The President has failed us

This week, I decided to list the reasons I would not vote for Barack Obama in the next election. Full Story

Level 5

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#152411 Jun 26, 2013
X -Man- wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
No, I don't think I am. I simply do not take your word for it as it is apparent you will say just about anything to win an argument. lol
<quoted text>
You attempted to provide support for the poster I was arguing with on the premiss that Topix allows posters to post anonymously. That premiss was never what was being debated, although that's what both you and Aphelion tried to make it about.
It was about posters that use anonymous proxies to insult and harass, which is what you see here daily from a large number of the far right conservative trolls.
<quoted text>
I've told you several times. If you don't like my responses, don't read or respond to them. There's no need for name calling like a child. lol
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
LOL
Oh, I'm "over it". Hahaha
I find it funny that you're unable to control your anger and resort to petty name calling because you happen to feel it's "warranted".
My replies aren't for you. Your opinion means nothing to me but I don't mind bringing to light your misconstrued conclusions and attempts to circumvent the truth. ;)
Totally untrue. I have had posters provide information to me indicating I was wrong in the past. I have researched the information and very willingly corrected my post and apologized for the error. If I am proven wrong, I not only have no problem admitting it, but I also apologize. You did not prove your point other than the May 2007 thread which evidently is no longer a part of the Topix Terms of Service. If it were actually there, I feel sure you would have provided it. It is evidently YOU who "will say just about anything to win an argument".

What I shared was not about posters posting anonymously. Basically everyone on the site posts anonymously unless they choose to provide their name. What I shared was that posters were not required to register in order to post on the site. If Topix does not allow "posters that use anonymous proxies to insult and harass", they should address the issue or you can easily report them. Evidently it is NOT an issue for Topix as you indicated it occurs "here daily from a large number of the far right conservative trolls". If Topix does not seem to be concerned, why do YOU feel the need to address it with posters on a regular basis? If it bothers you, report it and move on. It is certainly not your place to determine who can or cannot post on this thread and relentlessly whine about it.

As far as responding to you, my initial post regarding this matter was NOT TO YOU. YOU are the one who responded to me with a belittling response. Don't chastise me for calling you a name when you choose to belittle and berate most everyone you respond to. I would also assume you believe most of your liberal friends are "childish" since they call posters names incessantly.

Angry? I wasn't angry. If I had been "angry", I would have chosen a word much stronger than "jerk".

Level 5

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#152412 Jun 26, 2013
X -Man- wrote:
<quoted text>
The point is you won't because you know that because you are registered the police would be at your doorstep sooner than later.
Topix does not require people to register but does not allow proxy use to insult and harass.
Like I said, if you really believe there's no difference test it out. ;)
As I said, I do not threaten anyone and certainly have no desire to threaten you. You seem extremely paranoid and much too upset over my calling you a jerk. Report me.

If Topix "does not allow proxy use to insult and harass" why do you indicate it is done "daily"?
Quirky

Denver, CO

#152413 Jun 26, 2013
X -Man- wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL
Deflect much?
It doesn't feel good when people bring up personal issues does it Quirky?
I can't imagine what could make a child want to have nothing to do with their father but, It can't be good.
Your hollow laughter confirms that.
Oh Goursh? Still pizzin in the wind EH? Still got nothing . Lol !

