topix, call the police, get rid of pe...
hal

Paddington, Australia

#2326 May 9, 2014
Latest stuff I'm reading from local police is stop worrying about outside sexual "predators".
They hardly exist.
hal

Paddington, Australia

#2327 May 9, 2014
If you want to go looking for a molester, start in the front room.
Nine times out of ten, that's where it begins!!!!
And it's a huge problem.
With hardly any ever reported to police, let alone taken to court and getting convictions.
Very nasty eh Herby?
Running Turkey!
grunk

Knoxville, TN

#2328 May 9, 2014
hal wrote:
Latest stuff I'm reading from local police is stop worrying about outside sexual "predators".
They hardly exist.
What do you mean?
hal

Paddington, Australia

#2329 May 10, 2014
Julia wrote:
post #707. Bchan guys are troll pranksters who get their kicks off pretending to be the scum of society, illiterate, rapists, misogynists, viciously racist or anti-semitic and say the most absurd things one can think of, in 2nd grade spelling, in order to get a reaction out of people and amuse themselves.
My personal method for managing to sleep at night is to force myself to believe that all people like you are bchan guys, that monsters are not real and that the public education system has not collapsed.
Now, I'm not going to have a debate about pedophilia (or any other matter that goes beyond the shape of your favourite lego piece) with you, because you are either, in fact, a troll or simply stupid enough to warrant a support check from the government.
I will limit myself to report the people on this site who appear to be exchanging pedopornographic material and luring kids into abuse. Not you for saying what you say, but only the people who seem to be using this site to actually do those things. I don't believe in crimes of opinion, but I do believe in saving actual, live children from abuse.
Gee, you must be reporting day and night now Julia.
Thousands of posts every week now going through on the hookup threads.
Seems a pretty forlorn occupation these days.
Trying to roll back that tide of young humanity looking for body to body!!!!
hal

Paddington, Australia

#2330 May 10, 2014
grunk wrote:
<quoted text>
What do you mean?
If you want to go looking for a molester, start in the front room.
Nine times out of ten, that's where it begins!!!!
And it's a huge problem.
With hardly any ever reported to police, let alone taken to court and getting convictions.

“Alive to live life”

Since: Nov 13

Location hidden

#2332 May 10, 2014
Topix is crap I reported 6 hours ago sickos on a thread about doing and clam to done bad things to 4 year old children and still it's on line turns my gut what can u do to speed up Topxi
hal

Paddington, Australia

#2333 May 10, 2014
Bezeer wrote:
Topix is crap I reported 6 hours ago sickos on a thread about doing and clam to done bad things to 4 year old children and still it's on line turns my gut what can u do to speed up Topxi
I understand your concern, but stopping discussion is just going to hide the reality by pushing it underground.
And that's not going to help abused kids.
For that reason, I don't favour censorship, bar perhaps for some rare and extreme cases.
What you're suggesting is just pushing it back under the carpet.
Strong light in dark corners is always the best disinfectant, in my opinion!
hal

Paddington, Australia

#2334 May 10, 2014
Rodny wrote:
<quoted text>
I Know what you mean Hal, and the police are right. The vast majority of child sexual abuse takes place in the home.
That is by relatives and trusted people who work with kids. This is a fact.
So people here are looking in the wrong place.
No real pedo would post about it on Topix or anywhere else and make it public. So it is mostly fantasy.
Also people talking about abuse when they were young, or about cases that they know of, does not mean that they are pedos.
So people must make a distinction before they go on wild witch hunts, with mention of torture and murder. We are in the 21st Century, not in the Middle Ages.
Yes, look inside homes for sexual abuse, not outside.
I've said this before, but I'll repeat it again.
There's this urban myth that all pedos are "predators", a misnomer if ever there was one, given the realities of which the police inform us.
Also that they are all male, all overweight, all balding, all no hopers, middle aged, and all hanging around schools and malls in grubby long raincoats.
I even heard this back in 1946, as a child myself.
Myths never change!
Neither does profound prejudice and ignorance.
I mean, think about it, with that clear a description, right down to their bags of lollies, and/or their candy enticers, how hard can it be for the cops to hop in a squad car and just whip down to their congregation points, and pick them up en masse?
Neat, quick, and would save infinite time and money.
Why can't they do that????
I mean, how hard can it be, really????
You have to laugh though, at how many turkeys there are out there who really believe this tripe!!!!
Join Free

“4 out of 3 people”

Since: May 09

have trouble with fractions.

