Comments
21 - 40 of 47 Comments Last updated Oct 22, 2013
candy

East Lansing, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#21
Jun 30, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Quinn wrote:
Excuse me? What kind of upside down backwards criminal investigation thinking is that? Because there hasn't been a match then it must mean the family is involved? The very existence of CODIS allows for samples seeking a match over time.
OK, lets just call the FBI and suggest all samples in CODIS not matched to anyone should be allowed to just punt to the suspect someone "thinks" did it? Lets just forget about science or forensics?
Get real.
The fact the DNA hasn't matched anyone is a moot point and a flimsy argument.
Baloney. Read my thread on Colorado Cold Cases and DNA and see how FEW cold case hits there are to begin with and how FEWER even match a homicide. Any DNA hit to a killer would have happened LONG AGO, with all the PERSONAL REFERENCES AND KNOWLEDGE the ransom note writer had of the family. The universe of people who could have written that note and known John Ramsey's bonus that year is SMALL.
Quinn

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#22
Jun 30, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

candy wrote:
<quoted text>
Baloney. Read my thread on Colorado Cold Cases and DNA and see how FEW cold case hits there are to begin with and how FEWER even match a homicide. Any DNA hit to a killer would have happened LONG AGO, with all the PERSONAL REFERENCES AND KNOWLEDGE the ransom note writer had of the family. The universe of people who could have written that note and known John Ramsey's bonus that year is SMALL.
You're taking quite a few leaps while trashing forensic science along with the very basic skill of detection.

Old cold cases are solved regularly dating back decades. I doubt the loved ones of those victims would like hearing your ill conceived DNA logic. Solving cases, no matter how old, is the very basis for the existence of CODIS. How can you, or anyone, possibly assume and then state as fact the killer knew John Ramsey? Even if the killer did know Ramsey, how can you assume to know every person who knew or met him was DNA tested? And then to base that crazy assumption on the importance of DNA in this case is way out there.

Unless you can prove the DNA is not real, that the person who matches that DNA is not real, then you don't have a leg to stand on with your trumped up theories.
candy

East Lansing, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#23
Jun 30, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

You're just shooting off your mouth about a case in which you don't know the evidence. There is plenty of FIBER EVIDENCE against the Ramsey parents, Patsy's Ramseys's FIBERS were found on the ligature around JonBenet's neck AND on the sticky side of the duct tape APPLIED TO HER MOUTH AFTER SHE WAS DEAD. There are allegedly black fibers matching John Ramsey's Israeli black wool sweater he wore that day in JonBenet's panties. BOTH John and Patsy Ramsey were indicted by a Boulder Grand jury in 1999 for CHILD ABUSE LEADING TO DEATH.
Quinn

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24
Jun 30, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

candy wrote:
You're just shooting off your mouth about a case in which you don't know the evidence. There is plenty of FIBER EVIDENCE against the Ramsey parents, Patsy's Ramseys's FIBERS were found on the ligature around JonBenet's neck AND on the sticky side of the duct tape APPLIED TO HER MOUTH AFTER SHE WAS DEAD. There are allegedly black fibers matching John Ramsey's Israeli black wool sweater he wore that day in JonBenet's panties. BOTH John and Patsy Ramsey were indicted by a Boulder Grand jury in 1999 for CHILD ABUSE LEADING TO DEATH.
Fiber evidence can't hold a candle to DNA evidence. In fact it's rarely considered in court especially when fiber evidence is from the same family, living in the same house. There's a little thing called transference.

Allegedly? Black fibers? Sorta kinda maybe? That's no better than a rumor and more fine tuned gossip. Boulder Grand Jury results are also moot, and meant to incite those on a witch hunt. Plus why even consider such a result, if it's even true, when they didn't have all the evidence? Fact is, the Ramsey's weren't indicted. The DNA was far from developed at that point, and long before the touch DNA testing which makes the DNA in this case very powerful indeed. Even after all these years no one in an official capacity is willing to publicly dismiss the DNA. They can't.

It might feel good to utter the words, "child abuse resulting in death" but it holds no weight, especially given the forensics developed since then. DNA was in the dark ages back then...unlike today.
candy

East Lansing, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#25
Jun 30, 2013
 

Judged:

4

3

3

Quote: " Fiber evidence can't hold a candle to DNA evidence."

