Thomas's leaks: The smoking gun

Thomas's leaks: The smoking gun

Posted in the JonBenet Ramsey Forum

First Prev
of 22
Next Last
candy

East Lansing, MI

#1 Nov 21, 2009
Those two key leaks to CSI England, about Fleet White not wiping JonBenet, and his complaint that Patsy should have told JonBenet not to just ask anyone to wipe her, AND the second, about JonBenet only wearing ONE ponytail over to the Whites are the smoking guns against him. NO WHERE is this info printed, YOU'RE BUSTED STEVE, AGAIN.
candy

East Lansing, MI

#2 Nov 21, 2009
"And Fleet White complained about that "toileting," too. He felt it was quite inappropriate of JB to ask him to tend to her. He thought Patsy should have taught JB that men do not tend to the toilet needs of young girls.

Yes, the police do take some anonymous things seriously, and yes, there is every indication that they thought the writer of the Shreveport letter did know JB, but I guess we'll never know for sure since the writer was too - whatever - to come forward.

deb the poster asked her:

CSIEngland wrote:
<quoted text>
And Fleet White complained about that "toileting," too. He felt it was quite inappropriate of JB to ask him to tend to her. He thought Patsy should have taught JB that men do not tend to the toilet needs of young girls.
Yes, the police do take some anonymous things seriously, and yes, there is every indication that they thought the writer of the Shreveport letter did know JB, but I guess we'll never know for sure since the writer was too - whatever - to come forward.
do you have a source stated FW complained about the "toileting"?

CSI posted: CSIEngland
“Step away from the frog!”

Joined: Aug 20, 2009

Comments: 1960

Bexley, Ohio

ISP: Columbus, OH
Reply »
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1277
Saturday Oct 17

deb wrote:
<quoted text>
Ah, where did you get this info??
Steve Thomas email, Deb. I know you don't trust what he says. That's fine. We all see things differently.

Even if I hadn't gotten it from him, I don't believe Fleet was involved. If he would have been, he would have chosen a more opportune time, with less chance of discovery. Though he had a key, he wouldn't have been able to explain his presence in the Ramsey house in the middle of the night. I think if Fleet would have been involved he would have had someone snatch JB on her way to or from school or all those lessons she took.

And his DNA is not a match.
and this:

thewhitewitchone wrote:
<quoted text>
What's your source for this, CSI? I've never heard it before.
I looked it up and it was actually ST email. I know not everyone believes what he says, and I certainly don't believe he was/is infallible.

But I don't believe Fleet White was involved in the murder of JBR.
Heloise

UK

#3 Nov 21, 2009
In fairness, Candy, CSI may have just made that up. It's no smoking gun against ST. Until it is somewhere else in the public domain, we don't even know it's true, let alone whether ST told CSI about it. She also says she has relatives who were at the White's party - you'd have to assume they would know how JBR wore her hair and about FW's feelings about JBR's toileting issues. There is nothing here to point to ST.

The reasonable doubt against her is that a) ST denies knowing wtf she is and b) she claims kinship with someone at the White's party so anything she does spout must be assumed to come from them.
candy

East Lansing, MI

#4 Nov 21, 2009
Quote: CSIEngland
“Sarah Palin, Go Home!”


Joined: Aug 20, 2009

Comments: 2786

Bexley, Ohio

ISP: Columbus, OH
Reply »
|Report Abuse |Judge it!|#107 Sunday Nov 1
Judged:
1
Okay, here are some of the answers some of you have been wanting:

All books are in the possession of the Ramsey family. None were kept as evidence.

A photo showing the Ramsey dictionary (no mention of the word "incest" was made in the answer I got, so I don't know about that) was a Ramsey photo, not a crime scene or police photo.

JonBenet wore her hair in one ponytail with the rest flowing loose to the Whites' dinner. Like she has it in the photos of her on the 23rd at her own home.(Obviously, someone restyled it after the party into two ponytails.)

I got this straight from the horse's mouth, so take it or leave it as you please.
Legal_Eagle

Roanoke, VA

#5 Nov 21, 2009
Posting what she said again, doesn't make it true Candy - you are truly not the brightest crayon in the box are you, LMAO.

If you need an example of this, in words of few syllables - Candy called me today, and I hung up on her!

Now, let me post it again - Candy called me today and I hung up on her.

