said: All of the answers, and all of the clues allowing us to dismantle Usama bin Laden’s al Qaeda organization can be found in Saudi Arabia.

In August of 2001 FBI special agent John O’Neill complained bitterly that the United States State Department ---- and behind it the oil lobby ---- who make up President Bush’s entourage, blocked attempts to prove UBL’S guilt for the USS Cole.

The US ambassador to Yemen Republican Barbara Bodine forbade O’Neill and his FBI team from entering Yemen.

John O’Neill, a much-admired special agent, resigned in frustration with the Bush administration and took a new job as head of security at the World Trade Center.

He died in the September 11, 2001 attacks.

FOREIGN OPERATIONS, EXPORT FINANCING, AND RELATED PROGRAMS APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2004 http://tinyurl.com/3aboto
Congressional Record: October 28, 2003 (Senate)

The amendment is as follows:(Purpose: To urge the President to release information regarding sources of foreign support for the 9-11 hijackers) At the appropriate place, insert the following: Sec.. Sense of the Senate on declassifying portions of the Joint Inquiry into Intelligence Community Activities Before and After the Terrorist Attacks of September 2001

(a) Findings.--The Senate finds that--

(1) The President has prevented the release to the American public of 28 pages of the Joint Inquiry into Intelligence Community Activities Before and After the Terrorist Attacks of September 2001.

(2) The contents of the redacted pages discuss sources of foreign support for some of the September 11th hijackers while they were in the United States.

(3) The Administration's decision to classify this information prevents the American people from having access to information about the involvement of certain foreign governments in the terrorist attacks of September 2001.

(4) The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has requested that the President release the 28 pages.
(5) The Senate respects the need to keep information regarding intelligence sources and methods classified, but the Senate also recognizes that such purposes can be accomplished through careful selective redaction of specific words and passages, rather than effacing the section's contents entirely.
(b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate that in light of these findings the President should declassify the 28-page section of the Joint Inquiry into Intelligence Community Activities Before and After the Terrorist Attacks of September 2001 that deals with foreign sources of support for the 9-11 hijackers, and that only those portions of the report that would directly compromise ongoing investigations or reveal intelligence sources and methods should remain classified.
http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/2003_cr/s1028...

Citizen org

Brooklyn, NY

#289265 Jul 29, 2013
FOR MUQ:

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: August 1, 2003
Office of Sen. Charles E. Schumer http://tinyurl.com/3cfdxq

SENATORS APPEAL DECISION TO KEEP THE 9/11 REPORT'S 28 PAGES CLASSIFIED
Led by Schumer and Brownback, 46 Senators argue that America is being kept in the dark about possible Saudi involvement in the 9/11 attacks

A group of US Senators led by Democrat Charles Schumer and Republican Sam Brownback today asked the President to reconsider his decision not to release 28 classified pages of the Joint Inquiry into Intelligence Community Activities Before and After the Terrorist Attacks of September 2001.

Earlier this week, the President said declassifying the 28 pages could compromise national security. In their letter, the Senators argue that those concerns can be addressed through responsible redaction, rather than totally effacing the section’s contents. The Senators wrote that keeping the material classified would essentially spare Saudi Arabia from any public penalty for the support it may have given to terrorists.
"It's clear to me that the support for making this material public is growing by the day," Schumer said. "We've gotten 46 people on this letter and there are two other Senators who have called for the public disclosure of this material. The bottom line is that keeping this material classified only strengthens the theory that some in the US government are hellbent on covering up for the Saudis. If we're going to take terrorism down, that kind of behavior has got to be nipped in the bud and shedding some light on these 28 pages would start that process." http://www.fas.org/irp/news/2003/08/cs080103....

Bush Won't Reveal Saudi 9/11 Info
Saudi Minister Calls Alleged Terror Link 'An Outrage'
July 29, 2003 http://tinyurl.com/39gg3m
(CBS/AP) President Bush refused on Tuesday to release a congressional report alleging possible links between Saudi Arabian officials and the Sept. 11 hijackers. The White House sought to question a Saudi citizen who befriended two of the hijackers.
Bush said he could not comply with a request by the Saudi foreign minister for a chance to clear the Arab kingdom's name because publication of the report could hurt U.S. intelligence operations.
After the report was released last Thursday, Saudi Ambassador Prince Bandar bin Sultan issued a statement saying that "28 blanked-out pages are being used by some to malign our country and our people."
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/07/30/wor...

