So you think the Grand Jury was paid off to ignore this evidence?<quoted text>
Okay Shill, I see your logic has everyone ELSE having to prove a negative to refute you. We'll do it your way:
BURKE STATED IN HIS GJ TESTIMONY that his mother and father were up all night while he stayed in his bed. He heard their voices and panicked crying. He snuck out of bed and watched his mother writing at the table while his father stood over her, telling her what to write. He heard the two of them going back up and down from the basement while his mother wept.
Now PROVE he DIDN'T say that in his GJ testimony!
See, you make a claim about undisclosed testimony that couldn't possibly be true, where as my claim can be true because your alleged incriminating pineapple certainly was not incriminating to bring them to trial.
If what you claim had any weight, the Ramseys would be taken to trial.
But of course you're to pee brained to comprehend the reality of it, or you wouldn't have made such an ignorant post.