Gay Married Man Gets Green Card

Gay Married Man Gets Green Card

There are 734 comments on the EDGE story from Jul 3, 2013, titled Gay Married Man Gets Green Card. In it, EDGE reports that:

Late Friday, just two days after the US Supreme Court released their decision gutting the Defense of Marriage Act, a permanent visa, aka green card, was issued to Traian Popov, a Bulgarian man married to Florida-based club DJ Julian Marsh.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at EDGE.

“Luke laughs at hypocrites!”

Level 1

Since: Sep 10

Palm Springs, California

#453 Jul 23, 2013
Portiai the Rossi wrote:
<quoted text>There is really nothing sadder than a self hating gay male who prefers prison sex over female companionship. I guess it caused you to go insane when your dad wasted all of his maleness on a women, your mother. Or did he? Cause here you are.
Women like you give me a larf. You can slap your vagina all over the place, and I would run for the hills if I was unlucky enough to see it. All your girly ways will not change my interest ONE iota and it is killing you, since you obviously rely on your vaggg to get anywhere in life. Guess what, honey, bat your eyelashes and wear your tight skirts and low cut blouses and parade your fun bags around for all the world to see. It ain't a working on me. Give me a big hairy chest and big wiener and broad back and I am good to go. JEALOUS?

DNF

“Judge less, Love more”

Level 2

Since: Apr 07

Born in Newark Ohio

#454 Jul 23, 2013
Portiai the Rossi wrote:
<quoted text>Actually, for every gay there exists a phobia, that is because the phobia creates the gay, That which you fear you have become.
Your insanity didn't make me gay honey. Spin again.

Gee when you pull crap out of your ass you dig deep!

DNF

“Judge less, Love more”

Level 2

Since: Apr 07

Born in Newark Ohio

#455 Jul 23, 2013
Portiai the Rossi wrote:
<quoted text>There is really nothing sadder than a self hating gay male who prefers prison sex over female companionship. I guess it caused you to go insane when your dad wasted all of his maleness on a women, your mother. Or did he? Cause here you are.
I disagree. You're sadder.
Your ridiculous posts are sadder. Your moral compass is sadder.

But you can now jump for joy because you can finally say you won something with me. Of course you'll leave out the part where what you won was the prize for most ridiculous thinking heterosexuals have produced.
Broseph

New Castle, DE

#456 Jul 23, 2013
Portiai the Rossi wrote:
<quoted text>There is really nothing sadder than a self hating gay male who prefers prison sex over female companionship. I guess it caused you to go insane when your dad wasted all of his maleness on a women, your mother. Or did he? Cause here you are.
Do you even know any gay people in your personal life?

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Level 10

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#459 Jul 25, 2013
DNF wrote:
Yet you defend clerks who break them as well as cake bakers and anyone else who claims to do so because they are christians?
No law can force a private business to service a same sex marriage. The problem is same sex marriage clerks in the IRS who leaked the National Organization for Marriage's 2008 tax returns to their political enemies.

If you don't want your tax returns leaked, keep marriage one man and one woman.

.
DNF wrote:
Is that why the New Republic said I can comment and when I did with your own Bible verses they cancelled my account? You want special rights Brian. We don't.
I don't quote the Bible, DNF is confused.

Gays have always married under the same laws as everyone else; I cite Oscar Wilde and Meredith Baxter for examples. The issue isn't freedom, the issue is special laws for a mascot victim group, to balkanize our Republic on the lines of sexual orientation.

Many gays defend marriage as one man and one woman because every gay was born of man/woman unions.

“I Am No One Else”

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#460 Jul 25, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>No law can force a private business to service a same sex marriage. The problem is same sex marriage clerks in the IRS who leaked the National Organization for Marriage's 2008 tax returns to their political enemies.
If you don't want your tax returns leaked, keep marriage one man and one woman.
.
<quoted text>I don't quote the Bible, DNF is confused.
Gays have always married under the same laws as everyone else; I cite Oscar Wilde and Meredith Baxter for examples. The issue isn't freedom, the issue is special laws for a mascot victim group, to balkanize our Republic on the lines of sexual orientation.
Many gays defend marriage as one man and one woman because every gay was born of man/woman unions.
So then no business has to serve black folks either, by your own logic. Why are you so racist?

“Sara for Fun (( M 2 F ))”

Level 1

Since: Aug 10

Bahrain

#461 Jul 25, 2013
i am looking for same-sex married kindly read my profile for more info. i am looking 4 peace and love with my hard man !

