Pressure mounts on Arizona governor to veto bill dubbed anti-gay

Feb 25, 2014 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: Reuters

Arizona Governor Jan Brewer came under mounting pressure on Tuesday from other prominent Republicans and consultants to veto a controversial bill described by critics as a license to discriminate against gays and others in the name of religion.

Comments
1 - 20 of 208 Comments Last updated Mar 6, 2014
First Prev
of 11
Next Last
Cat74

Bloomingdale, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Feb 25, 2014
 

Judged:

5

5

3

So once again the Democrats favored few are trying to alter the Constitution. No more freedom of Religion for you, you simple minded Americans. We must all get on the same sex marriage bandwagon, or else!! Or else they will move the Super bowl. So what. If the Governor vetoes this bill we should all boycott the 2014 Super Bowl. Turn off the TV, no big bowls of Chicken wings, chips, booze, nothing. Isn't it time we sacrificed one day of football to prove a point? Do you have any idea how much money those people will lose if we stand up for the 1st Amendment?
No To Tinkerbell Marriage

Bohemia, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
Feb 25, 2014
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Boycott the Super Bowl? What a queer form of blackmail the gay mafia threatens.
foster

Ashburn, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
Feb 25, 2014
 

Judged:

3

2

2

Cat74 wrote:
So once again the Democrats favored few are trying to alter the Constitution. No more freedom of Religion for you, you simple minded Americans. We must all get on the same sex marriage bandwagon, or else!! Or else they will move the Super bowl. So what. If the Governor vetoes this bill we should all boycott the 2014 Super Bowl. Turn off the TV, no big bowls of Chicken wings, chips, booze, nothing. Isn't it time we sacrificed one day of football to prove a point? Do you have any idea how much money those people will lose if we stand up for the 1st Amendment?
Marxist, Racist, Russians and White Supremist the world over agree with your ideology
Level 5

Since: Sep 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
Feb 26, 2014
 

Judged:

1

1

1

foster wrote:
<quoted text>
Marxist, Racist, Russians and White Supremist the world over agree with your ideology
reality is - discrimination is part of being a human being, idiot. it is part of life.

we discriminate because of age, sex, religion, etc. pretty much everything. YOUR inability to realize this shows how stupid you are.

frankly, if the churches don't want to cater to the needs to gays because it is against their religion, I'm all for it.

if the gays don't like it, why don't they go harass some muslim mosque? go push them to cater to their needs and see what happens. lol.

if I don't like smoke in my face, jesus freaks in my face, OR gays in my face, that is MY RIGHT.

if you gays want some church that caters to YOUR needs, START one up instead of trying to force your lifestyle down everybody's throats.
Bob

Middleton, WI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
Feb 26, 2014
 
Cat74 wrote:
So once again the Democrats favored few are trying to alter the Constitution. No more freedom of Religion for you, you simple minded Americans.
So once again the Republican favored MAJORITY will alter their deeply held religious beliefs if it means less tourists money.
This bill will get a veto faster than you can say "cash or charge".
Cordwainer Trout

Elizabethtown, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7
Feb 26, 2014
 

Judged:

4

3

3

"...the bill is designed only to protect business owners with strong religious beliefs from discrimination lawsuits that have happened in other states. Some blame the media for blowing the law out of proportion."

This is what the clear-headed Americans know. The Left and the Left run media blow.
Rainbow Kid

Alpharetta, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8
Feb 26, 2014
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Asian Guy wrote:
if you gays want some church that caters to YOUR needs, START one up instead of trying to force your lifestyle down everybody's throats.
We have no use for snarling evangelical fundamentalist churches that are afraid of gay people
.
Gays already own and operate 12th largest protestant denomination in the world; all across America and in 42 nations
.
Why in the heck would we want to get hitched in some dumpy storefront fundie snake pit when we can marry in style in one of our own snazzy churches?
http://www.agoatlanta.org/Organs/AtlantaCity/...
Rainbow Kid

Alpharetta, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9
Feb 26, 2014
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Cordwainer Trout wrote:
"...the bill is designed only to protect business owners with strong religious beliefs from discrimination lawsuits that have happened in other states. Some blame the media for blowing the law out of proportion."
This is what the clear-headed Americans know. The Left and the Left run media blow.
No matter what kind of law they come up with; it is trumped by The Civil Rights Act of 1964: Title II - Public Accommodation
http://www.citizensource.com/History/20thCen/...

