Did theGingerbread productions pagean...

“WAX ON”

Since: Jul 10

WAX OFF

#53 Aug 14, 2013
In this paragraph, OS, you denounce the poop and say it is contrived only to fit MJ’s theory.
Spice Pond wrote:
<quoted text>
You are apparently expressing your opinion since I don't recall Kolar nor anyone else being so specific regarding Burke and JonBenet's personal hygiene. I just think it is interesting that the things you point to have not been proven to be factual and there had been no mention of them before Kolar's book, except from you. So it's my opinion that most of what you say is just contrived to support your theory.
In this paragraph, OS, you now use the poop to your advantage to bolster YOUR theory after accusing MJ of doing that very same thing with a negative connotation to your words towards her/him.
.
Spice Pond wrote:
<quoted text>
John Mark Karr's first child-wife has said that while they were in the basement of the family home, Karr asked her to have relations with him in HUMAN FECES. It's my opinion that since he made such a repulsive request to her and there might be evidence of feces having been found in various places in the Ramsey home, it seems logical to at least wonder if there can be a connection. I think this personality quirk is, to say the least, vile and unusual and therefore should at least raise some questions about Karr's apparent proclivities.
In this paragraph, OS, your defense of the word “fiasco” surrounding the FALSE confession (as determined by Law Enforcement) is just more of the same song – different verse. It was a fiasco. He lied – he wanted his 15 minutes of delusional fame until it got too hot in the kitchen – then the worm turned.

Lacy made it a fiasco – Lacy was NOT claiming Ramsey guilt. Your argument is moot.
Spice Pond wrote:
<quoted text>
Someone once used the word "fiasco" in reference to John Mark Karr. Then, the word stuck with a large group who were intent upon disproving his confession as being false, simply because it was necessary in order to claim the Ramsey guilt. It very well could have been false, but more likely the false part was that the death was an accident. That is just my opinion -- an opinion to which I'm entitled.

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#62 Aug 17, 2013
Legal__Eagle wrote:
<quoted text>
What was your first clue, LOL?
I guess I just wanted to see if she would admit it.
Nothing has changed with her, I see.:(
Spice Pond

Mobile, AL

#63 Aug 17, 2013
thewhitewitchone wrote:
<quoted text>
I guess I just wanted to see if she would admit it.
Nothing has changed with her, I see.:(
Thank you. But you're both off topic.

“If life gives you melons”

Since: Nov 06

You might be dyslexic

#64 Aug 17, 2013
And you were banned. What's your point?

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#65 Aug 17, 2013
Spice Pond wrote:
<quoted text>
Thank you. But you're both off topic.
I hardly think someone who has been banned and is posting under an alias should be acting as the forum police. ;) You're welcome.

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#66 Aug 17, 2013
Legal__Eagle wrote:
And you were banned. What's your point?
Hi LE!

“If life gives you melons”

Since: Nov 06

You might be dyslexic

#67 Aug 17, 2013
thewhitewitchone wrote:
<quoted text>
Hi LE!
Sup?
BrotherMoon

Arvada, CO

#68 Aug 17, 2013
moonjack wrote:
JAR was sexually abusing both Jonbenet and Burke. Burke was unable to understand or control the resulting anger and Jonbenmet is dead because of it.
Adjust the foil hat, your channelling is just a bit fuzzy there.
biz

Port Richey, FL

#69 Aug 18, 2013
thewhitewitchone wrote:
<quoted text>
I hardly think someone who has been banned and is posting under an alias should be acting as the forum police. ;) You're welcome.
No one who is IDI can be a forum police on this forum. It is so biased and full of RDI monitors. It's disgusting how you all were able to get control.

“If life gives you melons”

Since: Nov 06

You might be dyslexic

#70 Aug 18, 2013
biz wrote:
<quoted text>
No one who is IDI can be a forum police on this forum. It is so biased and full of RDI monitors. It's disgusting how you all were able to get control.
No one who has been banned should be here at all, much less attempting to post or police the forum. If you don't like it here so much why do you keep coming back? To tell us how awful it is? Seems counterproductive to me. Go back to your handler's board and be happy. Life's too short for all the negativity.

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#71 Aug 18, 2013
biz wrote:
<quoted text>
No one who is IDI can be a forum police on this forum. It is so biased and full of RDI monitors. It's disgusting how you all were able to get control.
Hi Biz.
Has it occurred to you that IDI are more offensive than RDI and that is why you all keep getting banned? Just something you may want to consider.
Also, I really do not see a lot of RDI trolls/spammers on here whereas there seems to have been an abundance of IDI ones on here throughout the years. Again, just something you may want to consider.

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#72 Aug 18, 2013
Legal__Eagle wrote:
<quoted text>
Sup?
Not much. Sup with you?

