First Prev
of 10
Next Last
outside

Livingston, TX

#1 Nov 10, 2010
Websleuths is a forum that claims to be looking for the truth about JonBenet's murder, but that is a lie. Websleuths accepts only certain ideas approved by Tricia. If your ideas go outside of that approved range, your ideas are rejected. If by chance, the truth lies outside of the approved range, there can never be a solution and the good posters at Websleuths are spinning their wheels for nothing. I have been banned from websleuths because I wrote.
ďMy posts and ideas are censored and removed from the Websleuths forum repeatedly. So, if you are looking to them for ideas you will get a limited range.Ē
The reason they gave me for banishment is because of this criticism. Do not believe for one moment that all ideas are explored! If you would like to see my ideas that have been censored at Websleuths, go to:
www.angelfire.com/planet/check/burke.html
Mame

Chicago, IL

#2 Nov 10, 2010
Welcome to The Third World Country of Tricia....

Where free speech, critical thinking and independent thought and FAIRNESS is never considered.

“WAX ON”

Since: Jul 10

WAX OFF

#3 Nov 10, 2010
Sounds like sour grapes all the way around to me, One because they got banned and the other because they would never be let in. It is what's known as a win/win.
candy

East Lansing, MI

#4 Nov 10, 2010
Come on TC! It's hardly the first time you've dealt with this with you're theory. Remember that letter you posted when Lin Wood was looking for your address to sue you? And that they were after Yahoo for years to take down your theory, and Yahoo wouldn't budge? Yahoo, or someone else strongly grounded in the First Amendment is about the only place you've er going to not be hassled about "that" theory.
Henri McPhee

Bradford, UK

#6 Nov 10, 2010
Anybody who suggests that Fleet White might be involved in the JonBenet murder seems to be immediately banned on Forums for Justice and Websleuths.

There used to be a poster on Websleuths called, I think Holdontoyourhat, who I always thought posted sense on Websleuths. I don't know who he or she was but it always amazed me that there was no banning of that poster. It must have been a bit lonely there.

“WAX ON”

Since: Jul 10

WAX OFF

#7 Nov 10, 2010
There used to be a poster here called 'undertheradar" that maligned RW and was banned too. What is your point Henri? When innocent people don't like to see their names smeared on the internet, they take action against it. I see the Ramseys haven't sued anyone, ever wonder why?
Henri McPhee wrote:
Anybody who suggests that Fleet White might be involved in the JonBenet murder seems to be immediately banned on Forums for Justice and Websleuths.
There used to be a poster on Websleuths called, I think Holdontoyourhat, who I always thought posted sense on Websleuths. I don't know who he or she was but it always amazed me that there was no banning of that poster. It must have been a bit lonely there.

“WAX ON”

Since: Jul 10

WAX OFF

#8 Nov 10, 2010
I meant to add they haven't sued any internet posters. Jameson used to ban anyone who mentioned the Ramseys in a tainted light. What's the difference?
Capricorn

Brooklyn, NY

#9 Nov 10, 2010
I don't understand what the hoopla is about. A privately owned forum such as Websleuths and all the others have their own personal set of rules.

Posting on forums is not a "right". You look at the tos, the rules and the flavor of the forum.

If you don't like the rules, it is really a simple solution....post elsewhere where you do like the rules and the flavor

Jameson forbid any discussion of Burke and a few other people involved in the case. Those who wanted to discuss Burke or the Stines or anyone else that would not be welcomed there went elsewhere. It was Jameson's right to ban anyone she wanted. SHE OWNED THE FORUM

Owning and running one's own forum gives you the right to pick and choose who you want to post and the content

The same goes for posters. They can pick and choose what forum they want to post on.

Anyone who wants to post whatever and whenever they want should open their own forum

What's the sense of complaining on another forum about another forum? What do you hope to accomplish?
candy

East Lansing, MI

#10 Nov 10, 2010
For TC, I would send your info and theory to the Boulder Police. Forget about the internet, THEY run this case, and some or all of it may be of interest to them.
Biz

Pinellas Park, FL

#11 Nov 10, 2010
DrSeussMd wrote:
I meant to add they haven't sued any internet posters. Jameson used to ban anyone who mentioned the Ramseys in a tainted light. What's the difference?
No she didn't. There were posters who were RDI on Jameson's forum. She didn't put up with untruths about Burke. He was just a child. He couldn't protect himself and he didn't deserve the criticism. So she may have banned someone if they talked badly about Burke but that's it.
outside

Livingston, TX

#12 Nov 10, 2010
Candy,
I talked to Steve Thomas when he was working on the Ramsey investigation. He was already aware of my site. So, there is no need to contact them.

