The President has failed us

The President has failed us

There are 391808 comments on the Times News story from Jun 9, 2012, titled The President has failed us. In it, Times News reports that:

This week, I decided to list the reasons I would not vote for Barack Obama in the next election.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Times News.

“Hop On Board!!!”

Level 2

Since: Oct 11

America, Canada, Mexico

#201878 Oct 28, 2013
Positronium wrote:
<quoted text>Same with democrats, the constant flux. A third party would straighten out their BS for sure.
3rd party uprising means an end to the GOP.

“Hop On Board!!!”

Level 2

Since: Oct 11

America, Canada, Mexico

#201880 Oct 28, 2013
ftp wrote:
<quoted text>Another keyboard warrior looking for a cyber scuffle. I bet you would not say that in his face you leftist pus.
I'll be your huckleberry you neo-con fascist dipwad..

Level 8

Since: Feb 12

Location hidden

#201881 Oct 28, 2013
Positronium wrote:
<quoted text>He didn't jump on this thread stirring up trouble.
He is just reminding those that are new here how racist you are and how well you have managed to keep that racism in your closet for so long.
I remember too those horrible comments you made to NTR and they, like he said, were so disgusting that even I couldn't repeat them.
Satan has your number.
Oh brother.

(rolls eyes)

“Try Reuters.”

Level 8

Since: Mar 07

Location hidden

#201882 Oct 28, 2013
USMA WP wrote:
<quoted text>I strongly have my doubts of your WP training. You left out the part where it is the duty of the military to defend the masses from an out of control government built up by ignorance. Obama is not stupid, he is dangerous. He was brilliant enough to know stupid, needy people would be the mass of ignorance needed to put him in power. You can control the ignorant person or the weak minded. Powerful people with money stand behind this dangerous man. All Americans are to blame for not standing up and demanding better of both sides of the political affiliate. Democrats are more to blame as they take from those who work to pay those who won't . That is a well known democrat policy. Time to reel that out of control notion in.
Class of 62
Take your time. Please read slowly:

Fox's 108.6 million figure for the number of "people on welfare" comes from a Census Bureau's account (Table 2) of participation in means-tested programs, which include "anyone residing in a household in which one or more people received benefits" in the fourth quarter of 2011, thus including individuals who did not themselves receive government benefits. On the other hand, the "people with a full time job" figure Fox used included only individuals who worked, not individuals residing in a household where at least one person works.

A side point that's obvious if you understand the comparison Fox is making here is that many in the 108.6 million receiving government assistance are children, disabled people, or senior citizens—groups that most of us, though perhaps not Fox, don't really expect to be working full time.

Finally, it's not like people working full time and people receiving government assistance are mutually exclusive groups. In fact, a lot of people work full time and also get food stamps or other nutrition assistance, rental assistance, or other forms of aid, thanks to low-wage employers like fast food chains and Walmart.

When you're Fox News and your only interest is in stigmatizing poor people and gutting the safety net, though, little distinctions like these don't matter.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/10/28/1251...

“Tea Baggers are Traitors!!!”

Level 1

Since: Oct 11

Ricoville, North America

#201883 Oct 28, 2013
_White American_ wrote:
<quoted text>Obamaphone???? I think not and that just shows that you have od'd on Fox news.
"Q: Has the Obama administration started a program to use "taxpayer money" to give free cell phones to welfare recipients?
A: No. Low-income households have been eligible for discounted telephone service for more than a decade. But the program is funded by telecom companies, not by taxes, and the president has nothing to do with it. "
http://www.factcheck.org/2009/10/the-obama-ph...
You see not only did President Obama not start that service but it isn't even funded by tax payer money.
So now whoes opinions are really the stupid, ignorant ones? It looks like the one you made would fit the bill.
It goes without saying, these Obama haters don't care about facts, reality or the truth. They see something put on blast from the tea bagging echo chamber and they repeat, parrot and copy & paste it even though they know it's a lie.

This is one reason why I feel sorry for their children. They're lied too all their lives. It's no wonder why so many children are committing violent crimes using their right wing parents guns & ammo.

