Did theGingerbread productions pagean...
biz

Port Richey, FL

#47 Aug 13, 2013
moonjack wrote:
There's a bunch of idiots who claim some poor bald bloke in the background resembles Karr but he was younger with a full head of hair in 1996.
I have one former wife and two former fiancé's and an acquaintance who have verified that it was him. I think he had several different looks and the mullet look you refer to was more in the 80's when he was living in Hamilton.
biz

Port Richey, FL

#48 Aug 13, 2013
moonjack wrote:
There's a bunch of idiots who claim some poor bald bloke in the background resembles Karr but he was younger with a full head of hair in 1996.
And the Karr likeness was not bald. I have seen a side by side comparison that is absolutely astonishing.
biz

Port Richey, FL

#49 Aug 13, 2013
DrSeussMd wrote:
The video clip you no doubt have (because we all have it), can be found also on youtube, and it was from December 22, 1996, not the 23rd, and from Southwest Plaza Mall and not the Twin peaks Mall.
<quoted text>
Thanks for clarifying.

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#50 Aug 13, 2013
Give it a rest biz, Karr had nothing to do with Jonbenet's death. Nothing trumps the fact the Ramsey family was so dysfunctional both kids crapped in their clothes and beds instead of a toilet.

Burke was so out of control fresh turds were found in his pajamas by police at the crime scene. Burke was a disturbed child living an emotional hell and Jonbenet took the brunt of it.
candy

East Lansing, MI

#51 Aug 13, 2013
Littleton is in the burbs of Denver. Whenever I think of Littleton, I always think of Columbine. The two are inexorably linked to me, the same way Boulder and JonBenet are.

“WAX ON”

Since: Jul 10

WAX OFF

#53 Aug 14, 2013
In this paragraph, OS, you denounce the poop and say it is contrived only to fit MJ’s theory.
Spice Pond wrote:
<quoted text>
You are apparently expressing your opinion since I don't recall Kolar nor anyone else being so specific regarding Burke and JonBenet's personal hygiene. I just think it is interesting that the things you point to have not been proven to be factual and there had been no mention of them before Kolar's book, except from you. So it's my opinion that most of what you say is just contrived to support your theory.
In this paragraph, OS, you now use the poop to your advantage to bolster YOUR theory after accusing MJ of doing that very same thing with a negative connotation to your words towards her/him.
.
Spice Pond wrote:
<quoted text>
John Mark Karr's first child-wife has said that while they were in the basement of the family home, Karr asked her to have relations with him in HUMAN FECES. It's my opinion that since he made such a repulsive request to her and there might be evidence of feces having been found in various places in the Ramsey home, it seems logical to at least wonder if there can be a connection. I think this personality quirk is, to say the least, vile and unusual and therefore should at least raise some questions about Karr's apparent proclivities.
In this paragraph, OS, your defense of the word “fiasco” surrounding the FALSE confession (as determined by Law Enforcement) is just more of the same song – different verse. It was a fiasco. He lied – he wanted his 15 minutes of delusional fame until it got too hot in the kitchen – then the worm turned.

Lacy made it a fiasco – Lacy was NOT claiming Ramsey guilt. Your argument is moot.
Spice Pond wrote:
<quoted text>
Someone once used the word "fiasco" in reference to John Mark Karr. Then, the word stuck with a large group who were intent upon disproving his confession as being false, simply because it was necessary in order to claim the Ramsey guilt. It very well could have been false, but more likely the false part was that the death was an accident. That is just my opinion -- an opinion to which I'm entitled.

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#55 Aug 14, 2013
Spice Pond wrote:
I don't recall Kolar nor anyone else being so specific regarding Burke and JonBenet's personal hygiene... there had been no mention of them before Kolar's book...
There's a lot you can't or don't want to remember. From the forgetful 'mind' that couldn't recall simple directions for pet medicine that killed a cat.

