FBI Pofiler Bob Ressler's take on the case...

Posted in the JonBenet Ramsey Forum

Comments (Page 45)

Showing posts 881 - 884 of884
|
next page >
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Fat Kt lovr prec Johnson

Edcouch, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#996
Jun 26, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

You now it all!!

Since: Jul 10

Crimson Tide Bulldozed

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#997
Jun 27, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

Sometimes, in an effort to be knowledgeable Candy, you are just mean.

To criticize the one person who spent endless hours and personal expense making sure everything out there in the public arena was categorized, indexed and available to the public on her site for FREE, and has been the absolute BEST historian on this case, bar none, you feel because you canít get YOUR hands on something immediately that you should blame ACR for it? That beats all! Sounds like the green eyed monster coming out in you AGAIN! All these poor case followers who just donít seem to live up to YOUR expectations, tsk tsk tsk.

It just so happens many of us have ALL the JW files, provided by ACR on CD, and have had them for years. The fact YOU were not included in the circle of recipients speaks more about you than ACR, and just goes to strengthen the decision made by ACR at the time as to who received them and who didnít!
candy wrote:
I distinctly recall where I read Robert Ressler's profile in the Ramsey case. On Justice Watch. Starry, a poster in the Maryland area, went to see Ressler and took notes. Those posts should still be available. A Candy Rose, who has not bothered to maintain or put up ANY Justice Watch threads IN YEARS, has YEARS AGO put up SOME THREADS, and in her typical fashion, either dropped the project or forgot about it. Someone else should have custody over those threads, that is interested in this case, and KNOWS what threads are relevant for case discussion, and Starry's posts are exhibit A of that.
candy

East Lansing, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#998
Jun 27, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

DrSeussMd wrote:
Sometimes, in an effort to be knowledgeable Candy, you are just mean.
To criticize the one person who spent endless hours and personal expense making sure everything out there in the public arena was categorized, indexed and available to the public on her site for FREE, and has been the absolute BEST historian on this case, bar none, you feel because you canít get YOUR hands on something immediately that you should blame ACR for it? That beats all! Sounds like the green eyed monster coming out in you AGAIN! All these poor case followers who just donít seem to live up to YOUR expectations, tsk tsk tsk.
It just so happens many of us have ALL the JW files, provided by ACR on CD, and have had them for years. The fact YOU were not included in the circle of recipients speaks more about you than ACR, and just goes to strengthen the decision made by ACR at the time as to who received them and who didnít!
<quoted text>
How utterly disgusting. NO REAL "historian" or archivist does ANYTHING like that, or would have anything to do with hir and hir pathetic MASSIVE censorship. KEEP THE TRUTH FROM THE PUBLIC, with a heavily redacted version of WHAT WAS REALLY DISCUSSED, the hard work of good posters like Starry, and pass around the COMPLETE record in secret, to a clique of fools. Who NEVER post any news or post ANY content in this forum. See who murders the truth in this case, but once again, I'm sure Hal Haddon, Lin Wood have all the relevant threads they try to cover up as never existing, and will be able to show how MASSIVE a censorship effort she has tried to peddle to the public. It's so butchered, it's like Pravda, A LIE about this case.

Since: Jul 10

Crimson Tide Bulldozed

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#999
Jun 28, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Ensuring the JW files lived on was the RIGHT thing to do, it isnít censorship, and the information isnít being withheld or changed or misrepresented. They are copies of already public files/threads that used to comprise the JW forum. It is basically the forum itself on CD. You would have a copy of them also had you copied them from JW, duh, so that dog of yours wonít hunt! It is no oneís fault except your own if you didnít have the foresight to archive them. You could have kept them in your secret document vault and then lauded them over everyoneís head like you tend to do.

No one, least of all me, was taking anything away from "good" posters or Starryís posts. What are you talking about being ďheavily redactedĒ? And who brought Haddon and Wood into this? It doesnít even remotely have anything to do with either of them.

You are just off the hook blathering now. Go get a pill for that green-eyed monster of yours. There is nothing in your post that even makes sense, or is even applicable to the subject matter, "HIR" indeed, LOL!
candy wrote:
<quoted text>
How utterly disgusting. NO REAL "historian" or archivist does ANYTHING like that, or would have anything to do with hir and hir pathetic MASSIVE censorship. KEEP THE TRUTH FROM THE PUBLIC, with a heavily redacted version of WHAT WAS REALLY DISCUSSED, the hard work of good posters like Starry, and pass around the COMPLETE record in secret, to a clique of fools. Who NEVER post any news or post ANY content in this forum. See who murders the truth in this case, but once again, I'm sure Hal Haddon, Lin Wood have all the relevant threads they try to cover up as never existing, and will be able to show how MASSIVE a censorship effort she has tried to peddle to the public. It's so butchered, it's like Pravda, A LIE about this case.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 881 - 884 of884
|
next page >
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

19 Users are viewing the JonBenet Ramsey Forum right now

Search the JonBenet Ramsey Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Patsy's little helpers 39 min Fr_Brown 6
Fleet, Priscilla White denied official Ramsey e... 4 hr candy 161
Smit try to climb back through the basement win... 16 hr Capricorn 12
Hair 22 hr Two 11
S.B.T.C: Weird coincidence? (Mar '10) Tue Bike club 48
Parents suspected of murder Jul 8 Just Wondering 31
John Mark Karr speaks about his Orchiectomy Sur... Jul 8 Biz 6
•••
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••