Gun Control Laws and Legislation: Whe...

Gun Control Laws and Legislation: Where Does Pennsylvania Stand?

There are 784 comments on the Patch.com story from Dec 18, 2012, titled Gun Control Laws and Legislation: Where Does Pennsylvania Stand?. In it, Patch.com reports that:

On the books, Pennsylvania's gun laws are somewhat tougher than those found elsewhere in the United States, according to the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence .

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Patch.com.

Canon

Texarkana, TX

#233 Jan 9, 2013
Spocko wrote:
<quoted text>
Huh? In you f-d up head mayby moron ...
You comment just proved who the moron is, that'd be you. Good greif, I am amazed at the lack of knowledge and common sense!!!
Canon

Texarkana, TX

#234 Jan 9, 2013
It's a right to own guns, get over it!

“Stop the Brain Rot”

Since: Jan 12

Take a Looonng Vacation

#235 Jan 9, 2013
CBOW wrote:
<quoted text>The Center for Disease Control (CDC), in 2003 thoroughly analyzed fifty-one in-depth studies dealing with gun control. Those studies included everything from the effectiveness of gun bans to laws requiring gun locks. From their objective analysis, they “found no discernible effect on public safety by any of the measures we commonly think of as ‘gun control.’”
Excellent, thanks for proving her post wrong:

"It's proven where guns are more restricted, there is MORE crime!"

;)

“Stop the Brain Rot”

Since: Jan 12

Take a Looonng Vacation

#236 Jan 9, 2013
Canon wrote:
<quoted text>
Surely you can look it up as easily I? Or can you?
Understood: you've got nothing.

CBOW proved your wild claim wrong, anyway, so don't sweat it.:)
CBOW

Abbottstown, PA

#237 Jan 9, 2013
tha Professor wrote:
<quoted text>
Excellent, thanks for proving her post wrong:
"It's proven where guns are more restricted, there is MORE crime!"
;)
It didn't. It proved that gun restriction has no effect on gun violence. The fact is, gun controls only effect those that abide by the law, so, it will never reduce "gun violence". Gun violence is not perpetrated by the law abiding, but by the lawless, get it?
Canon

Texarkana, TX

#238 Jan 9, 2013
tha Professor wrote:
<quoted text>
Understood: you've got nothing.
CBOW proved your wild claim wrong, anyway, so don't sweat it.:)
Who or whatever that means...

Quit whining and get over it.
Canon

Texarkana, TX

#240 Jan 9, 2013
CBOW wrote:
<quoted text>The Center for Disease Control (CDC), in 2003 thoroughly analyzed fifty-one in-depth studies dealing with gun control. Those studies included everything from the effectiveness of gun bans to laws requiring gun locks. From their objective analysis, they “found no discernible effect on public safety by any of the measures we commonly think of as ‘gun control.’”
OH MY GOODNESS...that is so bogus. You have fabricated a complete lie....The Center for Disease Control did no such study....on GUNS!!! Go to their website and see for yourself.

Come on raise you hands all who fell for that bunch of made up malarky!
CBOW

Abbottstown, PA

#241 Jan 9, 2013
tha Professor wrote:
<quoted text>
Understood: you've got nothing.
CBOW proved your wild claim wrong, anyway, so don't sweat it.:)
Here is a question, Nazi Germany was "disarmed" during Hitler, the only ones with guns were the Nazis and German soldiers. That was one of the most lawless times in human history. It just happened that it was the alleged authorities who had the weapons and the masses suffered for it. Do you want to see that happen here? Think long and hard on that.

“Stop the Brain Rot”

Since: Jan 12

Take a Looonng Vacation

#242 Jan 9, 2013
CBOW wrote:
<quoted text>
It didn't. It proved that gun restriction has no effect on gun violence. The fact is, gun controls only effect those that abide by the law, so, it will never reduce "gun violence". Gun violence is not perpetrated by the law abiding, but by the lawless, get it?
She claimed that restrictions created more crime, your claims about the cited study show that not to be true. So your statement "it didn't" is false.

"Gun violence si not perpetrated by the law abiding?" LOL! Statistics concerning accidental deaths, suicides, and homicides arising from domestic disputes call you a liar. Unless you conveniently insist that the moment a crime or even an accident occurs the person involved automatically beccomes "lawless," which would sure be a convenient argument!:)

“Stop the Brain Rot”

Since: Jan 12

Take a Looonng Vacation

#243 Jan 9, 2013
Canon wrote:
<quoted text>
OH MY GOODNESS...that is so bogus. You have fabricated a complete lie....The Center for Disease Control did no such study....on GUNS!!! Go to their website and see for yourself.
Come on raise you hands all who fell for that bunch of made up malarky!
Still like your little gun buddy, CBOW?

