Did theGingerbread productions pagean...

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#72 Aug 18, 2013
Legal__Eagle wrote:
<quoted text>
Sup?
Not much. Sup with you?

“If life gives you melons”

Since: Nov 06

You might be dyslexic

#73 Aug 20, 2013
thewhitewitchone wrote:
<quoted text>
Not much. Sup with you?
Life's Good. Hope you will be around more.
biz

Port Richey, FL

#74 Aug 20, 2013
Legal__Eagle wrote:
<quoted text>
No one who has been banned should be here at all, much less attempting to post or police the forum. If you don't like it here so much why do you keep coming back? To tell us how awful it is? Seems counterproductive to me. Go back to your handler's board and be happy. Life's too short for all the negativity.
That's what you want. You run off all of the IDI's so you can have total command of the forum.
The RDI's are the ones who are full of negativity.
biz

Port Richey, FL

#75 Aug 20, 2013
thewhitewitchone wrote:
<quoted text>
Hi Biz.
Has it occurred to you that IDI are more offensive than RDI and that is why you all keep getting banned? Just something you may want to consider.
Also, I really do not see a lot of RDI trolls/spammers on here whereas there seems to have been an abundance of IDI ones on here throughout the years. Again, just something you may want to consider.
I was never banned that I know of. It's funny how biased the monitors are here who ban people. They are all RDI's who disagree with the RDI's opinion.
Too bad Topix can't figure that out and ban the manipulative monitors.
This forum is full of RDIs who run off every IDI who tries to post anything. It's really a shame.

“If life gives you melons”

Since: Nov 06

You might be dyslexic

#76 Aug 20, 2013
biz wrote:
<quoted text>
That's what you want. You run off all of the IDI's so you can have total command of the forum.
The RDI's are the ones who are full of negativity.
If you don't like it here so much why do you keep coming back? To tell us how awful it is?

“May you all come home”

Since: Mar 07

safely Bless you all

#77 Aug 21, 2013
biz wrote:
<quoted text>
I was never banned that I know of. It's funny how biased the monitors are here who ban people. They are all RDI's who disagree with the RDI's opinion.
Too bad Topix can't figure that out and ban the manipulative monitors.
This forum is full of RDIs who run off every IDI who tries to post anything. It's really a shame.
I think you are fooling yourself if you truly believe that the topix employees, with the zillions of topics on this site are employed as RDI so that they can run IDI off the boards. You don't REALLY believe that do you biz? Despite differences on this case, I would be shocked to think that you truly believed that

What you need to believe is that when there are posters who can't seem to control themselves despite warnings and those who are here solely to spam and hurt others, it is appropriate to remove their posts and ban them if they don't heed the warnings that registered posters will receive.

However, you can still "choose" to believe that topix employs moderators based on their stance on the JonBenet Ramsey case. Whatever makes you feel better about it, works

“WAX ON”

Since: Jul 10

WAX OFF

#78 Aug 21, 2013
That tops my “Ludicrous “List” for this week – that Topix hires RDI to monitor the boards.

If truth be known, it isn’t just IDI vs RDI…it is obnoxious vs informative. You get people like the spammer who comes on and posts trash on every thread multiple times – they need to be removed.

Many more RDI have left Topix than IDI, because there are so few IDI left, especially after the DNA and GJ revelations! They get tired of having to post the same answers over and over again. Every couple of months it’s “Oh look, it was JMK, or McSanta.”
Capricorn wrote:
<quoted text>
I think you are fooling yourself if you truly believe that the topix employees, with the zillions of topics on this site are employed as RDI so that they can run IDI off the boards. You don't REALLY believe that do you biz? Despite differences on this case, I would be shocked to think that you truly believed that
What you need to believe is that when there are posters who can't seem to control themselves despite warnings and those who are here solely to spam and hurt others, it is appropriate to remove their posts and ban them if they don't heed the warnings that registered posters will receive.
However, you can still "choose" to believe that topix employs moderators based on their stance on the JonBenet Ramsey case. Whatever makes you feel better about it, works
biz

