Public Service Announcement: News Cov...
Newager

Reno, NV

#21 Jun 21, 2008
WSage1 wrote:
<quoted text>I mis-read your post.
I apologize.
Therefore, I over-reacted.
I won't call you any more names. Sorry. We should be more polite to each other.
Newager

Reno, NV

#22 Jun 21, 2008
In the future, I will confine my comments to your posts, and refrain from personal attacks, that is unless something you say is outrageous.
boohil

Orlando, FL

#23 Jun 21, 2008
Sorry, Gordon...just as PP doesn't live in Ocala or Pittsburgh, I don't live in Winter Park.
I've checked my email (all five accounts) and received nothing from you. I've checked my auto-deleted emails and received nothing from you. I don't know what you think you've "exposed" here, but it has nothing to do with me. As usual, it appears you are the one with your bony ass hanging out naked and exposed, you amusing little fruit fly.
I have absolutely no intention of clicking on any of your links to any of multiple websites/mirrors. My experience with you tells me clearly that you are not to be trusted, despite your (LOL) "assurances."
I did not realize, until I read your post above, that you had filed a motion for rehearing of the FLSC's denial of your unemployment claim. Good luck with that. I won't be reading your motion...sorry, I'm not interested, and I already know the end of that story.
As for your other "breaking news stories"...*SNORT*
--I don't care about Ron Paul's candidacy...
--And I care even less about whether or not you are running for the Florida legislature (other than the amusement factor, and I'll admit that prospect made me chuckle, but not enough to click on your link and expose myself to your clumsy spyware). You wouldn't be representing my district, so I'm not on your potential voter role. I care about who runs from MY district, and #64 ain't it.
When/if the FLSC issues an order on your motion for rehearing, I'll see it in the cases listed on my daily visits to the FLSC website. Otherwise, I won't. Whatever.
What a delightful little whackerdoodle you are, Gordo! Thanks for the laugh!
Boo

“www.GordonWayneW atts.com !”

Since: Sep 06

Lakeland, Florida, USA, Earth!

#24 Jun 21, 2008
Newager wrote:
In the future, I will confine my comments to your posts, and refrain from personal attacks, that is unless something you say is outrageous.
well, I misread your post -I read into it something you didn't explicity say (that I posted a virus online)-it happens.

If you really do feel I'm a loony, you are welcome to say it (we all have opinions)

“www.GordonWayneW atts.com !”

Since: Sep 06

Lakeland, Florida, USA, Earth!

#25 Jun 21, 2008
boohil wrote:
Sorry, Gordon...just as PP doesn't live in Ocala or Pittsburgh, I don't live in Winter Park.
I've checked my email (all five accounts) and received nothing from you. I've checked my auto-deleted emails and received nothing from you.
AOL did not give me the "bad address" message, so I know it was good -in fact, it was in my address book from back when you used your AOL account to post on their boards. Here's the email header -I used the Cc line to get witnesses, lol -but not to worry: This thread's 1st & 2nd messages covered the same thing that was in the email -you missed nothing, Boo.

Subject: Boo -news coveraege on YOU!(Courtesy copy to you)
Date: 6/21/2008 7:59:11 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time
From: Gww1210
Reply To:
To: Boohil
CC: PAT VGF, Buster the boa, Hornback12
boohil wrote:
I don't know what you think you've "exposed" here, but it has nothing to do with me.
Alas, it does:

You admitted that you used a google search, remember? I was simply reporting that I saw a VERY RECENT Google search on my web-tracker, and I suspected, but did not know, that it was you.(I still don't know as of this writing -maybe you will clarify as I read on down...)
boohil wrote:
As usual, it appears you are the one with your bony ass hanging out naked and exposed, you amusing little fruit fly.
I have absolutely no intention of clicking on any of your links to any of multiple websites/mirrors. My experience with you tells me clearly that you are not to be trusted, despite your (LOL) "assurances."
Your "experience"?? Like what? Have you visited my websites and gotten a virus? I think not!
boohil wrote:
I did not realize, until I read your post above, that you had filed a motion for rehearing of the FLSC's denial of your unemployment claim.
And I thought you (SAID that) you read the docket information ...DAILY,...remember?
boohil wrote:
Good luck with that. I won't be reading your motion...sorry, I'm not interested, and I already know the end of that story.
As for your other "breaking news stories"...*SNORT*
--I don't care about Ron Paul's candidacy...
--And I care even less about whether or not you are running for the Florida legislature (other than the amusement factor, and I'll admit that prospect made me chuckle, but not enough to click on your link and expose myself to your clumsy spyware).
Spyware?

