Britain and US fear Syrian chemical weapons could fall into the hands of extreme Islamist groups

Jan 8, 2013 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: The Independent

Note: We do not store your email address but your IP address will be logged to prevent abuse of this feature.

Comments
1 - 20 of 28 Comments Last updated Jan 11, 2013
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

“hi ya”

Since: Feb 12

Manchester

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Jan 8, 2013
 
ie could fall into the hands of the terrorists they support!
oh no!
jo jo

Australia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
Jan 8, 2013
 
What a stupid report, these three are working together.Where's the fear?????
Avenger

Kitchener, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
Jan 8, 2013
 
jo jo wrote:
What a stupid report, these three are working together.Where's the fear?????
Then just read your Russian, Ayatollah and despot Assad state media news then.
Syrian

New London, CT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
Jan 9, 2013
 
Genie2 wrote:
ie could fall into the hands of the terrorists they support!
oh no!
LOL! It's ironic how moronic Western foreign policy actually is!!
jo jo

Australia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
Jan 9, 2013
 
Avenger wrote:
<quoted text>
Then just read your Russian, Ayatollah and despot Assad state media news then.
actually don't bother reading anything , every media outlet writes anything to please its sponsor, their all full of crap and i mean all of them.
Rtloder

Sydney, Australia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6
Jan 9, 2013
 
Avenger wrote:
<quoted text>
Then just read your Russian, Ayatollah and despot Assad state media news th;
en.
You are not making any sense at all, did you go to a flea market expecting to purchase fleas?. Then why all the time say Russia and Ayatollah despot Assad?. Your not on the side of peace and freedom you support the vile intrusion of murder rape and the pillage of Syria, hosted by the colitis to descent behaviour, you know who I mean the whole world knows who I mean, Obama Cameron and Hollande, and Avenger I give them the caption they deserve, disgusting and pernicious, the forum knows whose side I'm on,like the flea market is aptly named.
Not you, NO!, you refer to Russia, Ayatollah and Assad as despots, all three are continually being attacked a defending tyrant is a hero, as you very well know.
They are attacking no one, the caption you give them is designed to mislead, it's far more probable Cameron will give his Client
the terrorist invader chemical weapons to justify British invasion.
ocxz

Saint Gilles, Reunion

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7
Jan 9, 2013
 
Avenger wrote:
<quoted text>
Then just read your Russian, Ayatollah and despot Assad state media news then.
What a moron you are, it comes naturally to you, no effort needed.
Avenger

Kitchener, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8
Jan 9, 2013
 
Rtloder wrote:
<quoted text>
You are not making any sense at all, did you go to a flea market expecting to purchase fleas?. Then why all the time say Russia and Ayatollah despot Assad?. Your not on the side of peace and freedom you support the vile intrusion of murder rape and the pillage of Syria, hosted by the colitis to descent behaviour, you know who I mean the whole world knows who I mean, Obama Cameron and Hollande, and Avenger I give them the caption they deserve, disgusting and pernicious, the forum knows whose side I'm on,like the flea market is aptly named.
Not you, NO!, you refer to Russia, Ayatollah and Assad as despots, all three are continually being attacked a defending tyrant is a hero, as you very well know.
They are attacking no one, the caption you give them is designed to mislead, it's far more probable Cameron will give his Client
the terrorist invader chemical weapons to justify British invasion.
Your clueless finger pointing is a joke i like the nonsense how the the BBC causes these world ills. lol
My 7 year old nephew has a better idea what is going on.
Avenger

Kitchener, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9
Jan 9, 2013
 
ocxz wrote:
<quoted text>
What a moron you are, it comes naturally to you, no effort needed.
Junior why don't you cluelessly get all mixed up between Bahrain,Qatar,UAE etc again give me another good chuckle i appreciated the last one.
Henry

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10
Jan 9, 2013
 
ocxz wrote:
<quoted text>
What a moron you are, it comes naturally to you, no effort needed.
You're the professor of morons.
The cesspool in reunion is overflowing. Better call waste cleanup, again.
Stay cool

Klang, Malaysia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11
Jan 9, 2013
 
Avenger wrote:
<quoted text>
Then just read your Russian, Ayatollah and despot Assad state media news then.
The problem can easily be resolve by your warmongering Anglo countries. The question is, does your boys in them hard boots have the ba1ls to face Assad's real fighting men?
"He's no pushover like the dog Gaddafi", I hear Cameron stractching his skinless little shining ba1ls.
Stay cool

Klang, Malaysia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12
Jan 9, 2013
 
Yes, BALLS is the main problem for you drone operators.
LOL
George

Red Deer, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#13
Jan 9, 2013
 
Henry wrote:
<quoted text>
You're the professor of morons.
The cesspool in reunion is overflowing. Better call waste cleanup, again.
LOL
Saudi Ministry of Virtue

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#14
Jan 9, 2013
 
Genie2 wrote:
ie could fall into the hands of the terrorists they support!
oh no!
That's not a problem. They've promised to hand them all over to us. They might gas a few Christians and Alawites beforehand but that's OK.