“Luke laughs at hypocrites!”

Level 1

Since: Sep 10

Palm Springs, California

#462 Jul 25, 2013
sarahomo wrote:
i am looking for same-sex married kindly read my profile for more info. i am looking 4 peace and love with my hard man !
This ain't a sex hook up site, hon. Try one of the thousands that DO exist.

DNF

“Judge less, Love more”

Level 2

Since: Apr 07

Born in Newark Ohio

#463 Jul 25, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>No law can force a private business to service a same sex marriage. The problem is same sex marriage clerks in the IRS who leaked the National Organization for Marriage's 2008 tax returns to their political enemies.
If you don't want your tax returns leaked, keep marriage one man and one woman.
.
<quoted text>I don't quote the Bible, DNF is confused.
Gays have always married under the same laws as everyone else; I cite Oscar Wilde and Meredith Baxter for examples. The issue isn't freedom, the issue is special laws for a mascot victim group, to balkanize our Republic on the lines of sexual orientation.
Many gays defend marriage as one man and one woman because every gay was born of man/woman unions.
Yes many gays do protect marriage as they were taught by their parents to do. You should try it sometime. And many heterosexuals also endorse our rights. A majority in fact. So here you go again whining that you aren't getting your special rights everyday for breakfast.

Those tax records are part of the public record. What leak are you talking about now? The one from your lower lip?

Or are you just made because many of those records were not part of the ones they were court ordered to produce! And have been refusing to produce to many State Courts investigating them for violating campaign finance laws!

Poor BrianG. All his attempts to spin the truth are failing.

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Level 10

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#464 Jul 25, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<So then no business has to serve black folks either, by your own logic. Why are you so racist?
Not by my logic; by KittenKoder's. Race isn't behavior; the same sex marriage issue has nothing to do with race. Racial differences aren't important and they are trivial, not even skin deep. Gender differences are so important, they are essential to the survival of the human race, they are so great that they separate homosexuals into lesbians and gays.

I've never written a racist argument like KittenKoder's quote "no business has to serve black folks either", I stand by the integration standards of our society.

This issue isn't about homosexuals; it's about same sex marriage. Barronelle Stutzman would have refused to serve a polygamous wedding or a wedding of a straight couple marrying for economic convenience instead of sex.

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Level 10

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#465 Jul 25, 2013
Stutzman told a long-time customer last March she would not provide flowers for a same-sex marriage because it was against her religious beliefs.
http://www.edgeseattle.com/news/national/news...

She didn't discriminate against homosexuals, this was a "long-time customer"; she discriminated based on her definition of marriage. In Washington State, advocating man/woman marriage by act or speech may be prosecuted by the state. This is why you must protect marriage in your state and country.

If you don't want to be sued, keep marriage one man and one woman. Reason 33: Litigation.

DNF

“Judge less, Love more”

Level 2

Since: Apr 07

Born in Newark Ohio

#467 Jul 25, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>Not by my logic; by KittenKoder's. Race isn't behavior; the same sex marriage issue has nothing to do with race. Racial differences aren't important and they are trivial, not even skin deep. Gender differences are so important, they are essential to the survival of the human race, they are so great that they separate homosexuals into lesbians and gays.
I've never written a racist argument like KittenKoder's quote "no business has to serve black folks either", I stand by the integration standards of our society.
This issue isn't about homosexuals; it's about same sex marriage. Barronelle Stutzman would have refused to serve a polygamous wedding or a wedding of a straight couple marrying for economic convenience instead of sex.
RE your gender segregated marriage idea.

Doesn't that apply to a divorced father like you just as easily as it would for a Same Sex couple??

DNF

“Judge less, Love more”

Level 2

Since: Apr 07

Born in Newark Ohio

#468 Jul 25, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
Stutzman told a long-time customer last March she would not provide flowers for a same-sex marriage because it was against her religious beliefs.
http://www.edgeseattle.com/news/national/news...
She didn't discriminate against homosexuals, this was a "long-time customer"; she discriminated based on her definition of marriage. In Washington State, advocating man/woman marriage by act or speech may be prosecuted by the state. This is why you must protect marriage in your state and country.
If you don't want to be sued, keep marriage one man and one woman. Reason 33: Litigation.
LMAO. If you don't want to get sued then repeal your DOMA laws!

Or add to the deficit your children will have to cover as Brain G suggests.

