Give 'em hell, Mitt: fight Obama's smears

[So True]

Alloramadai wrote:

<quoted text>
Worse than when Bush was in office? Not so, and not even possible.

Look at the economy. The facts are there whether you like it or not. Unemployment was actually higher in Obama's term. Liberals even agree to that.

[So True]

China doll two wrote:

<quoted text>Didn't say chit when Bush was in office taking a dump on this nation, did you neocon? Obama gets to come in and "try" to clean up the stink left by your president and party without any help from the aholes that caused the problems, and do everything in their power to obstruct him and you not only have the nerve to complain but want another shot?
HELL TO THE NO! You people are out of your freaking minds. Like Wall Street Bankers you honestly think you should be rewarded for phucking up! I don't think so!
This nation would not be in such dire straits if it weren't FOR REPUBLICANS TO BEGIN WITH!

Liar Obama never came through with the jobs you libatard. And you know it!

[Obama SUX]

Escorat wrote:

Oh O....The public now realizes this was another 9/11 hit on American soil in Libya...whats the Prez going to do???? Toss Hillary under the bus!

He can't toss Hillary under the bus. Bill would quit campaigning for him. So, as he's alrady done, he'll blame it on the video, same as he did at the U.N. or on some other lowly smuck in Hillary's State Department. Most, likely he'll apologize to the terrorists for causing them an inconvenience, of course. Maybe give them millions of taxpayer dollars so they'll be our friends.

The "Donkey Eared Bastard in Chief" is a pro islamist pussy.

[waitasec]

[QUOTE who="what??"]What the hell is wrong with you people pro Romney??? Pro OBAMA for life!! At least he really cares! Lets see if Romney made minimum wage.. What would he do then?[/QUOTE]

You think Obama ever made minimum wage? Omg you better do some research on your hero!

[Thegrif]

Marines there had rifles, but just for show, no bullets in weapon. Thats the rule since wanna be king obama

[senior citizen]

Thegrif wrote:

Marines there had rifles, but just for show, no bullets in weapon. Thats the rule since wanna be king obama

If Obama gets back in this is what we have to look forward to as
this only the beginning. get ready for militia vs national guard and marshal law our military will be used against its own citizens so the libs will stay in power....

[Quinton]

senior citizen wrote:

<quoted text>If Obama gets back in this is what we have to look forward to as
this only the beginning. get ready for militia vs national guard and marshal law our military will be used against its own citizens so the libs will stay in power....

Looks like dementia has set in! Are you eating out of aluminum cans again? The senior center has hot meals for you!

[No One Important]

Funny thing - while Obama/Biden keep yelling "liar!" out there:

Tax Policy Center issued a revamped anaysis way back in August that says Romney's plan can be revenue neutral. Who is still touting a revoked analysis? Lying to the voters about that analysis?

The TPC issued a statement in August "objecting" to Obama's use of their analysis.

Cutter admitted the "5 trillion" canard was false.

Princeton Professor objects to obama's false portrayal of his paper and it's conclusions.

AARP told Obama to stop using his name as an endorsement for Obamacare. Biden used it again.

Biden claimed he voted against 2 wars, and got caught lying when he voted for both wars.

Seems to me the Obama strategy of yelling "liar!" is backfiring. The only people I seeing being publically rebuked for misrepresenting facts are Obama and Biden.

[Quinton]

No One Important wrote:

Funny thing - while Obama/Biden keep yelling "liar!" out there:

Tax Policy Center issued a revamped anaysis way back in August that says Romney's plan can be revenue neutral. Who is still touting a revoked analysis? Lying to the voters about that analysis?

The TPC issued a statement in August "objecting" to Obama's use of their analysis.

Cutter admitted the "5 trillion" canard was false.

Princeton Professor objects to obama's false portrayal of his paper and it's conclusions.

AARP told Obama to stop using his name as an endorsement for Obamacare. Biden used it again.

Biden claimed he voted against 2 wars, and got caught lying when he voted for both wars.

Seems to me the Obama strategy of yelling "liar!" is backfiring. The only people I seeing being publically rebuked for misrepresenting facts are Obama and Biden.

I think your canard is in neutral

[So True]

Quinton wrote:

<quoted text>
I think your canard is in neutral

If you can't face reality ignore it. Is that your motto?

[downhill246]

Quinton wrote:

<quoted text>
Good! Stay put there!