Level 6

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#201884 Oct 28, 2013
The Short_Bus Driver wrote:
<quoted text>
"Whether Aryan is a race or not is debated." <---- By who? Ignorant bigots & racist with blonde hair & blue eyes who think driving a John Deere, owning an AR-15 & voting Republican is a paramount importance to the Aryan way life?
Anyways..... back to reality, of course it's a race. It's a sub-group of the Caucasian race which is funny because all you Aryan believers claim the Aryan race is a superior race in spite of the fact that it's a sub group of the larger Caucasian race.
And if the Aryan race was superior then why is it that when a black and white have a child, the child always look black? You see, Aryan race has no dominance when it comes to genes either.
You basically have to inbreed so called Aryans to keep Aryans looking like Aryans.
"You basically have to inbreed so called Aryans to keep Aryans looking like Aryans."

Inbreeding would explain a lot when it comes to the people on this thread that claim to be Aryan.

Level 8

Since: Oct 07

Serving sarcasm since 2007

#201885 Oct 28, 2013
Jaxxon wrote:
<quoted text>
"The Man With Two Heads Starring Rosie Grier and Ray Milland"
I've seen that one!
When I was a kid I used to sneak up late on Friday nights to watch a horror show hosted by a character called "Sammy Terry".
I would sneak to watch it because my mom thought I should be in bed and she didn't think I was old enough to watch horror movies.
My mom caught me one night and we sat and watched "The man with two heads" and we laughed all the way through it.
Mom decided that wasn't scary at all and never said another word about me watching Sammy Terry every Friday night.
Here is a neat movie website with a good article about Sammy Terry and his show.
http://366weirdmovies.com/nightmare-theater-w...

Our local station had no budget for a "Sammy Terry", so all we had was 'Creature Feature', with a spooky music intro and a still shot of some scary character like Frankenstein or Creature from the Black Lagoon. Then we were immediately launched into The Mummy or Trilogy of Terror or some other spooky black and white treasure. I would watch every Friday night after coming home from the roller skating rink.
Worth noting that back then POS was not yet born and missed the entire age of B&W TV.

Level 6

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#201886 Oct 28, 2013
NTRPRNR1 wrote:
<quoted text>Take your time. Please read slowly:
Fox's 108.6 million figure for the number of "people on welfare" comes from a Census Bureau's account (Table 2) of participation in means-tested programs, which include "anyone residing in a household in which one or more people received benefits" in the fourth quarter of 2011, thus including individuals who did not themselves receive government benefits. On the other hand, the "people with a full time job" figure Fox used included only individuals who worked, not individuals residing in a household where at least one person works.
A side point that's obvious if you understand the comparison Fox is making here is that many in the 108.6 million receiving government assistance are children, disabled people, or senior citizens—groups that most of us, though perhaps not Fox, don't really expect to be working full time.
Finally, it's not like people working full time and people receiving government assistance are mutually exclusive groups. In fact, a lot of people work full time and also get food stamps or other nutrition assistance, rental assistance, or other forms of aid, thanks to low-wage employers like fast food chains and Walmart.
When you're Fox News and your only interest is in stigmatizing poor people and gutting the safety net, though, little distinctions like these don't matter.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/10/28/1251...
That 108 million count isn't just what we traditionally think of as "welfare" either.

One example would be the fact that they included some types of Veteran's Pensions in that number.

A Veteran's pension is now considered welfare?

Really?

You're right about the household count though. If one person in that household happens to be on SSDI (just as an example), every person in that household was counted as receiving "welfare".

So if their are five people in that home with full time jobs and receiving no benefits and one person that is receiving some type of benefit, all six people got counted as receiving "welfare".

Children receiving reduced price meals at school were counted to, so even if their parents have jobs and receive no other benefits for the family, everyone in that household got counted as "welfare" recipient.

“Tea Baggers are Traitors!!!”

Level 1

Since: Oct 11

Ricoville, North America

#201887 Oct 28, 2013
NTRPRNR1 wrote:
<quoted text>Take your time. Please read slowly:
Fox's 108.6 million figure for the number of "people on welfare" comes from a Census Bureau's account (Table 2) of participation in means-tested programs, which include "anyone residing in a household in which one or more people received benefits" in the fourth quarter of 2011, thus including individuals who did not themselves receive government benefits. On the other hand, the "people with a full time job" figure Fox used included only individuals who worked, not individuals residing in a household where at least one person works.
A side point that's obvious if you understand the comparison Fox is making here is that many in the 108.6 million receiving government assistance are children, disabled people, or senior citizens—groups that most of us, though perhaps not Fox, don't really expect to be working full time.
Finally, it's not like people working full time and people receiving government assistance are mutually exclusive groups. In fact, a lot of people work full time and also get food stamps or other nutrition assistance, rental assistance, or other forms of aid, thanks to low-wage employers like fast food chains and Walmart.
When you're Fox News and your only interest is in stigmatizing poor people and gutting the safety net, though, little distinctions like these don't matter.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/10/28/1251...
At times I wonder why tea baggers call anyone receiving gov't cheese lazy moochers when in fact every tea bagger on this thread are either retired and receiving social security & food stamps, work but receive food stamps or have a family member receiving food stamps.