You give me more credit in that department than I properly deserve: I track visitors to my websites -and **OCCASIONALLY** get board and curious enough to peruse -KEY WORD: "peruse" the visit longs -that's all.

As far as motives, I know and God knows -and so do selected friends -and I guess you aren't one of those,--by your own admission, you don't know I'm innocent in this matter.
boohil wrote:
You wouldn't be representing my district, so I'm not on your potential voter role. I care about who runs from MY district, and #64 ain't it.
When/if the FLSC issues an order on your motion for rehearing, I'll see it in the cases listed on my daily visits to the FLSC website. Otherwise, I won't. Whatever.
What a delightful little whackerdoodle you are, Gordo! Thanks for the laugh!
Boo
HA ha...
Amazed

Minneapolis, MN

#26 Jun 21, 2008
boohil wrote:
Sorry, Gordon...just as PP doesn't live in Ocala or Pittsburgh, I don't live in Winter Park.
I've checked my email (all five accounts) and received nothing from you. I've checked my auto-deleted emails and received nothing from you. I don't know what you think you've "exposed" here, but it has nothing to do with me. As usual, it appears you are the one with your bony ass hanging out naked and exposed, you amusing little fruit fly.
I have absolutely no intention of clicking on any of your links to any of multiple websites/mirrors. My experience with you tells me clearly that you are not to be trusted, despite your (LOL) "assurances."
I did not realize, until I read your post above, that you had filed a motion for rehearing of the FLSC's denial of your unemployment claim. Good luck with that. I won't be reading your motion...sorry, I'm not interested, and I already know the end of that story.
As for your other "breaking news stories"...*SNORT*
--I don't care about Ron Paul's candidacy...
--And I care even less about whether or not you are running for the Florida legislature (other than the amusement factor, and I'll admit that prospect made me chuckle, but not enough to click on your link and expose myself to your clumsy spyware). You wouldn't be representing my district, so I'm not on your potential voter role. I care about who runs from MY district, and #64 ain't it.
When/if the FLSC issues an order on your motion for rehearing, I'll see it in the cases listed on my daily visits to the FLSC website. Otherwise, I won't. Whatever.
What a delightful little whackerdoodle you are, Gordo! Thanks for the laugh!
Boo
He wrote himself in- hardly qualifies him as a legit candidate. Given his lack of personal resources he likely won't have much of a campaign. As to his motivation to pencil himself in:
__________
meg·a·lo·ma·ni·a

–noun
1. Psychiatry. a symptom of mental illness marked by delusions of greatness, wealth, etc.
2. an obsession with doing extravagant or grand things.
__________

Pretty much also explains his worthless and ineffective legal filings. Actually the proper description of his legal filings is frivolous:
__________
friv·o·lous

–adjective
1. characterized by lack of seriousness or sense: frivolous conduct.
2. self-indulgently carefree; unconcerned about or lacking any serious purpose.
3.(of a person) given to trifling or undue levity: a frivolous, empty-headed person.
4. of little or no weight, worth, or importance; not worthy of serious notice: a frivolous suggestion.
__________

Hopefully for his sake God loves him as much as he seems to think God hates everyone who is not him.

He is a self righteous hypocrite and the only thing he has honestly earned in life is the disdain and ridicule of his fellow man.

__________

hyp·o·crite

–noun
1. a person who pretends to have virtues, moral or religious beliefs, principles, etc., that he or she does not actually possess, esp. a person whose actions belie stated beliefs.
2. a person who feigns some desirable or publicly approved attitude, esp. one whose private life, opinions, or statements belie his or her public statements.

“www.GordonWayneW atts.com !”

Since: Sep 06

Lakeland, Florida, USA, Earth!

#27 Jun 21, 2008
Boo -

regarding my battle with the Supremes, let me assure you of one thing -and you can take this to the bank (is it a threat, or merely a promise?--both)

I promise you that you are in jeopardy of getting "whacked" by the Supremes just like I was -well, maybe not *exactly* like me, denied of protections afforded by the *same* rule {the 5-day rule, 9.420(e)}.

