Ann Romney: "You Can Trust Mitt"

Ann Romney: "You Can Trust Mitt"

There are 374 comments on the KCRG story from Aug 28, 2012, titled Ann Romney: "You Can Trust Mitt". In it, KCRG reports that:

Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney swept to the Republican presidential nomination Tuesday night, praised lovingly by his wife from their national convention stage as the "man American needs" and cheered by delegates eager to propel him into the fall campaign against President Barack Obama.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at KCRG.

First Prev
of 19
Next Last
Wall Street Government

Sebastian, FL

#1 Aug 29, 2012
O.K.
If you say so.
NOT.

Since: May 11

Location hidden

#2 Aug 29, 2012
Jeffrey Dahmer's dad said Jeff was a good boy.

D Up

United States

#3 Aug 29, 2012
PayThat CEO wrote:
Jeffrey Dahmer's dad said Jeff was a good boy.
He always had a huge appetite.

Since: Jan 07

Location hidden

#4 Aug 29, 2012
Obama said he would be transparent.
NOT
Nu Words

Carol Stream, IL

#5 Aug 29, 2012
In Saint UU Trust vs In God UU Trust n In Topix Wii Love!!!;-0000000000
Wall Street Government

Sebastian, FL

#6 Aug 29, 2012
DavidH64 wrote:
Obama said he would be transparent.
NOT
So to prove tebagger disdain for that.

Teabaggers are voting for the Republican keeping secrets.

BRILLIANT "Strategery".

Since: Mar 09

The Left Coast

#7 Aug 29, 2012
DavidH64 wrote:
Obama said he would be transparent.
NOT
Turns out after 3+ years in office, it is very apparent he and his administration are confused by many issues. Food, gas insurance costs going up. When they started the debt was $10T and now it's $16trillion. Unemployment still above 8%. Solyndra was one of their biggest success stories. We can see exactly what Obama has done. His campaign promises were worthless then, why would anyone believe his promises this time?

Since: Jan 07

Location hidden

#8 Aug 29, 2012
Wall Street Government wrote:
<quoted text>
So to prove tebagger disdain for that.
Teabaggers are voting for the Republican keeping secrets.
BRILLIANT "Strategery".
Yea good thing Obama isn't keeping any secrets. ROFLMFAO!!!

Hypocrite much Skippy?

Since: Jan 07

Location hidden

#9 Aug 29, 2012
Wall Street Government wrote:
<quoted text>
So to prove tebagger disdain for that.
Teabaggers are voting for the Republican keeping secrets.
BRILLIANT "Strategery".
As expected response. Nothing to debate or comment to the contrary, so resort to attacks, insults, deflection and spin. Typical SOP for the Saul Alinsky types, as yourself.
Wall Street Government

Sebastian, FL

#10 Aug 29, 2012
DavidH64 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yea good thing Obama isn't keeping any secrets. ROFLMFAO!!!
Hypocrite much Skippy?
I'm sure he is.

If Mitt's going to run on a platform of a successful "business" man, he should be able to PROVE that he did it legally and legitimately.

Teabaggers are going to take his word for it?

After four years of the "lack of transperency" charges against Obama?

Of course they are.

Teabaggers did the same under Bush.
Wall Street Government

Sebastian, FL

#11 Aug 29, 2012
DavidH64 wrote:
<quoted text>
As expected response. Nothing to debate or comment to the contrary, so resort to attacks, insults, deflection and spin. Typical SOP for the Saul Alinsky types, as yourself.
Attacks, spin, deflection?
Insults?
Maybe, is calling you a hypocrite is insulting to teabaggers.
They have been claiming that for years, about everyone else but them.
conservative crapola

Zionhill, PA

#12 Aug 29, 2012
rugby outsourced the jobs of those whom were asked to trust him.

rugby '12: compulsive lying

Since: Jan 07

Location hidden

#13 Aug 29, 2012
Wall Street Government wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm sure he is.
If Mitt's going to run on a platform of a successful "business" man, he should be able to PROVE that he did it legally and legitimately.
Teabaggers are going to take his word for it?
After four years of the "lack of transperency" charges against Obama?
Of course they are.
Teabaggers did the same under Bush.
So then it is acceptable that there are secrets. You are silent about Obama's secrets, and only vocal about Romney's. So either A) you are a lunatic hypocrite, or B) just full of blind biased hatred.