Jihad is, above all, a virtuous enterprise and Wahabi jihad the most virtuous of all.
ocxz

Saint Gilles, Reunion

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#15
Jan 9, 2013
 
Avenger wrote:
<quoted text>
Junior why don't you cluelessly get all mixed up between Bahrain,Qatar,UAE etc again give me another good chuckle i appreciated the last one.
Sweety i don't want to harrass an under age toddler.
Call your mummy and i'll show her the parental control.
ocxz

Saint Gilles, Reunion

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#16
Jan 9, 2013
 
Henry wrote:
<quoted text>
You're the professor of morons.
The cesspool in reunion is overflowing. Better call waste cleanup, again.
And that is where you hop in, waste cleaner ?
Syrian

New London, CT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#17
Jan 9, 2013
 
jo jo wrote:
What a stupid report, these three are working together.Where's the fear?????
The West is afraid that the AlQaeda terrorists and Islam extremists are going to use those WMDs against them, just like the extremists they gave weapons to in Afghanistan!
Rtloder

Saint Marys, Australia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#18
Jan 10, 2013
 
Avenger wrote:
<quoted text>
Your clueless finger pointing is a joke i like the nonsense how the the BBC causes these world ills. lol
My 7 year old nephew has a better idea what is going on.
The formality of relationship that allows you to appreciate your family and your intellect doesn't just materialize out of thin air. It is the result of previous to it. Taking the form of commonly held social and political views. To prevent anarchy,(fragmentation) society relies on the function of the mass media to hold it together.
The media (BBC) by accepted definition it has of itself, is the cause of social and political outcome.
Good and bad outcomes is what gets argued about. When the protests arose 2 years ago it wasn't about social or even political it was specifically economic issues for which there is no answers. The BBC never once reported the significance of problematic population explosion, as a cause, or a need for industrial development import replacement, because those stories would conflict with existing and past privilege (formality). That is not their job, to put things right, but equally so it certainly is not their role to judge, condemned and create which they most certainly did. There was never any liberal mass movement, as the outcome proves. The BBC made it political, sacrificing their clients in order to stay in control, nothing they pouted materialized. Like the WMD. it doesn't matter because the BBC says so.
It will always fail because the British mass media should only slightly be involved in
other Nations, not dominating the view of
political life outside of Britain.
jo jo

Sydney, Australia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19
Jan 10, 2013
 
Syrian wrote:
<quoted text> The West is afraid that the AlQaeda terrorists and Islam extremists are going to use those WMDs against them, just like the extremists they gave weapons to in Afghanistan!
In that case why not help Assad to finish them off?????As the saying goes. Fool me once shame on you,fool me twice shame on me, something along those lines..who was it that said so, Confucius??or the Chinese lady from the Simpsons?.
CrimeaRiver

South Ockendon, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#20
Jan 10, 2013
 
Rtloder wrote:
<quoted text>
The formality of relationship that allows you to appreciate your family and your intellect doesn't just materialize out of thin air. It is the result of previous to it. Taking the form of commonly held social and political views. To prevent anarchy,(fragmentation) society relies on the function of the mass media to hold it together.
The media (BBC) by accepted definition it has of itself, is the cause of social and political outcome.
Good and bad outcomes is what gets argued about. When the protests arose 2 years ago it wasn't about social or even political it was specifically economic issues for which there is no answers. The BBC never once reported the significance of problematic population explosion, as a cause, or a need for industrial development import replacement, because those stories would conflict with existing and past privilege (formality). That is not their job, to put things right, but equally so it certainly is not their role to judge, condemned and create which they most certainly did. There was never any liberal mass movement, as the outcome proves. The BBC made it political, sacrificing their clients in order to stay in control, nothing they pouted materialized. Like the WMD. it doesn't matter because the BBC says so.
It will always fail because the British mass media should only slightly be involved in
other Nations, not dominating the view of
political life outside of Britain.
I would say the BBC is less dangerous than CNN and Fox. The BBC has an agenda but doesn't use the vitriolic language employed by American News outlets.

Remember, the BBC is state owned so doesn't rely on sponsors to function. The US media outlets on the other hand are sponsored by drug companies and corporations with vested interests in arms manufacturers. They love war and want war to spread all over the world.

Assad is the ruler of a sovereign nation, for his sovereignty to be questioned by Western nations is contradictory and underhand.

The west is already acknowledging the rebels as the de-facto govt. I think that is abhorrent. I hope Assad wins because then the west will be screwed, they would have created another enemey in the Middle East

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••