Homosexuality and the Bible

[Robsan5]

Jared wrote:

<quoted text>No, my post very accurately reflects the meaning of the word bigot and you are indeed one. You can make no rational case for your horrible hate based radical homosexual movement, yet you post on reflecting your anti-Christian bigotry and hate.
Now, try again to read and understand my post, and see if you are capable of answering the question and making a rational reply, bigot:
So, ignorant bigot that you are, you think that you homosexuals have no choice in whether or not to engage in the unspeakable God-forbidden acts that alone define and identify homosexuals?
It is anti-scientific to claim that anyone is 'born' a homosexual. Human sexuality is developmental in nature and not immutable. If you ever get your GED, try taking a psych course.
As for the final point that also seems to have gone over your head, psychology has long held that homosexuality is a developmental issue as indeed is all human sexuality. In the largest study on the subject, only about 20% of the identical twins of homosexuals shared their homosexuality, despite common nurturing, genetics, and environment. This disproved any major genetic disposition and the shared environment displays MUCH choice in the matter.

The sex act does not define sexual orientation. It is the attraction that defines orientation.
A celebate homosexual is still a homosexual, just as a celebate heterosexual is still a heterosexual.
It is very scientific to say that homosexuals are born that way. That is what all reputable scientists say.
It is 20% of homosexual fraternal twins that are homosexual, not identical. Identical homosexual twins are at about 50%. No twins have the exact same environmental experience. Ergo, not 100%.
Poor David, you try so hard to deny your own desires...

Robert

[Ivorydick]

Jared wrote:

<quoted text>..........reflecting your anti-Christian bigotry and hate.

YOU BELIEVE IN A BOOK that has talking animals, wizards, witches, demons, sticks turning into snakes, food falling from the sky, people walking on water, and all sorts of magical, absurd and primitive stories, in defiance of all known science, and yet YOU ACCUSE ME of being a bigot when I ask simple questions about it.

[Robsan5]

Ivorydick wrote:

<quoted text>
YOU BELIEVE IN A BOOK that has talking animals, wizards, witches, demons, sticks turning into snakes, food falling from the sky, people walking on water, and all sorts of magical, absurd and primitive stories, in defiance of all known science, and yet YOU ACCUSE ME of being a bigot when I ask simple questions about it.

Welcome to the world of the delusional.

Robert

[Ivorydick]

Robsan5 wrote:

<quoted text>
Welcome to the world of the delusional.
Robert

Thanks.
It's a familiar world because I grew up in a Jesuit boarding school where dogma was hammered into the kids and questions were unwelcome and I can therefore legitimately claim a far deeper biblical knowledge than Jared with his many aliases. I must add that I was lucky enough to escape the attentions of the usual paedophile priest, possibly because I was such a rebel.

[Manmanman]

Ivorydick wrote:

<quoted text>
Thanks.
It's a familiar world because I grew up in a Jesuit boarding school where dogma was hammered into the kids and questions were unwelcome and I can therefore legitimately claim a far deeper biblical knowledge than Jared with his many aliases. I must add that I was lucky enough to escape the attentions of the usual paedophile priest, possibly because I was such a rebel.

Thanks for sharing. I think it is fair enough to ask questions.

I think that those who are afraid of questions are those who are not on safe ground; They are afraid that they will revealed. If they were secure in their faith, they might not be so afraid of questions?

I have no problems with an anti-homosexual stand, but it might not be right to abuse earnest seekers? Those who really want to know?

[WasteWater]

Ivorydick wrote:

<quoted text>
Thanks.
It's a familiar world because I grew up in a Jesuit boarding school where dogma was hammered into the kids and questions were unwelcome and I can therefore legitimately claim a far deeper biblical knowledge than Jared with his many aliases. I must add that I was lucky enough to escape the attentions of the usual paedophile priest, possibly because I was such a rebel.

Good for you.

[Jared]

Ivorydick wrote:

<quoted text>
Thanks.
It's a familiar world because I grew up in a Jesuit boarding school where dogma was hammered into the kids and questions were unwelcome and I can therefore legitimately claim a far deeper biblical knowledge than Jared with his many aliases. I must add that I was lucky enough to escape the attentions of the usual paedophile priest, possibly because I was such a rebel.

Methinks you've never had any sort of Jesuit education, and there were indeed an extremely small number of pedophile priests. The priest about scandal was over 80% homosexual in nature and primarily involved homosexual molestation of minor young men. Just as you don't know the meaning of Fundamentalist, you also don't know the meaning of pedophile or even how to spell it.

[THE OLD BORNGAY]

Jared wrote:

<quoted text>Methinks you've never had any sort of Jesuit education, and there were indeed an extremely small number of pedophile priests. The priest about scandal was over 80% homosexual in nature and primarily involved homosexual molestation of minor young men. Just as you don't know the meaning of Fundamentalist, you also don't know the meaning of pedophile or even how to spell it.