Level 3

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10
Feb 26, 2014
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rainbow Kid wrote:
<quoted text>
We have no use for snarling evangelical fundamentalist churches that are afraid of gay people
.
Gays already own and operate 12th largest protestant denomination in the world; all across America and in 42 nations
.
Why in the heck would we want to get hitched in some dumpy storefront fundie snake pit when we can marry in style in one of our own snazzy churches?
http://www.agoatlanta.org/Organs/AtlantaCity/...
Why should we be afraid of some abnormal clown that can't even fit into the natural order of things. You are not religious, a cult for sure but not a church of the bible.

Level 3

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11
Feb 26, 2014
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Rainbow Kid wrote:
<quoted text>
No matter what kind of law they come up with; it is trumped by The Civil Rights Act of 1964: Title II - Public Accommodation
http://www.citizensource.com/History/20thCen/...
OOOSEC. 201.(a) All persons shall be entitled to the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, and privileges, advantages, and accommodations of any place of public accommodation, as defined in this section, without discrimination or segregation on the ground of race, color, religion, or national origin. Do you see GAY in there anywhere....didn't think so.
Oldglory

Banning, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12
Feb 26, 2014
 
What is this topic doing in the illegal immigration forum?

Level 1

Since: Jan 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#15
Feb 26, 2014
 

Judged:

2

2

1

No one seems to be considering how this bill could pit business interests against business interests. What it the best and brightest in your company or your field happen to be gay and lesbian, and you stand in danger of not attracting or losing your best talent because of a hostile business climate created in the area by associated community businesses? In this economically difficult climate can we really afford to allow yet another impediment, especially one as flimsy as this one?

“ reality, what a concept”

Level 2

Since: Nov 07

this one

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#17
Feb 26, 2014
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Cordwainer Trout wrote:
"...the bill is designed only to protect business owners with strong religious beliefs from discrimination lawsuits that have happened in other states. Some blame the media for blowing the law out of proportion."
This is what the clear-headed Americans know. The Left and the Left run media blow.
If it is supposedly a bill designed "only to protect business owners with strong religious beliefs from discrimination lawsuits", why does it try to create a "deeply held religious belief" exception to every last rule on the state and local books? Clear-headed Americans are the ones standing up against this incredibly broad and farcically vague special protection for "believers". It's closed-minded, easily misled, useful idiots like yourself driving this bus, the vast majority of businesses in the state want no part of this.

“ reality, what a concept”

Level 2

Since: Nov 07

this one

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#18
Feb 26, 2014
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Eighthman wrote:
No Shirt, No Shoes, No Service...(Unless you are GAY)
He swings, he misses. That rule applies regardless of race, religion, sex, nationality and every other suspect classification, including sexual orientation. The one's insisting on having a special right here are the bigots, we're just asking for equal treatment.

“TAKIA AND TA TONKA”

Level 9

Since: Aug 08

HAPPY TOGETHER!!!

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19
Feb 26, 2014
 

Judged:

1

1

1

It's actually pathetic that idiots CAN'T see this bill for what it truly is......nothing more than a Hate bill that allows people to use their so called religious beliefs to discriminate against ANYONE they see fit to discriminate against........and NOT just Gays and Lesbians, but Transgender individuals, Muslims, other religions, and so forth......and it even allows for folks to discriminate against Evangelistic Fundamentalist.......that's why some Republicans who have voted for it are now changing their position......because this bill has NO end to it.......and besides, it clearly shows just how much animus folks have towards those who are different than themselves!!!

