Websleuths is corrupt

“WAX ON”

Since: Jul 10

WAX OFF

#233 Mar 13, 2013
We love newbies if they know the case and can discuss it with some semblance of intelligence. So far that hasn't happened with you, but you could join in anytime you want to admit the error of your ways. LOL!
mee wrote:
<quoted text>and there you go again...you really dont like 'newbies' do you?? shame on you bully..
mee

Epsom, UK

#234 Mar 13, 2013
DrSeussMd wrote:
We love newbies if they know the case and can discuss it with some semblance of intelligence. So far that hasn't happened with you, but you could join in anytime you want to admit the error of your ways. LOL!
<quoted text>
error of my ways..you mean say i think the ramseys done it and agree with everything you say....sorry no..

“WAX ON”

Since: Jul 10

WAX OFF

#235 Mar 13, 2013
I would never ask you to say "the Ramseys 'done' it, LOL. My grammar is better than that.
mee

Epsom, UK

#236 Mar 13, 2013
DrSeussMd wrote:
I would never ask you to say "the Ramseys 'done' it, LOL. My grammar is better than that.
good for you einstien...

“WAX ON”

Since: Jul 10

WAX OFF

#237 Mar 13, 2013
That would be EinstEIn.
mee

Epsom, UK

#238 Mar 13, 2013
DrSeussMd wrote:
That would be EinstEIn.
haha..i dont claim to be a grammer nazi..

“WAX ON”

Since: Jul 10

WAX OFF

#239 Mar 13, 2013
Good thing because it wouldn't be believable!

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#240 Mar 13, 2013
Capricorn wrote:
<quoted text>
Hi Sam,
Sound advice for everyone LOL
Hello, Capricorn! Long time, no type. This topic is really not my bag, but I check in once in a while. This 'mee' entity was too incredible to ignore - very funny, unintentionally! You guys really think that was previously banned? Can't be Ole South, too succinct and doesn't ramble on about cats, personal ailments and the like (!)- message me and tell me who you think it is that has risen from the tomb. Don't try to tell me it is 'Ohn-ree McP'! That lunatic would NEVER be able to create a post shorter than a graduate thesis if its very life depended upon it. Location says UK, tho...
berrytea333

Saint Louis, MO

#245 Feb 8, 2017
I was put in time out for paying someone a compliment. (And what I said didn't have any profanity or name-calling.)

Since: Dec 14

Location hidden

#246 Feb 9, 2017
berrytea333 wrote:
I was put in time out for paying someone a compliment.(And what I said didn't have any profanity or name-calling.)
What were you talking about Berry? Why would anyone ever even think a compliment would contain any profanity or name-calling? I take it you were not exactly being genuine, lol!
Non-state Actor

United States

#248 Feb 9, 2017
Whatever faults it may or may not have, websleuths is still the best site where you can discuss this case. Having said that, I haven't checked it in 2 or 3 weeks since posting here on a regular basis. I just don't see the need to post on multiple sites at the same time about the same thing....no offense to those who do.

One thing I like here is that its much less active than websleuths. Doesn't take one or two hours just to read the latest discussions. One thing(and its a biggie) that I hate here is how its not moderated. The quality of discussions here is really out of whack. YOu can have a good discussion going and it can immediately turn to shit.

Since: Dec 14

Location hidden

#249 Feb 9, 2017
Non-state Actor wrote:
Whatever faults it may or may not have, websleuths is still the best site where you can discuss this case. Having said that, I haven't checked it in 2 or 3 weeks since posting here on a regular basis. I just don't see the need to post on multiple sites at the same time about the same thing....no offense to those who do.

One thing I like here is that its much less active than websleuths. Doesn't take one or two hours just to read the latest discussions. One thing(and its a biggie) that I hate here is how its not moderated. The quality of discussions here is really out of whack. YOu can have a good discussion going and it can immediately turn to shit.
I agree with that although I think not being freely able to discuss other possible to without being censored or having to post coded names is nice. Sometimes I feel moderation being so difficult to do, sometimes limits the conversation. I think they do a great job a Websleuths and I have seen here how no one watching has huge flaws but I wish there was a happy medium somewhere where only normal sane people posted.

Since: Dec 14

Location hidden

#250 Feb 9, 2017
Other possibilities not possible to
Non-state Actor

Long Beach, CA

#252 Feb 9, 2017
Went ahead and read this whole thread. Boy is it a doozy. Some classic Henri delusions in this discussion. Such as...

"It's Fleet White who is the psycho, in my opinion. Just because FW wrote some letters isn't proof of anything. I appeal to the people of Colorado on this public forum to INVESTIGATE what Nancy Krebs had to say about FW. "

and...

"John Ramsey has also atempted, at great expense to himself, to find the killer...."

and...

" John Mark Karr, who might have been involved as accomplices to the killer,..."

and...

"I have always regarded the Nancy Krebs information as crucial."

Here's some 100% pure Henri lunacy....

"Personally, I suspect that Lou Smit knew Fleet White did it, but that after he left the investigation in 1998 he came to an arrangement with the then Head of Security at Lockheed Martin..."

and...

"There could have been wild parties arranged by Fleet White for Lockheed Martin..."

You need to be in therapy. Your obsession with Fleet that goes back at least 15 years is disturbing. How anyone could research and follow this case for so long yet have the opinions posted above doesn't know their asshole from their elbow.

Even if it was a con ala Jameson and AK...its still disturbing. Those two don't focus on one person in particular(that's by design). You have a dartboard with Fleet's picture on it...always have and from the looks of it, always will.

Fleet is a crucial witness and a major part of the story yet you are so deep into your delusion that you bypass his actual involvement in the case for all this other nonsense. It's really bizarre.
Non-state Actor

Long Beach, CA

#253 Feb 9, 2017
This post from DrSeussMD describes IDI in general in a nutshell...

