Whatever Hunter's thinking was it can be said his refusal to prosecute was backed up by the lack of evidence supporting the indictment.
Since: Jul 10
#22 Oct 30, 2013
you can certainly speculate that BM, but since you haven't seen the GJ stuff, you can't back that up. I think I am with L_E on this one because Hunter's past record of prosecuting cases is public knowledge, and public record. I also think money talks and perps walk in Boulder.
#23 Oct 30, 2013
I'm curious about something. I've seen "lack of evidence" given dozens of times as the reason Hunter didn't indict. I've read that 90% of the evidence has never been made public. So, how does the public actually know there wasn't (isn't) enough evidence to take the case to trial? Sorry, but, at this point, just saying it doesn't cut the mustard with me.
“Sandy Stranger killed JonBenet”
Since: Jan 08
Not Boulder, Co.
#24 Oct 30, 2013
A juror was quoted as saying "We didn't know who did what."
All the evidence they saw could not clear up who did what between John and Patsy.
Hunter could have proceeded with designs to clear that up in court, and I think Thomas wanted him to do just that, but he chose not to.
The indictment is rather nonspecific.
In my opinion Boulder LE kept trying to fit a sqaure peg into a round hole, meaning both parents invovled in an accident/cover-up when the evidence does not support that.
#25 Oct 30, 2013
I understand what you are saying yet it doesn't prove the statement about there not being enough evidence to take it to trial vs the Grand Jury issued a true bill of indictment on two people, two counts each.
I think the public is being asked to just swallow the "not enough evidence" statement. Since Hunter did not use what I understand to be the proper channel (take the true bill into court and sign off on it, one way or the other, by indictment or a motion to dismiss) it seems questionable to me that there isn't enough evidence. It seems more like trying to hide that the Grand Jury did, in fact, vote to indict.
There is a six-year-old little girl lying dead in her grave. Who killed her? It seems to me it would be better to take it to court, win, loose, or draw, and get on with it. Seems to me like JonBenet has become a cash cow instead of a little dead six-year-old child whose death didn't mean enough to take it to court and let the chips fall where they may.
Add your comments below
|Ransom Note vs Patsy's Writing||54 min||berrytea333||20|
|My theory||2 hr||Anti-K||1,559|
|Intruder theories ONLY||4 hr||Latisha||67|
|Missing Strand of Christmas Lights!||4 hr||Jolamom||7|
|Random thought about the Stines (Jan '15)||6 hr||DedRed||92|
|The Evil Super Family||6 hr||DedRed||708|
|ICU2 's Child Trafficking (Dec '14)||9 hr||DedRed||665|
|Patsy Ramsey x Christmas Day||18 hr||Spraguestephens||88|
Find what you want!
Search JonBenet Ramsey Forum Now
Copyright © 2017 Topix LLC