The Harmful Psychiatric Drugging Of Children
Vancouver September 5, 2013 - The Harmful Psychiatric Drugging Of Children 20 million children are labeled with "mental disorders" that are based solely on a checklist of behaviors.
Join the discussion below, or Read more at I-Newswire.com.
#1 Sep 8, 2013
We have to do away with the single judge and jury method of law in favor of a jury trial for each and every incident involving social issues.
Remember the judge and the sentencing of children to psychiatric facilities and arresting parents for abuse of the child based on the hearsay of the mental health industry with political and financial interests of the mental health Industry.. Has to stop.
Here is the agenda of the Mental Health in the take over of the Judiciary Branch of government (by state) on the problem the industry caused in the USA.(Drug America) This is a similar takeover to what happen in the Public School System.
Mental Health Court by State links
#2 Sep 8, 2013
US Kids Represent Psychiatric Drug Goldmine
Column: Evelyn Pringle
Prescriptions for psychiatric drugs increased 50 percent with children in the US, and 73 percent among adults, from 1996 to 2006, according to a study in the May/June 2009 issue of the journal Health Affairs. Another study in the same issue of Health Affairs found spending for mental health care grew more than 30 percent over the same ten-year period, with almost all of the increase due to psychiatric drug costs.
Pasted from < http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0912/S00122.... ;
#3 Sep 8, 2013
Why your kid is drugged in school
How it works:
The State Department of Education gets monies from the Federal Government (Disability) under a program called "IDEA" for each child diagnosed with a disability. A disability could be ADD/ADHD, Bi-polar disorder, Depression or any of the other mental diagnoses.
Who profits: The State Department of Education, the mental health and counseling Industry, the Pharmaceutical company and the money that is kicked back by lobbyists for politicians special interest and of course the legal profession.
All this at the cost of your child's Health and welfare.
IDEA" Final Regulation (part 1 of 2)
300.7 Child with a disability.
(1) As used in this part, the term child with a disability means a child evaluated in accordance with §§300.530-300.536 as having mental retardation, a hearing impairment including deafness, a speech or language impairment, a visual impairment including blindness, serious emotional disturbance (hereafter referred to as emotional disturbance), an orthopedic impairment, autism, traumatic brain injury, an other health impairment, a specific learning disability, deaf-blindness, or multiple disabilities, and who, by reason thereof, needs special education and related services.
(i) The term means a condition exhibiting one or more of the following characteristics over a long period of time and to a marked degree that adversely affects a child's educational performance:
(A) An inability to learn that cannot be explained by intellectual, sensory, or health factors.
(B) An inability to build or maintain satisfactory interpersonal relationships with peers and teachers.
(C) Inappropriate types of behavior or feelings under normal circumstances.
(D) A general pervasive mood of unhappiness or depression.
(E) A tendency to develop physical symptoms or fears associated with personal or school problems.
(ii) The term includes schizophrenia. The term does not apply to children who are socially maladjusted, unless it is determined that they have an emotional disturbance.
9) Other health impairment means having limited strength, vitality or alertness, including a heightened alertness to environmental stimuli, that results in limited alertness with respect to the educational environment, that-
(i) Is due to chronic or acute health problems such as asthma, attention deficit disorder or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, diabetes, epilepsy, a heart condition, hemophilia, lead poisoning, leukemia, nephritis, rheumatic fever, and sickle cell anemia; and
(ii) Adversely affects a child's educational performance
§300.24 Related services.
(a) General. As used in this part, the term related services means transportation and such developmental, corrective, and other supportive services as are required to assist a child with a disability.
(9) Psychological services includes-
(i) Administering psychological and educational tests, and other assessment procedures;
(ii) Interpreting assessment results;
(iii) Obtaining, integrating, and interpreting information about child behavior and conditions relating to learning;
(iv) Consulting with other staff members in planning school programs to meet the special needs of children as indicated by psychological tests, interviews, and behavioral evaluations;
(v) Planning and managing a program of psychological services, including psychological counseling for children and parents; and
(vi) Assisting in developing positive behavioral intervention strategies.
