Kolar's Discrepancies

“May you all come home”

Since: Mar 07

safely Bless you all

#125 Apr 9, 2013
DrSeussMd wrote:
Which is "Sooooooooooooo" much different from you always thinking you are right, correct? LOL!
<quoted text>
Too funny Seuss. This is especially funny coming from someone who claims to not realize when a spammer comes on and not even observant enough, according to her own words, to know when someone is posting under her name LOL, so I would take that from whence it comes.

She also, doesn't realize when she is wrong, which is often btw and low class enough to drag CC into this where it doesn't belong, but to be expected. If she even had half the intellect and disposition of CC, she'd be ahead of the game

Again, not unexpected
Friend

Bangkok, Thailand

#126 Apr 9, 2013
Capricorn wrote:
<quoted text>
Too funny Seuss. This is especially funny coming from someone who claims to not realize when a spammer comes on and not even observant enough, according to her own words, to know when someone is posting under her name LOL, so I would take that from whence it comes.
She also, doesn't realize when she is wrong, which is often btw and low class enough to drag CC into this where it doesn't belong, but to be expected. If she even had half the intellect and disposition of CC, she'd be ahead of the game
Again, not unexpected
deb the best! school years were so fun.

Good post deb.

;-)

“WAX ON”

Since: Jul 10

WAX OFF

#127 Apr 9, 2013
And here, you have a space between a word and a comma, and at the end, your ellipsis has too many dots. It is only supposed to be three(3) as in (...), not seven(7) as in (.......)! What is your point?
Deb wrote:
<quoted text>
I read this three times , and I must read this again.......
:)
deb wrote:
<quoted text>
BTW, the correct spelling of "willfull" is willful.
And you were telling another poster to learn English - shame on you!:)

Since: Jan 09

Location hidden

#130 Apr 9, 2013
JimmyWells wrote:
I disagree. Why would someone tie ligatures to a child that is already dead? Wait, I know, she suspended her right? Must have not been very effective though considering the only ligature furrow was around her neck. And she definitely wasn't suspended from her neck. She was face down next to that paint tray when that furrow was created.
1.Molestation-Burke
2.Head Bash-Burke
3.Plan-John w/ some advice.(Missing phone records)
4.Bedtime-Burke
5.Cover Up and Pseudo Assault-John, Patsy
6.911 Call-Patsy
Bet on it.
<quoted text>
That would be my number one theory, Jimmy.

Since: Jan 10

Location hidden

#132 Apr 9, 2013
Then you are brilliant learnin.
learnin wrote:
<quoted text>
That would be my number one theory, Jimmy.

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#134 Apr 9, 2013
DrSeussMd wrote:
The person speaking can "enlighten", "inform", "edify", "educate", "instruct", and "teach" about a subject when making a statement, which was 'understood' in the original post.
Take your own advice – you were not invited to this argument!
<quoted text>
Was it an argument? I was simply trying to edify SE, you, etc....clarification, you know?

Wait, were you invited to an "official" argument? If so, I must have missed that post as I certainly was not attempting to "argue". Were you?
Steve Eller

United States

#135 Apr 9, 2013
Mama2JML wrote:
<quoted text>Was it an argument? I was simply trying to edify SE, you, etc....clarification, you know?
Wait, were you invited to an "official" argument? If so, I must have missed that post as I certainly was not attempting to "argue". Were you?
You would achieve far more edification by reading books and passages more carefully.
deb

Minneapolis, MN

#136 Apr 9, 2013
DrSeussMd wrote:
And here, you have a space between a word and a comma, and at the end, your ellipsis has too many dots. It is only supposed to be three(3) as in (...), not seven(7) as in (.......)! What is your point?
<quoted text>
:)
<quoted text>
That was not me; it's the so-called spammer. lol

My only point was I thought it was interesting that Stevie was telling another poster to learn English.
deb

Minneapolis, MN

#137 Apr 9, 2013
Steve Eller wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry if I misspelled willful but I was typing away quickly on my Blackberry. I stand by what I wrote and forgive the misspelling but you and your cohorts spread so much disinformation about this case I can't keep up.
Please list the disinformation IDI are spreading.

RDI disinformation: The Ramseys Did It
deb

Minneapolis, MN

#138 Apr 9, 2013
Mama2JML wrote:
<quoted text>Was it an argument? I was simply trying to edify SE, you, etc....clarification, you know?
Wait, were you invited to an "official" argument? If so, I must have missed that post as I certainly was not attempting to "argue". Were you?
ROFLMAO!! They are amusing, aren't they?