But rest assured: A long litany of others were victimized by the court -as I document in my motion -five (5) other state holdings ADMITTING that the court decided to not follow the rule.

While state case law does not fully support me (especially these cases), federal case law says that ignorance of the law (state holdings, in this case)*is* a legitimate excuse -

What that means in plain English is this:

* 5 others (at least) were whacked before me
* I was whacked in SC08 - 424
* Any subsequent litigant could be next (since you spend a lot of time in court, you could be next)

Since you are too paranoid to visit my brief, let me summarize the key holding (a federal one, which controls -over all state holdings, via the supremacy clause)

FEDERAL CASE LAW: Ignorance of the Law

Although it is a fundamental maxim of our legal system that "ignorance of the law or a mistake of law is no defense to criminal prosecution" (Cheek v. United States, 498 U.S. 192, 199 (1991); accord: Roberts v. Maine, 48 F.3d 1287, 1300 (1st Cir. 1995), Shevlin-Carpenter Co. v. Minnesota, 218 U.S. 57 (1910)), the Court reasoned that the Los Angeles ordinance provided such insufficient notice that it fell outside the bounds of due process. 355 U.S. at 229-30 (internal quotation marks omitted).

HELD: Due process places some limits on its exercise. Engrained in our concept of due process is the requirement of notice. Notice is sometimes essential so that the citizen has the chance to defend charges. Notice is required before property interests are disturbed, before assessments are made, before penalties are assessed. Notice is required in a myriad of situations where a penalty or forfeiture might be suffered for mere failure to act. Recent cases illustrating the point are Mullane v. Central Hanover Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306 ; Covey v. Town of Somers, 351 U.S. 141 ; Walker v. Hutchinson City, 352 U.S. 112 . These cases involved only property interests in civil litigation. But the principle is equally appropriate where a person, wholly passive and unaware of any wrongdoing, is brought to the bar of justice for condemnation in a criminal case. LAMBERT v. CALIFORNIA, 355 U.S. 225, 229 (1957)

U.S. Supreme Court precedents have consistently established that in order to withstand constitutional scrutiny, a statute must give a person of ordinary intelligence fair notice that certain conduct is forbidden (Papachristou v. City of Jacksonville, 405 U.S. 156, 162, 92 S.Ct. 839, 843, 31 L.Ed.2d 110; United States v. Harriss, 347 U.S. 612, 617, 74 S.Ct. 808, 811, 98 L.Ed. 989) and must contain explicit standards for law enforcement officials so that the statute is not enforced in an arbitrary and discriminatory manner (Grayned v. City of Rockford, 408 U.S. 104, 108-109, 92 S.Ct. 2294, 2298- 2299, 33 L.Ed.2d 222).

*** In PLAIN ENGLISH: The state holdings that abrogated the 5-day rule for notices of appeal ran afoul these federal holdings -and (more importantly) gave me ammunition to allege the state courts have bias in any rulings on the merits that may issue.

*** FURTHERMORE, I can ask, and get, attorneys fees from the judges & justices. Observe:

Glassroth v. Moore, 242 F.Supp.2d 1067, HELD: "It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against defendant [former Alabama State Supreme Court Chief Justice, Roy] Moore, for which execution may issue."

(Reasoning: Under the "Stripper Doctrine," they are stripped of sovereign immunity -and are subjected, in their persons, to the consequences of their individual conduct.)

“www.GordonWayneW atts.com !”

Since: Sep 06

Lakeland, Florida, USA, Earth!

#28 Jun 21, 2008
Amazed wrote:
He wrote himself in- hardly qualifies him as a legit candidate.
I'm legitimate; What's more, because of the way the State Constitution is written, my candidacy slammed the door shut in the otherwise "open" primary in that race -a primary that was "open" under state law when only one party fielded candidates.

The effect of my actions is that the three Republican Candidates now can only get voted on by registered Republicans, which reduces the chances of a liberal Republican getting the party's nomination -and subsequently probably winning (as no write in candidate has won in years -since their name doesn't appear on the ballot).

Before I declared my candidacy, the primary was open to all voters -because the constitutional drafters wanted all voters to get a say in an election if the opposition party didn't run -which would have otherwise denied the voters a chance.