They can deny it all they want but we all know that the bulk of tea baggers come from red states and red states are in fact the biggest consumers of food stamp participation. When you factor in a tea baggers education, low IQ, inability to compete with illegal aliens you come up with some empirical proof that most if not all tea baggers are welfare moochers themselves.

Food Stamp Use is Highest in Red States: The Truth Republicans Do Not Want You to Know
http://www.policymic.com/articles/14007/food-...

“Tea Baggers are Traitors!!!”

Level 1

Since: Oct 11

Ricoville, North America

#201888 Oct 28, 2013
Jaxxon wrote:
<quoted text>
"You basically have to inbreed so called Aryans to keep Aryans looking like Aryans."
Inbreeding would explain a lot when it comes to the people on this thread that claim to be Aryan.
Yes... the inbreeding defect is rampant amongst tea baggers [particularly on Topix] who advocate superiority based on the oxymoronic Aryan race.

O well... I guess God pulled a fact one on them.

I'm Caucasian. White skin, hazel eyes... bla bla bla and I never felt I was superior to somebody that was Black, Asian or Native American.

Level 8

Since: Oct 07

Serving sarcasm since 2007

#201889 Oct 28, 2013
ftp wrote:
What a bunch of stupid, leftist, maggots on this MFing thread!
Bisquick!!! Sorry I missed you.

Level 9

Since: Jun 10

Martinez, CA

#201890 Oct 28, 2013
Quirky wrote:
<quoted text>
Your just a conniving old Ch!t Stirrer. That's all!
No I'm not. You must be talking to yourself again, squirt.

Level 9

Since: Jun 10

Martinez, CA

#201891 Oct 28, 2013
Pos wrote:
<quoted text>You don't belong here. Go away. You are an undocumented poster. This is not roses pub.
You just hate it that you can't control me, don't you POS? LOL!

Level 9

Since: Jun 10

Martinez, CA

#201892 Oct 28, 2013
Positronium wrote:
<quoted text>Yes, Rose did exactly that and she can't hide that fact.
No wonder she gets along with Jax so well.
Thanks for bringing that up, FTP
LOL! And the little gossip girl strikes again.

You're off topic, troll.

Level 9

Since: Jun 10

Martinez, CA

#201893 Oct 28, 2013
Positronium wrote:
<quoted text>It still makes you a racist. You own it.
No it does not. I am no racist.

And you little girls who are bringing up ONE post from FOUR YEARS ago are as pathetic as it gets.

Grow up already.

“Take a deep breath”

Level 8

Since: Dec 12

Let it out

#201894 Oct 28, 2013
The Ricomeister wrote:
<quoted text>
It goes without saying, these Obama haters don't care about facts, reality or the truth. They see something put on blast from the tea bagging echo chamber and they repeat, parrot and copy & paste it even though they know it's a lie.
This is one reason why I feel sorry for their children. They're lied too all their lives. It's no wonder why so many children are committing violent crimes using their right wing parents guns & ammo.
Actually, it's the takers who don't understand the facts. Obamaphones are not funded by taxpayers but the telephone company doesn't pay for them either. The wealthy corporate phone companies just charge the middle class phone customers extra so that the scumbag takers of this nation can have a free phone.

Taking from the makers and giving to the takers is all redistribution pushed forward by socialist liberals. Does it matter whether it's the government of the corporation doing the taking and giving? Not to the poor and not to the wealthy is doesn't. The only ones that gets hurt is the working poor and his family.