Baloney! The fiber evidence can be matched to THOSE INDICTED BY THE GRAND JURY, and the DNA has not been matched to ANYONE, DEAD OR ALIVE IN 10 YEARS.

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27
Jul 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

Quinn wrote:
You're taking quite a few leaps while trashing forensic science along with the very basic skill of detection.
IMO If you want to use basic investigation skills you have to include the fact the Ramsey children were in therapy for encopresis, they didn't use the toilet for bowel movements. They were both suffereing form a rare symptom of mentally illness in children, in particular children that have been sexually abused. The exact type of family dysfunction and crisis that leads to discord and fighting with injuries such as Jonbenet had, the conditions were ripe. These children were angry and rightly so. Burke had no control of his emotions and struck his sister. Patsy glossed over everything and pretned her children weren't sick. There was no evidence the recommended therapy was in use in the home, instead Burke's pjs and Jonbenet's underwear both were found full of feces. These children were screaming for help and Patsy was playing deaf.
Quinn wrote:
Old cold cases are solved regularly dating back decades. I doubt the loved ones of those victims would like hearing your ill conceived DNA logic.
At least other vicitms have families that seek resolution and closure by helping the investigation and doing all in their power to keep the case alive. It's only the killers that want cases kept swept under the carpet. Jonbenet only has a handful of outsiders to speak for her. Burke won't speak to police without a court order.

The Ramseys are so good for what happened. Burke had every capability to physically harm her and the mental instability as well. Patsy was so conceited and worried about appearances they covered it up.

The DNA is a red herring. It wasn't a gob of semen. It was the same old degraded dna found everywhere. More so in the Ramsey family because they lived like pigs. The type of insignificant artifact found on all articles humans come in contact with.

GAB

Since: Jul 10

Crimson Tide Bulldozed

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#28
Jul 1, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

4

Fact is the GJ voted to indict. Just because Hunter chose not to follow through and sign the paperwork it doesn't take away from the vote itself.
Quinn wrote:
<quoted text>
Fact is, the Ramsey's weren't indicted.

Since: Jul 10

Crimson Tide Bulldozed

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29
Jul 1, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

DENVER - Talk radio-show host Peter Boyles did not appear Monday as the new host of the morning drive on 710 KNUS as expected.

Boyles told 9Wants to Know investigative reporter Jace Larson that he can't comment on what happened.

On the KNUS Facebook page, a statement was posted Monday morning:
"Due to circumstances beyond our control - we are unable to debut our new program this morning at 6AM - We will air our regular programming today and are working diligently to add a new program to our daily lineup at the earliest possible date. Stay tuned for breaking news and intelligent talk. Good things are coming," the statement said.

Read Boyles headed to KNUS here: http://on9news.tv/18qNm3c

Boyles was fired by Clear Channel after a May incident where he admits he got physical with his producer on the day Tom Tancredo announced he would run for governor.

In an interview on Friday, Boyles said he blames no one but himself for the incident.
Watch Boyles' interview here: http://on9news.tv/11YsoS2

Clear Channel has not responded to questions about whether Boyles' past contract contained a non-compete clause. Such causes are common in broadcast contracts and often are used to prevent a personality from switching to the competition without a several month waiting period.

http://www.9news.com/news/article/343026/339/...
BrotherMoon

Denver, CO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#30
Jul 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Thanks Doc. I wonder if it is an attempt to silence him for as long as they can or if it is an honest attempt to make it all clean legally.
candy

East Lansing, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#31
Jul 1, 2013
 
It should have been fine legally. He said his contract was ending when that incident happened. KHOW/Bain Capital could not compete with the Real Pete, and their ratings would have been blown out of the water. But I don't understand what type of leverage KHOW would have had to keep him off the air.

Since: Jul 10

Crimson Tide Bulldozed

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#32
Jul 2, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

NON-COMPETE clause most likely. They are standard, and they most likely will need to get that waived.
candy wrote:
It should have been fine legally. He said his contract was ending when that incident happened. KHOW/Bain Capital could not compete with the Real Pete, and their ratings would have been blown out of the water. But I don't understand what type of leverage KHOW would have had to keep him off the air.