#2335 May 10, 2014
Bezeer wrote:
Topix is crap I reported 6 hours ago sickos on a thread about doing and clam to done bad things to 4 year old children and still it's on line turns my gut what can u do to speed up Topxi
Be patient with Topix on the weekends. It may be Monday or Tuesday before the thread is deleted. Thanks for reporting, Bezeer.
Ron Wong TH

Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei Darussalam

#2336 May 10, 2014
Most internet attempt of child abuse here never works anyway.

I agree there are lots of pedos(is that what its called?) out there and here. Most of them are dirty geizer who cant afford to pay money for a prostitute and so seek cheaper solution. But some of them (ie me) are sincerely looking for girls closer to my age for chat and other fun stuffs. Seeking 18+ girls would be considered abuse for the girls. So please check before reporting :)

Ps I'm an asian, and asian girls are tough sell, hence why I'm here :)
Pss of course I like adult girls too, but no way I would date them.
Psss I'd rather date a 14yr old or someone at most a year older/younger than me.

“4 out of 3 people”

Since: May 09

have trouble with fractions.

#2337 May 10, 2014
Rodny wrote:
<quoted text>
I Know what you mean Hal, and the police are right. The vast majority of child sexual abuse takes place in the home.
That is by relatives and trusted people who work with kids. This is a fact.
So people here are looking in the wrong place.
No real pedo would post about it on Topix or anywhere else and make it public. So it is mostly fantasy.
Also people talking about abuse when they were young, or about cases that they know of, does not mean that they are pedos.
So people must make a distinction before they go on wild witch hunts, with mention of torture and murder. We are in the 21st Century, not in the Middle Ages.
Yes, look inside homes for sexual abuse, not outside.
No it doesn't. 60% of perpetrators are acquaintances of the child. 30% are family members.

That contradicts your 'vast majority' takes place in the home.
Eth

Gillingham, UK

#2339 May 10, 2014
I reported by e mail to CEOP LAST last year bout some of these threads but nothing is done they didn't even reply to to my email,
I'm open minded bout sex but thes threads are an open invitation to pedos and vulnerable kids
hal

Paddington, Australia

#2340 May 10, 2014
Eth wrote:
I reported by e mail to CEOP LAST last year bout some of these threads but nothing is done they didn't even reply to to my email,
I'm open minded bout sex but thes threads are an open invitation to pedos and vulnerable kids
What about tough kids that are open minded about sex too, that aren't vulnerable?
Should they have to suffer too?

“4 out of 3 people”

Since: May 09

have trouble with fractions.

#2341 May 10, 2014
Rodny wrote:
<quoted text>
That's exactly what I meant when I said that it takes place in the home, that is it is done by family members and acquaintances.
You confirm that this is in fact 90% of child abuse. Only 10% is done by strangers or outside predators. Contrary to what many believe.
Your end result of 10% is correct. However, combining 30% family and 60% acquaintances gives us skewed numbers of 'vast majority happens in the home'. It gives the impression that 90% of abuse happens within the family structure (parents, uncles, aunts, cousins, etc) and is incorrect. Acquaintances are not family and therefore are not combined to show a 90% percentile. The statistics are two separate entities as not to give false numbers of child abuse involving family. 30% gives us an idea of abuse in the home and also without.

The American Psychological Association, CDC and Dept of Justice, among many who compile abuse statistics, separate percentages to give more detailed information of who and what. They do not combine all the numbers for a percentage total. In that case, the numbers would only give us what we already know; children are being abused.