Level 8

Since: Feb 12

Location hidden

#152414 Jun 26, 2013
Republican Honey wrote:
<quoted text>
Totally untrue. I have had posters provide information to me indicating I was wrong in the past. I have researched the information and very willingly corrected my post and apologized for the error. If I am proven wrong, I not only have no problem admitting it, but I also apologize. You did not prove your point other than the May 2007 thread which evidently is no longer a part of the Topix Terms of Service. If it were actually there, I feel sure you would have provided it. It is evidently YOU who "will say just about anything to win an argument".
What I shared was not about posters posting anonymously. Basically everyone on the site posts anonymously unless they choose to provide their name. What I shared was that posters were not required to register in order to post on the site. If Topix does not allow "posters that use anonymous proxies to insult and harass", they should address the issue or you can easily report them. Evidently it is NOT an issue for Topix as you indicated it occurs "here daily from a large number of the far right conservative trolls". If Topix does not seem to be concerned, why do YOU feel the need to address it with posters on a regular basis? If it bothers you, report it and move on. It is certainly not your place to determine who can or cannot post on this thread and relentlessly whine about it.
As far as responding to you, my initial post regarding this matter was NOT TO YOU. YOU are the one who responded to me with a belittling response. Don't chastise me for calling you a name when you choose to belittle and berate most everyone you respond to. I would also assume you believe most of your liberal friends are "childish" since they call posters names incessantly.
Angry? I wasn't angry. If I had been "angry", I would have chosen a word much stronger than "jerk".
LOL

I see you posts are getting longer and longer.

Your argument as well as Aphelion's has always been moot. You both tried to make it about "posting unregistered" when it has always been about the use of anonymous proxies to insult and harass.

Your attempts to deflect the focus from the conservative anonymous proxy use to the issue of "unregistered vs registered" was obvious.

If you can't see the difference between a registered poster and a poster who hides behind a proxy to avoid responsibility for what they post then you are either dishonest or blind.

As for you childish name calling. You are responsible for your behavior. Do not blame me for it. No one forced you to call me a name like a two year old. I didn't call you a name did I? No, I didn't. lol

I never said I wasn't going to reply to you. I said if you can't handle my replies without resorting to childish name calling than maybe you shouldn't reply? Again, It's not like you're any different than the other far right conservative trolls that resort to petty name calling when someone doesn't post to them the way the feel they should be posted to. It didn't take much did it? Nope.

lol

Level 8

Since: Feb 12

Location hidden

#152415 Jun 26, 2013
Republican Honey wrote:
<quoted text>
As I said, I do not threaten anyone and certainly have no desire to threaten you. You seem extremely paranoid and much too upset over my calling you a jerk. Report me.
If Topix "does not allow proxy use to insult and harass" why do you indicate it is done "daily"?
LOL

That's my point, because you are a registered user, if you did, you would be held responsible for your actions.

This would not be the case if you were using an anonymous proxy.

In what way am I being paranoid? You calling me a "jerk" makes me laugh, because it is so petty and typical.

If you pay attention, you will see the posts of proxy users that are insulting others removed. Unfortunately Topix does not take this any further than that and rarely even banns these users because it is so easy for them to come back under another proxy.

Hence, the reason why I made the point about proxy users in the first place. They do it to avoid taking responsibility for their behavior. What about this don't you understand? Lol

Level 8

Since: Feb 12

Location hidden

#152416 Jun 26, 2013
"Life affords no greater responsibility, no greater privilege, than the raising of the next generation." C. Everett Koop

Level 8

Since: Feb 12

Location hidden

#152417 Jun 26, 2013
Quirky wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh Goursh? Still pizzin in the wind EH? Still got nothing . Lol !
(shakes head)
Quirky

Denver, CO

#152418 Jun 26, 2013
Republican Honey wrote:
<quoted text>
So you KNOW MORE about what I was "attempting" than I do? LOL! LOL!! Sorry bud, but you are WRONG. I "attempted" to find the facts by providing information which is CURRENTLY in the Topix Terms of Service. That is certainly more than you did in providing a "thread" from May 2007.
Your comment to me, which is indicated below, warranted your being called a "jerk". It is your normal, belittling, unprovoked response.
----------
X -Man- wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL
Then you need to look harder. Maybe you just don't want to see?
And you claim to be "intelligent".
;)
----------
If my opinion of you "holds little to no significance" to you, why bother to respond? Name calling on this thread goes both ways and is generally much worse than "jerk". Get over it.
People like X-Dummy hate people who post with honesty and truth. All they have is their Agenda!