DNF

“Judge less, Love more”

Level 2

Since: Apr 07

Born in Newark Ohio

#469 Jul 25, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
Stutzman told a long-time customer last March she would not provide flowers for a same-sex marriage because it was against her religious beliefs.
http://www.edgeseattle.com/news/national/news...
She didn't discriminate against homosexuals, this was a "long-time customer"; she discriminated based on her definition of marriage. In Washington State, advocating man/woman marriage by act or speech may be prosecuted by the state. This is why you must protect marriage in your state and country.
If you don't want to be sued, keep marriage one man and one woman. Reason 33: Litigation.
Lying again Brian. The State filed criminal charges against her for discrimination. And she lost.

DNF

“Judge less, Love more”

Level 2

Since: Apr 07

Born in Newark Ohio

#470 Jul 25, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>Not by my logic; by KittenKoder's. Race isn't behavior; the same sex marriage issue has nothing to do with race. Racial differences aren't important and they are trivial, not even skin deep. Gender differences are so important, they are essential to the survival of the human race, they are so great that they separate homosexuals into lesbians and gays.
I've never written a racist argument like KittenKoder's quote "no business has to serve black folks either", I stand by the integration standards of our society.
This issue isn't about homosexuals; it's about same sex marriage. Barronelle Stutzman would have refused to serve a polygamous wedding or a wedding of a straight couple marrying for economic convenience instead of sex.
That may be true about her. But she still violated the law. And it wasn't gays and lesbians that got her in trouble. It was here actions. Whcih is why the state filed CRIMINAL charges against here.

But you defend these criminals just as you defend the ones who murder abortionists.

DNF

“Judge less, Love more”

Level 2

Since: Apr 07

Born in Newark Ohio

#471 Jul 25, 2013
her own actions

“I Am No One Else”

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#472 Jul 25, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>Not by my logic; by KittenKoder's. Race isn't behavior; the same sex marriage issue has nothing to do with race. Racial differences aren't important and they are trivial, not even skin deep. Gender differences are so important, they are essential to the survival of the human race, they are so great that they separate homosexuals into lesbians and gays.
I've never written a racist argument like KittenKoder's quote "no business has to serve black folks either", I stand by the integration standards of our society.
This issue isn't about homosexuals; it's about same sex marriage. Barronelle Stutzman would have refused to serve a polygamous wedding or a wedding of a straight couple marrying for economic convenience instead of sex.
Nope, it is your logic that suggested it. If businesses are allowed to deny access to services and products simply out of their own fears, then you are opening a can of worms that would lead to not only a lot more homeless and needy people, but also businesses finding reasons to justify denying anyone access for any reason. Imagine if all the grocers said "no more people with brown hair, because brown hair is against our religion."

“I Am No One Else”

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#473 Jul 25, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
Stutzman told a long-time customer last March she would not provide flowers for a same-sex marriage because it was against her religious beliefs.
http://www.edgeseattle.com/news/national/news...
She didn't discriminate against homosexuals, this was a "long-time customer"; she discriminated based on her definition of marriage. In Washington State, advocating man/woman marriage by act or speech may be prosecuted by the state. This is why you must protect marriage in your state and country.
If you don't want to be sued, keep marriage one man and one woman. Reason 33: Litigation.
Yes, she did discriminate.

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Level 10

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#474 Jul 26, 2013
DNF wrote:
<quoted text>RE your gender segregated marriage idea. Doesn't that apply to a divorced father like you just as easily as it would for a Same Sex couple??
I've never divorced, I've been married more than 25 years. Learn from the lies supporting same sex marriage above; if you love truth keep marriage one man and one woman.

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Level 10

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#475 Jul 26, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
Yes, she did discriminate.
Not based on race or even sexual preference; she politically opposes same sex marriage just like the rest of us.

Reason 33 for keeping marriage one man and one woman; litigation. You might be sued next if same sex marriages are licensed in your state.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Immigration Reform Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Rose's Pub (Mar '10) 24 min D Valens 138,945
News NYC council speaker endorses Hillary Clinton fo... 43 min Le Jimbo 9
News 'Anchor baby' fight scrambles Republican field 50 min Learn to Read 425
News Donald Trump: Jorge Ramos 'like a madman' 54 min Simon 222
News Donald Trump to the - Tonight Show' 1 hr Responsibiility 4
News Republican candidate Walker calls building nort... 1 hr Le Jimbo 63
News Trump: 'I have to do right thing' 2 hr mjjcpa 269
More from around the web