Story of the Year: It's Global Warming, Stupid

Dec 31, 2012 Full story: Common Dreams 324

My favorite headline of 2012 was " It's Global Warming, Stupid ," which appeared on the cover of Bloomberg Businessweek on Nov.

Full Story

“dening those who deny nature. ”

Since: Jun 07

Norfolk va

#138 Jan 10, 2013
Fair Game wrote:
<quoted text>
A lie of course.
Half a dozen independent enquires found no evidence.
Independent? Far more inquiries found plenty of evidence.

“dening those who deny nature. ”

Since: Jun 07

Norfolk va

#139 Jan 10, 2013
Fair Game wrote:
<quoted text>
A lie of course.
Sceptikal Science and RealClimate discuss the scientific literature.
Wattsupmybum discusses any nonsense that seems to contradict AGW, however scientifically nonsensical, and attacks real climate science and scientists.
Not that an agenda driven ignoramuses like you know the difference- just which side you're on.
Sure skepticalscience and Realclimate discuss scientific literature. Science fiction literature is more like it and they write a rather large portion of it. You complain about Whatsupwiththat discuesses any nonesense that contradicts AGW while ignoring the fact that many scientist have already declared AGW a dead letter. You refer to them as agenda driven ignormauses and yet RealClimate and SkepticalScience are just as much agenda driven to try and resusitate AGW dispite the weath or research that has buried it.

A lie of course. Then again for you, anything that disproves what yo believe in must be a lie because for it to be true would mean that you have believed a lie. Dispite the wealth of facts/research/data to prove that it was a lie.

RealClimate and SkepticalScience discuss facts the way that Goring discuessed them. With an agenda to advance and people to hoodwink.
PHD

Overton, TX

#140 Jan 10, 2013
tina anne wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually Congress has more empty chairs and a lower approval rating than cockroaches. Then again the Senate also has a lower approval rating than cockroaches.
Well I never said you were correct but you do an excellant job giving the "pinheadlitesout" and spacedoutblues a good spanking.Ahh the roaches the GOP and Blue Dogs have many.
aaaaaarghhh SCHUMER

Riverhead, NY

#141 Jan 10, 2013
tina anne wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually Congress has more empty chairs and a lower approval rating than cockroaches. Then again the Senate also has a lower approval rating than cockroaches.
I would rather have my home infested with cockroaches than with Schumer and Pelosi.
litesong

Lynnwood, WA

#142 Jan 10, 2013
phud feces face wrote:
you(tiny-minded anne) do an excellant(sic) job......
'tiny-minded anne' made a friend with 'phud feces face'.'phud feces face' even misspelled another of his many misspelled words, so 'tiny-minded anne' would feel at home.'tiny-minded anne' will clean the face of 'phud feces face', but not very well or often. With many toxic topix AGW deniers leaving toxic topix AGW forums because their funding dried up after romneyhood, romesia & romney who(?) lost, toxic topix AGW deniers, even tho enemies, are friending each other & circling the wagons, unable to attack anymore.

In truth, most toxic topix AGW deniers never could attack, except for their slimy steenking filthy vile reprobate rooting(& rotting) racist pukey proud pigisms &/or alleged & proud threats. toxic topix AGW deniers didn't have any upper class science, chemistry, astronomy, physics, algebra or pre-calc to mount any arguments against scientists that had 10-16 years more mathematics & science training than toxic topix AGW deniers chose to have.
litesong

Lynnwood, WA

#143 Jan 10, 2013
tiny-minded anne wrote:
Am I confused........
Yes.

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#144 Jan 11, 2013
tina anne wrote:
<quoted text>
Sure skepticalscience and Realclimate discuss scientific literature.
Glad you acknowledge that.
PHD

Overton, TX

#145 Jan 11, 2013
pinheadlitesout wrote:
<quoted text>
'tina anne' made a friend with 'PHD'.'I "pinheadlitesout' even mispelled another of his many mispelled words, so 'tina- anne' would feel at home.'tiny anne' wouldn't clean the face of 'MY "pinheadlitesout" feces face'. With many toxic topix AGW deniers like me leaving toxic topix AGW forums because MY funding dried up after romneyhood, romesia & romney who(?) lost, toxic topix AGW deniers, even MY enemies, are friending each other & circling the wagons,om me I'm unable to attack anymore.
In truth, most toxic topix AGW deniers like ME never could attack, except for their slimy steenking filthy vile reprobate rooting(& rotting) racist pukey proud pigisms &/or alleged & proud threats. toxic topix AGW deniers like ME didn't have any upper class science, chemistry, astronomy, physics, algebra or pre-calc to mount any arguments against scientists or science that had 10-16 months more mathematics & science training than toxic topix AGW I "pinheadlitesout denier chose to have.
Well there you have it folks the only truth "pinheadlitesout" Above has ever posted.
hissie hissie

