Burke Ramsey's Facebook page back up

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#119 May 22, 2013
Correction: The page was created in late March, and posts were made during that time period as well.
The Truth Hurts

United States

#120 May 22, 2013
Mama2JML wrote:
The page in question does not belong to JBR's brother, Burke Ramsey. He has a FB page, and has had the same one for years.
This new "Burke Ramsey" FB page has few posts; ranging from April 11-April 28th. There are two friends listed: the founder of FB, and a former child actor....very few pictures, as well.
This is from the "About" section:
"I like media studies, politics, and skating. I just came back to Facebook. I don't know why so many people find me."
REALLY?
Burke never left FB, and Burke knows people would "find him" easily if he had selected none of the available privacy settings. It's absurd NOT to question the ownership of this new "Burke Ramsey" Facebook page.
Really? Do you have a link to his "real" FB page that he never left? I didn't see any other page for him.
Those two people listed are not his friends. They are people he is following. His friend list is private and not viewable to the public.
Face it, you're wrong. That IS his new page. Deal with it.
The Truth Hurts

United States

#121 May 22, 2013
Mama2JML wrote:
Correction: The page was created in late March, and posts were made during that time period as well.
No. There are posts from late in April too.
candy

East Lansing, MI

#122 May 22, 2013
The link to his original Facebook is in the first post on this thread, and it's still up. That's the one where his aunt Polly Davis asked him "Where's you helmet Burke?"
Heloise

Manchester, UK

#123 May 23, 2013
Having one Facebook page doesn't preclude you from having another. As has been pointed out, younger people do this for a variety of reasons.

In all truth, though, this is barely even a footnote to a sideshow in this case so I can't quite understand why IDI are getting so exercised about it.

“May you all come home”

Since: Mar 07

safely Bless you all

#124 May 23, 2013
Mama2JML wrote:
The page in question does not belong to JBR's brother, Burke Ramsey. He has a FB page, and has had the same one for years.
This new "Burke Ramsey" FB page has few posts; ranging from April 11-April 28th. There are two friends listed: the founder of FB, and a former child actor....very few pictures, as well.
This is from the "About" section:
"I like media studies, politics, and skating. I just came back to Facebook. I don't know why so many people find me."
REALLY?
Burke never left FB, and Burke knows people would "find him" easily if he had selected none of the available privacy settings. It's absurd NOT to question the ownership of this new "Burke Ramsey" Facebook page.
Really??????

Instead of biz and yourself whining and ranting that it is a fake, that it is a hack, that it is NOT Burke Ramsey, brother of JonBenet Ramsey, why not do the REAL and NECESSARY homework and research to back up such ridiculous claims. You both seem to be in a "bunch" about Burke's sexuality and feelings about women.

Here is an easy solution: You have a FB page. Biz has a FB page. Anyone else who has chosen to deny the reality rather than provide Burke with some kudos for coming out instead of hiding it have options because it is obvious that you care THAT much

Send a private message to Burke, either of his aunts or family that are ALSO on FB. Tell them that some awful evil person is pretending to be BR on FB and daring to state that he likes men as well as women. Tell them that the page MUST be hacked, tell them that it appears that Burke is an insensitive woman basher, and that someone has made those awful posts as Burke.

Biz, with all her inside knowledge and "connections" can notify Lin Wood, or any of the other celebrities in the Ramsey family about this that she is so close to.

It's a simple solution. Once they are aware of this horrific insult to Burke (in your opinion), they can notify FB, they can take the page down, put up a disclaimer about it and VOILA, the end of this saga

You and biz and whoever else, just coming to topix to insist that it isn't him, not only does a disservice to poor Burke who you feel is being maligned as a bi or gay man, but you must realize that you and biz coming around to deny it is meaningless to most people. Since you and biz are feeling so strongly about it, do something about it instead of just coming around to say it is a hack.

It's his FB page. You all will just have to deal with and live with the fact that Burke is bisexual at the very least and does not hold a high opinion of women.

After you have corrected this "easy fix" problem, you can come back and let us know how it went

TIA

For the latter, who can blame him? The women in his family growing up would be enough for anyone to hate women, and that started with his grandmother
Heloise