Port Richey, FL

#79 Aug 21, 2013
Capricorn wrote:
<quoted text>
I think you are fooling yourself if you truly believe that the topix employees, with the zillions of topics on this site are employed as RDI so that they can run IDI off the boards. You don't REALLY believe that do you biz? Despite differences on this case, I would be shocked to think that you truly believed that
What you need to believe is that when there are posters who can't seem to control themselves despite warnings and those who are here solely to spam and hurt others, it is appropriate to remove their posts and ban them if they don't heed the warnings that registered posters will receive.
However, you can still "choose" to believe that topix employs moderators based on their stance on the JonBenet Ramsey case. Whatever makes you feel better about it, works
I believe that YOU managed to become a monitor Cappie....and yes I do believe it was an effort to run off all of the IDI's. The RDI's are far more rude and unprofessional than the IDI's in this case. I have seen a lot of biased banning on this particular forum. I am not saying ALL of the monitors just the ones in the Ramsey forum.
They obviously don't check out their monitors and associations very well because they allowed Lei Sussura, a JMK run journalist effort, to be recognized as a legitimate news entity.

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

#80 Aug 21, 2013
biz wrote:
<quoted text>
I believe that YOU managed to become a monitor Cappie....and yes I do believe it was an effort to run off all of the IDI's. The RDI's are far more rude and unprofessional than the IDI's in this case. I have seen a lot of biased banning on this particular forum. I am not saying ALL of the monitors just the ones in the Ramsey forum.
They obviously don't check out their monitors and associations very well because they allowed Lei Sussura, a JMK run journalist effort, to be recognized as a legitimate news entity.
Amen!

“May you all come home”

Since: Mar 07

safely Bless you all

#81 Aug 21, 2013
biz wrote:
<quoted text>
I believe that YOU managed to become a monitor Cappie....and yes I do believe it was an effort to run off all of the IDI's. The RDI's are far more rude and unprofessional than the IDI's in this case. I have seen a lot of biased banning on this particular forum. I am not saying ALL of the monitors just the ones in the Ramsey forum.
They obviously don't check out their monitors and associations very well because they allowed Lei Sussura, a JMK run journalist effort, to be recognized as a legitimate news entity.
This post explains a lot of your skills ;)

“If life gives you melons”

Since: Nov 06

You might be dyslexic

#82 Aug 21, 2013
biz wrote:
<quoted text>
I believe that YOU managed to become a monitor Cappie....
You know Biz, you are welcome to check it out all on your own, we have given you the way to do that over and over again, each time you bring up this lie, and instead you continue to choose to post misinformation. Why is that?

Topix is a business. Their mods are employees, and do not post on forums other than to pop on and address and issue. So you are wrong all the way around. Please stop posting misinformation about the registered posters here. You are libeling people for no good reason other than you are too lazy to check it out.

“If life gives you melons”

Since: Nov 06

You might be dyslexic

#83 Aug 21, 2013
Capricorn wrote:
<quoted text>
This post explains a lot of your skills ;)
I trust you mean her sleuthing skills - to which I agree.
biz

Port Richey, FL

#84 Aug 24, 2013
Legal__Eagle wrote:
<quoted text>
You know Biz, you are welcome to check it out all on your own, we have given you the way to do that over and over again, each time you bring up this lie, and instead you continue to choose to post misinformation. Why is that?
Topix is a business. Their mods are employees, and do not post on forums other than to pop on and address and issue. So you are wrong all the way around. Please stop posting misinformation about the registered posters here. You are libeling people for no good reason other than you are too lazy to check it out.
I said I BELIEVE Cappie is a moderator here. I did not state it as fact so I am not libeling ANYONE.....and I don't care what you say I have good reason to believe it is true.
biz

Port Richey, FL

#85 Aug 24, 2013
Legal__Eagle wrote:
<quoted text>
I trust you mean her sleuthing skills - to which I agree.
At least I HAVE sleuthing skills. You and Cappie have no information to add to the case. You do is repeat and repeat the same ole same ole OVER AND OVER. I go right to the source and actually get information for myself. And I happen to think my sleuthing skills are pretty damn good!

“WAX ON”

Since: Jul 10

WAX OFF

#86 Aug 24, 2013
If you have sleuthing skills and have been given the source (which you say you go to) to verify something and you are still saying "you believe" Capricorn is a moderator, then you HAVEN'T gone to the source, or you are unable to process the information when it is given to you.

If you have gone to the source and you are not believing the source when they told you it wasn't true, and you are posting it anyway - then you are lying.

If you haven't gone to the source then you are lying about going to the source for your "sleuthing" information.

At the end of the day - it appears you are just lying!
biz wrote:
<quoted text>
At least I HAVE sleuthing skills. You and Cappie have no information to add to the case. You do is repeat and repeat the same ole same ole OVER AND OVER. I go right to the source and actually get information for myself. And I happen to think my sleuthing skills are pretty damn good!