What happened in the Ramsey family with the feces is the epitome of dysfunction. It was both children screaming for help and attention as a result of repeated incestual sexual assaults. It can’t be overlooked as anything else. It related to every action and behavior in the home, especially when you consider one child is dead under mysterious circumstances.

Housekeeper #1 said Burke smeared his feces.

Housekeeper #2 said Jonbenet left grapefruit size turds in her bed.

In interviews Patsy was asked about feces photographed in underwear on the bathroom floor.

Nedra had special wording - dirtying herself, for Jonbenet’s 'problem'.

Smith claims all the underwear of Jonbenet’s was stained from feces.

Kolar relates information about a candy box smeared with feces and a pair of Burke’s pj bottoms with a fresh load of shite.

The dirty underwear is from transcripts - Patsy is asked to look at a picture described as inside out pants with dirty underwear still in them on Jonbenet's bathroom floor. I think from from the National Enquirer Police Files Book - a suggested read if you want to understand the real Ramseys and all their BS.

TH: "It's a bathroom."

PR: "This one looks like someone went to the potty and didn't flush."

TH: "Okay, is that out of the ordinary?"

PR: "Not terribly. No."

TH: "Did you take JonBenet to the bathroom prior to putting her to bed?"

PR: "No."

TH: "Would she have gotten up during the night and gone to the bathroom?"

PR: "Possibly."

TH: "If she did, would she have flushed?"

PR: "Not necessarily."

......and later..........

PR: "This is JonBenet's floor, her pants."

TH: "Do you recall those particular pants, when she would have worn those last?"

PR: "Not for sure. Probably recently because they are dropped in the middle of the floor, but I don't remember exactly."

TH: "They are kind of inside out."

PR: "Right."

TH: "Here is a close up of it. It appears they are stained."

PR: "Right."

TH: "Is that something JonBenet had a problem with?"

PR: "Well she, you know, she was at the age where she was learning to wipe herself and, you know, sometimes she wouldn't do such a great job."

TH: "Did she have accidents , if you will, in the course of the day or the night, as opposed to just bed wetting?"

PR: "Not usually, no, huh-uh. That would probably be more from just not wiping real well."

TH: "Okay. Do you know how long those would have been in that position on the floor in there?"

PR: "It depends when she wore them last."

TH: "Again, do you recall?"

PR: "I don't remember."

TH: On Christmas day were you in that bathroom at all?"

PR: "Very likely, but I can't say for sure."

TH: "Had you been in there that day, would you have done something with them?"

PR: "Well, I got, you know -- that night I got -- I know I got the long johns for her out of that bathroom."

TH: "Right, out of one of the drawers in there."

PR: "Yeah."

TH: "Do you recall seeing those on the floor that night when you got the -- "

PR: "No."

TH: "underwear?"

PR: "They could have been there. I don't know."

TH: "Is it possible that some point during the night she would have gotten up and put those on or thrown them down there or changed in some way?"

PR: "I just -- I can't imagine that. No, because I put those -- she was zonked out asleep, so I put her to bed. And she had those, she had worn the black velvet ones to Priscilla's."

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#56 Aug 14, 2013
Spice Pond wrote:
<quoted text>
You are apparently expressing your opinion
My opinion and I am free to state it is that the older half brother John Andrew Eamsey sexually abused both if these younger siblings throughout their lives. He was the family member with ready access and the most active weiner, even left his calling card on the linens.

It's never been suggested or addressed and perhaps should be. Something beyond horrific was ongoing within that family and this scenario fits.

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#59 Aug 14, 2013
Spice Pond wrote:
But YOU don't seem to REMEMBER this matter was clarified. It's usually a natural thing to wonder what killed a beloved pet; therefore, I wondered why he died so suddenly. I later learned from the vet that my cat had distemper, which is generally fatal in animals.
You're the one with clogged arteries to your fat head. You couldn't even recall IT HAD BEEN MENTIONED PRIOR TO KOLAR the Ramsey kids had severe toileting issues to the point professional therapy was needed.

