"Climate Change Castaways" Have Long Years To Wait

Jan 7, 2012 Full story: Right Wing News

This story jumped up and hit me when I took my morning perusal of Memeorandum , seeing what the big stories of the day are, so, I didn't have to hunt around for an unhinged Warmist story THE President of what could be the first country in the world lost to climate change has urged Australia to prepare for a mass wave of climate refugees seeking a ... (more)

Full Story
Jennifer

Poland

#1 Jan 11, 2012
So if an island nation is submerged beneath the ocean, does it maintain its membership in the United Nations? Who is responsible for the citizens? Do they travel on its passport? Who claims and enforces offshore mineral and fishing rights in waters around a submerged nation? International law currently has no answers to such questions.
United Nations Ambassador Phillip Muller of the Marshall Islands said there is no sense of urgency to find not only those answers, but also to address the causes of climate change, which many believe to be responsible for rising ocean levels.
“Even if we reach a legal agreement sometime soon, which I don’t think we will, the major players are not in the process,” Muller said.
Those players, the participants said, include industrial nations such as the United States and China that emit the most carbon dioxide and other so-called greenhouse gases. Many climate scientists say those gases are responsible for global warming. Mary-Elena Carr of Columbia University’s Earth Institute said what is now an annual sea level rise of a few millimeters will increase dramatically by the year 2100.“The biggest challenge is to preserve their nationality without a territory,” said Bogumil Terminski from Geneva. International legal experts are discovering climate change law, and the Pacific island nation of Tuvalu is a case in point: The Polynesian archipelago is doomed to disappear beneath the ocean. Now lawyers are asking what sort of rights citizens have when their homeland no longer exists.
t present, however, there appear to be at least three possibilities that could advance the international debate about ‘climate refugee’ protections and fill existing gaps in international law.
The first option is to revise the 1951 Convention on the Status of Refugees to include climate (or environmental) refugees and to offer legal protections similar to those for refugees fleeing political persecution. A second, more ambitious option is to negotiate a completely new convention, one that would try to guarantee specific rights and protections to climate or environmental ‘refugees`.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Memeorandum Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Sandra Fluke's biggest donor is ... Sandra Fluke Aug '14 Responsibility 2
Troubled Life in Malcolm X's Shadow Comes to a ... (May '13) May '13 one less black punk 3
Professor blames mass shootings on 'white male ... (Jan '13) May '13 lux 5
Is Barack Obama America's Most Dishonest Politi... (Sep '12) Sep '12 You are a fool 1
Obama Is Likely Getting the Monetary Policy He ... (Sep '12) Sep '12 Janice 1
Obama has investments in companies that ship jo... (Jul '12) Jul '12 Really 1
Sanford, Fla., explains why George Zimmerman wa... (Mar '12) Jul '12 awtfyo 40
More from around the web