LOL

“Stop the Brain Rot”

Since: Jan 12

Take a Looonng Vacation

#244 Jan 9, 2013
In fact, the CDC (and the ATF) are actually RESTRICTED BY LAW from disseminating information in the form of statistics about gun violence. How? Congressional Republicans have repeatedly passed riders to bills preventing any money from being used for the purpose.

http://www.ajc.com/news/news/cdc-politics-aff...

As i've noted before, for gunners the First Amendment is the enemy of the Second...:)

“Stop the Brain Rot”

Since: Jan 12

Take a Looonng Vacation

#245 Jan 9, 2013
Some further information on the issue from the usually reliable FactCheck.Org :

http://factcheck.org/2012/12/gun-rhetoric-vs-...
the rest of us

Saint Paul, MN

#246 Jan 9, 2013
tha Professor wrote:
<quoted text>
Still like your little gun buddy, CBOW?
LOL
Professor Fartsack, you're doing it again.......posting over and over and over again on the same thread and NOBODY is agreeing with anything you say.....how unbelievably dense are you? As you've been told repeatedly, it is no different on here than your real life....nobody wants to hear your asinine comments.
Spocko

Oakland, CA

#247 Jan 9, 2013
CBOW wrote:
<quoted text>Besides, don’t you think we're pretty damn safe from that scary tyrannical rule propagated by the NRA? Based on WHAT? If Odumbo gets his way and actually gets a third term, what is stopping him from pushing other agendas? You are simplistic and naive at best.
You are one those dumb-f*** morons thinking a mob of armed rednecks are going to take on the US Gov't - you need help, lots of help friggen psycho!!
Spocko

Oakland, CA

#248 Jan 9, 2013
CBOW wrote:
<quoted text>
Here is a question, Nazi Germany was "disarmed" during Hitler, the only ones with guns were the Nazis and German soldiers. That was one of the most lawless times in human history. It just happened that it was the alleged authorities who had the weapons and the masses suffered for it. Do you want to see that happen here? Think long and hard on that.
Complete bunk, the Nazis disarmed, what they called, enemies of the state, Jews and Gypsies - you are a spectacularly misinformed propagandist and moron!!

“Stop the Brain Rot”

Since: Jan 12

Take a Looonng Vacation

#249 Jan 9, 2013
Spocko wrote:
<quoted text>
Complete bunk, the Nazis disarmed, what they called, enemies of the state, Jews and Gypsies - you are a spectacularly misinformed propagandist and moron!!
Gun nuts who use the Nazi card have already lost the battle. They're disloyal Americans who equate the American government with Hitler's in an effort to discredit responsible gun control.

Despicable, really.

“Stop the Brain Rot”

Since: Jan 12

Take a Looonng Vacation

#250 Jan 9, 2013
Spocko wrote:
<quoted text>
You are one those dumb-f*** morons thinking a mob of armed rednecks are going to take on the US Gov't - you need help, lots of help friggen psycho!!
Hilarious that they think that Obama wants or would seek a third term, which is impossible by law.

Paranoia running amok...

“Stop the Brain Rot”

Since: Jan 12

Take a Looonng Vacation

#251 Jan 9, 2013
Canon wrote:
<quoted text>
Who or whatever that means...
Quit whining and get over it.
LOL...thanks for admitting that you're stupid and can't even follow a simple chain of argument.
KeepGitmoOpen

Bryn Mawr, PA

#252 Jan 9, 2013
2nd amendment protects the people from the over reach of gummit if they try to make us register that is an overreach and the 2nd amendment maybe exercised.
Guns r Us

Allentown, PA

#254 Jan 9, 2013
Spocko wrote:
<quoted text>
Smart and effective gun control that protects society has nothing to do with the 2nd amendment at all! Qualified people certainly have the right to own or carry but the government has a duty and responsibility to regulate the sale and ‘the carry’ of guns. The notion that a mob of people are ready and equipped to take on the US Gov’t is comical at best. Besides, don’t you think we're pretty damn safe from that scary tyrannical rule propagated by the NRA?
Do you or anyone know what Biden Obama and Holder are really going to do about gun control. Restict assault type guns ? Like a Garand or 15 mag hand gun ? Or maybe a six shot revolver ? How are they going to get the guns away from the yutes and maybe only go after the guns on register . That leaves more out there than the amount they could confiscate . Little measures don't do anything to control guns , they're after the big 2nd .

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Immigration Reform Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Rural America Braces for Labor Shortages After ... 4 min DR X 10
Has Donald Trump Already Failed Us? (Nov '16) 19 min Agents of Corruption 9,484
News Tense days for business owners without legal st... 23 min spytheweb 1
Rose's Pub (Mar '10) 30 min Crazy Beautiful 147,143
News Why Hire More Border Patrol When Illegal Immigr... 2 hr Red Crosse 40
News Mayor Emanuel, City of Chicago File Federal Law... 3 hr spud 93
News 2 accused of selling fake immigration documents... 3 hr spud 4
More from around the web