Not allowed an opinion on ccadp-IT'S ...

Not allowed an opinion on ccadp-IT'S A FRAUD

First Prev
of 2
Next Last
Foxylady

Redmond, WA

#2 Mar 9, 2007
u r an idiot wrote:
Maggot face! Why don't you move to China. You filthy animal.
Maggie
C.O.
member is offline
Joined: Apr 2005
Gender: Female
Posts: 919
Location: Ohio
Re: Scott's interview with Brocchini
« Reply #54 on Mar 5, 2007, 7:16pm »
----------
You are correct. Your opinion on Scott Peterson is no longer welcome here.
This person has been banned.
This is a SUPPORT forum. Anyone who doesn't understand that word needs to look it up in the dictionary. Debate Scott's case somewhere else. How much more clear can I be???
This section of the CCADP message board is for people who SUPPORT Scott Peterson.
Blatant bashing of any death row prisoner is not allowed anywhere on this site, as this entire site is designed to be supportive of friends and family members of those on death row.
SPIG, how come you didn't know CCADP was a board for those who support Scott? If you posted some of the garbage you post here they were right to ban you. IMO you should also be banned from THIS forum.
Foxylady

Redmond, WA

#4 Mar 9, 2007
Scaughtie wrote:
<quoted text>
IMO, likewise for you.
Like I care what your opinion is.
Sunny

San Jose, CA

#5 Mar 9, 2007
u r an idiot wrote:
Maggot face! Why don't you move to China. You filthy animal.
Maggie
C.O.
member is offline
Joined: Apr 2005
Gender: Female
Posts: 919
Location: Ohio
Re: Scott's interview with Brocchini
« Reply #54 on Mar 5, 2007, 7:16pm »
----------
You are correct. Your opinion on Scott Peterson is no longer welcome here.
This person has been banned.
This is a SUPPORT forum. Anyone who doesn't understand that word needs to look it up in the dictionary. Debate Scott's case somewhere else. How much more clear can I be???
This section of the CCADP message board is for people who SUPPORT Scott Peterson.
Blatant bashing of any death row prisoner is not allowed anywhere on this site, as this entire site is designed to be supportive of friends and family members of those on death row.
This is old news. Why are you posting it here?
Scaughtie

Houston, TX

#6 Mar 9, 2007
Foxylady wrote:
<quoted text>
Like I care what your opinion is.
If you didn't care, you'd ignore me.

LOL Bet you can't IGNORE me...
Foxylady

Redmond, WA

#9 Mar 11, 2007
Sunny wrote:
<quoted text>This is old news. Why are you posting it here?
Because that's just SPIG's way.
Foxylady

Redmond, WA

#10 Mar 11, 2007
Scaughtie wrote:
<quoted text>
If you didn't care, you'd ignore me.
LOL Bet you can't IGNORE me...
And vice versa!
Foxylady

Redmond, WA

#11 Mar 11, 2007
u r an idiot wrote:
Watcht the idiot Voice of Sanity aka happy haddock/dless davie repeating the same lines over and over. He's an embarassment to the human race.
http://www.drphil.com/messageboard/topic/2332...
Someone is kicking him where it hurts!
And just how do YOU know voice of sanity is happy haddock/dless davie? By the lines they "repeat over and over"? Funny, because that's exactly how you make yourself so obvious, SPIG. LOL LOL LOL
Foxylady

Redmond, WA

#12 Mar 11, 2007
u r an idiot wrote:
<quoted text>
She's desperate. I ignore "it".
Of course you do. NOT!!
Foxylady

Redmond, WA

#14 Mar 12, 2007
Wilson wrote:
dang what is that smell? nabella hasn't f'n showered in weeks.
Hi SPIG...

“Scott Peterson is Innocent”

Since: Jun 07

White Rock

#17 Jun 18, 2007
Respectful arguments _ARE_ allowed on "Canadian Coalition Against the Death Penalty :: Debate The Death Penalty and Related Issues HERE", but NOT on "Scott Peterson Supporters and Discussion Area" for what should be obvious reasons.
Alice

AOL

#18 Jun 19, 2007
There is nothing respectable about ccadp.org nor you. The obvious reason is you can't handle the truth. That is the OBVIOUS. You're the laughing stock of the net and only show Scott is even more guilty than he already is. Thanks to you, the NGs are shown to be losers who know nothing. The Ps loathe you. FACT

Since: Jun 07

Little Rock, AR

#19 Jun 19, 2007
Alice wrote:
There is nothing respectable about ccadp.org nor you. The obvious reason is you can't handle the truth. That is the OBVIOUS. You're the laughing stock of the net and only show Scott is even more guilty than he already is. Thanks to you, the NGs are shown to be losers who know nothing. The Ps loathe you. FACT
You wouldn't know what the word respect was if it hit you in the face.
Foxylady

Redmond, WA

#21 Jun 21, 2007
Alice wrote:
There is nothing respectable about ccadp.org nor you. The obvious reason is you can't handle the truth. That is the OBVIOUS. You're the laughing stock of the net and only show Scott is even more guilty than he already is. Thanks to you, the NGs are shown to be losers who know nothing. The Ps loathe you. FACT
SPIG
Foxylady