Report on 9/11 Suggests a Role By Saudi Spies
August 2, 2003 http://tinyurl.com/37xp9p
The classified part of a Congressional report on the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, says that two Saudi citizens who had at least indirect links with two hijackers were probably Saudi intelligence agents and may have reported to Saudi government officials, according to people who have seen the report.
These findings, according to several people who have read the report, help to explain why the classified part of the report has become so politically charged, causing strains between the United States and Saudi Arabia. Senior Saudi officials have denied any links between their government and the attacks and have asked that the section be declassified, but President Bush has refused.
People familiar with the report and who spoke on condition of not being named said that the two Saudi citizens, Omar al-Bayoumi and Osama Bassnan, operated in a complex web of financial relationships with officials of the Saudi government. The sections that focus on them draw connections between the two men, two hijackers, and Saudi officials.
The report urges further investigation of the two men and their contacts with the hijackers, because of unresolved questions about their relationship and whether they had any involvement in the 9/11 plot.
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html...


RedHorseRevelati on

AOL

#289266 Jul 29, 2013
.

Bible PROOF 1.5 BIL MUSLIMS to die --

http://youtu.be/n7ok0g8iwJI

.
ABs

Aiken, SC

#289268 Jul 29, 2013
MUQ wrote:
911 Reasons why 9/11 was (probably) an inside job. PART-: 7
http://rt.com/Top_News/2009-09-12/911-reason-...
The devil is in… the dust
44.“At the microscopic level, if you examine the granular structure of the steel, one can detect the presence of an element that is not normally present,” said Marini.“And it is there in substantial qualities. It is sulfur.”
Professor Steven Jones, a member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, after examining samples of the dust collected from residents (from different locations around the city), provided the shocking reason for the high levels of sulfur found in the steel beams: the existence of thermite, a powerful material that is often employed in detonations.
45.“We are quite certain where this molten metal comes from,” the physicist explained in the documentary film Zero.“It comes from a material called thermite, which is made up of aluminum powder, iron oxide and sulfur.”
According to Jones,“the presence of thermite in the dust samples implies that someone had to place the thermite near the steel columns in order to cut through them.”
In other words, Jones is describing what is commonly known as a controlled demolition.
In addition to thermite, Jones said that his team detected large amounts of barium in the dust particles as well.
46.“This is very interesting,” he said,“because barium nitrate and sulfur are part of the military patent on what is known as thermate (thermite with sulfur and barium nitrate added). Barium is a very toxic metal, so one would not expect it to be present in the large concentrations that we see.”
In several of the available photos from Ground Zero, some of the protruding steel columns that survived the collapse have straight downward cuts that seem to lend credence to Jones’s chilling theory.
Your comments Mr. AB s?
Jones is on the donate now list which obviously we had a DONATE NOW agreement on...but I ask you one question related to it... Comrade, do you know the actual ppm levels of sulphur and barium were that they analyzed?

As for the angle cuts on columns that has already been resolved. Rescue teams admitted thay plasma cut those during rescue and the reason (as any moron would agree) they angled the cut was to make them fall AWAY from the area they were trying gain access to...you know, things that make you go DUH!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Terrorism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Oklahoma's Warning to Trump's America 2 hr As I see it 2
News Russia says ready to talk to Trump about nuclea... Fri swampmudd 33
News Across arc of conflict, 'Obama Doctrine' shows ... (Sep '15) Thu Cordwainer Trout 32
News ZOA Rips Nikki Haley as UN Ambassador Over Isra... Thu Jeff Brightone 1
News In UN Lawsuit, Ukraine Demands Russia End Suppo... Jan 17 George 2
News Serbia warns France over extradition of Kosovo ... Jan 13 Slobodan B Medojevic 1
News Serbia warns France over extradition of Kosovo ... Jan 13 Sonja Biserko 1
More from around the web