If you now want to claim the cat is dead from distemper you are still at fault as vacine is readily available.

http://www.topix.com/forum/news/jonbenet-rams...
Spice Pond wrote:
Thank you. It's a long story, but to be brief. It's doubly hard because I feel responsible. We had a sudden heavy flea infestation among my cats and they apparently had built up an immunity to all the "remedies". So, not taking into account how tiny he was, I'm afraid over a period of time, I overdosed him. And I didn't even realize it. Now that it's too late, I can see what I should
have seen.

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#60 Aug 14, 2013
JAR was sexually abusing both Jonbenet and Burke. Burke was unable to understand or control the resulting anger and Jonbenmet is dead because of it.

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#62 Aug 17, 2013
Legal__Eagle wrote:
<quoted text>
What was your first clue, LOL?
I guess I just wanted to see if she would admit it.
Nothing has changed with her, I see.:(
Spice Pond

Mobile, AL

#63 Aug 17, 2013
thewhitewitchone wrote:
<quoted text>
I guess I just wanted to see if she would admit it.
Nothing has changed with her, I see.:(
Thank you. But you're both off topic.

“If life gives you melons”

Since: Nov 06

You might be dyslexic

#64 Aug 17, 2013
And you were banned. What's your point?

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#65 Aug 17, 2013
Spice Pond wrote:
<quoted text>
Thank you. But you're both off topic.
I hardly think someone who has been banned and is posting under an alias should be acting as the forum police. ;) You're welcome.

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#66 Aug 17, 2013
Legal__Eagle wrote:
And you were banned. What's your point?
Hi LE!

“If life gives you melons”

Since: Nov 06

You might be dyslexic

#67 Aug 17, 2013
thewhitewitchone wrote:
<quoted text>
Hi LE!
Sup?
BrotherMoon

Arvada, CO

#68 Aug 17, 2013
moonjack wrote:
JAR was sexually abusing both Jonbenet and Burke. Burke was unable to understand or control the resulting anger and Jonbenmet is dead because of it.
Adjust the foil hat, your channelling is just a bit fuzzy there.
biz

Port Richey, FL

#69 Aug 18, 2013
thewhitewitchone wrote:
<quoted text>
I hardly think someone who has been banned and is posting under an alias should be acting as the forum police. ;) You're welcome.
No one who is IDI can be a forum police on this forum. It is so biased and full of RDI monitors. It's disgusting how you all were able to get control.

“If life gives you melons”

Since: Nov 06

You might be dyslexic

#70 Aug 18, 2013
biz wrote:
<quoted text>
No one who is IDI can be a forum police on this forum. It is so biased and full of RDI monitors. It's disgusting how you all were able to get control.
No one who has been banned should be here at all, much less attempting to post or police the forum. If you don't like it here so much why do you keep coming back? To tell us how awful it is? Seems counterproductive to me. Go back to your handler's board and be happy. Life's too short for all the negativity.

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#71 Aug 18, 2013
biz wrote:
<quoted text>
No one who is IDI can be a forum police on this forum. It is so biased and full of RDI monitors. It's disgusting how you all were able to get control.
Hi Biz.
Has it occurred to you that IDI are more offensive than RDI and that is why you all keep getting banned? Just something you may want to consider.
Also, I really do not see a lot of RDI trolls/spammers on here whereas there seems to have been an abundance of IDI ones on here throughout the years. Again, just something you may want to consider.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

JonBenet Ramsey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Today Show: JonBenet Ramsey case lies 1 hr Sheriff Wydell 205
Sig 1 hr stoned luck aka ... 11
Gates hired the hit (Dec '15) 4 hr stoned luck aka ... 28
It always leads back to Burke (Oct '11) 6 hr berrytea333 169
ICU2 's Child Trafficking (Dec '14) 8 hr icu2 425
Questioning Burke Ramsey (Dec '08) 12 hr moonjack 278
Obvious History of ABUSE (Sep '12) 14 hr moonjack 98
More from around the web