Redmond, WA

#22 Jun 21, 2007
Lee wrote:
Same goes for you trailer trash.
SPIG
Foxylady

Redmond, WA

#24 Jun 21, 2007
Summer wrote:
URAI
SPIG
Foxylady

Redmond, WA

#25 Jun 21, 2007
N Morrison wrote:
Respectful arguments _ARE_ allowed on "Canadian Coalition Against the Death Penalty :: Debate The Death Penalty and Related Issues HERE", but NOT on "Scott Peterson Supporters and Discussion Area" for what should be obvious reasons.
Not true Morrison. I know first-hand. I was discussing a "situation". Scott's name was NOT mentioned. Guilt nor innocence was mentioned. It was just an ordinary "situation". It had NOTHING to do with support or non-support of Scott. I responded to a post and another poster responded to my comments. When I attempted to respond to that poster I learned I had been banned! Was just to the CCADP site and on the Scott Peterson Supporters and Discussion thread the last post is by a poster with the nic "sara" and signed "Alice". Seems a little strange that the "sara" and "Alice" that post here on AOL are diehard "G"s. Yet sara/Alice is wishing Scott a happy fathers day and says this will be the last fathers day he will spend in SQ. The nics hardly seem just a coincidence. LOL LOL What say you sara and Alice on AOL?

“Scott Peterson is Innocent”

Since: Jun 07

White Rock

#26 Jun 21, 2007
Foxylady wrote:
<quoted text>
Not true Morrison. I know first-hand. I was discussing a "situation". Scott's name was NOT mentioned. Guilt nor innocence was mentioned. It was just an ordinary "situation". It had NOTHING to do with support or non-support of Scott. I responded to a post and another poster responded to my comments. When I attempted to respond to that poster I learned I had been banned! Was just to the CCADP site and on the Scott Peterson Supporters and Discussion thread the last post is by a poster with the nic "sara" and signed "Alice". Seems a little strange that the "sara" and "Alice" that post here on AOL are diehard "G"s. Yet sara/Alice is wishing Scott a happy fathers day and says this will be the last fathers day he will spend in SQ. The nics hardly seem just a coincidence. LOL LOL What say you sara and Alice on AOL?
Beats me. I'm no cyber stalker. Who banned you, Maggie?
Foxylady

Redmond, WA

#27 Jun 21, 2007
N Morrison wrote:
<quoted text>Beats me. I'm no cyber stalker. Who banned you, Maggie?
I don't have a clue. Maggie is the Admin./Mod of that thread so it may have been her. I wasn't given a reason even after I requested one. My request for an explanation was totally ignored. I have NO respect for any forum/board when you can't get a response from the Admin./Mod's.

“Scott Peterson is Innocent”

Since: Jun 07

White Rock

#28 Jun 21, 2007
Foxylady wrote:
<quoted text> I don't have a clue. Maggie is the Admin./Mod of that thread so it may have been her. I wasn't given a reason even after I requested one. My request for an explanation was totally ignored. I have NO respect for any forum/board when you can't get a response from the Admin./Mod's.
Well if you look at the thread "Is everyone innocent?" you will see that it was acknowledged that, no, most people aren't innocent. Unfortunately rather too many are and it is those we concentrate on. Those who have been found not guilty despite the evidence are a lost cause, they can't be retried (except in the UK), so they can only be watched. But those who are on death row and are innocent are worthy of a determined effort.

For example, I have no opinion on this ( http://www.justiceforscottdyleski.com/ ) as yet, but he may just be another one it seems. I had assumed there was no doubt as to his guilt but troubling questions seem to have been raised. We shall see.

Since: Jun 07

Fort Worth, TX

#29 Jun 21, 2007
N Morrison wrote:
<quoted text>Beats me. I'm no cyber stalker. Who banned you, Maggie?
Maggie wouldn't ban anyone without good reason. Maybe it was that person with the nic "Guest4life". Remember how you were defending the hell out of that trouble maker until Maggie had to jump in and be a moderator and ban the trouble maker "guest4life" who lied like crazy and was stirring up trouble and chaos. You were even defending her over me, and you sent me that stupid pm, telling me I wasn't being nice enough to her. Maggie saw her for what she really was-- a basher of Scott and a trouble maker. Maggie knows how to read people. She sees a trouble maker, and she knows. She bans no one unless they fully deserve it.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Scott Peterson Trial Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Suit: Amber Frey broke deal on 'sex addict' book (Mar '11) Dec '15 Derp 4
Who is a sociopath? (Apr '06) Nov '15 Lola 22
Scott Peterson's email address in prison (Oct '07) Sep '15 karen 98
I don't think Scott did this (May '09) Jun '15 dobby 7
News Scott Peterson family asking for donations (Jul '09) Apr '15 tom wingo 64
News Jodi Arias (Jun '13) Mar '15 Jinx 6
News Laci's mom outraged over Scott Peterson's blog (Jul '08) Aug '14 Stedenko 3,068
More from around the web