Level 8

Since: Feb 12

Location hidden

#152419 Jun 26, 2013
Quirky wrote:
<quoted text>
People like X-Dummy hate people who post with honesty and truth. All they have is their Agenda!
LOL

You wouldn't know the first thing about posting with honesty and truth Quirky.

Now you are an expert on being a bigot though. ;)

Level 5

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#152420 Jun 26, 2013
X -Man- wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL
I see you posts are getting longer and longer.
Your argument as well as Aphelion's has always been moot. You both tried to make it about "posting unregistered" when it has always been about the use of anonymous proxies to insult and harass.
Your attempts to deflect the focus from the conservative anonymous proxy use to the issue of "unregistered vs registered" was obvious.
If you can't see the difference between a registered poster and a poster who hides behind a proxy to avoid responsibility for what they post then you are either dishonest or blind.
As for you childish name calling. You are responsible for your behavior. Do not blame me for it. No one forced you to call me a name like a two year old. I didn't call you a name did I? No, I didn't. lol
I never said I wasn't going to reply to you. I said if you can't handle my replies without resorting to childish name calling than maybe you shouldn't reply? Again, It's not like you're any different than the other far right conservative trolls that resort to petty name calling when someone doesn't post to them the way the feel they should be posted to. It didn't take much did it? Nope.
lol
I can assure you I am neither "dishonest" or "blind". Difference between you and is I am NOT paranoid and could care less what an anonymous proxy posts. Registered posters harass and insult also. I take total responsibility for my behavior just as YOU should. Belittling and berating posters incessantly as you do is spiteful and vicious. I will take "childish" over that any day.

You are no different than the other far left liberal trolls who resort to vicious berating "when someone doesn't post to them the way they feel they should be posted to". You routinely come on this thread and began responding to post after post with your customary, arrogant, belittling retorts. I guess this must be your daily entertainment.

I think I will go to bed now so find someone else to vilify.

Level 8

Since: Feb 12

Location hidden

#152421 Jun 26, 2013
Republican Honey wrote:
<quoted text>
I can assure you I am neither "dishonest" or "blind". Difference between you and is I am NOT paranoid and could care less what an anonymous proxy posts. Registered posters harass and insult also. I take total responsibility for my behavior just as YOU should. Belittling and berating posters incessantly as you do is spiteful and vicious. I will take "childish" over that any day.
You are no different than the other far left liberal trolls who resort to vicious berating "when someone doesn't post to them the way they feel they should be posted to". You routinely come on this thread and began responding to post after post with your customary, arrogant, belittling retorts. I guess this must be your daily entertainment.
I think I will go to bed now so find someone else to vilify.
LMAO

Goodnight. ;)

Level 8

Since: Feb 12

Location hidden

#152422 Jun 26, 2013
Oh..and I disagree. ;)
Sunny

Longview, WA

#152423 Jun 26, 2013
OzRitz wrote:
<quoted text>
Next you will be telling me about big Al and his hummers. Well even Arnie's Hummers are now running bio fuel or hydrogen. It's just a matter of perspective, if you want to own the big a$$ toys then be prepared to pay. Soon enough there will be a cleaner burning jet fuel, its just a matter of time. Thats the whole point, Obama wants collective heads to come up with some break through tech on alternative clean energy & it automatically becomes the new gold mine. Or wait until the Chinese invent it, that's your choice.
God OZ the whole point is Oblamber was payed for and is owned by evil people that don't give a Rats ass what you think.
He's been put there to pizz off the right just like Bush was put there to pizz of the left.
It automantically becomes the new gold mine,I think your mind has turned into chit for brains.
Sunny

Longview, WA

#152424 Jun 26, 2013
X -Man- wrote:
Oh..and I disagree. ;)
Damn X long day for you better get some zzzzzz.
Aphelion