That is, they didn't want the primary winner (would would have won the general election by default) to be denied a chance to get voted on by the opposition party.

Indeed, I might have changed the outcome of the election by my actions here (by changing the pool of voters who are eligible to vote in the primary).
Amazed wrote:
Given his lack of personal resources he likely won't have much of a campaign.
True -but some resources are better than none. I will fight to win, even if I am up against long odds.(I can't get a vote unless someone remembers to write me in -my name does *NOT* appear on the ballot -just a blank space, lol.)
Amazed wrote:
<quoted text>
As to his motivation to pencil himself in:
__________
meg·a·lo·ma·ni·a...
You don't know my motivation -several motive are possible, winning (or being "famous") not necessarily being the top ones.

I do not think I will do any "grand" thing here -like win -I do, however, know that I prevented registered Democrats from voting in this primary -and possibly angering a whole boatload of them -oh, well...
Amazed wrote:
<quoted text>
friv·o·lous...

hyp·o·crite...
You don't know my intentions, and, unless you've read the laws surrounding this, you don't know the effect of my actions.

I'll give you a primer -since I suspect you are too paranoid to visit my website and see the proper news coverage:

* http://flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm...

101.021 Elector to vote the primary ballot of the political party in which he or she is registered.--In a primary election a qualified elector is entitled to vote the official primary election ballot of the political party designated in the elector's registration, and no other. It is unlawful for any elector to vote in a primary for any candidate running for nomination from a party other than that in which such elector is registered.

TRANSLATION: Florida is a "Closed Primary" state.

http://flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm...

ARTICLE VI
SUFFRAGE AND ELECTIONS
SECTION 5. Primary, general, and special elections.--
(b) If all candidates for an office have the same party affiliation and the winner will have no opposition in the general election, all qualified electors, regardless of party affiliation, may vote in the primary elections for that office.

History.--Am. S.J.R. 162, 1992; adopted 1992; Am. proposed by Constitution Revision Commission, Revision No. 11, 1998, filed with the Secretary of State May 5, 1998; adopted 1998.

TRANSLATION: My candidacy slammed the door shut, thus altering the voter pool for the primary, and this is germane, since the winner of the primary will, in all likelihood (baring an Act of God) win the general election -since his/her opposition would only be a "write in."
Boohil

Orlando, FL

#29 Jun 21, 2008
boohil wrote:
Sorry, Gordon...just as PP doesn't live in Ocala or Pittsburgh, I don't live in Winter Park.
I've checked my email (all five accounts) and received nothing from you. I've checked my auto-deleted emails and received nothing from you.

Gordon:
AOL did not give me the "bad address" message, so I know it was good -in fact, it was in my address book from back when you used your AOL account to post on their boards. Here's the email header -I used the Cc line to get witnesses, lol -but not to worry: This thread's 1st & 2nd messages covered the same thing that was in the email -you missed nothing, Boo.

Subject: Boo -news coveraege on YOU!(Courtesy copy to you)
Date: 6/21/2008 7:59:11 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time
From: Gww1210
Reply To:
To: Boohil
CC: PAT VGF, Buster the boa, Hornback12

Gordon, you may well have sent an email (which went through) to someone on AOL that you're addressing as "Boohil," but it is not me. I no longer have an AOL account, and even when I did, my user name was not "Boohil," but rather "Boohil2." There may be an AOL user whose User ID is "Boohil" but it is not--and has never been--me. So, you've apparently emailed some stranger on AOL who will certainly know--right out of the box--that they've been contacted by a whackjob stalking stranger. LOL! That's all so *YOU* that, although I feel sorry for the person you're currently harrassing in your silly ego-exercise, I cannot help but laugh that, once again, you've merely stepped on your crank.

boohil wrote:
I don't know what you think you've "exposed" here, but it has nothing to do with me.

Gordon:
Alas, it does:

Boo: No, it really doesn't, you stalking whackjob.

Gordon:
You admitted that you used a google search, remember? I was simply reporting that I saw a VERY RECENT Google search on my web-tracker, and I suspected, but did not know, that it was you.(I still don't know as of this writing -maybe you will clarify as I read on down...).

