gee, isn't that what I just said? except, u seem to think that in the old, old days the people had a choice! no, the Party selected or drafted a candidate THEY wanted at their convetions. some potential wannabes might solicit support but if they were not the annointed Party favorite, too bad.<quoted text>In the "old" days, the Republicans would have offered a better quality of candidates. As it stands, they trotted back ....
did u never watch ANY of the OLD political movies and follow the political manuevering going on? are u that under-educated?
obviously, if the P.S./D MSM doesn't endorse it, u don't absorb it!
and, for the last friggin' time, Romney wrote off that 47% as VOTERS, NOT CITIZENS. the MSM reported as he was dissing the people and not the voters. what is soooo hard to understand about politics?
do you honestly, without actually knowing the man, any person, PERSONALLY, that Romney, or any body, does not care as you say he doesn't? how shallow, so UN-informed, SO biased, SO STOOPID can such a person be?
lord luv a duck...
COME ON NOV.