Melbourne, FL

#152425 Jun 26, 2013
---Wild Irish Rose--- wrote:
MONDAY, JUN 24, 2013
This pretty much kills the IRS scandal
The scandal has been a fiction all along as new documents show the IRS targeted liberal groups as well
BY ALEX SEITZ-WALD
Remember the IRS scandal? How the tax agency improperly singled out Tea Party groups for extra scrutiny in a nefarious political vendetta against conservatives because the agency is either inherently liberal or was acting on orders from the Democratic President? Remember how it cost even Mitt Romney the election?
Well, as it turns out, that whole scandal is entirely bogus. False. A fiction. The entire notion that the agency singled out groups with “Tea Party” in their name in simply wrong, we learn today, thanks to new documents revealed by the Associated Press. The documents, and confirmation from officials, show the IRS targeted groups with other keywords in their names, including “Progressive” and “Occupy.”
“There was a wide-ranging set of categories and cases that spanned a broad spectrum” on the lists, newly appointed IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel said on a conference call with reporters.
So the IRS was targeting Tea Party groups, but it was also targeting progressive groups, which means it wasn’t really singling out anyone. And remember the only group actually denied tax-exempt status was a progressive one.
This should put this matter to bed forever. All along, everyone agreed that the problem with the IRS’ behavior was that the agency seemed to be giving extra scrutiny to groups of one political affiliation, and not the other. Now we know that it targeted groups on both sides.
http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/this_pretty_m...
Left wing site praising the IRS's investigation into itself and exonerating itself of any wrong doing.

HAHAHAHAHA
Aphelion

Melbourne, FL

#152426 Jun 26, 2013
X -Man- wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL
I see you posts are getting longer and longer.
Your argument as well as Aphelion's has always been moot. You both tried to make it about "posting unregistered" when it has always been about the use of anonymous proxies to insult and harass.
Your attempts to deflect the focus from the conservative anonymous proxy use to the issue of "unregistered vs registered" was obvious.
If you can't see the difference between a registered poster and a poster who hides behind a proxy to avoid responsibility for what they post then you are either dishonest or blind.
As for you childish name calling. You are responsible for your behavior. Do not blame me for it. No one forced you to call me a name like a two year old. I didn't call you a name did I? No, I didn't. lol
I never said I wasn't going to reply to you. I said if you can't handle my replies without resorting to childish name calling than maybe you shouldn't reply? Again, It's not like you're any different than the other far right conservative trolls that resort to petty name calling when someone doesn't post to them the way the feel they should be posted to. It didn't take much did it? Nope.
lol
X-girl still railing about proxies. Geez ... She's the "Hero" of the posting world, ever present to aid the registered users in their battle against the evil unregistered proxy posters. Extolling the bravery of the registered posters and calling out the cowardly unregistered.

HAHAHAHAHA

You are a mental case
Aphelion

Melbourne, FL

#152427 Jun 26, 2013
X -Man- wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL
You wouldn't know the first thing about posting with honesty and truth Quirky.
Now you are an expert on being a bigot though. ;)
Would this be an example of the name calling that you claim that you do not participate. Oh wait ... because you are registered and brave in your words, and believe that you are held responsible for them, it's ok. Pffffftt
Aphelion

Melbourne, FL

#152428 Jun 26, 2013
You're being spun, America. On the vital question of whether the Internal Revenue Service incompetently or corruptly targeted conservative groups, both the White House and GOP are rushing to judgment – and they want you to follow like lemmings.

Don't do it.

Nearly six weeks ago, President Obama responded to an inspector general's report detailing the targeting, which had been long denied by the IRS. "The misconduct that it uncovered is inexcusable. It's inexcusable, and Americans are right to be angry about it, and I am angry about it," Obama said, vowing to "hold the responsible parties accountable."

The IG report was based on a cursory audit. It was not a full-fledged investigation. And yet Democrats disingenuously claimed that it exonerated the Obama administration and the president's re-election campaign from any involvement in IRS targeting.

