Opinion: Obama Losing Hispanic Support

Opinion: Obama Losing Hispanic Support

There are 207 comments on the Hispanic Business story from Dec 29, 2013, titled Opinion: Obama Losing Hispanic Support. In it, Hispanic Business reports that:

The past year has been tough on President Barack Obama's poll numbers, especially among Hispanics.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hispanic Business.

The

Huntsville, AL

#97 Jan 2, 2014
Barack wrote:
<quoted text>
….
posts are getting dumber and dumber.

It isn't a game which is how the republicans have been playing it, screwing the recovery and the people in the process.

Level 1

Since: Sep 08

Viva Madeira

#98 Jan 2, 2014
positronium wrote:
<quoted text>Malfeasance in office.
Which act(s) was unequivocally illegal???

“Gloria Ad Caput Venire”

Level 9

Since: Jan 08

Trump 2016 and beyond

#99 Jan 2, 2014
Marichu wrote:
<quoted text>
Which act(s) was unequivocally illegal???
That would be for the court to decide, not me.
I am saying he should be arrested and tried. Lying "if you like your insurance you can keep it" is an act of malfeasance. Circumventing our constitution is also grounds for malfeasance as he has done so on numerous occasions.
Seek and you will see. You know how to google, don't you.
so you

Huntsville, AL

#100 Jan 2, 2014
positronium wrote:
<quoted text>
.
got nothing.

Level 1

Since: Sep 08

Viva Madeira

#101 Jan 2, 2014
positronium wrote:
<quoted text>That would be for the court to decide, not me.
I am saying he should be arrested and tried. Lying "if you like your insurance you can keep it" is an act of malfeasance. Circumventing our constitution is also grounds for malfeasance as he has done so on numerous occasions.
Seek and you will see. You know how to google, don't you.
How can you prove he lied when he said,“If you like your insurance you can keep it”?
And how did he circumvent the Constitution when the Affordable Health Care Act was passed into law by Congress and upheld by the SCOTUS??

Did GWB lie about Iraq’s WMD or was he given bad intelligence?? Could the same not be applicable to Obama?? I am not as naïve as some who believe presidents always tell the truth.
Duplicity may be part and parcel with the office of the presidency. Lincoln was considered a skillful dissembler while at the same time one of our greatest president.

There are many, many things I know how to do without seeking help or support. You may wish to follow your own advice.

“Gloria Ad Caput Venire”

Level 9

Since: Jan 08

Trump 2016 and beyond

#102 Jan 2, 2014
Marichu wrote:
<quoted text>
How can you prove he lied when he said,“If you like your insurance you can keep it”?
And how did he circumvent the Constitution when the Affordable Health Care Act was passed into law by Congress and upheld by the SCOTUS??
Did GWB lie about Iraq’s WMD or was he given bad intelligence?? Could the same not be applicable to Obama?? I am not as naïve as some who believe presidents always tell the truth.
Duplicity may be part and parcel with the office of the presidency. Lincoln was considered a skillful dissembler while at the same time one of our greatest president.
There are many, many things I know how to do without seeking help or support. You may wish to follow your own advice.
He needs to be arrested and charged first. The proof would then come out or not. There is probable cause enough to make an arrest, IMO and I am not changing my mind.

Level 1

Since: Sep 08

Viva Madeira

#103 Jan 2, 2014
positronium wrote:
<quoted text>He needs to be arrested and charged first. The proof would then come out or not. There is probable cause enough to make an arrest, IMO and I am not changing my mind.
No one is asking you to change your opinion~~~~~~ you’re entitled to it as I am.
Impeachment does not necessarily result in removal from office; it is only a legal statement of charges, parallel to an indictment in criminal law.
Another

Huntsville, AL

#104 Jan 2, 2014
positronium wrote:
<quoted text>He needs to be arrested and charged first. The proof would then come out or not. There is probable cause enough to make an arrest, IMO and I am not changing my mind.
insane assertion.
ima-Ilis Myka Ashanti

El Paso, TX

#105 Jan 2, 2014
wild child wrote:
<quoted text>hey ima that is exactly what he is doing.you hit the nail on the head.he does not like what we say.moron that he is.there is no law that says we have to like the president or agree with him and what he says.happy new year ima.watch how many republicans get elected in 2014.
Right on Brenda! happy new year to you too! and take care.

“26.2”

Level 1

Since: Feb 08

Santa Fe, NM

#106 Jan 2, 2014
positronium wrote:
<quoted text>He needs to be arrested and charged first. The proof would then come out or not. There is probable cause enough to make an arrest, IMO and I am not changing my mind.
OK, tough guy. Why don't you and Sheriff Joe Arpaio go to Washington DC and place him under arrest for whatever crimes you think he is guilty of. Be sure to let us know how that works out.
Dequin

Sandersdorf, Germany

#107 Jan 2, 2014
Obama wants to stay in charge of the situation by remaining in thebackground and waiting for the right moment.
But-is there a right moment?
They´re going to do a partial immigration-deal with no path to citizenship while Obama is busy worrying ybout the healthcare.reform.
Oh, yes: He did say he wants to make another push, but it´s not his fault that Boehner is so stubborn and insists on partial solutions which in
the long run are not going to make anyone happy.
So- why not increase the pressure on Boehner whp is pretending to
be trying to cooperate, when really he is just one hell of a stubborn mule
as far as immigration is concerned.
Darkness Falls

United States

#108 Jan 2, 2014
NOMOREYEARS wrote:
Why would anyone support a liar who can't manage anything.
Everything he touches turns to dog doo.
He has not reduced unemployment - if anything it is worse than advertised, his economy is in shambles, his foreign policy all mucked up, no one respects us and his blatant constitutional abuse is appalling.
Maobama - one bad arse mistake Amerika!
Now that Obama doesn't have to worry about running for re-election, I seriously doubt he would even give Hispanics the time of day.
wild child

Brooklyn, NY

#109 Jan 3, 2014
Darkness Falls wrote:
<quoted text> Now that Obama doesn't have to worry about running for re-election, I seriously doubt he would even give Hispanics the time of day.
sooooooooooooo true.he does not care.there will not be amnesty.all these illegals, the circus clowns, are In for a rude awakening.foodstamps and benefits will get cut.if americans have foodstamp cuts, vet cuts, no extended unemployment benefits.where do you think the republicans are going next.benefits for illegals.get the helllllllll out is what I say.
wild child

Brooklyn, NY

#110 Jan 3, 2014
Marichu wrote:
<quoted text>
How can you prove he lied when he said,“If you like your insurance you can keep it”?
And how did he circumvent the Constitution when the Affordable Health Care Act was passed into law by Congress and upheld by the SCOTUS??
Did GWB lie about Iraq’s WMD or was he given bad intelligence?? Could the same not be applicable to Obama?? I am not as naïve as some who believe presidents always tell the truth.
Duplicity may be part and parcel with the office of the presidency. Lincoln was considered a skillful dissembler while at the same time one of our greatest president.
There are many, many things I know how to do without seeking help or support. You may wish to follow your own advice.
oh please, he lied !!!!!!!
wild child

Brooklyn, NY

#111 Jan 3, 2014
Another wrote:
<quoted text>
insane assertion.
I like it.hope it happens real soon.
x democrat independent