#4 Sep 8, 2013
IDEA (2 of 2)
§300.26 Special education.
(1) As used in this part, the term special education means specially designed instruction, at no cost to the parents, to meet the unique needs of a child with a disability, including-
(i) Instruction conducted in the classroom, in the home, in hospitals and institutions, and in other settings; and
(ii) Instruction in physical education.
(2) The term includes each of the following, if it meets the requirements of paragraph (a)(1) of this section:
(i) Speech-language pathology services, or any other related service, if the service is considered special education rather than a related service under State standards;
(ii) Travel training; and
(iii) Vocational education.
(3) Specially-designed instruction means adapting, as appropriate to the needs of an eligible child under this part, the content, methodology, or delivery of instruction-
(i) To address the unique needs of the child that result from the child's disability; and
(ii) To ensure access of the child to the general curriculum, so that he or she can meet the educational standards within the jurisdiction of the public agency that apply to all children.
§300.110 Condition of assistance.
(a) A State is eligible for assistance under Part B of the Act for a fiscal year if the State demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Secretary that the State has in effect policies and procedures to ensure that it meets the conditions in §§300.121-300.156.
State EligibilitySpecific Conditions
§300.121 Free appropriate public education (FAPE).
(a) General. Each State must have on file with the Secretary information that shows that, subject to §300.122, the State has in effect a policy that ensures that all children with disabilities aged 3 through 21 residing in the State have the right to FAPE, including children with disabilities who have been suspended or expelled from school.
§300.154 Maintenance of State financial support.
(a) General. The State must have on file with the Secretary information to demonstrate, on either a total or per-capita basis, that the State will not reduce the amount of State financial support for special education and related services for children with disabilities, or otherwise made available because of the excess costs of educating those children, below the amount of that support for the preceding fiscal year.
(b) Reduction of funds for failure to maintain support. The Secretary reduces the allocation of funds under section 611 of the Act for any fiscal year following the fiscal year in which the State fails to comply with the requirement of paragraph
FREE APPROPRIATE PUBLIC EDUCATION
#5 Sep 8, 2013
Watch Out for Mental Health Screening
Pasted from < http://www.mindfreedom.org/campaign/usa/usa-p... ;
#6 Sep 8, 2013
Prozac / Ritalin lined up at door with armed NAZI guards
#7 Sep 8, 2013
The Judiciary added under the Reagan / Bush presidency the "Family Law Court that incorporated the Guardian Ad Litem programs. The court hearings were held under a secular judge making decisions that always included Mental Health along with counseling. Further, the oversight of the Judiciary with the Mental Health Industry trampled on the civil rights of the individual under the 1st and 5 amendments by making the defendant (under court order) violate his / her rights to free speech or lack there of and his/her Privacy Issues. The most concerning of the civil rights violation were under the self incrimination issues.. particular under the criminal procedures. It should be noted that the mental Health Industry has no science. No medical model and no evidence based medicine to be placed in the the medical sciences. Today we have the Drug court created by the drugging of America and the new Mental Health Court with the attempts to license psychologist to dispense mind drugs nationwide.
The expenditures based on 70 percent Mental Health disability and the VA Mental Health disability along with the costs of prescription "mind" medication is the largest health cost to the taxpayer and most likely has led to the financial healthcare problem we have today.
Under the skirt of the health-care issues are the Republicans and the New World Order.
#8 Sep 8, 2013
The (APA) DSM-V is the future version of the Mein Kampf.
Bombs and bullets will be replaced with mind drugs and psychotherapy (false memory) in future generations.
That's certainly what Aldus Huxley predicted with his fictional Soma and it came true
#9 Sep 8, 2013
U.S. judges admit to jailing children for money
PHILADELPHIA | Thu Feb 12, 2009 5:36pm EST
(Reuters)- Two judges pleaded guilty on Thursday to accepting more than $2.6 million from a private youth detention center in Pennsylvania in return for giving hundreds of youths and teenagers long sentences.