That is why we need to get the democrats out of government. They are thieves who steal from the poor and give to the lazy. At least when the republicans are in charge they leave the poor alone and let the lazy go hungry.
Aphelion

Melbourne, FL

#201895 Oct 28, 2013
The Ricomeister wrote:
<quoted text>
At times I wonder why tea baggers call anyone receiving gov't cheese lazy moochers when in fact every tea bagger on this thread are either retired and receiving social security & food stamps, work but receive food stamps or have a family member receiving food stamps.
They can deny it all they want but we all know that the bulk of tea baggers come from red states and red states are in fact the biggest consumers of food stamp participation. When you factor in a tea baggers education, low IQ, inability to compete with illegal aliens you come up with some empirical proof that most if not all tea baggers are welfare moochers themselves.
Food Stamp Use is Highest in Red States: The Truth Republicans Do Not Want You to Know
http://www.policymic.com/articles/14007/food-...
How bout taking a more granular view and look at the food stamp usage by county in some of these red states. Funny how liberals like the disingenuous approach to facts, either that or they are the sheep that others claim they are.

http://mapsontheweb.tumblr.com/post/642324007...

Level 9

Since: Jun 10

Martinez, CA

#201896 Oct 28, 2013
Positronium wrote:
<quoted text>He didn't jump on this thread stirring up trouble.
He is just reminding those that are new here how racist you are and how well you have managed to keep that racism in your closet for so long.
I remember too those horrible comments you made to NTR and they, like he said, were so disgusting that even I couldn't repeat them.
Satan has your number.
LMFAO!

You lie, distort, exaggerate and promote hatred as always, POS.

It just tickles you and other hateful imbeciles here to dredge up that comment from four years ago, and you think you've really hit pay dirt.

You're an idiot, and there was nothing so horrible in that comment that was nearly as disgusting as what your friends post here about incest and "turning tricks" and a the myriad other vulgarities they post, so don't even pretend to be outraged when you weren't even there.

But I owe no one an explanation about something I posted to NTR FOUR YEARS ago. It was resolved between NTR and myself, and you using that is just proof of what a lowlife, petty, hateful person you are. You have zero integrity. All you have is hate and vengeance.

"Satan has your number"???

Hahahahahahah!

You're insane.

Level 9

Since: Jun 10

Martinez, CA

#201897 Oct 28, 2013
ftp wrote:
<quoted text>No problem. I just hate hypocrites and racists. These libtards are the biggest ones you know. It's all about their socialist agenda and keeping certain groups down and controlled. Rose fits this category because the system you and I pay for supports her and her ilk. It's a sad selfish agenda, imo.
LMAO! You don't pay for anything to do with me, you nasty hypocrite and liar.

You came to this thread to incite trouble and to spread hatred. That's who you are. Pathetic is what you are, ftp. You preach Christian values out of one side of your mouth, then you gossip, lie, judge and condemn people you know nothing about out of the other.

I am no racist or hypocrite, and you are certainly no Christian so quit pretending you are. You're a hateful trouble maker and liar.

Level 9

Since: Jun 10

Martinez, CA

#201898 Oct 28, 2013
ftp wrote:
<quoted text>That's right. It was just a reminder is all. She typed it, proofread it, corrected it, posted it, and unlucky for us, we had to read and endure it.
OMG! Hahhahahhahaha!

You had to read it and endure it? No one forced you to read anything, you lying, two-faced little worm.

You and POS are making a huge case out of something I posted ONE time to NTR FOUR YEARS ago, and you're enjoying every bit of this hatred you spread.

Can you possibly sound anymore phony, you drama queen? You and POS are disgusting, and your hatred is disgusting. Neither of you could care less about NTR or anything anyone posted to her, yet here you are pretending to be so concerned.

YOu're both liars and frauds instigating hatred and malice, and you leave out the details of what was going on back then and what prompted my comment to her. But that's how you haters play the games you play. You leave out the details and the context.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Immigration Reform Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Rose's Pub (Mar '10) 23 min Just Slim 141,979
News Sanders: Don't blame Islam for Orlando shooting 1 hr Khan 1,155
News If Donald Trump Was President, Here's What Woul... (Oct '15) 1 hr Nopal 10,532
News Trump Isn't Bluffing, He'll Deport 11 Million P... 1 hr Mikey 5,774
News Critics: Trump speech signals shift to coded ra... 3 hr Bloodonhishands 49
News Voters have trust issues with Hillary Clinton? ... (Jul '15) 6 hr positronium 7,055
News Illegal Immigration Figures in Montana (Sep '15) 9 hr Bama Yankee 35
More from around the web