DNA again
First Prev
of 22
Next Last

Since: Oct 08

Grande Prairie, Canada

#444 Apr 20, 2013
Legal__Eagle wrote:
<quoted text>
Boulder or the surrounding area? Why do you try and soft-pedal and/or obfuscate the obvious truth?
The person would have had to have been IN THE HOME to kill JBR, not merely "in the surrounding area".
{{{sigh}}}
There’s no obfuscation.

This all goes back to Candy’s point, I quote: THEY HAD TO BE IN BOULDER AT THE TIME OF THE CRIME, it shortens the LIST as to who could have committed this crime, and it's MOST UNUSUAL it's never been matched, if you're betting it's an intruder's DNA.
The list – I am using Candy’s term – is composed of about three hundred thousand people.

How far away from the Ramseys house could a person drive in an hour? I have NO idea. From here, I could be out of the city in less than ten minutes if I drove in the right direction. So, I say “and surrounding area” to account for someone who was living maybe up to an hour drive away from the house. I’m pretty much saying the exact same thing that Candy’s saying.


AK

“If life gives you melons”

Since: Nov 06

You might be dyslexic

#445 Apr 20, 2013
Anti-K wrote:
<quoted text>
There’s no obfuscation.
This all goes back to Candy’s point, I quote: THEY HAD TO BE IN BOULDER AT THE TIME OF THE CRIME, it shortens the LIST as to who could have committed this crime, and it's MOST UNUSUAL it's never been matched, if you're betting it's an intruder's DNA.
The list – I am using Candy’s term – is composed of about three hundred thousand people.
How far away from the Ramseys house could a person drive in an hour? I have NO idea. From here, I could be out of the city in less than ten minutes if I drove in the right direction. So, I say “and surrounding area” to account for someone who was living maybe up to an hour drive away from the house. I’m pretty much saying the exact same thing that Candy’s saying.

AK
Ok thanks for the explanation. I just read back a couple of posts, I am not on the board much anymore and I didn't realize you were specifically relating to Candy's post and the "generality" of what DNA comprises the bulk of the database.

To your other point, Marc Klass always says with missing kids that the 'getaway' formula is a mile a minute, so I don't see where this would be any different.

Since: Oct 08

Grande Prairie, Canada

#446 Apr 20, 2013
No worries.


AK

Since: Oct 08

Grande Prairie, Canada

#449 Apr 27, 2013
learnin wrote:
<quoted text>
Here's another one for you.
FBI FACTOID: Child found dead in home. 90% of the time, it's parents or family member.
I've listed about 7 things which suggest familiarity. No one category indicates 100% familiarity, but, taken together, the 7 items present overwhelming evidence of familiarity.
If you really are leaning toward an intruder, you would do yourself a favor by looking heavily at a close acquaintance.
Reasons in support of a stranger as intruder/killer:
2 ˝ pages of handwriting: Although the author did take steps to discourage identification; for example, using materials from the house, using a sharpie, printing instead of writing; 2 ˝ pages of handwriting and linguistic evidence seems like a lot for someone to create if they were inside any reasonably constructed suspect circle. This speaks to me of someone who was confident that his handwriting and/or written work would never be looked at or considered.

DNA testing: So far, despite concerted effort and over 200 samples compared, no one has been matched to the panty/leggings CODIS samples. These 200 samples represent person known to have been or who could have been in recent contact with the victim up to the time of collection of said samples.

Investigation of persons known to family: Persons close to the family, business associates, etc. were investigated or looked at to determine if investigation was worthwhile and these investigations resulted in no reasonable suspect being revealed.

No conclusive evidence: While it can be said the killer had some familiarity with the Ramseys and/or the interior of the Ramsey home, the killer could have been familiarized himself with them and their home without their knowledge.

No motive: The Ramseys et. al know of no one who could have been motivated to commit this crime against them.
For these reasons I think that the killer was not someone that the Ramseys were familiar with and contend that an intruder was more likely a stranger to them.


AK

Since: Oct 08

Grande Prairie, Canada

#451 Apr 28, 2013
I know someone with degrees in engineering and physics who has done such calculations. I have his work but am not at liberty to share, I have the calculations for a simple fall, an enhanced fall, being slammed against an object and being struck with an object such as a golf club or bat (something that could be swung with speed).

If this child was injured by accident then it was a very strange accident and it involved being struck with an object with force and speed.


AK
Steve Eller

Brooklyn, NY

#452 Apr 28, 2013
I am amazed at some of the ingenious things I learn on this thread, in particular about what can happen when being struck with force and speed.
BrotherMoon

Denver, CO

#453 Apr 28, 2013
Anti-Krist wrote:
<quoted text>
For these reasons I think that the killer was not someone that the Ramseys were familiar with and contend that an intruder was more likely a Stranger to them.

AK
Sandy Stranger.

Since: Oct 08

Grande Prairie, Canada

#454 Apr 29, 2013
BrotherMoon wrote:
<quoted text>
Sandy Stranger.
LOL. Okay, I guess I set myself up for that one!
:)
...

AK

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 22
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

JonBenet Ramsey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Celine 1:1 quality sunglasses celine fashion ha... 2 hr Coppy 1
history of abuse... or her story of abuse 2 hr Blue Sage 23
small or sma4 11 hr rainbow 45
Possible clue to John's initial lack of involve... Sat rainbow 114
ICU2 's Child Trafficking (Dec '14) Fri ICU2 237
Laurence Smith book on JonBenet's murder Jul 31 candy 116
Jeffrey MacDonald Is Guilty (Sep '08) Jul 31 JTF 7,589
More from around the web