I wonder if John Ramsey reads this forum

[GreyStone15]

He answered many of the RDIs questions about his behavior after an intruder murdered JonBenet, in his new book. It makes me wonder if he reads this forum. BTW, I love watching all the news/talk shows. Everyone of them has used the word EXONERATED.

The Ramsey's were EXONERATED after new DNA techniques PROVED that they were not responible for their daughter's death. I bet Tricia feels like an idiot.

[BrotherMoon]

They were exonerated by Mary Lacy, so it is meaningless, legally nonbinding.

[JimmyWells]

Either way he probably does not like me.

[DrSeussMd]

I see you are still doing it - posting misinformation like it was some sort of valid statement of something.

The old almost-out-of-office DA writing a letter to the Ramseys which the new DA, upon taking office, scoffed at, is hardly exoneration.

Their first book was to lay to rest internet rumors, so why shouldn't the second book be more of the same?

I bet she doesn't feel like an idiot, but I wonder if you might? I doubt it since misinformation is your mainstay.

GreyStone15 wrote:

He answered many of the RDIs questions about his behavior after an intruder murdered JonBenet, in his new book. It makes me wonder if he reads this forum. BTW, I love watching all the news/talk shows. Everyone of them has used the word EXONERATED.
The Ramsey's were EXONERATED after new DNA techniques PROVED that they were not responible for their daughter's death. I bet Tricia feels like an idiot.

[GreyStone15]

We can only speculate why John wrote the book. He says it was written to help others who are trying to cope with a loss. Perhaps he wants to bring JonBenet's murder back into the limelight in hopes that her killer may be found. If John or Patsy were guilty for murdering their daughter, would John want to bring attention back to the case?

[Legal__Eagle]

GreyStone15 wrote:

We can only speculate why John wrote the book. He says it was written to help others who are trying to cope with a loss. Perhaps he wants to bring JonBenet's murder back into the limelight in hopes that her killer may be found. If John or Patsy were guilty for murdering their daughter, would John want to bring attention back to the case?

Sure you can speculate and you can go from past experience as well, and there is always the $$$$$$$$$$ off the head of his dead child!

[realTopaz]

Legal__Eagle wrote:

<quoted text>
Sure you can speculate and you can go from past experience as well, and there is always the $$$$$$$$$$ off the head of his dead child!

just got off the phone with my brother and he said the same thing, LE. He couldn't care less about this case or any other but he has the opinion that parents of a child whose killer is still on the loose don't contemplate suicide...or write books about their nice new life.

[moonjack]

GreyStone15 wrote:

If John or Patsy were guilty for murdering their daughter, would John want to bring attention back to the case?

It's not an uncommon ploy in criminal behavior, deflection of suspicion. They've been at it since day one.

[Lynette 22]

I hope and trust John has enough sense NOT to read this forum, but if he does, at least he can't complain of feeling neglected.

I've just counted and so far this month there are no fewer than SEVENTEEN John Ramsey threads and those are only the ones which either directly mention him by name or refer to him as JonBenet's father/dad. There are also a couple of others devoted to articles about him or his new book.

What is this? "John Ramsey" month?

[Lynette 22]

moonjack wrote:

<quoted text>
It's not an uncommon ploy in criminal behavior, deflection of suspicion. They've been at it since day one.

You have it wrong. That's what the killer and his followers have done to the Ramseys all these years.

[Legal__Eagle]

Lynette 22 wrote:

I hope and trust John has enough sense NOT to read this forum, but if he does, at least he can't complain of feeling neglected.
I've just counted and so far this month there are no fewer than SEVENTEEN John Ramsey threads and those are only the ones which either directly mention him by name or refer to him as JonBenet's father/dad. There are also a couple of others devoted to articles about him or his new book.
What is this? "John Ramsey" month?

Great question, and Candy went on about not giving him attention, and yet there she is on, or having started, most of those threads.

[Capricorn]

Legal__Eagle wrote:

<quoted text>
Great question, and Candy went on about not giving him attention, and yet there she is on, or having started, most of those threads.

I agree LE and is it John Ramsey month? LOL Isn't it John Ramsey infiltrating the media this month trying to hawk his new book?

I'm sure he doesn't read the forums. There's nothing in it for him and it is about the crime so why would he read here?:)

[Legal__Eagle]

Capricorn wrote:

<quoted text>
I agree LE and is it John Ramsey month? LOL Isn't it John Ramsey infiltrating the media this month trying to hawk his new book?
I'm sure he doesn't read the forums. There's nothing in it for him and it is about the crime so why would he read here?:)

Hey Cap, I hope it is not JR month, but he is certainly trying to make it be that. The man is getting far more attention than he deserves.