Mexico's Take Over Of California: Complete By 2014?

[bearon2]

La Duranguense wrote:

<quoted text>
No seas mamon!

What the hell does frito think he's doing sending secret messages?

[FRido BanDITO]

bearon2 wrote:

<quoted text>
And of course pay back government funds for thier fun pursuient to all the other laws that apply.

Drunk....

[FRido BanDITO]

La Duranguense wrote:

<quoted text>
No seas mamon!

No seas maricon....

[Robert Carothers]

to you wrote:

stupid "white americans" when mexicans are the majority you will no longer be able to hide behind your racism and exclusion policies. You are scared of us because you know that we are real and treat each other like human beings while you are fake and always behind your facades.

Your allready the majority in Cal.Without the U.S.white, brown, blue, pink, red, whatever.Where would Mexico be then.Take your gang bangers home and quit sucking the life out of the social services,then we might see things differantly.

[bearon2]

Rico from East Los wrote:

<quoted text>
I remember prop 187. Grey Davis could have pursued it but buckled under pressure. I believe that the California taxpayer protection act of 2010 is a mirror proposition of prop 187.
Maybe it will have the same fate!!!

Whats going on in Pico Rivera ?

[Enemy Lines]

What? Not till 2014, the illegal smelly mexicans have already taken over. They dont have to wait until they have thier people in office, the liberal race mixing whites are already doing their bidding.
The state is dead, bankrupt and about to fall into the ocean from the weight of the illegals.
Nobody cares, the white race is dead and we let it die.....
Or did we
REVOLUTION IS THE ONLY SOLUTION

[The Out Law Josie Wales]

to you wrote:

stupid "white americans" when mexicans are the majority you will no longer be able to hide behind your racism and exclusion policies. You are scared of us because you know that we are real and treat each other like human beings while you are fake and always behind your facades.

You treat each other like human beings?? Sure you do, just read the police report every morning. Gang fights, drive by shootings, car jacking, ect. You guys are the salt of the earth. How many teenage girls are out pushing a baby stroller, one in it, one in the oven? Daddy already hot the road. P.S. I don't know anyone afraid Mexicans. We do know how to even the odds. Everyone is aware of your pack mentality.

[Nuke DC]

bearon2 wrote:

<quoted text>
They are married to a hole, arn't they?

The "best" part of you ran down one of your mommy's unnamed boyfriend's legs, ya blotch of rectum sludge.

[Nuke DC]

USAsince1680 wrote:

<quoted text>
Wow, no need to answer any of your questions. It's always nice to post with someone who will look up the facts.
Yes, it was an abuse of power by the judge but mostly the fault of Gray Davis for not pursuing the appeal. We got even by kicking him out of office with a recall vote but it was too late.

Please wake up, you are being fooled by the postor Bearon2 from different cities, it is one and the same person, working both sides of this issue who ever it is, is one bi-polar, schizoid freak.

[Yeek]

La Duranguense wrote:

<quoted text>
No seas mamon!

Hey , you are getting better and better!!

Very good D!!Excuse me-La D.

Y tambien, el ES maricon!

[USAsince1680]

Atticus Tiberius Finch wrote:

<quoted text>
The Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment is applicable when a state law discriminations a group based on its sex, race and alienage. A group that is classified by its sex, race and alienage is considered a “suspect classification.”
In reviewing a state law, the United States Supreme Court will weight the state government ‘s interests against rights of group being discriminated.
The United States Supreme Court has determined that based on alienage that it would apply intermediate scrutiny analysis to determine whether or not the law passes constitutional muster. Intermediate scrutiny, which is second highest level of judicial review, means that in order for the state law to be constitutional it has to satisfy important governmental interests that are furthered by substantially related means. This should be contrasted with strict scrutiny, the higher standard of review which requires narrowly tailored and least restrictive means to further a compelling governmental interest.
The issue here is whether or not the be the state’s compelling governmental interest that “substantial impact on the state's economic recovery” would be sufficient to withstand the “Intermediate Scrutiny” review of the United States Supreme Court.
This argument about state’s economic impact has been addressed in previous Supreme Court decisions.
In Graham v. Richardson, 403 U.S. 365 (1971)., Supreme Court held that a state’s regulations conditioning the receipt of welfare benefits either on U.S. citizenship or residence within the United States for a specified number of years failed to meet the intermediate scrutiny test, even though, the state argued it was justified due to limited public resources.
In Plyler v. Doe, 457 U.S. 202 (1982), the Supreme Court held that a state’s
refusal to finance the education of undocumented children failed to meet the intermediate scrutiny test; even though, the state argued that educating these children would drain the state’s revenues.
As such, it would appear that ballot measure suffers from the same defect as prior cases before the Supreme Court if the state’s only argument is an economic one.

Things have changed since those cases you cited (1971 & 1982). California can now prove without a doubt that it is suffering because of these services. I think the measure stands a good chance given the current economic crisis.

[SOCAL FAN]

The Out Law Josie Wales wrote:

<quoted text> You treat each other like human beings?? Sure you do, just read the police report every morning. Gang fights, drive by shootings, car jacking, ect. You guys are the salt of the earth. How many teenage girls are out pushing a baby stroller, one in it, one in the oven? Daddy already hot the road. P.S. I don't know anyone afraid Mexicans. We do know how to even the odds. Everyone is aware of your pack mentality.

Don't forget white neo-nazis,and those white girls at the welfare office too,then you got your white trailer trash druggies,and it speeled "hit the road".

[SOCAL FAN]

SOCAL FAN wrote:

<quoted text>Don't forget white neo-nazis,and those white girls at the welfare office too,then you got your white trailer trash druggies,and it speeled "hit the road".

Typo Correction"spelled".

[Ms Taletha]

La Duranguense wrote:

<quoted text>
No seas mamon!

Hola amiga! Como has estado?

[La Duranguense]

bearon2 wrote:

<quoted text>
Is he stupid or what?

He crazy

[La Duranguense]

Ms Taletha wrote:

<quoted text>
Hola amiga! Como has estado?

Hola! Estoy muy bien gracias pero un poco triste. Me voy de regreso para Mexico fin de este ano. Toda mi familia se va ir para Baja California. Esta muy peligroso ahorrita la situacion en Mexico, en Baja California esta poquito mas pacifico. Ya me estaba acostumbrando a la vida de aqui. Ni modo, asi es la vida. Tu como estas? Como esta tu nenita?

[Mr Right]

La Duranguense wrote:

<quoted text>
He crazy

I want to come see you sexy.

[Ms Taletha]

Yo estoy bien. Mi hija cada dia crese mas y es muy traviesa.

pero que lastima que te vas a regresar para Baja California. Es dificil dejar algo que te trajo alegria. Veo las nuevas en Univison y miro el alto peligro que existe.

Me encanta tratar contigo. Yo quiceria seguir siendo amigas del internet.

[Migra]

Mr Right wrote:

<quoted text>
I want to come see you sexy.

Perv!

[Mr Right]

Migra wrote:

<quoted text>
Perv!

Dont get jealous