Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#1935 May 29, 2013
Steve Eller wrote:
<quoted text>
STOP THE PRESSES!!!!! We have found common ground. Although I would have added a few more characterizations ;)
;o)

“WAX ON”

Since: Jul 10

WAX OFF

#1937 May 30, 2013
An excellent point, albeit, a point missed by the spammer and IDIs alike.
BrotherMoon wrote:
<quoted text>
The moderator of a forum deleting statements deemed to be obscene according to the agreed to terms of the forum IS the exercise of the First Amendement.
Steve Eller

United States

#1938 May 30, 2013
DrSeussMd wrote:
An excellent point, albeit, a point missed by the spammer and IDIs alike.
<quoted text>
Brother Moon is the Spammer in Chief.

“WAX ON”

Since: Jul 10

WAX OFF

#1939 May 30, 2013
No he is not, but he certainly doesn't help an already bad situation.
Steve Eller wrote:
<quoted text>
Brother Moon is the Spammer in Chief.

“May you all come home”

Since: Mar 07

safely Bless you all

#1943 May 30, 2013
Steve Eller wrote:
<quoted text>
Brother Moon is the Spammer in Chief.
He does spam, but is not THE spammer/s

THE spammer/s are those who come here for the early shift, try and debate, fail miserably, leave and do the "changing of the hats" and come back to mess up the board and hope to have certain threads removed that they are unsuccessful in debating.

They even answer themselves from time to time and only when BM brought it to the forefront that they are all never on together, they decided to all "be on together" yesterday LOL

It's very contrived. Just look at the saddest part of all this. They claim to be responsible for children EEK!
Steve Eller

United States

#1944 May 30, 2013
Capricorn wrote:
<quoted text>
He does spam, but is not THE spammer/s
THE spammer/s are those who come here for the early shift, try and debate, fail miserably, leave and do the "changing of the hats" and come back to mess up the board and hope to have certain threads removed that they are unsuccessful in debating.
They even answer themselves from time to time and only when BM brought it to the forefront that they are all never on together, they decided to all "be on together" yesterday LOL
It's very contrived. Just look at the saddest part of all this. They claim to be responsible for children EEK!
Be that as it may, he has waged quite a few of his own massive spam attacks on this forum and it is ridiculous for him to call out people for doing the same thing that he is doing albeit on a larger scale. That said, I wish there was something that could done about all of the spammers polluting and diluting the Forum.

“May you all come home”

Since: Mar 07

safely Bless you all

#1945 May 30, 2013
Steve Eller wrote:
<quoted text>
Be that as it may, he has waged quite a few of his own massive spam attacks on this forum and it is ridiculous for him to call out people for doing the same thing that he is doing albeit on a larger scale. That said, I wish there was something that could done about all of the spammers polluting and diluting the Forum.
Hi Steve,

It isn't "all" the spammers. It is a proxy server that shows up in all different places as a proxy

The only thing to do is to report all offensive or spamming posts to topix no matter WHO is doing them. Polluting the forum and diluting the posts, baiting, etc. is done purposefully by the IDI

If you notice, and I know you haven't always been here, but all spammers and trolls are IDI.

“WAX ON”

Since: Jul 10

WAX OFF

#1946 May 30, 2013
Even though I posted he isnít the main one, you have some good and valid points here Steve when you say he does do spamming attacks. I donít care for the fact that he changes your quoted verbiage and adds ĎStupid Ellerí either Ė it just shows immaturity, and a lack of cognizant command of the language to be able to debate and discuss points.

Capricorn has already mentioned just reporting the posts through feedback, and I think it is basically the only tool available when they are using proxy servers so they canít be traced. Sad but true.
Steve Eller wrote:
<quoted text>
Be that as it may, he has waged quite a few of his own massive spam attacks on this forum and it is ridiculous for him to call out people for doing the same thing that he is doing albeit on a larger scale. That said, I wish there was something that could done about all of the spammers polluting and diluting the Forum.

“If life gives you melons”

Since: Nov 06

You might be dyslexic

#1948 Jun 7, 2013
Justice1313 wrote:
<quoted text> ***Thank you for your kindness about my losses. An agent said that ALL cases in Cook County, Illinois would have to be REVISITED, based on the information posted on SHATTERED SHIELDS / Babich Homicides. The same holds true on the information about Ocean County, NJ./ Police protecting METH LABS/ DRUG HOUSES.(Several Police Chiefs and D.A.s had to step down by 12-31-2012. The 'List of the Dead' section of my site was looked into as well. That list was found to be short a few people. The facts I made available to the authorities, was found to be credible. If Bill Ramsey is innocent of JonBenet's death, he can seek justice through the courts, under at least ONE of his many AKA's.
If he was at all involved, the police have given no indication of it, so I have to believe their actions.

