And in fact, when you look at the horoscopes of Clinton and Obama: Both leos with the moon in Taurus, and at the horoscopes of Newt and Cantor: Both Gemini´s with the moon in Saggittarius, you realizethat there´s got to be something to this.
The gemini-moon acts as a sheperd to the Taurus-ox;Saggitarius feels that they are wiser than the leos.
At any rate Gemini and Saggittarius are both mutable, that is to say, flexilble and adaptable star signs.
A Scorpio like Boehner will also feel superior in
that Scorpios believe themselves to be more principled than a Leo. Virgo likewise thinks they
are smarter and clearer as well as tougher than
a Taurus Moon.
Gemini ends up in the seventh house of the horoscope of the United States, the house of
visible reality. Taurus ends up underneath that
in the sixth house. So both Clinton and Obama
have the same dilemma:They need an extraordinary
amount of extra conflict-energy to bring their
ideas across to Americans, who like to be persuaded
in an intellectual manner and not so much by appealing to ideals and feelings of right and wrong as is the preference of a taurus-mmon.
With Boehner, this type of conflictual energy-potential of Gemini versus Taurus does not exist, as his moon is in Virgo.
Cantor would be quite an adversary for Obama, but maybe someone he could sparr with more successfully
than with Boehner, the unflexible Scorpio.
So- there you go: Astrology explains how this is
all a problem of chemistry not happening between
Boehner and Obama.