How utterly disgusting. NO REAL "historian" or archivist does ANYTHING like that, or would have anything to do with hir and hir pathetic MASSIVE censorship. KEEP THE TRUTH FROM THE PUBLIC, with a heavily redacted version of WHAT WAS REALLY DISCUSSED, the hard work of good posters like Starry, and pass around the COMPLETE record in secret, to a clique of fools. Who NEVER post any news or post ANY content in this forum. See who murders the truth in this case, but once again, I'm sure Hal Haddon, Lin Wood have all the relevant threads they try to cover up as never existing, and will be able to show how MASSIVE a censorship effort she has tried to peddle to the public. It's so butchered, it's like Pravda, A LIE about this case.Sometimes, in an effort to be knowledgeable Candy, you are just mean.
To criticize the one person who spent endless hours and personal expense making sure everything out there in the public arena was categorized, indexed and available to the public on her site for FREE, and has been the absolute BEST historian on this case, bar none, you feel because you canít get YOUR hands on something immediately that you should blame ACR for it? That beats all! Sounds like the green eyed monster coming out in you AGAIN! All these poor case followers who just donít seem to live up to YOUR expectations, tsk tsk tsk.
It just so happens many of us have ALL the JW files, provided by ACR on CD, and have had them for years. The fact YOU were not included in the circle of recipients speaks more about you than ACR, and just goes to strengthen the decision made by ACR at the time as to who received them and who didnít!
#998 Jun 27, 2013
Since: Jul 10
#999 Jun 28, 2013
Ensuring the JW files lived on was the RIGHT thing to do, it isnít censorship, and the information isnít being withheld or changed or misrepresented. They are copies of already public files/threads that used to comprise the JW forum. It is basically the forum itself on CD. You would have a copy of them also had you copied them from JW, duh, so that dog of yours wonít hunt! It is no oneís fault except your own if you didnít have the foresight to archive them. You could have kept them in your secret document vault and then lauded them over everyoneís head like you tend to do.
No one, least of all me, was taking anything away from "good" posters or Starryís posts. What are you talking about being ďheavily redactedĒ? And who brought Haddon and Wood into this? It doesnít even remotely have anything to do with either of them.
You are just off the hook blathering now. Go get a pill for that green-eyed monster of yours. There is nothing in your post that even makes sense, or is even applicable to the subject matter, "HIR" indeed, LOL!
#1000 Mar 23, 2017
John Ramsey said JAR's room overlooked the driveway. He believes the intruder came into the house and was there all the time they were gone and then came out after everyone was gone.
I just heard the story about a 6 year old girl being sexually assaulted in her bedroom but being interrupted and running out of a house in a Ninja outfit. Sorry I came late to the game.
I still don't understand how anyone without a map and GPS could negotiate that house and wouldn't they be afraid of running into the family on the stairwell?
#1001 Mar 24, 2017
Well, if Patsy passed a paid for polygraph, that leads to two conclusions. Must I spell it out?
#1003 May 5, 2017
Today is Cinco De Mayo and also the day we are going to solve the case. Some think caylee in Florida is still alive. Murphy USA is a clue
Add your comments below
|Boulder, Colo., police regain lead role in JonB... (Feb '09)||2 hr||KCinNYC||1,663|
|change the name to MOONJACK & FRANKIE'S FORUM (Aug '11)||5 hr||kauna||14|
|Are you watching closely?||5 hr||KCinNYC||45|
|Why not pull-ups?||5 hr||kauna||20|
|John Andrew Ramsey Said What?? (Nov '16)||6 hr||kauna||240|
|Experts reveal it takes five months to lose the...||9 hr||kauna||6|
|Long Underwear in Bathroom (Mar '10)||10 hr||kauna||110|
Find what you want!
Search JonBenet Ramsey Forum Now
Copyright © 2017 Topix LLC