Manchester, UK

#125 May 23, 2013
Capricorn wrote:
<quoted text>
Really??????
Instead of biz and yourself whining and ranting that it is a fake, that it is a hack, that it is NOT Burke Ramsey, brother of JonBenet Ramsey, why not do the REAL and NECESSARY homework and research to back up such ridiculous claims. You both seem to be in a "bunch" about Burke's sexuality and feelings about women.
Here is an easy solution: You have a FB page. Biz has a FB page. Anyone else who has chosen to deny the reality rather than provide Burke with some kudos for coming out instead of hiding it have options because it is obvious that you care THAT much
Send a private message to Burke, either of his aunts or family that are ALSO on FB. Tell them that some awful evil person is pretending to be BR on FB and daring to state that he likes men as well as women. Tell them that the page MUST be hacked, tell them that it appears that Burke is an insensitive woman basher, and that someone has made those awful posts as Burke.
Biz, with all her inside knowledge and "connections" can notify Lin Wood, or any of the other celebrities in the Ramsey family about this that she is so close to.
It's a simple solution. Once they are aware of this horrific insult to Burke (in your opinion), they can notify FB, they can take the page down, put up a disclaimer about it and VOILA, the end of this saga
You and biz and whoever else, just coming to topix to insist that it isn't him, not only does a disservice to poor Burke who you feel is being maligned as a bi or gay man, but you must realize that you and biz coming around to deny it is meaningless to most people. Since you and biz are feeling so strongly about it, do something about it instead of just coming around to say it is a hack.
It's his FB page. You all will just have to deal with and live with the fact that Burke is bisexual at the very least and does not hold a high opinion of women.
After you have corrected this "easy fix" problem, you can come back and let us know how it went
TIA
For the latter, who can blame him? The women in his family growing up would be enough for anyone to hate women, and that started with his grandmother
Excellent post, Cappy.

The way these people are going on, you'd think the site contained or was being interpreted by anyone as a confession to the crime. Or that it was doing any real harm to the Ramseys.

If they really want to get upset about something, they should take a look at some of the truly vile JonBenet Twitter feeds, at least one of which would make them literally sick. Isn't this supposed to be about JonBenet?

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#126 May 23, 2013
Capricorn wrote:
<quoted text>...
You both seem to be in a "bunch" about Burke's sexuality and feelings about women.

...this horrific insult to Burke (in your opinion)...

You and biz and whoever else, just coming to topix to insist that it isn't him, not only does a disservice to poor Burke who you feel is being maligned as a bi or gay man...
Dear GAWD, Capricorn. You are so off base.

“May you all come home”

Since: Mar 07

safely Bless you all

#127 May 23, 2013
If I am off base, then please explain why you are so upset about the FB page, enough to say it is a hoax or hacker, etc.

I do not think I'm off base at all. The only negative thing on that page is his attitude toward women IMO

As for his sexuality, you are the one who seems to have a problem with the FB page. What is your issue with it if I'm so "off base"

Why would you automatically assume it was a hacker?

Why can't it be his page?

Like I said, whatever your issue with the page is, there are simple solutions such as what I already posted. The ball is in your court if everyone else is so wrong.

“WAX ON”

Since: Jul 10

WAX OFF

#128 May 23, 2013
Hi Heloise,
No it doesn’t, you are right - one does not preclude the other. One of the reasons kids have more than one page is prospective employers started using FB, Linked in, and many other social sites in their job screening process. I know that wasn’t the intent of FB because the intent was strictly supposed to be a social site, but it has proven time and time again to be a window into the social adeptness and general attitudes of prospective employees. College age kids and young adults just out of college will have one page that is pretty straight and narrow, and often times another shall we say ‘looser’ one for their friends.

I don’t’ even agree with the use of a site like FB in employment screening, but we are immersed in a digital age, and different people are going to use the available technology for whatever reason they choose at the time.
Heloise wrote:
Having one Facebook page doesn't preclude you from having another. As has been pointed out, younger people do this for a variety of reasons.
In all truth, though, this is barely even a footnote to a sideshow in this case so I can't quite understand why IDI are getting so exercised about it.

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#129 May 23, 2013
Capricorn wrote:
If I am off base, then please explain why you are so upset about the FB page, enough to say it is a hoax or hacker, etc.

I do not think I'm off base at all. The only negative thing on that page is his attitude toward women IMO

As for his sexuality, you are the one who seems to have a problem with the FB page. What is your issue with it if I'm so "off base"

Why would you automatically assume it was a hacker?

Why can't it be his page?

Like I said, whatever your issue with the page is, there are simple solutions such as what I already posted. The ball is in your court if everyone else is so wrong.
There are obvious indications that the page in question is likely NOT Burke Ramsey's FB page. I have already described a few details that seem "off". You have your opinion, and there is no doubt in my mind that you will never bend. Keep plugging away!

Now, regarding your incessant and annoying remarks about sexuality, of which I have yet to respond, here ya go...

I could NOT care any less about a man's or a woman's sexuality. Homosexuality, heterosexuality, bi-sexuality; none of the three defines an individual. Sexuality bears no weight on a person's character. That is my stance. PERIOD.

Think before you type, Capricorn.
Who brought up sexuality?
&
WHO keeps tossing it around, Cap? Hmm...

BTW, the page has been "reported". TODAY. Assuredly FB management will look into the possibility that the owner of this FB page is an imposter, and that the profile is a "fake"....when they get around to it, of course.

“May you all come home”

Since: Mar 07

safely Bless you all

#130 May 24, 2013
I have to say that your little speech was just lovely and the sentiments also very politically correct and liberal minded.

That said, it is quite unfortunate that you chose NOT to make this post when Candy first broke the news about his sexuality.