There - it MUST BE TRUE!
candy

East Lansing, MI

#6 Nov 21, 2009
The cops have to figure out what they can do LEGALLY about Thomas, so he even HASN'T ALREADY cost them the case file again. They need to talk to the Attorney General about the unique situation they are in with him legally. They have no leverage as he quit, BUT he is leaking THEIR case file ILLEGALLY as ever. Their MUST be a way to punish him for it, and have the liability be HIS, NOT THE COPS. IF the Ramseys can use this to take away the case file again, THEY WILL.
Capricorn

Sag Harbor, NY

#7 Nov 21, 2009
thare she blows

It's gonna be a long night for Candy, crouching in the closet, leafing through the documents for something she can post from too many years ago, from some sideshow trial, with sideshow people, about issues we don't really care about, about issues and trials that didn't and still don't do anything to find justice for a murdered child, to find something to make ST look bad, blah blah

Do yourself a favor Candy, take a valium and go lie down
Legal_Eagle

Roanoke, VA

#8 Nov 21, 2009
Capricorn wrote:
thare she blows
It's gonna be a long night for Candy, crouching in the closet, leafing through the documents for something she can post from too many years ago, from some sideshow trial, with sideshow people, about issues we don't really care about, about issues and trials that didn't and still don't do anything to find justice for a murdered child, to find something to make ST look bad, blah blah
Do yourself a favor Candy, take a valium and go lie down
I'll be her widdle fax machine is overheating, poor baby. I'm going to one-up you Cappy -(and I generally would never do that), but Do US a favor Candy, take a Valium and lie down.
(Sorry Cappy, I just had to, LMAO)
Legal_Eagle

Roanoke, VA

#9 Nov 21, 2009
correction:
I'll BET her widdle fax machines is overheating.
Shill it like it is

Anaheim, CA

#10 Nov 21, 2009
Legal_Eagle wrote:
Posting what she said again, doesn't make it true Candy - you are truly not the brightest crayon in the box are you, LMAO.
If you need an example of this, in words of few syllables - Candy called me today, and I hung up on her!
Now, let me post it again - Candy called me today and I hung up on her.
There - it MUST BE TRUE!
Funny how that logic holds true for the National Inquirer and all those sleaze ball tabloids that printed stories on the case.
Shill it like it is

Anaheim, CA

#11 Nov 21, 2009
Heloise wrote:
In fairness, Candy, CSI may have just made that up.
Amazing how long it took RDI to figure this out.
koldkase

Lawrenceville, GA

#12 Nov 21, 2009
candy wrote:
Those two key leaks to CSI England, about Fleet White not wiping JonBenet, and his complaint that Patsy should have told JonBenet not to just ask anyone to wipe her, AND the second, about JonBenet only wearing ONE ponytail over to the Whites are the smoking guns against him. NO WHERE is this info printed, YOU'RE BUSTED STEVE, AGAIN.
If this info is NOT PUBLIC, then how do you know about it, FOOL?

Prove it's true, or else, it's GOSSIP.

So either YOU'RE lying, or YOU are LEAKING INFO! Stupid jealous groupie!
koldkase

Lawrenceville, GA

#13 Nov 21, 2009
Heloise wrote:
In fairness, Candy, CSI may have just made that up. It's no smoking gun against ST. Until it is somewhere else in the public domain, we don't even know it's true, let alone whether ST told CSI about it. She also says she has relatives who were at the White's party - you'd have to assume they would know how JBR wore her hair and about FW's feelings about JBR's toileting issues. There is nothing here to point to ST.
The reasonable doubt against her is that a) ST denies knowing wtf she is and b) she claims kinship with someone at the White's party so anything she does spout must be assumed to come from them.
Not to mention, JUST YESTERDAY CSI said she TALKED TO THOMAS ON THE PHONE and got the info, not in emails.

Thanks, gutter candy, for posting those to refresh everyone's memory of what a LIAR CSI is.
koldkase

Lawrenceville, GA

#14 Nov 21, 2009
Legal_Eagle wrote:
Posting what she said again, doesn't make it true Candy - you are truly not the brightest crayon in the box are you, LMAO.
If you need an example of this, in words of few syllables - Candy called me today, and I hung up on her!
Now, let me post it again - Candy called me today and I hung up on her.
There - it MUST BE TRUE!
Go for the Witness Protection Program. NOW!
koldkase

Lawrenceville, GA

#15 Nov 21, 2009
candy wrote:
The cops have to figure out what they can do LEGALLY about Thomas, so he even HASN'T ALREADY cost them the case file again. They need to talk to the Attorney General about the unique situation they are in with him legally. They have no leverage as he quit, BUT he is leaking THEIR case file ILLEGALLY as ever. Their MUST be a way to punish him for it, and have the liability be HIS, NOT THE COPS. IF the Ramseys can use this to take away the case file again, THEY WILL.
Hey, maybe they can get the CIA and FBI to arrest Thomas and charge him with being stalked by crazy people! You should get right on that, gutter candy! Call them! I'm sure you have them on speed dial!