To truly "hold the responsible parties accountable," Obama still needed a thorough and impartial inquiry led by investigators who would question witnesses under oath, and would subpoena the White House and his own re-election campaign for related emails and other documents.

He did not ask for that.

Smelling blood, the GOP-controlled House launched an investigation led by Rep. Darrell Issa of California. Never mistaken for an impartial investigator, Issa quickly declared that IRS targeting was "ordered from Washington" – a thinly veiled indictment of the White House. His evidence? A few cherry-picked interviews with IRS officials and an Orwellian subtext: "We're getting to proving it," Issa said. On June 3 I wrote of Issa: "Meet the best friend of a controversy-plagued Democratic White House: a demagogic Republican."

Meanwhile, Obama backed his strong words with middling action, transferring political ally Danny Werfel from the Office of Management and Budget to the IRS, where as acting commissioner Werfel would investigate his own administration.

Why, after the agency's massive breach of trust, would Obama think a Werfel-led investigation will restore the public's faith?

Werfel announced Monday that instructions used by the IRS to look for applicants seeking tax-exempt status with "Tea Party" and "Patriots" in their title also included groups whose names included the word "Progressive" and "Occupy." Jonathon Weisman of The New York Times reported, "The documents appeared to back up contentions by IRS officials and some Democrats that the agency did not intend to single out conservative groups for special scrutiny."

The White House and its allies declared the scandal over. Said David Axelrod, one of Obama's longest-serving advisers, said on MSNBC's "Morning Joe" show: "I think the implication that this was some sort of scheme is falling apart."

Don't buy it. Like Issa and the GOP, Democrats are jumping to convenient conclusions based on incomplete evidence and no credible investigation.

There is a hard truth that partisans won't admit: Until more is known, we can't implicate or exonerate anybody.

Somebody like …. a special prosecutor. Those words are hard for me to type two decades after an innocent land deal I covered in Arkansas turned into the runaway Whitewater investigation.

What the IRS did, Obama said less than six weeks ago, was "inexcusable." That's a good word to describe what Republicans and Democrats in Washington are doing now -- cherry-picking evidence from partisan and cursory inquiries, treating Americans like lemmings and the truth like a leper.

http://www.nationaljournal.com/politics/why-t...

“Gloria Ad Caput Venire”

Level 9

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#152429 Jun 26, 2013
Jbone72 wrote:
He has not kept one promise. He just keeps saying everything is ok, because he on vacation too much to know what the hell is going on!!!!!
Just like the Rose here, his layers of insulation that protect his accountability for his outright lies and ineptness are being stripped, piece by piece by the very pellets they are leaving until there is nothing but a yellow core of cowardice left as he and the Rose stand trembling and naked.

“Gloria Ad Caput Venire”

Level 9

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#152430 Jun 26, 2013
Jbone72 wrote:
He has not kept one promise. He just keeps saying everything is ok, because he on vacation too much to know what the hell is going on!!!!!
---Wild Irish Rose--- wrote:
<quoted text>
Whaaaaaa, whaaaaa, whaaaaaa, whaaaaaa, whaaaaaa!
Mommy Mommy, President Obama ate my homework. It's all his fault.
Here you have it folks. The classic reply of a pure far left communist coward to a mostly true post.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Immigration Reform Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
GOP stokes Ebola fears against immigrants 1 hr Here Is One 498
The Big Stupid Thread About Everything (Jul '13) 2 hr USMail XXXII 536
Rose's Pub (Mar '10) 2 hr American Werewolves 136,487
Obama admin. to allow thousands of Haitians int... 3 hr Shinichiro Takizawa 29
Ebola fears spark backlash against Latino immig... 4 hr Responsibility 93
Many illegal immigrants live in public housing (Jan '09) 6 hr bigcircle247 5,604
Native Americans say "Mexicans are NOT Indians" (Mar '08) 7 hr OneRepublic 1,909

Immigration Reform People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE