You might argue that the bruise is consistent with abuse, but it is not evidence of abuse and it is also consistent with many, more innocent explanations.<quoted text>
You can find it in this article yourself if the wood dust from peckering hasn't blinded you. You might question my POST but since this is the article where I found the quoted data, I suggest you do your own research and look it up without my leading you to the exact spot.
There was never an attempt to FACTUALLY connect the bruise seen on JB to abuse; it was pointed out to show the possibility does exist since several doctors who are experts in the field say that JB WAS BEING MOLESTED PRIOR TO HER MURDER and one of them pointed out that such bruising can indicate a child being sexually abused! Or is it to be dismissed simply because there is no direct, factual connection?(I'll have to remember that at other times, like how -- according to another RDI -- when Patsy lied to John's ex-girlfriend when girlfriend was stalking him, it shows she's mentally unbalanced! Which by the way, I suggest he PROVE FACTUALLY that that incident can be connected to his claim that Patsy was mentally unbalanced and give a source for it.)
You're welcome (in advance).