Texas law professor calls for repeal ...

Texas law professor calls for repeal of Second Amendment

There are 12127 comments on the BizPacReview.com story from Nov 17, 2013, titled Texas law professor calls for repeal of Second Amendment. In it, BizPacReview.com reports that:

A professor at the Texas A&M University School of Law claims that the Second Amendment should be shelved and replaced with something else.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at BizPacReview.com.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#8739 Apr 22, 2014
Independent wrote:
<quoted text>
The militias showed up at Bundy's ranch recently.....you were saying?
Militias?

HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAH!

Drunks with guns!

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#8740 Apr 22, 2014
Ari son of Anarchy wrote:
<quoted text>
Dimocrats have flat lined the learning curve...they don't learn

Gosh funny how the cuntservatives keep insisting the Democrats have lost the election.

Name of president again, SpoogeSponge?

The enlarged GOP rectal orifice has Democrat DNA on it, dear.

Wipe your chin...

Since: Oct 09

.

#8741 Apr 22, 2014
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Gosh funny how the cuntservatives keep insisting the Democrats have lost the election.
Name of president again, SpoogeSponge?
The enlarged GOP rectal orifice has Democrat DNA on it, dear.
Wipe your chin...
Only in your crossdresser fantasy!
When you lose an argument on merit you have to go 5th grader don't you?
That is no substitute for factual debate.
YOU FAIL AGAIN!

2014 midterms haven't happened...yet!
Colorado has!...and Scott walker won the Wisconsin recall.
Rand Paul won Kentucky and may very well be the next POTUS!

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#8742 Apr 22, 2014
Ari son of Anarchy wrote:
<quoted text>
Only in your crossdresser fantasy!
When you lose an argument on merit you have to go 5th grader don't you?
I know you aren't ready for the fifth grade, Shug, but I cannot use smaller words, I really can't.

Let me know when you can come up with a better response then when you proved felons don't go to gun shows by posting links to felons who were arrested at gun shows.

You really had me in a corner there, shug.
Independent

United States

#8743 Apr 22, 2014
barefoot2626 wrote:
Militias?
HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAH!
Drunks with guns!
Nice attempt at deflecting the fact that you just got schooled by those evil things called facts.

Dance for me.....

:^`P

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#8744 Apr 22, 2014
Ari son of Anarchy wrote:
Colorado has!...and Scott walker won the Wisconsin recall.
The law is STILL in place, shug, no matter how hard you stomp your feet.

And more laws are coming.

Americans are tired of you gun gnutters running amok.

Universal background checks: tick tock.

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#8745 Apr 23, 2014
charles in charge wrote:
<quoted text>
I'd say it's likelier that YOU'RE the confused one, and that you're getting yourself all tied up in knots trying, feebly, to claim it's me.
LOL
Nope. It's you who is confused. No doubt about it. Anyone who thinks the right to keep and bear arms is dependent upon raising a militia is confused. It's the other way around dopy, the ability to raise a militia is dependent upon the individual right to keep and bear arms. Plain and simple. See how confused you are?

“Evolved hunter/gatherer”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#8747 Apr 23, 2014
Well wrote:

<quoted text>
Initially funded by local grass roots organizations. The NRA did not get involved until the blooming idiot from NY provided funds.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
The NRA has never not been involved.
God what a liar you are!
HAHAAHAHAHAHAHAH!
Step away from the mirror.

The other poster said;
"The NRA did not get involved until ..."

Notice the word "until" in that statement. It means that the NRA got involved.
But then you know that already, doncha.

“Evolved hunter/gatherer”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#8748 Apr 23, 2014
charles in charge wrote:
<quoted text>
Uh, no, nowhere have I shown myself "confused" about "rights," pointy-head. The 2nd gives you the right to own a gun in order to form a militia. Not forming militias anymore?
Then no right to have a gun. End of story.
Incorrect.
You say that the 2nd amendment grants the right to keep and bear arms. That is pure nonsense. To be sure, the 2nd amendment speaks of a right of the people. It speaks of that right as a thing which already exists sir. It also says that the right to keep and bear is off limits to governmental infringement.
Since the government did not "grant" any such right to begin with, and the people ... individually and collectively ... possess that unalienable right from the moment of their births, the government, in THIS country, which assumes it's authority by the consent of the people, is restricted and forbidden to interfere with a free citizen's right to protect life and property ... with lethal force if necessary.

“Evolved hunter/gatherer”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#8749 Apr 23, 2014
charles in charge wrote:
<quoted text>
Uh, no, nowhere have I shown myself "confused" about "rights," pointy-head. The 2nd gives you the right to own a gun in order to form a militia. Not forming militias anymore?
Then no right to have a gun. End of story.
You most certainly are confused about how a person comes to be in possession of their unalienable rights.
Since you think yourself correct and clear concerning how we come to be in possession of our unalienable rights, show me the exact words in the 2nd amendment which grants any right whatsoever.
Go ahead, show me the words which support your claim that the 2nd amendment grants any right at all.