METHINKS YER A NUT!..... rather WE'SKNOWS YER CRACKED!

[WasteWater]

THE OLD BORNGAY wrote:

<quoted text>
METHINKS YER A NUT!..... rather WE'SKNOWS YER CRACKED!

No doubt about it.

[Jared]

THE OLD BORNGAY wrote:

<quoted text>
METHINKS YER A NUT!..... rather WE'SKNOWS YER CRACKED!

All you can do is call those who post the truth names.

You cannot disprove the truth you responded to:

The priest about scandal was over 80% homosexual in nature and primarily involved homosexual molestation of minor young men. Just as you don't know the meaning of Fundamentalist, you also don't know the meaning of pedophile or even how to spell it.

You also can cite no Bible translation, ancient Bible text, or Judeo-Christian tradition that places in question the Bible's many condemnations and prohibitions against homosexual acts.

[WasteWater]

THE OLD BORNGAY wrote:

<quoted text>
METHINKS YER A NUT!..... rather WE'SKNOWS YER CRACKED!

David is totally cracked....

[Austin]

WasteWater wrote:

<quoted text>
David is totally cracked....

You also can cite no Bible translation, ancient Bible text, or Judeo-Christian tradition that places in question the Bible's many condemnations and prohibitions against homosexual acts.

[WasteWater]

Austin wrote:

<quoted text>You also can cite no Bible translation, ancient Bible text, or Judeo-Christian tradition that places in question the Bible's many condemnations and prohibitions against homosexual acts.

snipity old closet queen throwing a hizzy fit again.

ROTFLMAO

[WasteWater]

OK let me spell it out correctly.

David of Pekin is a snippety old closet queen trowing daily hissy fits.

[THE OLD BORNGAY]

Jared wrote:

<quoted text>All you can do is call those who post the truth names.
You cannot disprove the truth you responded to:
The priest about scandal was over 80% homosexual in nature and primarily involved homosexual molestation of minor young men. Just as you don't know the meaning of Fundamentalist, you also don't know the meaning of pedophile or even how to spell it.
You also can cite no Bible translation, ancient Bible text, or Judeo-Christian tradition that places in question the Bible's many condemnations and prohibitions against homosexual acts.

So whats yer point?. What about homosexual acts?. What about your idiocy?
... YOU cannot disprove the truth that GOD NEVER commanded anyone "THOU SHALT NOT BE GAY".. bible irrelevant GOD didn;t write it..

p.s. you speak no truth and only pass evangelical wanna be plastic Christian gas.. you are a fool..

[THE OLD BORNGAY]

Austin wrote:

<quoted text>You also can cite no Bible translation, ancient Bible text, or Judeo-Christian tradition that places in question the Bible's many condemnations and prohibitions against homosexual acts.

cite anything you want from the bible. If your persona and way of life is reflected from the influence of the bible, then keep your misery to yourself. Lovely book of stories and dreams of common men of yore Yet you don;t even follow it..

Your bible is probably buried in your bookshelves amongst Gay porn & love stories.

[THE OLD BORNGAY]

Jared wrote:

<quoted text>No, my post very accurately reflects the meaning of the word bigot and you are indeed one. You can make no rational case for your horrible hate based radical homosexual movement, yet you post on reflecting your anti-Christian bigotry and hate.
Now, try again to read and understand my post, and see if you are capable of answering the question and making a rational reply, bigot:
So, ignorant bigot that you are, you think that you homosexuals have no choice in whether or not to engage in the unspeakable God-forbidden acts that alone define and identify homosexuals?
It is anti-scientific to claim that anyone is 'born' a homosexual. Human sexuality is developmental in nature and not immutable. If you ever get your GED, try taking a psych course.
As for the final point that also seems to have gone over your head, psychology has long held that homosexuality is a developmental issue as indeed is all human sexuality. In the largest study on the subject, only about 20% of the identical twins of homosexuals shared their homosexuality, despite common nurturing, genetics, and environment. This disproved any major genetic disposition and the shared environment displays MUCH choice in the matter.

Let me guess,,,,all the above:

From the chronicles of Fucktard Evangelical University right?.

[THE OLD BORNGAY]

WasteWater wrote:

<quoted text>
David is totally cracked....

thats putting it mildly, being a christian ( and a gay one), I'm trying to be nice to him..

[THE OLD BORNGAY]

Austin wrote:

<quoted text>You also can cite no Bible translation, ancient Bible text, or Judeo-Christian tradition that places in question the Bible's many condemnations and prohibitions against homosexual acts.

LMAO!!!! yeah so?. What is your problem then?..What purpose are you serving? You plaster bible bible bible around and what are you trying to accomplish?. You've already established the fact you're a half wit.Shitt or get off the crapper !..

[WasteWater]

THE OLD BORNGAY wrote:

<quoted text>
thats putting it mildly, being a christian ( and a gay one), I'm trying to be nice to him..

Whatever for? He isn't nice to anyone.