Bill McReynolds

“May you all come home”

Since: Mar 07

safely Bless you all

#22 Feb 4, 2012
Georgie wrote:
<quoted text>
Why else would someone come here in post, unless they have a hidden agenda. I don't have a hidden agenda. My agenda is as I stated above.
As for Facebook, I only have access to the info that is public. There must be a reason that goes deeper than privacy to not ask questions of those who have been looked upon in questionable light by LE, when the opportunity to do so has presented itself.
Perhaps discussion of the case instead of who is on FB might be helpful, if the "case" is really your agenda. You shouldn't ask people to do what you are unable to do yourself.

Those who are players in this case can be found in places other than FB, so please feel free to contact whomever you like and let us know how it went

They aren't all on FB. JR can be located, FW can be located as can Burke, Pam, the Fernies, and so many others
Georgie

Foley, AL

#23 Feb 4, 2012
Spain 1997

Why do you think the santas went to Spain in January 1997? Did they attend a shaman workshop, a retreat, something else shamanic related? I haven't checked that out yet, but I would venture a guess that it probably would.

Did you ever hear about BM and the human mind and consciousness?

Since: May 11

Seattle, WA

#24 Feb 4, 2012
Georgie wrote:
<quoted text>
Why else would someone come here in post, unless they have a hidden agenda. I don't have a hidden agenda. My agenda is as I stated above.
As for Facebook, I only have access to the info that is public. There must be a reason that goes deeper than privacy to not ask questions of those who have been looked upon in questionable light by LE, when the opportunity to do so has presented itself.
I don't believe you.
Georgie

Foley, AL

#25 Feb 4, 2012
Capricorn wrote:
<quoted text>
Perhaps discussion of the case instead of who is on FB might be helpful, if the "case" is really your agenda. You shouldn't ask people to do what you are unable to do yourself.
Those who are players in this case can be found in places other than FB, so please feel free to contact whomever you like and let us know how it went
They aren't all on FB. JR can be located, FW can be located as can Burke, Pam, the Fernies, and so many others
I don't think I asked anyone to do anything. I believe I offered a suggestion if those asking and wondering are truly interested in learning something. It's always better to go directly to the source for answers. Here's that opportunity.

I would imagine the players you mention can be located as well, but this is a McReynolds thread.
aussiesheila

Australia

#27 Feb 5, 2012
Georgie wrote:
<quoted text>
That is THE Jill. Read her info and her friends. If you don't think she would talk, then why do posters keep asking questions that cannot or will not be answered. Of course it wouldn't hurt to ask. What's the worse that could happen?
I would love you to ask Georgie. And report back here please. I don't wish to join Facebook otherwise I would do so myself

“May you all come home”

Since: Mar 07

safely Bless you all

#28 Feb 5, 2012
aussiesheila wrote:
<quoted text>I would love you to ask Georgie. And report back here please. I don't wish to join Facebook otherwise I would do so myself
Nobody answers questions of that nature on FB anyway. Anyone who would answer a total stranger's questions about a murder on FB would answer them anywhere.

It's foolish and IMO, nervy to do that to someone on FB. Everyone is entitled to their privacy, at least according to those who say that about John and Burke. Funny how the double standards work.

Only the Ramseys are entitled to be left alone if you ask the ABAR group

“May you all come home”

Since: Mar 07

safely Bless you all

#29 Feb 5, 2012
Georgie wrote:
Spain 1997
Why do you think the santas went to Spain in January 1997? Did they attend a shaman workshop, a retreat, something else shamanic related? I haven't checked that out yet, but I would venture a guess that it probably would.
Did you ever hear about BM and the human mind and consciousness?
Are you "familiar" with Evening 2 :)

Seems she is feeling better now

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#30 Feb 5, 2012
Georgie wrote:
Spain 1997

Why do you think the santas went to Spain in January 1997? Did they attend a shaman workshop, a retreat, something else shamanic related? I haven't checked that out yet, but I would venture a guess that it probably would.

Did you ever hear about BM and the human mind and consciousness?
No, but I find this post interesting... Please share more info or links...

“May you all come home”

Since: Mar 07

safely Bless you all

#31 Feb 5, 2012
Georgie has lots of info on the McReynolds that I'm sure she'll be willing to share
Georgie

Foley, AL

#32 Feb 5, 2012
Mama2JML wrote:
<quoted text>
No, but I find this post interesting... Please share more info or links...
I don't have a link to his talk on the subject. It came up on a Google search a while back from a discussion forum. So, I entered the subject in Google and read up on it.

“If life gives you melons”

Since: Nov 06

You might be dyslexic

#33 Feb 5, 2012
Capricorn wrote:
Georgie has lots of info on the McReynolds that I'm sure she'll be willing to share
I see you picked up on the whackadoodle scent too!

“May you all come home”

Since: Mar 07

safely Bless you all

#34 Feb 5, 2012
Legal__Eagle wrote:
<quoted text>
I see you picked up on the whackadoodle scent too!
:)

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#35 Feb 5, 2012
That's a good question!...