Pasted from < http://www.reuters.com/article/2009/02/12/us-... ;
Judges Mark Ciavarella and Michael Conahan of the Court of Common Pleas in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, entered plea agreements in federal court in Scranton admitting that they took payoffs from PA Childcare and a sister company, Western PA Childcare, between 2003 and 2006.
"Your statement that I have disgraced my judgeship is true," Ciavarella wrote in a letter to the court. "My actions have destroyed everything I worked to accomplish and I have only myself to blame."
Conahan, who along with Ciavarella faces up to seven years in prison, did not make any comment on the case.
When someone is sent to a detention center, the company running the facility receives money from the county government to defray the cost of incarceration. So as more children were sentenced to the detention center, PA Childcare and Western PA Childcare received more money from the government, prosecutors said.
Teenagers who came before Ciavarella in juvenile court often were sentenced to detention centers for minor offenses that would typically have been classified as misdemeanors, according to the Juvenile Law Center, a Philadelphia nonprofit group.
One 17-year-old boy was sentenced to three months' detention for being in the company of another minor caught shoplifting.
Others were given similar sentences for "simple assault" resulting from a schoolyard scuffle that would normally draw a warning, a spokeswoman for the Juvenile Law Center said.
The Constitution guarantees the right to legal representation in U.S. courts. But many of the juveniles appeared before Ciavarella without an attorney because they were told by the probation service that their minor offenses didn't require one.
Marsha Levick, chief counsel for the Juvenile Law Center, estimated that of approximately 5,000 juveniles who came before Ciavarella from 2003 and 2006, between 1,000 and 2,000 received excessively harsh detention sentences. She said the center will sue the judges, PA Childcare and Western PA Childcare for financial compensation for their victims.
"That judges would allow their greed to trump the rights of defendants is just obscene," Levick said.
The judges attempted to hide their income from the scheme by creating false records and routing payments through intermediaries, prosecutors said.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court removed Ciavarella and Conahan from their duties after federal prosecutors filed charges on January 26. The court has also appointed a judge to review all the cases involved.
Pasted from < http://www.reuters.com/article/2009/02/12/us-... ;
United States of America v. Mark Ciavarella, Jr. and Michael Conahan
Middle District of Pennsylvania Docket Number 3:CR-09-00028
Pasted from < http://www.justice.gov/usao/pam/Victim_Witnes... ;
#10 Sep 8, 2013
Establishing State Mental Health Courts
There is no science and there has never been a cure for mental illness.
There is no medical model. No evidence based medicine and the Mental Health / Pharmaceutical industry lied about Chemical imbalance to drug the population. There is no imaging (MRI) to declare a defective brain from a normal brain.
The Mental Health Industry is political and based on hearsay. The court shouldn't except hearsay.
Psychiatry is fake science. The Thud Experiment proof.
Pasted from <
Psychiatry "No Science"
Psychiatry: An Industry of Death, Introduction
#11 Sep 8, 2013
Violence, Deaths Murders and Suicides from mind drugs.
#12 Sep 8, 2013
Psychiatric Diagnosis: Too Little Science, Too Many Conflicts of Interest [i]
Paula J. Caplan, Ph.D.