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#88 Aug 24, 2013
Spice Pond wrote:
<quoted text>And, yes, you DO have sleuthing skills, Biz. Far moreso than any of those who are busy attacking you and calling you a liar. I can vouch for how you go to the source and find out whatever it is you want to know. No one else here can say that and if they should say it, then who are the liars?

And at the end of the day, why worry about them? None of them are worth your time or concern. Anyone with any sense of decency can see right through them. I've finally seen ALL of them for what they are; with no exceptions. Anyone would think they're all the same person, right?
Lol. Yep!

“May you all come home”

Since: Mar 07

safely Bless you all

#89 Aug 25, 2013
DrSeussMd wrote:
If you have sleuthing skills and have been given the source (which you say you go to) to verify something and you are still saying "you believe" Capricorn is a moderator, then you HAVEN'T gone to the source, or you are unable to process the information when it is given to you.
If you have gone to the source and you are not believing the source when they told you it wasn't true, and you are posting it anyway - then you are lying.
If you haven't gone to the source then you are lying about going to the source for your "sleuthing" information.
At the end of the day - it appears you are just lying!
<quoted text>
The "collective" skills are not much better LOL

Leave it alone Seuss. They're bored and baiting. In recent days, there has only been ONE poster that has had posts removed.

Enough said
Biz

Port Richey, FL

#90 Aug 27, 2013
DrSeussMd wrote:
If you have sleuthing skills and have been given the source (which you say you go to) to verify something and you are still saying "you believe" Capricorn is a moderator, then you HAVEN'T gone to the source, or you are unable to process the information when it is given to you.
If you have gone to the source and you are not believing the source when they told you it wasn't true, and you are posting it anyway - then you are lying.
If you haven't gone to the source then you are lying about going to the source for your "sleuthing" information.
At the end of the day - it appears you are just lying!
<quoted text>
i heard it from a VERY VERY reliable source. An RDI to be exact. Someone I don't necessarily agree with all the time but someone that would have no reason to lie. Someone who would have the ability to know.
Biz

Port Richey, FL

#91 Aug 27, 2013
Spice Pond wrote:
<quoted text>
And, yes, you DO have sleuthing skills, Biz. Far moreso than any of those who are busy attacking you and calling you a liar. I can vouch for how you go to the source and find out whatever it is you want to know. No one else here can say that and if they should say it, then who are the liars?
And at the end of the day, why worry about them? None of them are worth your time or concern. Anyone with any sense of decency can see right through them. I've finally seen ALL of them for what they are; with no exceptions. Anyone would think they're all the same person, right?
thank you spice pond. You are another sleuther who actually does "sleuth" too. These RDI's only know how to Pete and Repeat over and over the same ole same ole. They offer nothing new to contribute to the case. They have NO sleuthing skills. Most of them are just full of hate and vengeance. With no evidence to back it up.
I appreciate my fellow sleuth sisters who really do dig for the info on this case.

“If life gives you melons”

Since: Nov 06

You might be dyslexic

#92 Aug 28, 2013
Biz wrote:
<quoted text>
i heard it from a VERY VERY reliable source. An RDI to be exact. Someone I don't necessarily agree with all the time but someone that would have no reason to lie. Someone who would have the ability to know.
Biz wrote:
<quoted text>
i heard it from a VERY VERY reliable source. An RDI to be exact. Someone I don't necessarily agree with all the time but someone that would have no reason to lie. Someone who would have the ability to know.
Adding the word VERY, in caps, twice doesn't make it true, but it does seem to accentuate the fact you do not go to the source when you are getting your information. You have just poster a he said/she said as your source. You are so full of hot air.

You need to contact Topix, or you need to know the person you are accusing to know the truth. You have done neither, and you are promulgating a lie. I agree with Seuss on this point that you need to quit lying about people.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

JonBenet Ramsey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
ICU2 's Child Trafficking (Dec '14) 37 min icu2 431
Gates hired the hit (Dec '15) 1 hr sickofpervs 29
Think family...helter skelter type of family 2 hr sickofpervs 9
Identity Problems 7 hr berrytea333 98
OJ Simpson and JonBenet Ramsey cases 10 hr stoned luck aka ... 14
Today Show: JonBenet Ramsey case lies 11 hr stoned luck aka ... 213
Sig 17 hr stoned luck aka ... 13
More from around the web