Capricorn
Websleuths claims to be searching for the killer of JonBenet. To me when you don't know the truth and then reject ideas, the claim that you are looking for the truth must be a lie. Years ago I use to post on Websleuths frequently. Then it was a good forum and you were allowed to post your ideas freely. It no longer is a good forum and there is no free exchange of ideas. Some people improve when criticized and that was my motive not hate or sour grapes.

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#14 Nov 10, 2010
Since itís a private forum, I think Tricia has the right to run it any way she wants, though I donít personally agree with her. Itís and RDI forum, thatís for sure. I donít think theyíre searching for the truth about what happened to JBR so much as they are posting to malign the Ramseys.

“May you all come home”

Since: Mar 07

safely Bless you all

#15 Nov 11, 2010
Derek Jeter Fan wrote:
Since itís a private forum, I think Tricia has the right to run it any way she wants, though I donít personally agree with her. Itís and RDI forum, thatís for sure. I donít think theyíre searching for the truth about what happened to JBR so much as they are posting to malign the Ramseys.
Anybody who owns a forum can run it any way they want. Tricia, Jameson and anyone else who owns a forum has the right to run it with the rules that they personally want to see enforced.

Jameson did not allow certain discussions and neither does Tricia. Why would you say that Tricia doesn't want to search for the truth? Do you feel the same way about Jameson? About other forum owners whose flavor is slanted one way or the other or only an RDI forum owner?

Seems to me that if you aren't happy on one forum, to go to another one. It's really very simple, but unfair to say a forum owner doesn't want the truth because they have some rules about the content.

“WAX ON”

Since: Jul 10

WAX OFF

#16 Nov 11, 2010
So you are familiar with all things done towards justice for a slain child by all the members of both of these forums over the years?
Derek Jeter Fan wrote:
Since itís a private forum, I think Tricia has the right to run it any way she wants, though I donít personally agree with her. Itís and RDI forum, thatís for sure. I donít think theyíre searching for the truth about what happened to JBR so much as they are posting to malign the Ramseys.
deb

Minneapolis, MN

#17 Nov 11, 2010
DrSeussMd wrote:
There used to be a poster here called 'undertheradar" that maligned RW and was banned too. What is your point Henri? When innocent people don't like to see their names smeared on the internet, they take action against it. I see the Ramseys haven't sued anyone, ever wonder why? <quoted text>
FW hasn't sued an internet poster, either. Nor has he sued NK -
ever wonder why?

Undertheradar did get taken to court by RW.
Biz

Pinellas Park, FL

#18 Nov 11, 2010
deb wrote:
<quoted text>
FW hasn't sued an internet poster, either. Nor has he sued NK -
ever wonder why?
Undertheradar did get taken to court by RW.
Yes, but the case was dropped against undertheradar too.
My theory on why FW hasn't filed a suit against NK is because it would embarrass his family and children. Plus he would be forced to testify and be subject to interrogation about the case.

“May you all come home”

Since: Mar 07

safely Bless you all

#19 Nov 11, 2010
deb wrote:
<quoted text>
FW hasn't sued an internet poster, either. Nor has he sued NK -
ever wonder why?
Undertheradar did get taken to court by RW.
Wonder why John Ramsey didn't sue her?

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#20 Nov 11, 2010
DrSeussMd wrote:
So you are familiar with all things done towards justice for a slain child by all the members of both of these forums over the years?<quoted text>
Yes. Done and not done.

“WAX ON”

Since: Jul 10

WAX OFF

#21 Nov 11, 2010
You know an awful lot of people then don't you? Combined, that would be a ballpark of about 33,000 people. I'm impressed.
Derek Jeter Fan wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes. Done and not done.

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#22 Nov 11, 2010
DrSeussMd wrote:
You know an awful lot of people then don't you? Combined, that would be a ballpark of about 33,000 people. I'm impressed.<quoted text>
Thanks.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 10
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

JonBenet Ramsey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Fleet and Priscilla White on Peter Boyles show ... 1 hr whadoouno 42
ICU2 's Child Trafficking 5 hr Legal__Eagle 18
JonBenet Investigation (Nov '11) Tue JBI 1,629
JonBenet Ramsey, DNA and the Phantom of Heilbronn Dec 22 Bakatari 6
The Forgotten Suspect Dec 22 Legal__Eagle 227
"Note-Free Case Discussion" Dec 22 Legal__Eagle 99
It always leads back to Burke (Oct '11) Dec 22 Capricorn 107
More from around the web