“YES”

Since: Mar 07

TWICE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#33
Jul 2, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

DrSeussMd wrote:
NON-COMPETE clause most likely. They are standard, and they most likely will need to get that waived.
<quoted text>
Most likely. When all the legal wrangling is over, someone like Boyles will be difficult to silence, so sooner or later, he will be back on the air, doing what he does.

It's probably red legal tape for the moment.

Since: Jul 10

Crimson Tide Bulldozed

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34
Jul 2, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Your welcome BM. I don’t know the answer to that but non-compete clauses are put in contracts to put space between working at another place in the same industry for a period of time. I don’t know if that is what they are doing or not.
BrotherMoon wrote:
Thanks Doc. I wonder if it is an attempt to silence him for as long as they can or if it is an honest attempt to make it all clean legally.
I agree Capricorn. It could be a combination of several things, but I also think he will be back soon, and “his” show will move forward regardless of venue.
Capricorn wrote:
<quoted text>
Most likely. When all the legal wrangling is over, someone like Boyles will be difficult to silence, so sooner or later, he will be back on the air, doing what he does.
It's probably red legal tape for the moment.
candy

East Lansing, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#35
Jul 2, 2013
 
Peter Boyles tentatively scheduled to make his KNUS debut TOMORROW, Wednesday, July 3rd:

http://blogs.westword.com/latestword/2013/07/...

Since: Jul 10

Crimson Tide Bulldozed

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36
Jul 2, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Good Deal! Thanks ~ I hope it happens.
candy wrote:
Peter Boyles tentatively scheduled to make his KNUS debut TOMORROW, Wednesday, July 3rd:
http://blogs.westword.com/latestword/2013/07/...

“YES”

Since: Mar 07

TWICE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37
Jul 3, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Glad to hear this news. It's tough to keep someone like Boyles quiet for long :)
Hate Hustler

Denver, CO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#38
Jul 3, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Peter Boyles the hate monger was back on the public air waves today spewing his hate of the Ramseys and Obama.

I hate the hateful haters and I love to look down on them by fooling myself that I am not a hater which of course I am and I am lower than that as I hustle hate just like all the petty small time race hustlers do.

The Ramsey are innocent.

Have an abortion.

It's just a fetus.

Since: Jul 13

Fort Lauderdale, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#39
Jul 11, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Candy, thanks for telling us who John Ramsey said might be a suspect during his book tour in March 2012 but I'm not convinced that it's the same man that called in to the Peter Boyles show on December 28, 2011. I listened to the show out of curiosity and noticed that he said JonBenet was around 3 when this incident happened. This contradicts John Ramsey because he said this was just weeks before she died.
candy

East Lansing, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40
Jul 13, 2013
 
chocolate brownie wrote:
Candy, thanks for telling us who John Ramsey said might be a suspect during his book tour in March 2012 but I'm not convinced that it's the same man that called in to the Peter Boyles show on December 28, 2011. I listened to the show out of curiosity and noticed that he said JonBenet was around 3 when this incident happened. This contradicts John Ramsey because he said this was just weeks before she died.
It is the same person, from the same 1996 Parade of Lights. The guy just was wrong about how old JonBenet was. Everything else is the same, about this person "approaching" JonBenet, where they were stationed, where the parade was. JonBenet was not in any other Christmas time parade outdoors in any other year. Team Scamsey knew when I started posting about this too, and they dropped it like a rock.

Since: Jul 13

Fort Lauderdale, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#41
Jul 14, 2013
 
Candy, I understand what you're saying but according to DOI, that was not the only Christmas time parade she attended. In chapter Christmas Past of page 101, it says "Another part of our Christmas tradition in Boulder was the children's parade that Boulder held each year. For several years both JonBenet and Burke had been two of the many children joining the event. Our first involvement occurred in 1993 when Patsy was still struggling with chemotherapy".

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

21 Users are viewing the JonBenet Ramsey Forum right now

Search the JonBenet Ramsey Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
Jeffrey MacDonald Is Guilty (Sep '08) 46 min OneWhoCares 7,453
"Mr Ramsey Listen Carefully!" New book released... 3 hr Biz 11
Snow Prints? 3 hr Biz 31
I know what really happened to JoneBEnnet 3 hr Biz 63
Before I Die 3 hr Biz 5
Atlanta attorney Lin Wood hired to defend Cain (Nov '11) 6 hr grt 2
Note-odd detail? 20 hr Note 208
•••
•••