You and other brain dead liberals keep claiming "illegal" business practices. So back it up. I hear a lot of hot air and not one shred of evidence has been presented. Obviously you are nothing more than a parrot for the talking heads on MSNBC.

Thank you for playing Skippy. Better luck next time.

Be sure to come back and post when you wake up from your Obama Kool-Aid induced coma and can get your head pulled out of his a$$.
conservative crapola

Zionhill, PA

#14 Aug 29, 2012
Wall Street Government wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm sure he is.
If Mitt's going to run on a platform of a successful "business" man, he should be able to PROVE that he did it legally and legitimately.
Teabaggers are going to take his word for it?
After four years of the "lack of transperency" charges against Obama?
Of course they are.
Teabaggers did the same under Bush.
Hag rugby bragged about his time at bain, but criticizing him about it is off the table for the hyper-sensitive cons. It doesn't jive with their attempted remake of the severely lib con from MA.
serfs up

Melbourne, FL

#15 Aug 29, 2012
No matter if Obama wins or loses in November, he lost a healthy amount of supporters in his first meeting with the congress when he told Repubs..."you lost, get over it" when a Repub politician suggested they work together. You guys forget that Bush for all of his faults by your insults and worse, was not a conservative and signed on to many progressive issues. Repub voters regurgitated McCain in 2008 and frankly deserved better then what they got now in terms of conservatism.
Wall Street Government

Sebastian, FL

#16 Aug 29, 2012
DavidH64 wrote:
<quoted text>
So then it is acceptable that there are secrets. You are silent about Obama's secrets, and only vocal about Romney's. So either A) you are a lunatic hypocrite, or B) just full of blind biased hatred.
You and other brain dead liberals keep claiming "illegal" business practices. So back it up. I hear a lot of hot air and not one shred of evidence has been presented. Obviously you are nothing more than a parrot for the talking heads on MSNBC.
Thank you for playing Skippy. Better luck next time.
Be sure to come back and post when you wake up from your Obama Kool-Aid induced coma and can get your head pulled out of his a$$.


Keep drinking that "Two if by tea" Limaughtomy hypocrite kool-aid.

Teabaggers were the ones freaking out about the lack of transparency in the Obama administration.

The discovery that the Romneys had $3 million in an account with the Swiss bank UBS came only after the Republican presidential candidate released his tax returns for 2010 on Tuesday. The campaign had maintained that it was not necessary to disclose the Swiss account because Romney's money manager, Brad Malt, had shuttered it in early 2010.

Not neccessary?
Until someone pointed it out.
You want this guy revising the tax code?

Presumptive Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney insists that he didn’t shut down his tax shelters in the Cayman Islands, Bermuda and Switzerland because it would “avoid the truth” and he wasn’t going to “manipulate my life” just to become president.

Fox News host Chris Wallace asked Romney in an interview that aired on Sunday why he didn’t close the Swiss bank accounts and get out of the investments in the Cayman Islands before he spent the last eight years running for president.

“First of all, there was no reduction — not one dollar reduction — in taxes by virtue of having an account in Switzerland or a Cayman Islands investment,” Romney explained.“The dollars of taxes remained exactly the same. There was no tax savings at all. And the conduct of the trustee and making investments was entirely consistent with U.S. law and all the taxes paid were those legally owed and there was no tax saving by virtue of those entities.”

So if there was no ulterior motive, why not keep his money in an American bank?

Mitt Romney will release his complete 2011 tax return by Oct. 15 and possibly sooner, but that will be the Republican presidential challenger’s final disclosure, his campaign said Sunday.

Final discloure?

Why Mitt Romney would share 23 years of tax returns with McCain in 2008, when he was being considered as a possible running mate, but withhold the same volume of financial documents from the public. Obama released seven years of tax returns in 2008 and has made his return public each year he has been in the White House.