There is a lot of pain and suffering in the world, and it is tempting to believe that the mental health community knows how to help. It is widely believed, both by mental health professionals and the general population, that if only a person gets the right psychiatric diagnosis, the therapist will know what kind of measures will be the most helpful. Unfortunately, that is not usually the case, and getting a psychiatric diagnosis can often create more problems than it solves, including a lifetime of being labeled, difficulties with obtaining affordable (or any) health insurance (due to now having a pre-existing condition), loss of employment, loss of child custody, the overlooking of physical illnesses and injuries because of everything being attributed to psychological factors, and the loss of the right to make decisions about ones medical and legal affairs. The creation and use of psychiatric diagnosis, unlike, for instance, psychiatric drugs, is not overseen by any regulatory body, and rarely does anyone raise the question of what role the assignment of a psychiatric label has played in creating problems for individuals.[ii]
The Problematic History
These serious limitations have not prevented the authors of the American Psychiatric Associations (APA) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), sometimes known as the therapists Bible, from making expansive claims about their knowledge and authority and wielding enormous power to decide who will and will not be called mentally ill and what the varieties of alleged mental illness will be. The DSMs current edition is called DSM-IV-TR, and it was preceded by the original DSM (in 1952), then DSM-II (1968), DSM-III (1980), DSM-III-R (Third Edition Revised)(1987), DSM-IV (1994), and DSM-IV-TR (2000). The DSM-V is currently in preparation and slated for 2013 publication. Each time a new edition appears, the media ask whichever psychiatrist is the lead editor why a new edition was necessary, and like clockwork, each editor replies that it was because the previous edition really wasnt scientific (Caplan, 1995). And each time a new edition appears, it contains many more categories than does the previous one. For instance, DSM-III-R contained 297 categories, and DSM-IV contained 374 (Caplan, 1995).
I served as an advisor to two of the DSM-IV committees, before resigning due to serious concerns after witnessing how fast and loose they play with the scientific research related to diagnosis (Caplan, 1995). The DSM is widely used, not only in the mental health system, but also in general medical practice, in schools, and in the courts. I have been involved since 1985 in trying to alert both therapists and the public to the manuals unscientific nature and the dangers that believing in its objectivity poses. Since then, I have watched with interest a national trend toward gradually increasing openness to the idea that psychiatric diagnosis (A)is largely unscientific,(B)is highly subjective and political, and (C)can cause untold harm, ranging from the patients lowered self-confidence to loss of custody of children to loss of health insurance (because any psychiatric label can be considered evidence of a pre-existing condition) to loss of the right to make decisions about their medical and legal affairs.
More of this article:
#13 Sep 8, 2013
Beware of the Behavior clinics and the mind drugging of children and the forced judicial process along with the school system threatening parents under teen screen.
Take note to the Massachusetts and Connecticut Hospitals setting up a hospital treatment for Web Addiction. Goes hand and hand with the judicial courts (ALEC driven)to suppress free speech by the internet.
People are not going to a hospital on their own to be mind drugged.
#14 Sep 8, 2013
Considering the Behavior clinic and forced psychiatry by the court or Social Services and the education system and with consideration of public investment... one shouldn't oversight the newest means of the political suppression of speech or lack there of considering the internet.
State something or write something wrong on the internet ( in the opinion of the DSM 5) or some clown from a mental health corporation, the Court, School system and the Social Services of each State (considering Telemarketing Psychiatry to increase mental health services for the court ... any state) have a ligament place to deal with socially deviant behavior by their opinion in a hospital with mind drugs for profit
Scary considering the NAZI state of mind with KGB tactics being used.
#15 Sep 8, 2013
Pennsylvania hospital to open country's first inpatient treatment program for Internet addiction
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/science/2013/09/01/pen...
Political suppression of speech by the internet
#17 Sep 24, 2013
I have ordered 2 times from this website PILLSMEDSHOP. COM . I called yesterday the customer care and asked for a discount as i was about to order twice the regular amount.
Add your comments below
|Drug overuse||12 hr||Humanspirit||2|
|HIV Epidemic Strikes an Indiana County (Apr '15)||Sun||Hgfd||20|
|5 Oroville Dam workers fired after posting pict...||Feb 25||scooterman||4|
|Obama Dozed - People Froze AKA Obama's Katrina (Feb '09)||Feb 24||Jaydon||2,068|
|Minor earthquake hits off B.C. coast||Feb 23||local resident||1|
|They paid premiums, so why must they fight for ...||Feb 22||Tea Bag Residue C...||2|
|Michigan Lawmakers consider going after 'Pill M...||Feb 21||Faith||2|
Find what you want!
Search Natural Disasters Forum Now
Copyright © 2017 Topix LLC