Instead what is really important is the FIRST reactions by others, so you'll have to (or not) be understanding if I and others don't find you to be sincere about your remarks, especially considering the "annoyance" you seem to have, getting yourself in a bunch LOL. If what you say is true about your feelings, the mentioning of it shouldn't be so annoying, so that is very telling also.

Like I said, why all the fuss?

Your first reaction, like biz, was to deny the page was his. Why all the fuss if you don't care about his sexuality? I bring it up because I assume that is what the fuss is about and the DENIAL that was your first reaction instead of the lovely sentiments you make NOW, realizing that you may in fact be wrong and it is his page.

Maybe the fuss was about his remarks about women but I have to assume that the big problem was his sexuality. That WAS what the breaking news was all about after all, true or not.

So now that you don't care about his sexuality or seemingly anything else about the page that you may find disturbing, why the denial about it being his page? Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmm?

As for the page being "reported", I'm sure it was checked out the first day it was up by others who have reported it. However, FB doesn't just "get around" to things like that. You'll just have to accept the fact that it would have been down already and a disclaimer put up had it been a hoax. I have no doubt that you realize that but I felt the need to say it again.

Burke and other Ramseys have access that the average citizen doesn't have to those in charge of internet sites and certainly social networks. One call from Lin Wood or any other attorney that they continue to utilize would have had that page taken down immediately if it were an imposter and surely they would have filed charges.

It is against the law to do that and impersonate others,(unless you are Susan Stine)

Glad to hear you reported it and at least that is something productive despite waiting so long to report it. Better late than never eh?
Heloise

UK

#131 May 24, 2013
I wouldn't be surprised if he didn't take it down himself TBH. If he wanted a space away to be himself from censuring eyes, it's been an epic fail...*

*Hate that expression but eldest daughter uses it so much that I can barely remember what the alternative expressions are..
Heloise

UK

#132 May 24, 2013
DrSeussMd wrote:
Hi Heloise,
No it doesn’t, you are right - one does not preclude the other. One of the reasons kids have more than one page is prospective employers started using FB, Linked in, and many other social sites in their job screening process. I know that wasn’t the intent of FB because the intent was strictly supposed to be a social site, but it has proven time and time again to be a window into the social adeptness and general attitudes of prospective employees. College age kids and young adults just out of college will have one page that is pretty straight and narrow, and often times another shall we say ‘looser’ one for their friends.
I don’t’ even agree with the use of a site like FB in employment screening, but we are immersed in a digital age, and different people are going to use the available technology for whatever reason they choose at the time.
<quoted text>
I agree completely, Dr Seuss. The irony is that employers etc using the Internet to screen people has made not one whit of difference to businesses: they still make mistakes in who they recruit and don't recruit. Depressing really.

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#133 May 24, 2013
Not to mention Burke's BS degree in Computer and Information Technology.
Heloise

UK

#134 May 24, 2013
Just surmising and spit balling here but could IDI's eagerness to prove this a fraud be motivated by the fact that it tells them something they didn't know even with all their 'sources.'
Heloise

UK

#135 May 24, 2013
Heloise wrote:
I wouldn't be surprised if he didn't take it down himself TBH. If he wanted a space away to be himself from censuring eyes, it's been an epic fail...*
*Hate that expression but eldest daughter uses it so much that I can barely remember what the alternative expressions are..
'A space away from censuring eyes' is what I meant, LOL!

“If life gives you melons”

Since: Nov 06

You might be dyslexic

#136 May 24, 2013
Heloise wrote:
Just surmising and spit balling here but could IDI's eagerness to prove this a fraud be motivated by the fact that it tells them something they didn't know even with all their 'sources.'
I believe that to be true and also the point Cap was making.

The IDI are counting on the page being taken down so they can say "See, I told you it was fake", when the truth is Burke has has his pages public and then private, and then down completely and then back up - for all of his adult life. There will be no proof he didn't take it down himself as he has done for years. There will be no resolution to this instance.

“If life gives you melons”

Since: Nov 06

You might be dyslexic

#137 May 24, 2013
correction:
Burke has has = Burke has had

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#138 May 24, 2013
Mama2JML wrote:
<quoted text>
Dear GAWD, Capricorn. You are so off base.
Speaking of off base.....lol. Had you not better be getting ready for your June engagement?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

JonBenet Ramsey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Diane Dimond: Still No Justice for JonBenet Ram... (Dec '16) 5 hr Jonnie B 176
News 'Oh my gosh! Oh my gosh! Oh my gosh!': Burke Ra... 13 hr robert 73
Mr. Garnett, Impact This Already ! 13 hr robert 10
Pedophiles in Boulder and in general (Nov '16) 14 hr Alana 4
News Inside basement where JonBenet Ramsey was murde... 15 hr BrotherMoon 2
News JonBenet: Paula Woodward on New Book, John Rams... 17 hr Rainbow334 7
Burke Ramsey REFUSED to be interviewed by inves... (Sep '10) 23 hr Logic101 648
More from around the web