“If life gives you melons”

Since: Nov 06

You might be dyslexic

#73 Aug 20, 2013
thewhitewitchone wrote:
<quoted text>
Not much. Sup with you?
Life's Good. Hope you will be around more.
biz

Port Richey, FL

#74 Aug 20, 2013
Legal__Eagle wrote:
<quoted text>
No one who has been banned should be here at all, much less attempting to post or police the forum. If you don't like it here so much why do you keep coming back? To tell us how awful it is? Seems counterproductive to me. Go back to your handler's board and be happy. Life's too short for all the negativity.
That's what you want. You run off all of the IDI's so you can have total command of the forum.
The RDI's are the ones who are full of negativity.
biz

Port Richey, FL

#75 Aug 20, 2013
thewhitewitchone wrote:
<quoted text>
Hi Biz.
Has it occurred to you that IDI are more offensive than RDI and that is why you all keep getting banned? Just something you may want to consider.
Also, I really do not see a lot of RDI trolls/spammers on here whereas there seems to have been an abundance of IDI ones on here throughout the years. Again, just something you may want to consider.
I was never banned that I know of. It's funny how biased the monitors are here who ban people. They are all RDI's who disagree with the RDI's opinion.
Too bad Topix can't figure that out and ban the manipulative monitors.
This forum is full of RDIs who run off every IDI who tries to post anything. It's really a shame.

“If life gives you melons”

Since: Nov 06

You might be dyslexic

#76 Aug 20, 2013
biz wrote:
<quoted text>
That's what you want. You run off all of the IDI's so you can have total command of the forum.
The RDI's are the ones who are full of negativity.
If you don't like it here so much why do you keep coming back? To tell us how awful it is?

“May you all come home”

Since: Mar 07

safely Bless you all

#77 Aug 21, 2013
biz wrote:
<quoted text>
I was never banned that I know of. It's funny how biased the monitors are here who ban people. They are all RDI's who disagree with the RDI's opinion.
Too bad Topix can't figure that out and ban the manipulative monitors.
This forum is full of RDIs who run off every IDI who tries to post anything. It's really a shame.
I think you are fooling yourself if you truly believe that the topix employees, with the zillions of topics on this site are employed as RDI so that they can run IDI off the boards. You don't REALLY believe that do you biz? Despite differences on this case, I would be shocked to think that you truly believed that

What you need to believe is that when there are posters who can't seem to control themselves despite warnings and those who are here solely to spam and hurt others, it is appropriate to remove their posts and ban them if they don't heed the warnings that registered posters will receive.

However, you can still "choose" to believe that topix employs moderators based on their stance on the JonBenet Ramsey case. Whatever makes you feel better about it, works

“WAX ON”

Since: Jul 10

WAX OFF

#78 Aug 21, 2013
That tops my “Ludicrous “List” for this week – that Topix hires RDI to monitor the boards.

If truth be known, it isn’t just IDI vs RDI…it is obnoxious vs informative. You get people like the spammer who comes on and posts trash on every thread multiple times – they need to be removed.

Many more RDI have left Topix than IDI, because there are so few IDI left, especially after the DNA and GJ revelations! They get tired of having to post the same answers over and over again. Every couple of months it’s “Oh look, it was JMK, or McSanta.”
Capricorn wrote:
<quoted text>
I think you are fooling yourself if you truly believe that the topix employees, with the zillions of topics on this site are employed as RDI so that they can run IDI off the boards. You don't REALLY believe that do you biz? Despite differences on this case, I would be shocked to think that you truly believed that
What you need to believe is that when there are posters who can't seem to control themselves despite warnings and those who are here solely to spam and hurt others, it is appropriate to remove their posts and ban them if they don't heed the warnings that registered posters will receive.
However, you can still "choose" to believe that topix employs moderators based on their stance on the JonBenet Ramsey case. Whatever makes you feel better about it, works
biz

Port Richey, FL

#79 Aug 21, 2013
Capricorn wrote:
<quoted text>
I think you are fooling yourself if you truly believe that the topix employees, with the zillions of topics on this site are employed as RDI so that they can run IDI off the boards. You don't REALLY believe that do you biz? Despite differences on this case, I would be shocked to think that you truly believed that
What you need to believe is that when there are posters who can't seem to control themselves despite warnings and those who are here solely to spam and hurt others, it is appropriate to remove their posts and ban them if they don't heed the warnings that registered posters will receive.
However, you can still "choose" to believe that topix employs moderators based on their stance on the JonBenet Ramsey case. Whatever makes you feel better about it, works
I believe that YOU managed to become a monitor Cappie....and yes I do believe it was an effort to run off all of the IDI's. The RDI's are far more rude and unprofessional than the IDI's in this case. I have seen a lot of biased banning on this particular forum. I am not saying ALL of the monitors just the ones in the Ramsey forum.
They obviously don't check out their monitors and associations very well because they allowed Lei Sussura, a JMK run journalist effort, to be recognized as a legitimate news entity.

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

#80 Aug 21, 2013
biz wrote:
<quoted text>
I believe that YOU managed to become a monitor Cappie....and yes I do believe it was an effort to run off all of the IDI's. The RDI's are far more rude and unprofessional than the IDI's in this case. I have seen a lot of biased banning on this particular forum. I am not saying ALL of the monitors just the ones in the Ramsey forum.
They obviously don't check out their monitors and associations very well because they allowed Lei Sussura, a JMK run journalist effort, to be recognized as a legitimate news entity.
Amen!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

JonBenet Ramsey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Burke's handwriting?? Take a look. (Oct '16) 4 min HJT 38
Patsy Powerless SAHM (Aug '17) 20 min HJT 85
We Both Got Bikes 26 min HJT 46
Ramsey's larry king live (Jan '07) 29 min Anonymous 20
Dr. Phil (Sep '16) 32 min Anonymous 19
IT is now ... 1 hr HJT 28
Be Careful Who You Call Fat, Norma (Aug '10) 1 hr HJT 17