Coffeyville, KS

#112 Jan 3, 2014
Lobo Viejo wrote:
<quoted text>
I asked a simple question, Bubba, and instead of answering it all you conservatives can do is accuse me of being a racist?
Now I am gonna go out on a limb and predict that President Obama will not get re-elected in the 2016. But the rallying cry of some of the posts earlier in this thread was to take the POTUS out in 2014. My question is simple, how do you intend to take out the POTUS in 2014? See if you can grow a pair and come up with an answer.
You were NOT asking a question in the post I responded to...you were accusing the poster of threatening the president and saying the secret service would be knocking on their door. So Bubby...learn to freakin read or learn to quit lying...either one might be helpful to you in the future.
I responded to a post that was not asking a question, you were making an accusation that was incorrect!
Now you did actually ask a question in the post I am now responding too so I will answer it despite the fact that it is a asinine question. The president cannot be "taken out" in 2014 since it is not a presidential election. What can be done and we can only pray will happen is that the R's or the I's, either one, gain majorities in the House and the Senate and give us some kind of check and balance on the president's all too damaging agenda. So I am going to give you a little credit that is likely not due but I am feeling generous, so I will assume you didn't mean to ask such an obviously ignorant question and must have experienced a great deal of typos in your post....but then you're liberal so chances are you really meant to ask a stupid question, not realizing it was so stupid, because most of your information comes from the Onion News network.
kuda

Cincinnati, OH

#114 Jan 3, 2014
tooeasy wrote:
<quoted text> What part of agreeing with them because of it ,do you fail to understand?. voting for a person and or defending their stance on a subject based solely on race is racist. As is calling those that disagree racists just because they do not like a persons political objectives.
Well, "too easy," whomever you may be, despite the unkindly harsh tone with which you've chosen to question my astuteness, I can assure you that if you would specify exactly whatever it may be you believe I've said that leads you to conclude I've failed somehow to understand in any way any part of your system of beliefs about racism, I'll have absolutely no difficulty comprehending your answer.
but

United States

#115 Jan 3, 2014
tooeasy wrote:
<quoted text> What part of agreeing with them because of it ,do you fail to understand?. voting for a person and or defending their stance on a subject based solely on race is racist. As is calling those that disagree racists just because they do not like a persons political objectives.
the point is that the initial post that said that the president is somehow "getting a pass because of his race" IS a lie based on racist attitudes and the truth is racism is the basis for much of the mindless form of criticism that he has faced from day 1. All the birther BS, the usurper (i. e. uppity), Chicago thug (n-word). 47%ers (lazy minorities) etc. is race-based. Never mind the overt crude remarks about his wife or the sick imagery that you find on topix and elsewhere.

The racists who were hiding under a rock for a generation have all come out of the woodwork and now feel like THEY have cover for the revival of racism. On the policy side that means voter suppression, harassing Hispanics, cutoff of the safety net, defunding public education and institutions etc.
nope

Huntsville, AL

#117 Jan 3, 2014
Bannedagain4 wrote:
<quoted text>
.
The media was giving this guy a free pass ?
that is a lie, based on racism.

If you think serious journalists should have promoted the birther idiocy or they should have actively advocated tearing him down or work for a one-term presidency like rightwing media, blogs and the republicans, you are wrong.

“Gloria Ad Caput Venire”

Level 9

Since: Jan 08

Trump 2016 and beyond

#118 Jan 3, 2014
Marichu wrote:
<quoted text>
No one is asking you to change your opinion~~~~~~ you’re entitled to it as I am.
Impeachment does not necessarily result in removal from office; it is only a legal statement of charges, parallel to an indictment in criminal law.
"Impeachment does not necessarily result in removal from office; it is only a legal statement of charges, parallel to an indictment in criminal law."
I fully agree.
Folks are arrested without charges being filed. He should be too.
http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitu...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Immigration Reform Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Trump Isn't Bluffing, He'll Deport 11 Million P... 19 min Le Jimbo 5,211
Rose's Pub (Mar '10) 21 min Freespirit8 141,885
News Critics: Trump speech signals shift to coded ra... 1 hr Bama Yankee 10
News The Latest: Clinton says she'll pick 'very qual... 1 hr Brian_G 242
News If Donald Trump Was President, Here's What Woul... (Oct '15) 1 hr Nopal 10,328
News Jewish groups slam 'xenophobia' in US election 4 hr Moishe Shekelgruber 9
News Voters split over how to secure US from illegal... 4 hr BabyDoll 17
More from around the web