Comments
1,381 - 1,400 of 1,704 Comments Last updated Thursday Jul 17

Since: Jan 12

Kansas City, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1573
Apr 5, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Capricorn wrote:
<quoted text>
It lacks science? The FACT is that there are only three people KNOWN to be in the house that night and there is absolutely no proof that a fourth, fifth, or dozen others were there. NONE; not even any evidence to show any point of entry, exit or having been there.
I know, it's not nearly as scientific as random birth and death dates that match JBR's
Now THAT is scientific!
I noted coincidental dates. BMcR made more than a few bizarre statements about his "angel", JonBenet.(JMO)...a child he'd met maybe "5 times", yet, he felt closer to her than his own grandchildren? Strange. Considering the date and age of his sister's death, the coincidence(s) are quite eery (JMO), but I have not established a hypothesis based on any coincidence(s).

You and Seuss have posted statements (yours above) as if they are factual and indisputable, but that's simply not the case. Theories are intended to be tested and challenged. It might benefit us all if more posters were willing to open their minds and challenge their long established opinions.

Since: Jan 12

Kansas City, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1574
Apr 5, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

DrSeussMd wrote:
Hey if you have the “scientific” evidence that someone else “CAN” be proven to have been in the home, you shouldn’t sit on that information, LOL. That might certainly be the feather on the back of LE to sway this case, don’t you think?
You KNOW no one else has EVER been “proven” to have been in that house in all of 16+ years, except for the fictional accounts of the ninja intruders, JMK, etc.
Congrats on your avatar – Magic Johnson would be as proud of you as he is of his son, I know I am!
Again, I have to ask if you have run out of legitimate things to discuss?
<quoted text>
You lost me... What "legitimate things" are you here to discuss?

Since: Jan 12

Kansas City, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1575
Apr 5, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

OneWhoCares wrote:
<quoted text>
ROFLMA
You forgot the "O". "Rolling On the Floor Laughing My @$$ Off". ROFLMAO.
Roy

San Jose, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1578
Apr 5, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

realTopaz wrote:
<quoted text>
too bad she couldn't shvoe allllllll those sleping kids of her's in that litle photo op,..next time they shuold stand in front of a bunk bed and say 'cheese'.
Did not know this.

Since: Jan 12

Kansas City, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1583
Apr 6, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

In the following excerpt BMcR explains (somewhat) why he chose to grow a beard.
**********
From the LKL interview, w/Wolf Blitzer sitting in,(04.1997):

"W. MCREYNOLDS: Well, I will tell you that -- I won't tell you about what happened to me as a child because that's not relevant. But I was in a play at the University -- excuse me, at our church, which is the Unity of Boulder -- and I was in "Les Miserables." And I was just a tavern-owner, sort of, and I decided that I would, you know, grow a beard for my characterization. And it turned out that the play was held over at our church, and then I -- everybody started calling me Santa Claus.

They do it all the time. They do it in summer as well. My belief is that Christmas is every day. I have a lot of little stories to tell, which I won't bore you with tonight. But that's the reason that I'm Santa Claus."

**********

What "happened to [BMcR] as a child"? If his experience(s) is/are irrelevant, then why did he mention this at all?

Was the Unity Church of Boulder simply the venue for the play, "Les Miserables", but produced by some division of the University?

I am also curious about all of the "little stories" he has to tell.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1585
Apr 6, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Childhood experiences are the very damaging if they are bad. Mothers and daughters are usually close but I know of a woman who did not even attend her mother's funeral. Nor did she shed any tears or show any emotion. That tells me that there was something emotionally wrong with that woman and it was not the mother's fault.
Do A Dear

Atlanta, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1588
Apr 6, 2013
 
DrSeussMd wrote:
Wasn't it determnied to me more 'gaffers' tape? Use to be to call something duct tape, meant only one or to kinds, but now the possibiltiies of colors and variations of duct tape are almost endless. I have never known any duct packing tape, but that doesn't mean there isn't any.
Gaffer's tape is also used on stages to mark the point where someone is to stand (for positoin), so with all of the pageant rehearsing going on it doesn't seem unrealsitic that PR might have had some around, and if so, it wouldn't have seemed out of place to have some.
<quoted text>
Good post.