Boo:
I acknowledged (over 6 weeks ago), that I saw a couple of your unemployment comp case filings included in some Google search results (a search conducted a couple of weeks before that discussion). I've conducted no "VERY RECENT" Google searches which would have included any results related to you. There's your clarification. For the third time, I've not been anywhere near your websites, and I don't care about you or your unemployment claim, or anything else about you. If you choose to harrass some person whose AOL User ID is "Boohil," that's on you. Happily, it has nothing to do with me.

Gordon:
And I thought you (SAID that) you read the docket information ...DAILY,...remember?

Boo:
No, you ignorant and foolish putz, I said that I read the case disposition orders (as well as issued opinions, if any) daily. Why in the hell would I waste my time reading docket information on the hundreds of active cases currently before the FLSC, that are irrelevant to me and my clients? Dockets don't inform me, and are of no use to me. Case disposition orders and opinions, on the other hand...that's the meat and potatoes--that's the case law. While I realize that you probably have no idea what the difference is between "dockets" and "case disposition orders," I'd appreciate it if you would not allow your abject ignorance, stupidity, or phony agenda to put your false words and flat out lies into my mouth.

Ta.

Boo
Boohil

Orlando, FL

#30 Jun 21, 2008
Amazed wrote:
<quoted text>
He wrote himself in- hardly qualifies him as a legit candidate.
He's a WRITE IN CANDIDATE? I didn't realize that (although I should have, I suppose...Gordy could have never come up with the scratch, or the potential constituents' petition signatures, to qualify with his name actually appearing on the ballot). Too funny! What an ultramaroon.:-D

Boo

“www.GordonWayneW atts.com !”

Since: Sep 06

Lakeland, Florida, USA, Earth!

#31 Jun 21, 2008
"3rd" time...? No -I don't recall ever getting a straight answer from you -except (maybe) now.

But all the same, thanks for your feedback and clarification.
Boohil wrote:
boohil wrote:
That's all so *YOU* that, although I feel sorry for the person you're currently harrassing...If you choose to harrass some person whose AOL User ID is "Boohil," that's on you.
"currently harrassing..."??

I only sent one email -so there is no "currently harrassing" going on -get a grip on reality, Boo.
Boohil wrote:
While I realize that you probably have no idea what the difference is between "dockets" and "case disposition orders," I'd appreciate it if you would not allow your abject ignorance, stupidity, or phony agenda to put your false words and flat out lies into my mouth.
Ta.
Boo
I know exactly the difference -the disposition is merely one entry on the docket -the latter of which contains a whole list of the filings.

As far as putting words into your mouth, I did not.

The closest I came was when I said "...who calls herself "Boohil," is believed to be the person searching for updates on Watts' case..."

Shake the paranoia -you'll feel a lot better.

OK, I've tried "[email protected]" -and it seems to work.(I was curious if it were a good email addy as you imply above, so I tried it.) You can delete my email if you like, since, in substance, I've found out what I asked, it would appear.

“www.GordonWayneW atts.com !”

Since: Sep 06

Lakeland, Florida, USA, Earth!

#32 Jun 21, 2008
Boohil wrote:
<quoted text>
He's a WRITE IN CANDIDATE? I didn't realize that (although I should have, I suppose...Gordy could have never come up with the scratch, or the potential constituents' petition signatures, to qualify with his name actually appearing on the ballot). Too funny! What an ultramaroon.:-D
Boo
you mean ultra-MORON?

I could, if I so chose, get the signatures (probably)-or the ca$h (harder yet).

You didn't catch the Constitutional twist on my candidacy, did you, Boo?

My filing has changed the eligible voter pool for the primary.
Walter In FL

Saint Petersburg, FL

#33 Jun 21, 2008
WSage1 wrote:
see my question / response above that covers this: you productive? you got a job?<quoted text>
Yes, I do have a job, 35-years with a major company and shortly will retire.

Now that you don't have a job, when can you retire, Gordon? Or are you still going tho live off others. Maybe you're just looking for someone to sue for your retirement or create a Foundation like the Schindlers and collect donations to live on? The latter would more fixing for you. Maybe the Schindlers would help you setting up with your own scam.

“www.GordonWayneW atts.com !”

Since: Sep 06

Lakeland, Florida, USA, Earth!

