The unbroken cobweb is nowhere near the broken windowpane.<quoted text>
Clearly, it is not clear that it was a fresh break. The dailybeast video does not support the claim that it was a fresh break, in fact it seems to contradict it. The “unbroken cobweb in the corner of the window” demonstrates that the window was not broken recently.
You are making unfounded assumptions regarding investigator’s motivations for the window questioning and have failed to counter alternative and practical explanations as outlined above (post 83).
The window evidence is the weakest and possibly the funniest aspect of your convoluted and fanciful theory. As previously stated, you would be better off to argue that Mr Ramsey chose to stage an entry/exit point at that specific location because he knew the window was already broken.
And Linda testified that she knew nothing about any broken window long before she turned on Patsy. In fact she was strongly defending Patsy at that time -- see PMPT. Moreover, she contradicted Patsy on two different points: first, that the window was ever broken at all, which she would certainly be in a position to know about, and second that she helped Patsy clean up the glass which she has completely denied.
It's clear from your refusal to accept the very obvious contradictions between LInda's version and Patsy's version that no piece of evidence and no argument will ever change your mind about any aspect of this case. I see no point in continuing this discussion.