"You wouldn't listen if anyone sat here all day and listed facts for you. At the end of the day you would be back to square one saying the same thing over and over. It is a waste of time and an exercise in futility."
Non-state Actor

Long Beach, CA

#254 Feb 10, 2017
Since this is a websleuths thread, I'll go ahead and list my favorite members for shits and giggles...

dave
UK
otg
DeDee
Tortoise
icedtea4me(his/her sense of humor goes over many heads)
Madeleine
reintarnation
HeyMom
DFF
BoldBear

Many others I like such as kanzz, tadpole, AndHence,etc.

I also like how Tricia keeps the drama to a minimum. Any drama would have to go on in PM so its easily avoidable.

I just now logged in for the first time in weeks. Almost 2 pages worth of threads and some have a couple dozen pages unread. No way in hell can I catch up on all that.
Just Wondering

Beckley, WV

#255 Feb 10, 2017
Non-state Actor wrote:
Went ahead and read this whole thread. Boy is it a doozy. Some classic Henri delusions in this discussion. Such as...

"It's Fleet White who is the psycho, in my opinion. Just because FW wrote some letters isn't proof of anything. I appeal to the people of Colorado on this public forum to INVESTIGATE what Nancy Krebs had to say about FW. "

and...

"John Ramsey has also atempted, at great expense to himself, to find the killer...."

and...

" John Mark Karr, who might have been involved as accomplices to the killer,..."

and...

"I have always regarded the Nancy Krebs information as crucial."

Here's some 100% pure Henri lunacy....

"Personally, I suspect that Lou Smit knew Fleet White did it, but that after he left the investigation in 1998 he came to an arrangement with the then Head of Security at Lockheed Martin..."

and...

"There could have been wild parties arranged by Fleet White for Lockheed Martin..."

You need to be in therapy. Your obsession with Fleet that goes back at least 15 years is disturbing. How anyone could research and follow this case for so long yet have the opinions posted above doesn't know their asshole from their elbow.

Even if it was a con ala Jameson and AK...its still disturbing. Those two don't focus on one person in particular(that's by design). You have a dartboard with Fleet's picture on it...always have and from the looks of it, always will.

Fleet is a crucial witness and a major part of the story yet you are so deep into your delusion that you bypass his actual involvement in the case for all this other nonsense. It's really bizarre.
After the initial clearing of the family in a crime like this, police would naturally turn to closest friends and domestic help in order to clear or indict them. It appears that the BPD did that with the exception of the family. They chased leads and investigated many, many people. They weren't just focused on the family, but it seems all their trails eventually led back to them. It was only Mary Lacy who felt she had the go ahead to "exonerate" the Ramseys. Most others in that department weren't so convinced.

If BPD had reason to believe Fleet White was a suspicious character, in order to prove their competency if for no other reason, they would never have stopped collecting incriminating evidence against him. They did sufficiently investigate the man!!! But they KNEW who their culprits were by the evidence and the lack of evidence. They just could not prove WHO in the family did WHAT that night.
kauna

United States

#257 Feb 10, 2017
DedRed wrote:
When he saw dead Joni isn't questioned.He doesn't offer time of his initial discovery. FW has deep seated fear of his involvement and needs enhanced interrogatory with NancyG. Or the broads on View.
Unless FW took kids caroling for Christmas, he should be worry free.
Right?

Since: Dec 14

Location hidden

#258 Feb 10, 2017
Just Wondering wrote:
<quoted text>

After the initial clearing of the family in a crime like this, police would naturally turn to closest friends and domestic help in order to clear or indict them. It appears that the BPD did that with the exception of the family. They chased leads and investigated many, many people. They weren't just focused on the family, but it seems all their trails eventually led back to them. It was only Mary Lacy who felt she had the go ahead to "exonerate" the Ramseys. Most others in that department weren't so convinced.

If BPD had reason to believe Fleet White was a suspicious character, in order to prove their competency if for no other reason, they would never have stopped collecting incriminating evidence against him. They did sufficiently investigate the man!!! But they KNEW who their culprits were by the evidence and the lack of evidence. They just could not prove WHO in the family did WHAT that night.
I agree. There was no case to be made against any of the numerous suspects they investigated, all of which have been cleared. Those include the names of EVERY suspect the Ramseys suggested to the BPD along with the countless other names that have been given to them as suspects from everyone involved in this case, and even the suspects suggested by nutty internet psychos who think they are the next Sherlock Holmes.
kauna

United States

#260 Feb 10, 2017
DedRed wrote:
FW caroling:"John grabbed me from the party. It was 1210. He wanted me to see something.I saw him drive out a few minutes earlier. "
"What did he show you?"
"The pantry door was broke. I used a kitchen knife to open it. I climbed to the bottom and Joni was lying dead in the nude under a lamp."
Thats not the posing of a body, yet.
My size barbie was the twin doll that night.
Awful late for a private show, ded.
Holiday closings leave private enterprises to flourish.
Construction site not too far either, by way the Fernie flies.
Who goes caroling at construction sites anyways.
Did she have her sax with her?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

JonBenet Ramsey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Officer French Field Report 7 min kauna 246
News 'Oh my gosh! Oh my gosh! Oh my gosh!': Burke Ra... 6 hr kauna 42
housekeeper a possible suspect (May '12) 8 hr kauna 170
JAR must have been beside himself when he heard... (Jan '16) 11 hr kauna 6
The Changing Stories of John Ramsey. :) 12 hr kauna 18
Music for the soul 12 hr kauna 366
News CBS' "The Case Of: JonBenet Ramsey" Premieres O... (Sep '16) 20 hr Latisha 954
More from around the web