The RDIs are SUPER paranoid about any poster that isn't RDI, they think all IDIs are posting under many hats. I really don't think they understand that many people newer to the case lean IDI because of the more recent evidence. Many of the RDI posters here became interested in the case EARLY on and decided then that the RDI, the problem is they ignore any and all evidence that points to a non-Ramsey. They will never change their minds.
Georgie wrote:
<quoted text>
Why else would someone come here in post, unless they have a hidden agenda. I don't have a hidden agenda. My agenda is as I stated above.
As for Facebook, I only have access to the info that is public. There must be a reason that goes deeper than privacy to not ask questions of those who have been looked upon in questionable light by LE, when the opportunity to do so has presented itself.
Georgie

Foley, AL

#36 Feb 5, 2012
Capricorn wrote:
Georgie has lots of info on the McReynolds that I'm sure she'll be willing to share
Haven't you and others wondered why the McSantas said all the odd things they said? Really strange remarks. Why would they do that? Was there a message to convey? Look at those remarks. Compare them to a base topic, like Shamanism. Gee, even "listen carefully" fits.
deb

Minneapolis, MN

#37 Feb 5, 2012
Mama2JML wrote:
That's a good question!...
The RDIs are SUPER paranoid about any poster that isn't RDI, they think all IDIs are posting under many hats. I really don't think they understand that many people newer to the case lean IDI because of the more recent evidence. Many of the RDI posters here became interested in the case EARLY on and decided then that the RDI, the problem is they ignore any and all evidence that points to a non-Ramsey. They will never change their minds.<quoted text>
See if you can sign up at Crime Chatter and you can read all about Eve2's interested info she gathered about Mcreynolds.
The Truth Hurts

United States

#38 Feb 5, 2012
Georgie wrote:
<quoted text>
Haven't you and others wondered why the McSantas said all the odd things they said? Really strange remarks. Why would they do that? Was there a message to convey? Look at those remarks. Compare them to a base topic, like Shamanism. Gee, even "listen carefully" fits.
Honestly, I haven't found anything the "McSantas" have said or done to be particularly odd in the least. There is not one shred of physical evidence that connects them to the crime. Yes, it is possible to fit a square peg into a round hole if you pound it in hard enough, which is what I think the "McSanta" subscribers do. I've been around long enough to have read all of Eve2's ramblings on the subject and to be honest, her thoughts and theory border on lunacy. But that's JMHO.:)
The Truth Hurts

United States

#39 Feb 5, 2012
Mama2JML wrote:
That's a good question!...
The RDIs are SUPER paranoid about any poster that isn't RDI, they think all IDIs are posting under many hats. I really don't think they understand that many people newer to the case lean IDI because of the more recent evidence. Many of the RDI posters here became interested in the case EARLY on and decided then that the RDI, the problem is they ignore any and all evidence that points to a non-Ramsey. They will never change their minds.<quoted text>
Not paranoid in the least. Just smarter than the average IDI. ;)

People "newer to the case" could not possibly know as much about the case as us "oldies" do and therefore are not likely to have an intelligent and informed opinion, and that includes RDI and IDI alike. A snap judgment, perhaps, but that's about all.

I guess you must have gotten off of your fence and turned to the IDI side. Whoa...never saw THAT coming. ;)
The Truth Hurts

United States

#40 Feb 5, 2012
deb wrote:
<quoted text>
See if you can sign up at Crime Chatter and you can read all about Eve2's interested info she gathered about Mcreynolds.
She can also google the old crime library forum and read the archives. But I don't think she will need to do that. Seems she's already read a lot of it judging from her posts. ;)
Georgie

Foley, AL

#41 Feb 5, 2012
deb wrote:
<quoted text>
See if you can sign up at Crime Chatter and you can read all about Eve2's interested info she gathered about Mcreynolds.
A lot of it comes up in Google, but I haven't read anything about Shamanism.

Since: May 11

Seattle, WA

#42 Feb 5, 2012
The Truth Hurts wrote:
<quoted text>
Honestly, I haven't found anything the "McSantas" have said or done to be particularly odd in the least. There is not one shred of physical evidence that connects them to the crime. Yes, it is possible to fit a square peg into a round hole if you pound it in hard enough, which is what I think the "McSanta" subscribers do. I've been around long enough to have read all of Eve2's ramblings on the subject and to be honest, her thoughts and theory border on lunacy. But that's JMHO.:)
funny how there's so much dirt on the Ramsey's friends and associates, yet the Ramseys are (according to IDI) as pure as the driven snow. Surrounded by savages, those poor lambs never stood a chance. Unlike other Christian do gooders, the Ramsey's fell in with an evil circle of peeps. Usually good people know good people. LOL

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

JonBenet Ramsey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Other missing items from the Ramsey home (Jul '11) 11 hr Texxy 21
Urine stain on the long johns (Jun '17) 11 hr Texxy 4
The Fix Was In From the Jump. #1 (Apr '17) 11 hr Texxy 10
Music for the soul (Feb '17) 11 hr KCinNYC 636
Ramsey VS Spitz lawsuit (radio show) 11 hr KCinNYC 9
John Ramsey vs CBS, Experts, Critical Content P... 11 hr KCinNYC 8
JonBenet's dolls (Sep '06) 11 hr KCinNYC 349
More from around the web