DAD

Since: Jul 10

Crimson Tide Bulldozed

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1590
Apr 6, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Reading comprehension problems Deb? I said I was proud of her. Here, read it again!
DrSeussMd wrote:
Congrats on your avatar – Magic Johnson would be as proud of you as he is of his son, I know I am!

<quoted text>
deb wrote:
now you are gay bashing....

Since: Jul 10

Crimson Tide Bulldozed

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1591
Apr 6, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Exactly what I posted about. The people who CAN be proven to have been in the house that night. How can you get lost about that?
Mama2JML wrote:
<quoted text>You lost me... What "legitimate things" are you here to discuss?

Since: Jan 12

Vienna, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1592
Apr 6, 2013
 

Judged:

4

3

3

deb wrote:
<quoted text>What do you have legitimate to discuss regarding the case? So far all you have posted is to mock others and now you are gay bashing....as if your parents are proud of you - lol. Good luck to you! Like someone said here "what goes around comes around."
:oO

Thank you, Deb, for clarifying that post....made no sense to me!

Shame, shame, Seuss. FWIW, the lady with me in my profile pic is my mom.*SIGH*

Since: Jan 12

Kansas City, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1593
Apr 6, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

DrSeussMd wrote:
<quoted text>Exactly what I posted about. The people who CAN be proven to have been in the house that night. How can you get lost about that?
That's not EXACTLY what had me scratching my head, but your "who CAN" comment above reflects your strong convictions (BIAS) regarding this case.

You make statements that ARE disputable, as if your opinion=FACT, thus, indisputable.("The people who CAN be proven to have been in the house that night.")

There is evidence that has not been sourced to the Ramseys. There exists MUCH more than "a reasonable doubt". There is evidence exculpatory to the Ramseys. Whether you choose to consider any, some, or none of this evidence to be legitimate is your choice, negligent as it may be.

Hmm, like the evidentiary DNA? The FBI & CBI do not dismiss this evidence. So, if (WHEN) a DNA profile is found to be consistent with that of the JBR CODIS profiles, then that man will have some explaining to do....don't ya think? Hypothetically, he may be asked "Where were you on 12.25/26.96?". The answer may nullify your "who CAN" statement. Get it?
The Truth Hurts

Rochester, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1594
Apr 6, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Hey Mama...I'm just wondering how you can be in IL. and Kansas at the same time. That's one hell of a ping. ;)
vickey

Scranton, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1596
Apr 6, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

cat man do wrote:
<quoted text>
CMD
Some time I don't understand the RDIs postes
vickey

Scranton, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1597
Apr 6, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Mama2JML wrote:
<quoted text>That's not EXACTLY what had me scratching my head, but your "who CAN" comment above reflects your strong convictions (BIAS) regarding this case.
You make statements that ARE disputable, as if your opinion=FACT, thus, indisputable.("The people who CAN be proven to have been in the house that night.")
There is evidence that has not been sourced to the Ramseys. There exists MUCH more than "a reasonable doubt". There is evidence exculpatory to the Ramseys. Whether you choose to consider any, some, or none of this evidence to be legitimate is your choice, negligent as it may be.
Hmm, like the evidentiary DNA? The FBI & CBI do not dismiss this evidence. So, if (WHEN) a DNA profile is found to be consistent with that of the JBR CODIS profiles, then that man will have some explaining to do....don't ya think? Hypothetically, he may be asked "Where were you on 12.25/26.96?". The answer may nullify your "who CAN" statement. Get it?
This one I understand..........