#34 Jun 21, 2008
Walter In FL wrote:
Yes, I do have a job, 35-years with a major company and shortly will retire.
that's nice to know (that you are productive and have a job)
Walter In FL wrote:
Now that you don't have a job, when can you retire, Gordon? Or are you still going tho live off others. Maybe you're just looking for someone to sue for your retirement or create a Foundation like the Schindlers and collect donations to live on? The latter would more fixing for you. Maybe the Schindlers would help you setting up with your own scam.
I am not always unemployed.

But Walter, remember that evi people populate this world -in no particular order:

#1 -the Rawanda genocide,
#2 -the Jewish Holocaust, and both
#3 -British Salvery and
#4 -Americasn slavery -plus
#5 -the Native American Trail of Tears to name just five.

If many different races of people (and classes,-as in poor -that would be at least #6 in this count) have experienced prejudice, it is no stretch of the imagination that lesser evils (such as mere job discrimination).But in your mind, America is a Utopia, where no such woes occur. Only in Heaven...

“www.GordonWayneW atts.com !”

Since: Sep 06

Lakeland, Florida, USA, Earth!

#35 Jun 21, 2008
I published a clarification Boo's statement:

"news"
www.members.aol.com/gww1210
www.geocities.com/Gordon_Watts32313

"personal"
www.GordonWayneWatts.com
www.GordonWatts.com (Editor's note: The online personality referred to above has, just now, offered this clarification: "I acknowledged (over 6 weeks ago), that I saw a couple of your unemployment comp case filings included in some Google search results (a search conducted a couple of weeks before that discussion). I've conducted no "VERY RECENT" Google searches which would have included any results related to you. There's your clarification.")

"this" clkarification being the post above:

www.topix.com/forum/news/terri-schiavo/T1R2C7...
Walter In FL

Saint Petersburg, FL

#36 Jun 22, 2008
Gordon

You are one sick puppy that has a mental problem(s) and needs professional help. You will never be elected to any office in government. To read anything by you or about you would tell all that you are delusional and grandiose person. You have no background except being the laughing stock of the legal profession and becoming one on this forum. Your puffery shows through in all of your written statements. A modified Irish toast for you Gordon:“As long as you hold to one blade of grass you will not fall off the face of the earth.” You, Gordon do not have both feet on the face of the earth so it is suggested that you walk in tall grassy areas.
Walter In FL

Saint Petersburg, FL

#37 Jun 22, 2008
WSage1 wrote:
I published a clarification Boo's statement:
"news"
www.members.aol.com/gww1210
www.geocities.com/Gordon_Watts32313
"personal"
www.GordonWayneWatts.com
www.GordonWatts.com (Editor's note: The online personality referred to above has, just now, offered this clarification: "I acknowledged (over 6 weeks ago), that I saw a couple of your unemployment comp case filings included in some Google search results (a search conducted a couple of weeks before that discussion). I've conducted no "VERY RECENT" Google searches which would have included any results related to you. There's your clarification.")
"this" clkarification being the post above:
www.topix.com/forum/news/terri-schiavo/T1R2C7...
Gordon

It sounds like you have a little paranoia to add to your mental problem(s).

“www.GordonWayneW atts.com !”

Since: Sep 06

Lakeland, Florida, USA, Earth!

#38 Jun 22, 2008
Walter In FL wrote:
<quoted text>
Gordon
It sounds like you have a little paranoia to add to your mental problem(s).
Not really -I did, however, take my friend's statement to heart about lawyers running things, but I admit, I suspected he may have been wrong.
Amazed

Minneapolis, MN

#39 Jun 22, 2008
Don't call Gordon a sick puppy.

I like dogs. Sick puppies deserve more respect than that.

Since: Oct 06

Location hidden

#40 Jun 22, 2008
Amazed wrote:
Don't call Gordon a sick puppy.
I like dogs. Sick puppies deserve more respect than that.
:-)

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Terri Schiavo Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
An Update (Nov '09) Nov 15 Unreal 88
As we enter 12 years since Schiavo-Lessons of w... Nov 11 Unreal 1
News Schiavo remembers Bush as 'making him miserable (Mar '15) Nov 11 Unreal 9
News Terri Schiavo's Painful Deprivation of Food and... (Mar '09) Jun '17 hornback12 1,223
David Bryer (Mar '07) May '17 hornback12 27
News Strange & Unusual - Florida Suburb Prepares For... (Mar '07) Feb '17 Happy Phart 5
Trudy Capone (Apr '09) Jan '16 Jackie 8
More from around the web