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#139 Apr 9, 2013
deb wrote:
<quoted text>ROFLMAO!! They are amusing, aren't they?
At best! ;o)

Since: Jan 10

Location hidden

#141 Apr 10, 2013
Yes we know as we've all read this ridiculous post several hundred times. And if "We're all gonna do it together" wouldn't there have been four bodies in the wine cellar that night?
BrotherMoon wrote:
Patsy killed JonBenet deliberately. No one else was involved. There was no staging for police. Everything that was done was done by Patsy for Patsy as part of a psychotic fantasy revolving around an imagined relationship with a supernatural being, the fear of judgment by that God and the fear of death. What people mistakingly take as staging for police had symbolic meaning known only to Patsy. This includes the ransom note. There were two aspects to what was done to the body: the ligatures were suspension devices, the body was posed and viewed and then taken down, placed in the small room, wrapped and the duct tape applied to set the kidnapping scene up in Patsy's mind. The ransom note is full of the ideas that swirled in Patsy's mind that night and plagued her for many years.
The goal was not to kill JonBenet but to make an Angel out of her.
Patsy herself said after the funeral "JonBenet is in Heaven with God awaiting her mother's arrival and it won't be long." Patsy put JonBenet in that heaven to complete the fantasy and in her mind assure her life after death.
As the dedication in DOI says:
Wherever we go ...
Whatever we do ...
[We're gonna go through it together ...]

“May you all come home”

Since: Mar 07

safely Bless you all

#142 Apr 10, 2013
deb wrote:
<quoted text>
Please list the disinformation IDI are spreading...
That's easy: IDI

“May you all come home”

Since: Mar 07

safely Bless you all

#143 Apr 10, 2013
deb wrote:
<quoted text>
That was not me; it's the so-called spammer. lol
So called? LOL

How conveniently astute you are when it suits you LOL

Were your parents siblings?

“WAX ON”

Since: Jul 10

WAX OFF

#144 Apr 10, 2013
So, therefore, I couldn't edify you - good to know! Thanks.
Mama2JML wrote:
One can edify others, but one cannot edify that which has no moral and/or intellectual capacity.
Yes, I received an email, LOL!
Mama2JML wrote:
Wait, were you invited to an "official" argument?
Steve Eller

United States

#145 Apr 10, 2013
deb wrote:
<quoted text>
That was not me; it's the so-called spammer. lol
My only point was I thought it was interesting that Stevie was telling another poster to learn English.
You should try it as well, you wouldn't have to read passages three times to understand them.
deb

Minneapolis, MN

#147 Apr 10, 2013
Steve Eller wrote:
<quoted text>
You should try it as well, you wouldn't have to read passages three times to understand them.
You are confusing me with "spambot" - I did not post that statement.

“WAX ON”

Since: Jul 10

WAX OFF

#148 Apr 10, 2013
Did you mean read things multiple times and still NOT understand them?
Steve Eller wrote:
<quoted text>
You should try it as well, you wouldn't have to read passages three times to understand them.

“May you all come home”

Since: Mar 07

safely Bless you all

#149 Apr 10, 2013
DrSeussMd wrote:
Did you mean read things multiple times and still NOT understand them?
<quoted text>
I wonder how many times she read the "deb" posts before she realized she didn't write them? I'm thinking only a couple of times :)
Steve Eller

United States

#152 Apr 10, 2013
DrSeussMd wrote:
Did you mean read things multiple times and still NOT understand them?
<quoted text>
LOL! Very good point.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

JonBenet Ramsey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Dr Phils credibility 4 min Blind Bat 19
Anyone believe the ramseys didn't do the crime?? 1 hr Blind Bat 193
Michael Helgoth - INNOCENT victim of Team Ramsey 2 hr candy 24
It always leads back to Burke (Oct '11) 4 hr Steve Eller 209
Jonbenet 'accidentally' what???? (Feb '13) 4 hr Brittanyanne 53
Burke Ramsey's 1998 interview on Ramsey case 8 hr candy 5
Burke Ramsey- INNOCENT victim of BORG 9 hr robert 44
Evidence that Burke Was Involved (Oct '09) Aug 17 Brittanyanne 2,265
More from around the web