Kim Kardashian Versus Kate Middleton: Whose Wedding is More Beautiful?

Aug 23, 2011 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: International Business Times

The reality star Kim Kardashian and NBA basketball player Kris Humphries finally tied the knot in Montecito, Calif.

Comments
1 - 17 of 17 Comments Last updated Dec 21, 2011
MJR

San Antonio, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Aug 24, 2011
 

Judged:

2

1

1

None of the Kardashian family has any kind of respect, they are all trashy women. Kim wanted a wedding like Prince William and Kate but she will never amount to the real wedding of the year which belongs to Prince William and his beautiful bride that have the respect of the world.
redrivergirl

Austin, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
Aug 26, 2011
 

Judged:

1

MJR wrote:
None of the Kardashian family has any kind of respect, they are all trashy women. Kim wanted a wedding like Prince William and Kate but she will never amount to the real wedding of the year which belongs to Prince William and his beautiful bride that have the respect of the world.
So agree!
Thehood

Randolph, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
Aug 27, 2011
 

Judged:

1

1

1

MJR wrote:
None of the Kardashian family has any kind of respect, they are all trashy women. Kim wanted a wedding like Prince William and Kate but she will never amount to the real wedding of the year which belongs to Prince William and his beautiful bride that have the respect of the world.
kate is white class and kim is white trash. Kardashian is a complete joke. Throw this human garbage in the dumpster.

“STOP THE BULLSH** DRAMA!”

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
Aug 27, 2011
 

Judged:

1

I think the Royal Wedding was better. I think it was kind of stupid that they talked about Kim K's wedding like she's royalty too. For one, she only got famous off of her sex tape and she was friends with Paris Hilton. But the Kardashians are getting paid for having this wedding all thanks to Momma Kris Jenner. Kris Jenner might be superficial but she knows how to make money. But most of the Kardashians are superficial. I watch the reality TV show sometimes and Kim got upset at her hubby Kris because he tossed her in the water she lost her earring in the ocean at Bora Bora. The guy was just having fun and she started to make him worry about how the rest of the vacation would be with her and the rest of the family. The marriage mostlikely won't last long anyways.
Veronica R

Miami, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6
Nov 30, 2011
 
For me the royal wedding was beautiful it made me happy to see Prince William getting married to Kate Middleton. The wedding went along very well the music the people that were there. You can see the love that William and Kate had in them beautiful wedding and the people who the wedding did it not do it because of the money but to see a wedding that many of want and the love between them. And people were making good comments of the wedding of the dress etc. they have been together William and Kate for 8 years
The Kardashians are people who have no live they put their lives on tv. This wedding with Kim and Kris was just fake. Kim and Kris have been together 10 months that little time. She always wanted to get married but she didnít know what marriage life comes with. Sheís only famous for dumb things. And her family donít keep quiet no they have to talk about everything.
Veronica R

Miami, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7
Nov 30, 2011
 
MJR wrote:
None of the Kardashian family has any kind of respect, they are all trashy women. Kim wanted a wedding like Prince William and Kate but she will never amount to the real wedding of the year which belongs to Prince William and his beautiful bride that have the respect of the world.
I agree with you I dont like them at all on the tv they are always talking about them
want to move

Winter Springs, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8
Nov 30, 2011
 
Kim's wedding..what a joke. The whole thing was a bad azz joke. Only in America coud a family with no talent get rich and be compared to royalty. If Kim and Company are America's royalty we are in worse shape then I thought we were and that's pretty bad.

Kim was the azz she is famous for...lol
Mandi

Medina, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9
Nov 30, 2011
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Can't compare them, Kate has class and comes from a family who carries themselves with respect and married a family who is actual real royalty.

Kim married for a TV show, her family has filthy mouths and they might have money but they ain't got no class! Their actions make them ugly.
Justice44

Rochester, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10
Dec 16, 2011
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Mandi wrote:
Can't compare them, Kate has class and comes from a family who carries themselves with respect and married a family who is actual real royalty.
Kim married for a TV show, her family has filthy mouths and they might have money but they ain't got no class! Their actions make them ugly.
But let's face it based on the logic of many Kim critics, Kate middleton is talentless. Why Kim critics fail to apply this same logic to Kate Middleton? It is irrelevant that you find Kate a superior role model than Kim K? We are referring to talent as defined by those who dislike or hate KIm K? Kate Middleton is famous for being in a family far more so than Kim K. The media rarely puts Robert K. as one of the reasons for Kim K. success.