Since: Jul 10

Crimson Tide Bulldozed

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1598
Apr 6, 2013
 

Judged:

5

4

4

There is no bias, when I am making a statement as proven by the evidence and facts in this case. The 4 Ramseys were the only people proven by evidence to have been in the house that night.

If you can prove someone else was there, then do it now. Otherwise quit trying to twist my words and take things out of context. You are as bad as Biz when you do that.

Who else was proven to be in the house that night Mama?????
Mama2JML wrote:
<quoted text>That's not EXACTLY what had me scratching my head, but your "who CAN" comment above reflects your strong convictions (BIAS) regarding this case.
You make statements that ARE disputable, as if your opinion=FACT, thus, indisputable.("The people who CAN be proven to have been in the house that night.")
There is evidence that has not been sourced to the Ramseys. There exists MUCH more than "a reasonable doubt". There is evidence exculpatory to the Ramseys. Whether you choose to consider any, some, or none of this evidence to be legitimate is your choice, negligent as it may be.
Hmm, like the evidentiary DNA? The FBI & CBI do not dismiss this evidence. So, if (WHEN) a DNA profile is found to be consistent with that of the JBR CODIS profiles, then that man will have some explaining to do....don't ya think? Hypothetically, he may be asked "Where were you on 12.25/26.96?". The answer may nullify your "who CAN" statement. Get it?

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1599
Apr 6, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

The Truth Hurts wrote:
Hey Mama...I'm just wondering how you can be in IL. and Kansas at the same time. That's one hell of a ping. ;)
It is called a proxy. She just forgets a lot and she also gives herself away with her words. You just have to laugh. I call her cheap entertainment.

Since: Jan 12

Kansas City, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1600
Apr 6, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

DrSeussMd wrote:
There is no bias, when I am making a statement as proven by the evidence and facts in this case. The 4 Ramseys were the only people proven by evidence to have been in the house that night.
If you can prove someone else was there, then do it now. Otherwise quit trying to twist my words and take things out of context. You are as bad as Biz when you do that.
Who else was proven to be in the house that night Mama?????
<quoted text>
I did not twist your words. I quoted you directly. You cannot prove no one else was in the house that night, just as I cannot prove someone else was. Based on the evidence, to which WE are privy, neither can be proven....not by me and not by you. There is evidence that is exculpatory to the Ramseys, and this extends WELL beyond "a reasonable doubt".

I appreciate the comparison to Biz, BTW. She's not bad, she's "bad ass"! ;o)

Since: May 11

AOL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1601
Apr 6, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

Mama2JML wrote:
<quoted text>I did not twist your words. I quoted you directly. You cannot prove no one else was in the house that night, just as I cannot prove someone else was. Based on the evidence, to which WE are privy, neither can be proven....not by me and not by you. There is evidence that is exculpatory to the Ramseys, and this extends WELL beyond "a reasonable doubt".
I appreciate the comparison to Biz, BTW. She's not bad, she's "bad ass"! ;o)
Leave it at ass and it's all good;)
Deb

Atlanta, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1602
Apr 6, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

OneWhoCares wrote:
<quoted text>
It is caled a proxy glue. She just forgots a lot and she also gives herself today with her good words. You just have to not laugh. I call her good facts entertainment.
I read this three times , and I must read this again.......

Since: Jan 12

Kansas City, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1603
Apr 6, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

vickey wrote:
<quoted text>This one I understand..........
:o)

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

7 Users are viewing the JonBenet Ramsey Forum right now

Search the JonBenet Ramsey Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
Note-odd detail? 2 hr Note 191
I know what really happened to JoneBEnnet 10 hr JustANNOYED 53
Jeffrey MacDonald Is Guilty (Sep '08) 12 hr JTF 7,452
Snow Prints? Thu Just Wondering 29
"Mr Ramsey Listen Carefully!" New book released... Jul 21 candy 10
Sid Wells mother complains (Mar '08) Jul 21 candy 24
Why patsy didn't wake up Burke Jul 20 Just Wondering 3
•••
•••