Riverhead, NY

#146 Jan 11, 2013
litesong wrote:
<quoted text>

In truth, most toxic topix AGW deniers never could attack, except for their slimy steenking filthy vile reprobate rooting(& rotting) racist pukey proud pigisms &/or alleged & proud threats.
Your argument sure does have science, facts and logic beat.

You are the schoolyard pundit!
PHD

Overton, TX

#147 Jan 11, 2013
I disagree they wouldn't allow "pinheadlitesout in a school yard.

“dening those who deny nature. ”

Since: Jun 07

Norfolk va

#148 Jan 11, 2013
Fair Game wrote:
<quoted text>
Glad you acknowledge that.
Actually, I said that they discuss science fiction. Then again you have been showing signs of being in distress.

So are you ready to admit that AGW=science fiction.

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#149 Jan 11, 2013
tina anne wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, I said that they discuss science.
You are quite right, they do.

http://www.skepticalscience.com/
PHD

Overton, TX

#150 Jan 11, 2013
All science eventually becomes science fiction.

“dening those who deny nature. ”

Since: Jun 07

Norfolk va

#151 Jan 15, 2013
Fair Game wrote:
<quoted text>
You are quite right, they do.
http://www.skepticalscience.com/
Trimming my words to fit your beliefs. Just like you love to do with the facts.

The funny thing is that you only seem to have one or two sources left with your favorite being run by a physics grad who was considered so loony that he could not get a job in the field. Imagine someone so bad he was considered to loony to be working for Dr Hansen at NASA or Dr Mann at Penn State.
PHD

Overton, TX

#152 Jan 15, 2013
They are all in error. More science fiction.

Since: Jan 13

Fairfax, VA

#153 Jan 15, 2013
PHD wrote:
All science eventually becomes science fiction.
That would be your version of science, which is pseudoscience.

“dening those who deny nature. ”

Since: Jun 07

Norfolk va

#154 Jan 16, 2013
Wallop10 wrote:
<quoted text>
That would be your version of science, which is pseudoscience.
Which would be a excellent description of Dr Hansen's and Dr Mann's work.
litesong

Everett, WA

#155 Jan 16, 2013
phud fetid feces face wrote:
All science eventually becomes science fiction.
Not good science fiction, unless science fiction can stay ahead of the science.
There was a 1955 science fiction movie that portrayed a landing on the moon, 145 years later in the year 2100. Astronauts were picked by NASA in 1957, Pres. Kennedy started the program to land a man on the moon in 1961, & the U.S. landed people on the moon in 1969, 14 years AFTER the movie.

Wasn't a very good sci-fi movie.
Where

Pageland, SC

#156 Jan 16, 2013
Where's Al Gore?
PHD

Overton, TX

#157 Jan 16, 2013
pinheadlitesout wrote:
<quoted text>
Not good science fiction, unless science fiction can stay ahead of the "pinheadlitesout" ME.
There was a 1955 science fiction movie that portrayed a landing on the moon, 145 years later in the year 2100. Astronauts were picked by NASA in 1957, Pres. Kennedy started the program to land a man on the moon in 1961, & the U.S. landed people on the moon in 1969, 14 years AFTER the movie.
Wasn't a very good sci-fi movie.
The only science fiction here is your useless babble cut and paste hot air.Did you get that check up from the neck up?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Hurricane Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
El Nino may bring drought to Tonga 4 hr Josh 2
Body of Texas sheriff's deputy found in lake 19 hr paddyomalley 1
New hurricane heads toward... Fri rollo 1
Filipinos crowd capital for huge Catholic parade (Jan '14) Fri ELIAS IBARRA 39
Rain From Tropical Storm Begins Falling on Arizona Sep 18 Gary 1
Pacific storm blast pushes rain into Arizona Sep 17 Phoenix 1
Utahns stranded in hotel destroyed by Hurricane... Sep 17 Phoenix 1
•••

Hurricane People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••