“If life gives you melons”

Since: Nov 06

You might be dyslexic

#1951 Jun 10, 2013
Justice1313 wrote:
<quoted text> ***(continued) If this meeting did NOT take place, then pray tell, HOW--- multiple Police Chiefs and D. A.s had to STEP DOWN by 12-31-2012, in Ocean County, NJ. The AX is FALLING, state by state. I do believe, the DOUBLE murder of Walter Babich Sr. and his wife in McCook,Illinois is next. The JonBenet case should follow.* Each and every person, in that meeting, carried with them a copy of, " SANTA (you be the judge) Murderer of Mine! No one could miss the bright yellow cover.
We will have to agree to disagree. I believe you are caught up in some conspiracy theory which doesn't align with the facts in this case. There very well may be corruption in NJ, but it doesn't relate to the JonBenet Ramsey case in any meaningful way.
vivielou

Camp Hill, PA

#1957 Jun 11, 2013
Steve Eller wrote:
<quoted text>
Hunter did not have a veto. The problem was that Hunter did his best to prevent an indictment but he was flummoxed in part by Michael Kane. Explanations and rationalizations after the fact not withstanding, after a lengthy investigations the Ramseys were indicted by the Grand Jury.
I ran into Michael Kane at our grocery store after he came back from Boulder here in Pennsylvania (he lives in this area). I asked him if the case was cold, he said yes unless Patsy confesses, he shook his head & said "Boulder" He seemed pretty disgusted with that place. I have never forgotten that brief conversation that year. We have a lot of respect for Michael Kane here in Pa.
Terrance

Canada

#1959 Jul 21, 2013
Ole South wrote:
<quoted text>
The McReynolds made two appearances on Geraldo's show, both of which were filmed at a local motel/resort center. I saw both shows and I can say without a doubt that the one that I found to be so abhorred cannot be found via a transcript nor any other means, such as copies of the show via purchase from the Network. I know, because I've tried without success to locate even a mention of this particular show or a transcript of it. This has made me wonder if for some reason LE has confiscated all copies of the show and are keeping such under wraps.
It was after this particular show that Geraldo himself clarified a prior statement he made inviting Santa Bill to play Santa Claus for his own children by issuing a statement saying that he would NEVER have the man play Santa in his home!
That alone whould say something about what transpired on his show -- something so dire that he felt the need to withdraw his prior invitation.
We all need to see that tape.

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#1960 Jul 21, 2013
It's doubtful Geraldo would have any Santa in his home - he's Jewish.

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#1961 Jul 21, 2013
aussiesheila wrote:
<quoted text>SNIP...over and over it will say her hair was tied in the knot itself. I don't believe it was. I think it just became twisted around the knot because garotte was twisted and it caught some of her hair around the centre of the handle where the knot was
It appears that way to me, as well.
BrotherMoon

Denver, CO

#1962 Jul 21, 2013
And as Logan rides off into the sunset you appear. Gee .......

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#1964 Jul 21, 2013
...& you are STILL here, Brothermoon.

“WAX ON”

Since: Jul 10

WAX OFF

#1966 Jul 22, 2013
Yes, BM is still here (as are you obviously) but he isn't quoting 18-month old aussie posts just to have 'someplace to post' without really saying anything like you are upthread, LOL. Maybe we should all go bump some old posts up to the top, it was a trip reading through this whole thread. Makes me HAPPY HAPPY HAPPY some of the really outlandish posters are gone now - at least maybe the discussions could be a tad more down to earth (so to speak).
Mama2JML wrote:
...& you are STILL here, Brothermoon.
BrotherMoon

Denver, CO

#1970 Jul 22, 2013
DrSeussMd wrote:
quoting 18-month old aussie posts <quoted text>
That is one of the things that gives "It" away. And when It gets outed It vents It's visceral wrath as the multi-hat spammer. It's transposition to Moon Jack/MMichigan is the most puzzling.

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#1971 Jul 23, 2013
DrSeussMd wrote:
Yes, BM is still here (as are you obviously) but he isn't quoting 18-month old aussie posts just to have 'someplace to post' without really saying anything like you are upthread, LOL. Maybe we should all go bump some old posts up to the top, it was a trip reading through this whole thread. Makes me HAPPY HAPPY HAPPY some of the really outlandish posters are gone now - at least maybe the discussions could be a tad more down to earth (so to speak).
<quoted text>
Yes, I think this forum would benefit if you (and "all") would bump older, ON-TOPIC posts. I'm pleased to be your role model, and, as always, you're welcome! ;o)

“WAX ON”

Since: Jul 10

WAX OFF

#1972 Jul 23, 2013
Don't worry about being my role model, I'm positive you are not qualified so most likely, it won't happen. And, you didn't bump anything for discussion - dissention perhaps, but certainly not discussion. But carry on, and I will certainly follow your lead. ;)
Mama2JML wrote:
<quoted text>Yes, I think this forum would benefit if you (and "all") would bump older, ON-TOPIC posts. I'm pleased to be your role model, and, as always, you're welcome! ;o)

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

JonBenet Ramsey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
JonBenet Investigation (Nov '11) 26 min JBI 1,615
"Note-Free Case Discussion" 3 hr Legal__Eagle 92
Note-odd detail? 4 hr Note 2,400
Upcoming National Enquirer story - JonBenet Ram... (Oct '10) 5 hr berrytea333 35
koldkase patsy wrote the note 16 hr Legal__Eagle 18
Haapy Thanksgiving 19 hr Capricorn 15
ICU2 's Child Trafficking Tue Legal__Eagle 6
More from around the web