Secondly, Kate middleton carries herself with class in public but no one knows the Kate middleton in private. Kate Middleton according to "Kim K hater" reasoning has no business being famous, yet she is as exposed as Kim K.

Frankly, I love the fact that Kate Middleton has the image of Mrs. Perfect but I wish people would stop being insincere with claiming Kim has no talent and expressing this excuse as a reason to dislike her when the real reason is that haters/critics dislike Kim's personality. That's fine but just say this.
Kingfish

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11
Dec 17, 2011
 
Justice44 wrote:
<quoted text>
But let's face it based on the logic of many Kim critics, Kate middleton is talentless. Why Kim critics fail to apply this same logic to Kate Middleton? It is irrelevant that you find Kate a superior role model than Kim K? We are referring to talent as defined by those who dislike or hate KIm K? Kate Middleton is famous for being in a family far more so than Kim K. The media rarely puts Robert K. as one of the reasons for Kim K. success.
Secondly, Kate middleton carries herself with class in public but no one knows the Kate middleton in private. Kate Middleton according to "Kim K hater" reasoning has no business being famous, yet she is as exposed as Kim K.
Frankly, I love the fact that Kate Middleton has the image of Mrs. Perfect but I wish people would stop being insincere with claiming Kim has no talent and expressing this excuse as a reason to dislike her when the real reason is that haters/critics dislike Kim's personality. That's fine but just say this.
Actually, most people sincerely hate Kim for both her lack of talent and her obnoxious personality.
Myth Killer

Rochester, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12
Dec 19, 2011
 

Judged:

1

Kingfish wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, most people sincerely hate Kim for both her lack of talent and her obnoxious personality.
I see talent and personality as two different things. Kanye is talented but has an obnoxious personality. Kate Middleton has a nice personality but has no talent when we define talent soley as acting, singing and dancing.

Kate is someone who conducts herself in a classy manner. However, that does not mean she has more talent than Kim K in marketing and Kanye West in music. Personally I don not see the negative things that others see in Kim but I do see how Kanye is a tool. Thus, I think I am objective in my opinion.

So if we were really trying to make a fair description, Kate Middleton would considered "talentless" although I think she is great representative and role model. Whether you have an aversion toward Kim K's personal behavior is irrelevant in the discussion of talent. The bottom line is that the same standards of considering Kim K as talentless should be applied to Kate Middleton. Who cares if Kate has a degree and is perceived as a better role model? That is not the defintion of talent which people are referring to when they describe to Kim K.
Myth Killer

Rochester, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#13
Dec 19, 2011
 
This is what annoys me. We judge EVERY entrerprenuer based on their ability to generate profit. We the owners of fashion lines, restuarants and beauty products on the level of profit they generate.

The last time I checked Kim K generates profit from her fashion line. Her fashion line, perfume and shoe are not considered an immoral products to sell. She has generated millions of dollars of profit from these lines. This objectively is considered a success and one infers that it takes marketing talent to generate this suceess.

If you look at every entreprenuer who is considered successful, the primary measurment is profit. It is irrelvant if you think the person is a whore, obnoxious, petty, arrogant or ingeniuine. When it comes to Kim K, it seems to me that people feel that their negatie opinions about her personality is justification to descredit her financial accomplishments.

She makes 20 million dollars over her salary on business and marketing ventures. This is more than many supermodels in the 90's and 00's. Why is this denied as marketing talent, when we use the same numerical statistics to determine other successful entreprenuers?
Myth Killer

Rochester, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#14
Dec 19, 2011
 
want to move wrote:
Kim's wedding..what a joke. The whole thing was a bad azz joke. Only in America coud a family with no talent get rich and be compared to royalty. If Kim and Company are America's royalty we are in worse shape then I thought we were and that's pretty bad.
Kim was the azz she is famous for...lol
But one could ask what has Kate done on her own to merit fame? I know she is a nice person but that does not mean she has more observable skills than Kim K. All the haters love to mention how Kim K has benefited from a market savvy manager and wealth from her family before her reality show. Why is the same level of critism not leveled at Kate Middleton? She is famous for being in born in the right family! She did not earn Royalty, she was born into it. Everyone says it takes no talent to be on a reality show, but it also takes no talent to be PART OF THE ROYAL FAMILY.

Kim EARNS income from her clothing, perfume and shoe line. She is an entreprenuer who has earned 20 million dollars over her regular salary. Is she just lucky when most reality stars, actors, and music stars do not earn close to this amount as entrerprenuers. Don't get me started on the stupid sex tape theory. If the sex tape was the sole reason for her success, Kendra Wilkinson would have the same level of endorsements and exposure as Kim K.