By the way, did you get the death penalty for Britney Spears' and Lindsey Lohan's mom yet? Are they going to let you do the honors?
Heloise

UK

#16 Nov 22, 2009
candy wrote:
The cops have to figure out what they can do LEGALLY about Thomas, so he even HASN'T ALREADY cost them the case file again. They need to talk to the Attorney General about the unique situation they are in with him legally. They have no leverage as he quit, BUT he is leaking THEIR case file ILLEGALLY as ever. Their MUST be a way to punish him for it, and have the liability be HIS, NOT THE COPS. IF the Ramseys can use this to take away the case file again, THEY WILL.
Actually, Candy, you mentioned the possibility of the case being taken back to the DA's office as soon as CSI posted ST's 'replies' to her questions. I'm not sure that this attempt to make it look like ST is leaking information isn't all part of attempt to do that and I am pretty sure I know who is behind it, too (although that is largely circumstantial).
Heloise

UK

#17 Nov 22, 2009
candy wrote:
Quote: CSIEngland
“Sarah Palin, Go Home!”
Joined: Aug 20, 2009
Comments: 2786
Bexley, Ohio
ISP: Columbus, OH
Reply »
|Report Abuse |Judge it!|#107 Sunday Nov 1
Judged:
1
Okay, here are some of the answers some of you have been wanting:
All books are in the possession of the Ramsey family. None were kept as evidence.
A photo showing the Ramsey dictionary (no mention of the word "incest" was made in the answer I got, so I don't know about that) was a Ramsey photo, not a crime scene or police photo.
JonBenet wore her hair in one ponytail with the rest flowing loose to the Whites' dinner. Like she has it in the photos of her on the 23rd at her own home.(Obviously, someone restyled it after the party into two ponytails.)
I got this straight from the horse's mouth, so take it or leave it as you please.
Thank you for refreshing our memories about that, Candy. CSI says,'A photo showing the Ramsey dictionary (no mention of the word "incest" was made in the answer I got, so I don't know about that) was a Ramsey photo, not a crime scene or police photo.
JonBenet wore her hair in one ponytail with the rest flowing loose to the Whites' dinner'.

>>No mention of the word 'incest' was made in the answer I got.

This sounds like a reference to an e mail reply than a verbal conversation.
candy

East Lansing, MI

#18 Nov 22, 2009
I hope the media picks up this story, and investigates the facts about Thomas and these specific leaks for themselves. The public has a right to know, they have a right to know about how he has leaked and lied for the last 13 years, how he lied his way out of getting fired over Vanity Fair leaks, how he's thrown people under the bus to get out of responsiblity for his own actions, how he paid off the Ramseys via his publisher to get of their lawsuit against him, how the Ramseys used his leaks to get the case file moved to the District Attorney's office, why Fox News dropped him as a witness in their case, and the public has a right to know every single word and every single dollar he paid via his publisher to the Ramseys, so all the facts are on the table that should know about.

“Sarah Palin, Go Home!”

Since: Aug 09

Bexley, Ohio

#19 Nov 22, 2009
candy wrote:
Those two key leaks to CSI England, about Fleet White not wiping JonBenet, and his complaint that Patsy should have told JonBenet not to just ask anyone to wipe her, AND the second, about JonBenet only wearing ONE ponytail over to the Whites are the smoking guns against him. NO WHERE is this info printed, YOU'RE BUSTED STEVE, AGAIN.
ST needs his OWN page at busted.com , which I didn't even existed until today. He really needs to stop playing both sides against the middle.

“Sarah Palin, Go Home!”

Since: Aug 09

Bexley, Ohio

#20 Nov 22, 2009
koldkase wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey, maybe they can get the CIA and FBI to arrest Thomas and charge him with being stalked by crazy people! You should get right on that, gutter candy! Call them! I'm sure you have them on speed dial!
By the way, did you get the death penalty for Britney Spears' and Lindsey Lohan's mom yet? Are they going to let you do the honors?
You had been a very credible poster until now, but you're drifting into BrotherMoon nutjob territory now.

You should take a lesson from Fr. Brown. It'd do you good.

And Candy is EXACTLY right. I should go straight to Beckner, and tomorrow, I will.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 22
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

JonBenet Ramsey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Patsy Powerless SAHM 1 hr Green Envelope 13
John Lesko Checked My Linked In. (Nov '16) 1 hr Mean man 25
News 'Oh my gosh! Oh my gosh! Oh my gosh!': Burke Ra... 6 hr heatherk79 72
Mr. Garnett, Impact This Already ! 8 hr heatherk79 8
The plot sickens: John wants whole GJ records r... (Oct '13) 10 hr BrotherMoon 29
News Breakthrough in 'exercise pill' to help battle ... 11 hr Green Envelope 3
News Do Young People Feel the Need to Be Selfie-Ready? 11 hr Green Envelope 2
More from around the web