“Evolved hunter/gatherer”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#8750 Apr 23, 2014
charles in charge wrote:
<quoted text>
I'd say it's likelier that YOU'RE the confused one, and that you're getting yourself all tied up in knots trying, feebly, to claim it's me.
LOL
Then save face and show us the words in the 2nd amendment which grants the people the right to keep and bear arms.
You say it grants that right. Prove it by posting the words from the 2nd amendment which support your claim.

“Evolved hunter/gatherer”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#8751 Apr 23, 2014
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
March comes before August on this planet, shug.
Not necessarily. It depends upon which March and which August.
Example:
August 2013 comes before March 2014
Just sayin'.

“Evolved hunter/gatherer”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#8752 Apr 23, 2014
spocko wrote:
<quoted text>
Your not the brightest bulb in the chandelier are you buddy?!
Total raised from CO citizens for the recall $540.000
Total raised from CO citizens against the recall $1.5 million
So, bright bulb, if the anti-recall donations from the citizens of Colorado were three times the amount of the pro-recall donations from the citizens of Colorado, how is it that the recall was held anyway and the anti-gun "officials" were removed from office?
POINT:
Your guys outspent the freedom loving folks of Colorado by three to one ... and still lost ... bright bulb.
<smile>

“Evolved hunter/gatherer”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#8753 Apr 23, 2014
Ari son of Anarchy wrote:
<quoted text>
Only in your crossdresser fantasy!
When you lose an argument on merit you have to go 5th grader don't you?
That is no substitute for factual debate.
YOU FAIL AGAIN!
2014 midterms haven't happened...yet!
Colorado has!...and Scott walker won the Wisconsin recall.
Rand Paul won Kentucky and may very well be the next POTUS!
The GOP establishment ... the good ole boy club ... will do to Rand what they did to his father. They will never allow him on the platform. The vote will be split again and another puppet from the left will gain the WH. Watch and see.
grumpy

Central Islip, NY

#8754 Apr 23, 2014
Aquarius-WY wrote:
<quoted text>
So, bright bulb, if the anti-recall donations from the citizens of Colorado were three times the amount of the pro-recall donations from the citizens of Colorado, how is it that the recall was held anyway and the anti-gun "officials" were removed from office?
POINT:
Your guys outspent the freedom loving folks of Colorado by three to one ... and still lost ... bright bulb.
<smile>
I'm weak in arithmetic but it seems the pro-gun people spent $1.5 million and the anti-gun people spent $500,000, Smiley.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#8755 Apr 23, 2014
Aquarius-WY wrote:
Step away from the mirror.
The other poster said;
Must hurt ya, eh, BooBoo.

heheheheeh....

Sometimes the gun gnuttters fire before they look at who they are aiming at...

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#8756 Apr 23, 2014
Aquarius-WY wrote:
The other poster said;
"The NRA did not get involved until ..."
Notice the word "until" in that statement. It means that the NRA got involved.
But then you know that already, doncha.
English was never your strong suite, BooBoo.

I replied that the NRA had never NOT been involved.

What that means, dear: the NRA was involved from the GetGo.

I'll give you some time to look that up in your atlas.

You might also note (as I said before) March comes before the end of August.

I should have added "in the year" because after you lose that argument, you will insist August comes before March on your desk calendar you haven't changed since Bush was president.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#8757 Apr 23, 2014
Aquarius-WY wrote:
Your guys outspent the freedom loving folks of Colorado by three to one ... and still lost ... bright bulb.
The law is still in force, BooBoo. <smile> And more laws are being passed. <smile>
And more money is being spent. <smile>

Wipe your chin, BooBoo.

“Evolved hunter/gatherer”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#8758 Apr 23, 2014
grumpy wrote:
<quoted text> I'm weak in arithmetic but it seems the pro-gun people spent $1.5 million and the anti-gun people spent $500,000, Smiley.
Your comprehension skills are worse than your ability to cipher.
Pro-gun = Pro-recall. Spent $500,000.
Anti-gun = Anti-recall. Spent $1,500,000.

“Evolved hunter/gatherer”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#8759 Apr 23, 2014
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
The law is still in force, BooBoo. <smile> And more laws are being passed. <smile>
And more money is being spent. <smile>
Wipe your chin, BooBoo.
Specifically ... WHICH law (s)?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Opinion Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News What would Jesus say about same-sex marriage? (Jul '15) 16 min barry 18,796
News Constitutional Crisis in Slow Motion 1 hr Trump is a joke 118
News MPP fails to offer solutions (Jul '09) 4 hr sad state of affairs 28
News Say it in six words (Jul '08) 10 hr Tinman 11,103
News February 19, 2018: The Netanyahu probes 22 hr Jeff Brightone 1
News Chantal Hebert: For NDP, slogans have changed b... 22 hr yep 1
News Treating justices like celebrities undermines t... 22 hr Aggravated 1
Best Adult Hookup Sites Online (May '17) Feb 15 Seriously 49
More from around the web