Simply because you think Kate is a better person than Kim K does not mean she has more talent or is more deserving of being famous based on talent when it has been established that Kate does not sing, act or dance.

(BTW What does a good AZZ convince female shoppers to buy her shoes?)
Myth Killer

Rochester, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#15
Dec 19, 2011
 
Karelle94 wrote:
I think the Royal Wedding was better. I think it was kind of stupid that they talked about Kim K's wedding like she's royalty too. For one, she only got famous off of her sex tape and she was friends with Paris Hilton. But the Kardashians are getting paid for having this wedding all thanks to Momma Kris Jenner. Kris Jenner might be superficial but she knows how to make money. But most of the Kardashians are superficial. I watch the reality TV show sometimes and Kim got upset at her hubby Kris because he tossed her in the water she lost her earring in the ocean at Bora Bora. The guy was just having fun and she started to make him worry about how the rest of the vacation would be with her and the rest of the family. The marriage mostlikely won't last long anyways.
This is what I find hypocritical about how we percieve the royal family. I find wedding boring. However, I do not understand why the Royal Wedding does not receive the flack for being over the top. I understand the Royal Family evokes historical nostalgia. But come on! This thing was televised world wide. Yet, Kim gets flack for having an elaborate wedding which was not nearly as televised. YOu could argue neither of them deserve this coverage. Yet, KIm gets ripped for trying to be like the Royal Wedding. Why is he Royal Wedding so important?
Myth Killer

Rochester, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#16
Dec 19, 2011
 
Kate is a nice person so she is more talented than Kim. Do you know that many talented people are tools, wife beaters, adulters and drunks? Why is that talentless is brought up in regards to Kim but you give Kate a pass? This clearly shows you base your decision on which personality you like the best. It is basic common sense that if we consider Kim K talentless based on the lacking of singing, dancing, or music talent, Kate Middleton should be considred talentless as well. I am puzzled why posters need to posit the claim that Kim is talentless when Kate has only shown she is a good person and role model.

Yeah, Kanye West is not talented because he is not a good role model.
Myth Killer

Rochester, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#17
Dec 19, 2011
 
Mandi wrote:
Can't compare them, Kate has class and comes from a family who carries themselves with respect and married a family who is actual real royalty.
Kim married for a TV show, her family has filthy mouths and they might have money but they ain't got no class! Their actions make them ugly.
A lot of families carry themselves with respect. So what? Does that mean they should be famous? Why did Barbara Walters fail to tell Kate Middleton that she is described as someone who can not sing, dance or act? A lot of talented enterpreneuers have foul mouths and cheat on their spouses, they should not be famous for their talent. Why in the world the Royal Family gets this much attention? Their born into a historical family.
want to move

Winter Springs, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#18
Dec 21, 2011
 
Myth Killer wrote:
<quoted text>
But one could ask what has Kate done on her own to merit fame? I know she is a nice person but that does not mean she has more observable skills than Kim K. All the haters love to mention how Kim K has benefited from a market savvy manager and wealth from her family before her reality show. Why is the same level of critism not leveled at Kate Middleton? She is famous for being in born in the right family! She did not earn Royalty, she was born into it. Everyone says it takes no talent to be on a reality show, but it also takes no talent to be PART OF THE ROYAL FAMILY.
Kim EARNS income from her clothing, perfume and shoe line. She is an entreprenuer who has earned 20 million dollars over her regular salary. Is she just lucky when most reality stars, actors, and music stars do not earn close to this amount as entrerprenuers. Don't get me started on the stupid sex tape theory. If the sex tape was the sole reason for her success, Kendra Wilkinson would have the same level of endorsements and exposure as Kim K.
Simply because you think Kate is a better person than Kim K does not mean she has more talent or is more deserving of being famous based on talent when it has been established that Kate does not sing, act or dance.
(BTW What does a good AZZ convince female shoppers to buy her shoes?)
Obsessed lonely sickos like you follow her every word and action...you are the same one that buy her crap.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Royal Wedding Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
annette marion psyco queen wanted 2 marry alien... Jul '14 PSYCOTODYA 1
Whats really happening Jul '14 Concerned 1
OMG Harrys approval Jul '14 Concerned 1
Teacher Meets World: The Collected Wisdom of Mr... Jul '14 biggest fan 1
Kate Middleton's bare bum exposed May '14 Looking Up 1
Nude photo of Duchess Kate in Australia publish... May '14 Stan Dandyliver 2
Peter McKay: Should we pay a 50k to guard the p... May '14 Adulperson 1

Search the Royal Wedding Forum:
•••