Okay, it is about 85 degrees at the Ft Lauderdale beach today ,sunny skies,breezy and full of bikinis.

[downhill246]

Quinton wrote:

<quoted text>
I think your canard is in neutral

'I can’t tell exactly how the Obama campaign reached that characterization of my work. It might be that they assume that Governor Romney wants to keep the taxes from the Affordable Care Act in place, despite the fact that the Governor has called for its complete repeal. The main conclusion of my study is that under plausible assumptions, a proposal along the lines suggested by Governor Romney can both be revenue neutral and keep the net tax burden on taxpayers with incomes above $200,000 about the same. That is, an increase in the tax burden on lower and middle income individuals is not required in order to make the overall plan revenue neutral."

Princeton economic professor Harvey Rose

[TonyT1961]

Le Jimbo wrote:

<quoted text>Lie again...typical. Not one lie shown by MSM or Fact Check........just bidens. GFY

80,000 posts - and still lying, with no facts.

What a fcuking retard you are Dumbo - here are Lyin Ryan's lies;

http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/article/2...

Decision - most of Bidens statement's were true / most of Ryan's were false.

Douche bag - no source from you, no credibility, as always.

[TonyT1961]

Since it's Saturday, has Mitt changed his views since Thursday?

[Razors Edge]

Slick Will,the very 1st Black POTUS,stabbed for the
2nd X?/ Wife going under the Bus..And by a black guy?

say it aint so billy boy!!

[So True]

TonyT1961 wrote:

Since it's Saturday, has Mitt changed his views since Thursday?

No, but sure wish Obama would. Then maybe the unemployment rate would go down. Funny how the unemployment rate went up during Obama's term. I guess he wasn't lying about the change. LOL!!

[senior citizen]

Quinton wrote:

<quoted text>
Looks like dementia has set in! Are you eating out of aluminum cans again? The senior center has hot meals for you!

You had better look at America and what Obama is currently doing. You are worshiping Obama to the point that you can not see clear as to the lies he is telling. This is a man that has NO RECORD to run on. He has to have BILL CLINTON babysit him because he does not have enough smarts to think for himself. Your smart ass cracks shows you are a true Obama worshiper and a DEM - those are the only ones that have to develop a potty mouth and lie when they know they can not counter any post that gets made because of Obama's record. GROW UP.

[No One Important]

TonyT1961 wrote:

<quoted text>
80,000 posts - and still lying, with no facts.
What a fcuking retard you are Dumbo - here are Lyin Ryan's lies;
http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/article/2... .

Bwaaahahahaaa....did you even read your source you posted? Biden's claim about childhood education is false. His claim about romney's position on the auto industry is "half" true.(Which means false for those of you out there in reality/meatspace land.)

Biden asserted that Iran is being cripled by sanctions...and then they review a Romney statement? Not biden's? This is your "source" for truth? And notes "it's true that obama resisted Congress dictating the admin's strategy." Then hypothesizes that there's no support for asserting he could have gotten stronger ones, which is what Ryan was pointing out, Obama's lack of leadership. He didn't get stronger ones through the UN.(Circular logic?)

Bwaahahahahahaaaaa, what a joke that site is....

[No One Important]

senior citizen wrote:

<quoted text>
You had better look at America and what Obama is currently doing..

They have problems dealing with reality. The fact is, Romney stood up there, unfiltered, and looked like a successful leader, a successful businessman, ready to take control on day one.

Obama? He looked like what he was. A fly weight 1 term senator who arrogantly thought he could be a good president based alone on his opinions of himself and his ideas.

I do agree with Obama about one thing. He described himself as "arm candy" on The View.

And that's exactly what he looked like. As empty, vacuous and economically illiterate as "arm candy."

So I can finally say, Obama and I finally agree on something.(grin)

Mwaaaahahahahaaa!

[No One Important]

Anyone else find it amazing that Obama, after four years in office - didn't have a single economic factoid memorized other than his lame marketing talking points?

Then again, he's spent the last 2 years acting like "Kardashian" Obama flitting from one inane talk show to another like he was humpin' some fad diet book.

And that's what he looked like in the debate. Romney was debating a "Kardashian." Economically illiterate. Even a 5 year old could have understood what Romney was explaining, and yet, this supposed "brilliant professor" couldn't understand basic econ 101.