McCain didn't take his "word" for it
McCain passed on Mitt.
Interesting.
Wall Street Government

Sebastian, FL

#17 Aug 29, 2012
DavidH64 wrote:
<quoted text>
So then it is acceptable that there are secrets. You are silent about Obama's secrets, and only vocal about Romney's. So either A) you are a lunatic hypocrite, or B) just full of blind biased hatred.
You and other brain dead liberals keep claiming "illegal" business practices. So back it up. I hear a lot of hot air and not one shred of evidence has been presented. Obviously you are nothing more than a parrot for the talking heads on MSNBC.
Thank you for playing Skippy. Better luck next time.
Be sure to come back and post when you wake up from your Obama Kool-Aid induced coma and can get your head pulled out of his a$$.
Yeah.

Thanks for playing.

Better luck next time.

Poor teabagger.
fedupwiththemess

Ashburn, VA

#18 Aug 29, 2012
Hell no! You can trust JESUS and that is about it. Mitt don't like black folks. His mormon religion says blacks are cursed. Screw mitt...Obama 2012!
serfs up

Melbourne, FL

#19 Aug 29, 2012
Wall Street Government wrote:
<quoted text>
Keep drinking that "Two if by tea" Limaughtomy hypocrite kool-aid.
Teabaggers were the ones freaking out about the lack of transparency in the Obama administration.
The discovery that the Romneys had $3 million in an account with the Swiss bank UBS came only after the Republican presidential candidate released his tax returns for 2010 on Tuesday. The campaign had maintained that it was not necessary to disclose the Swiss account because Romney's money manager, Brad Malt, had shuttered it in early 2010.
Not neccessary?
Until someone pointed it out.
You want this guy revising the tax code?
Presumptive Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney insists that he didn’t shut down his tax shelters in the Cayman Islands, Bermuda and Switzerland because it would “avoid the truth” and he wasn’t going to “manipulate my life” just to become president.
Fox News host Chris Wallace asked Romney in an interview that aired on Sunday why he didn’t close the Swiss bank accounts and get out of the investments in the Cayman Islands before he spent the last eight years running for president.
“First of all, there was no reduction — not one dollar reduction — in taxes by virtue of having an account in Switzerland or a Cayman Islands investment,” Romney explained.“The dollars of taxes remained exactly the same. There was no tax savings at all. And the conduct of the trustee and making investments was entirely consistent with U.S. law and all the taxes paid were those legally owed and there was no tax saving by virtue of those entities.”
So if there was no ulterior motive, why not keep his money in an American bank?
Mitt Romney will release his complete 2011 tax return by Oct. 15 and possibly sooner, but that will be the Republican presidential challenger’s final disclosure, his campaign said Sunday.
Final discloure?
Why Mitt Romney would share 23 years of tax returns with McCain in 2008, when he was being considered as a possible running mate, but withhold the same volume of financial documents from the public. Obama released seven years of tax returns in 2008 and has made his return public each year he has been in the White House.
McCain didn't take his "word" for it
McCain passed on Mitt.
Interesting.
You progressives wanted Romney in case Obama had a hard time this election because of a reputation of being a RINO. The truth is..a real Republican conservative would have won this election easily. I believe Romney will win. Probably easily despite reservations. Then we will see early next year what we got. He will probably fight his own party or the voters will start rebelling like they did in 2008. Watch for wars and increased security suppression at home with the congress going along with it.
Wall Street Government

Sebastian, FL

#21 Aug 29, 2012
"a real Republican conservative".

They don't exist.

Just repackaged republicans.

They have to "reinvent" themselves from time to time.

Painting vertical black stripes on a white dog and trying to convince people "it's a zebra".

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 19
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Hurricane Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Aviation and animal rescue - let the good work ... Jan 10 Qtown Lady 2
News Yale: Deep Atlantic current in peril from globa... Jan 5 PeopleLikeBS 2
News Flood-stricken historic town mulls federal buyo... Dec '16 Frogface Kate 2
News What we should be asking Donald Trump and Hilla... Dec '16 Waco1910 11
News Over 10,000 Stranded Haitians Could Seek Asylum... Dec '16 lsluera61 1
News Cold freezes bell ringers Dec '16 Big Johnson 1
News Home sales climb 2% in October (Nov '12) Dec '16 fkhstmldkxd 58
More from around the web