“4 out of 3 people”

Since: May 09

have trouble with fractions.

#2342 May 10, 2014
hal wrote:
<quoted text>
What about tough kids that are open minded about sex too, that aren't vulnerable?
Should they have to suffer too?
There is no such thing as a tough kid. They're all vulnerable with the right person.
Eth

Gillingham, UK

#2344 May 10, 2014
hal wrote:
<quoted text>
What about tough kids that are open minded about sex too, that aren't vulnerable?
Should they have to suffer too?
Of course not
hal

Paddington, Australia

#2345 May 10, 2014
_Zoey_ wrote:
<quoted text>
There is no such thing as a tough kid. They're all vulnerable with the right person.
You think so do you?
My wife taught some of the toughest, most sexually active kids in London, for 2 separate years.
Real hands on experience dealing with these kids.
Her observations of life as it really is at the coal front would tend to disavow completely that neat convenient contention.
hal

Paddington, Australia

#2346 May 10, 2014
hal wrote:
<quoted text>
You think so do you?
My wife taught some of the toughest, most sexually active kids in London, for 2 separate years.
Real hands on experience dealing with these kids.
Her observations of life as it really is at the coal front would tend to disavow completely that neat convenient contention.
And we're talking here kids aged 11 and younger.
By the time they get to age 13, they've matured already way beyond what you still regard as children.
There's something deeply amiss, imo, with a society that neds so desperately to infantilize its youth, and deny their maturity in age and experience, beyond all rational comprehension.
You seem to be possessed of deep fears of the unknown, and have lost all trust in your own society.
It seems as if you feel some deep insecurity about your young people, which necessitates that you create a society at war with reality, and possessed of a deep and desperate need to control everything, as if somehow that will keep you safe from life!
It's difficult to put into words, but it's truly bizarre!!!!
In fact, if that's the future of society, lose all confidence and just play it safe, the human race will not survive.
Nature is quite ruthless that way!

“4 out of 3 people”

Since: May 09

have trouble with fractions.

#2347 May 10, 2014
Rodny wrote:
<quoted text>
But that is exactly the question being discussed here "Abused by whom".
Certainly not by the fantasists posting here and other forums, as you yourself confirm. Which was my point, that we are barking up the wrong tree.
Can you give the link to the statistics? Otherwise one can interpret them as they like without having the official statistics before them.
The statistics I quoted are on my laptop in a PDF file so impossible to link. Topix doesn't allow links on HS anyway. It would be filtered and deleted immediately. I have a link that might interest you, with similar numbers, from The National Center For Victims of Crime. I can send it thru PM if you'd like.

“4 out of 3 people”

Since: May 09

have trouble with fractions.

#2348 May 10, 2014
hal wrote:
<quoted text>
You think so do you?
My wife taught some of the toughest, most sexually active kids in London, for 2 separate years.
Real hands on experience dealing with these kids.
Her observations of life as it really is at the coal front would tend to disavow completely that neat convenient contention.
Yes, I do think so. As a Child Advocate for 6 years I believe I have the experience under my belt to back it up.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Human Sexuality Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Gay/bi K....k (Nov '13) 2 min Jayden0211 415,599
Online Submissive/Sex Slave (Sep '10) 2 min Will 2,361
Bi/Gay Skype sex (Oct '11) 3 min jongki 826,492
Bi girl sharing busty friend for naughty guys 3 min Reaper13nick 4
i like every body 3 min don_nadir 11
Poll Would you eat a womans poo if you had the chance? (Jun '11) 3 min Varun 74
my. husband. milking my udders 3 min sandy7299 14
gay snapchat!!! (Dec '12) 5 min maxwelltj 859,303
Girls nude snapchat usernames (Apr '14) 6 min omar_1455 117,043
Dirty ki...k 6 min girls girls girls 142,473
More from around the web