No one's religious freedoms are being trampled on......they are still free to hate who they want.......just NOT with regards to running a business for the public!!!

Level 1

Since: Jan 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#21
Feb 26, 2014
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Eighthman wrote:
If you are a Lesbian prostitute in a state where prostitution is legal, does this mean you have to have sex with men too?
.
Whether you want to or not?
If you are a foot doctor would the state require you to perform brain surgery, whether you want to or not? Cone on, Darling, you're comparing specialization with religious discrimination?

“THERE IS NO GOD”

Level 1

Since: Feb 09

Northern California

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#22
Feb 26, 2014
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Eighthman wrote:
Are heteros anti-gay or are gays anti hetero?
.
There should be a bill protecting heteros from gays too.
Just the opposite! No one has the right to discriminate against anyone for any reason. Because straight men refuse to consider gay men as sexual partners, just like bigot bakers refuse to consider gay weddings as customers, straight men should be forced, by completely Constitutional anti-discrimination law, to consider gay men as sex partners because our government has an interest in stopping all the anti-gay discrimination gay men have to face in this free country of ours!

It should be illegal for a straight man to say no to the sexual advances of a gay man. No gay should have to face the slight, the humiliation, the insult of being told no, go find someone else. This happens a lot more than does gays being told no about a wedding cake, therefore it needs immediate attention: it must be stopped! No one has the right to discriminate against anyone for any reason. We need a law. Straight men who refuse to obey the law should get the death penalty should they say no to the sexual advances of a gay man. We must end discrimination in all of its ugly forms and we must end it now. And this is the worst discrimination of all. How dare straight men say no to gay men and offended them

“THERE IS NO GOD”

Level 1

Since: Feb 09

Northern California

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#23
Feb 26, 2014
 

Judged:

1

1

Eighthman wrote:
All this over a wedding cake.
It wasn't very nice of the bakers not to do it but the gays can boycott that bakery if they want. Don't need another law.
So I say if the Gays want to; "Let Them Eat Cake"
Yes, all this over a wedding cake.
serfs up

Ormond Beach, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24
Feb 26, 2014
 

Judged:

3

3

1

Bob wrote:
<quoted text>
So once again the Republican favored MAJORITY will alter their deeply held religious beliefs if it means less tourists money.
This bill will get a veto faster than you can say "cash or charge".
You get to kill the Christians when the time comes. Isn't that enough? You dog you! Enjoy the minimal years of pleasure before you get it.

“TAKIA AND TA TONKA”

Level 9

Since: Aug 08

HAPPY TOGETHER!!!

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#25
Feb 26, 2014
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Eighthman wrote:
All this over a wedding cake.
It wasn't very nice of the bakers not to do it but the gays can boycott that bakery if they want. Don't need another law.
.
So I say if the Gays want to; "Let Them Eat Cake"
If you think this is all just over a cake......you really are an idiot!!!

Oh and tell that to the Evangelistic Fundamentalist who feel that their religion somehow should trump laws in this Country.....and they DON'T!!!

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

First Prev
of 11
Next Last
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

60 Users are viewing the Immigration Reform Forum right now

Search the Immigration Reform Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
The President has failed us (Jun '12) 9 min UidiotRaceMAkeWor... 253,433
Border agents arrest Central American sex offen... 30 min sheepleloveroyalty 8
Militias complicate situation on Texas border 38 min Your Ex 51
'Hit the Right Nerve' Pelosi confronts Gop rep ... 39 min INFIDEL 599
First National Guard troops at Texas-Mexico border 42 min STOMP AN ILLEGAL ... 5
Rose's Pub (Mar '10) 2 hr Freespirit8 135,373
Anti-illegal immigration Border Convoy headed t... 3 hr INFIDEL 318
DHS secretary says unaccompanied kids show need... 17 hr nomoreillegals3 99
•••
•••