Hagel testifies Wednesday on Taliban ...

Hagel testifies Wednesday on Taliban prisoner swap

There are 64 comments on the NBC12 story from Jun 11, 2014, titled Hagel testifies Wednesday on Taliban prisoner swap. In it, NBC12 reports that:

Bowe Bergdahl sits in a vehicle guarded by the Taliban in eastern Afghanistan. . FILE - In this file image taken from video obtained from Voice Of Jihad Website, Sgt.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at NBC12.

First Prev
of 4
Next Last

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#1 Jun 11, 2014
They should have traded Obama for the deserter.
.
At least Obama would have felt right at home with the Taliban.

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#2 Jun 11, 2014
And Moochelle said "BLALALALNBALABLABALABLAB LABLABLAA
John n Chuck

Phoenix, AZ

#3 Jun 11, 2014
Eighthman wrote:
They should have traded Obama for the deserter.
.
At least Obama would have felt right at home with the Taliban.
;) i knew u dont liked Obamaxwell! do U starting to lik mike Angels Chuck?
;-0or D#of Coaches! ;)

“Hillary, thirty years of lying”

Since: Nov 08

Paris

#4 Jun 11, 2014
Eighthman wrote:
And Moochelle said "BLALALALNBALABLABALABLAB LABLABLAA
Obama is sleeping on AF 1. It was either that or in the dog house with Bo the first dog after Michele kicked his skinny ass down the stairs.

“Hillary, thirty years of lying”

Since: Nov 08

Paris

#5 Jun 11, 2014
Eighthman wrote:
They should have traded Obama for the deserter.
.
At least Obama would have felt right at home with the Taliban.
Hagel testifies that he thought the trade for the deserter was due to a video produced by an obscure film maker.
Responsibility

Petaluma, CA

#6 Jun 11, 2014
So much fantasy and obsession about the first lady from you folks, so little time! Believe you must have blown up dolls in your prison beds? loll

“Happiness comes through giving”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#7 Jun 11, 2014
Eighthman wrote:
They should have traded Obama for the deserter.
.
At least Obama would have felt right at home with the Taliban.
We should trade you to the Taliban, for the assurance they won't give you back.

“Happiness comes through giving”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#8 Jun 11, 2014
Le Jimbo wrote:
<quoted text>Obama is sleeping on AF 1. It was either that or in the dog house with Bo the first dog after Michele kicked his skinny ass down the stairs.
Thud.

“Happiness comes through giving”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#9 Jun 11, 2014
Just imagine the right wing outcry if Obama had the chance to get back one of our own and did nothing about it. The hypocrisy is fouling up the air.
Eleanor

Vernon Hills, IL

#10 Jun 11, 2014
Lawrence Wolf wrote:
Just imagine the right wing outcry if Obama had the chance to get back one of our own and did nothing about it. The hypocrisy is fouling up the air.
No one doubts that it is the right thing to bring our soldiers home.

However, USING our soldier as a negotiating tool to get terrorists released, will only encourage more kidnapping and taking of prisoners BY terrorists AROUND THE ENTIRE WORLD.

<IMHO>
Cordwainer Trout

Elizabethtown, KY

#11 Jun 11, 2014
Obama and Hagel planned to give Afghanistan and Iraq back to al Qaeda and have done so. The al Qaeda in Iraq, that Democrats claimed weren't there, have taken over a whole province. The worst radical Islam elements in Afghanistan are readying the bags for their women. Obama and Hagel hobnob with traitors, arming al Qaeda everywhere. Obama and Hagel approve of neo-Nazis killing scores of children, while shelling civilians in Eastern Ukraine. Nobody reports it. Our Congress interviews them instead of putting them in prison.

“Happiness comes through giving”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#12 Jun 11, 2014
Eleanor wrote:
<quoted text>
No one doubts that it is the right thing to bring our soldiers home.
However, USING our soldier as a negotiating tool to get terrorists released, will only encourage more kidnapping and taking of prisoners BY terrorists AROUND THE ENTIRE WORLD.
<IMHO>
Your doom scenario notwithstanding, we have a situation where President Obama wanted to save the life of one our own, and is being vilified by the vultures for his compassion. There are always risks in war, but this was the morally right thing to do.

“It's Time to Defeat Terrorism ”

Since: May 11

NYC

#13 Jun 11, 2014
Why would any American thrust the Chuck Hagel who proved to love the Mozlem Brother terrorists of al Qaida and Taliban more than our US troops as he knew that Bergdahl was already converted Jihadist Mozlem Brother who declared Jihad war on US troops and received AK-47 automatic rifle to go after them? Undoubtedly, in the White House of Mozlem Brother sympathizer Obama it is all upside down and Obama will do anything to release Jihadist terrorists or Jihadist convert like Bergdahl but Obama and Hillary never thought it was necessary to save the lives of our US fallen heroes of Benghazi or other US troops that were under Taliban terrorists attacks. Why would any American trust the president who is engage since his first day in the White House in releasing Mozlem Brother terrorists with much American and Christian blood on their hands from Gitmo and from prisons all over the world. Would it be nice to have Commander in chief in America who cares for our US troops first rather than be obsessed with the financing, arming support and welfare of the Jihadist terrorists that he adores and loves with their Jihadist culture of death for America?

“i hope we can change this!”

Since: Aug 08

usa

#14 Jun 11, 2014
Responsibility wrote:
So much fantasy and obsession about the first lady from you folks, so little time! Believe you must have blown up dolls in your prison beds? loll
off the meds again, huh ...
NO ONE is talking about the first lady, dear...

“i hope we can change this!”

Since: Aug 08

usa

#15 Jun 11, 2014
like "chuck" was involved in the decision making process of is!

he's a male version of Susan Rice ... say EXACTLY what you're told to say...nothing more, nothing less.

“Yeah, but...”

Since: Sep 11

MILKY WAY

#16 Jun 11, 2014
Lawrence Wolf wrote:
Just imagine the right wing outcry if Obama had the chance to get back one of our own and did nothing about it. The hypocrisy is fouling up the air.
A specious argument at best.
Where as that supposed outcry during the five years of Bergdahl's time?

“Yeah, but...”

Since: Sep 11

MILKY WAY

#17 Jun 11, 2014
Lawrence Wolf wrote:
Just imagine the right wing outcry if Obama had the chance to get back one of our own and did nothing about it. The hypocrisy is fouling up the air.
A specious argument at best.
Where was that supposed outcry during the five years that Bergdahl spent with the Taliban?

“Happiness comes through giving”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#21 Jun 11, 2014
carey529 wrote:
like "chuck" was involved in the decision making process of is!
he's a male version of Susan Rice ... say EXACTLY what you're told to say...nothing more, nothing less.
Something like you, huh?

“Happiness comes through giving”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#22 Jun 11, 2014
SirPrize wrote:
<quoted text>
A specious argument at best.
Where was that supposed outcry during the five years that Bergdahl spent with the Taliban?
Our outcry goes way back. We have been attempting to get Bergdahl back for a long time. After previous unkept promises, the Taliban finally gave us an opening.

Wouldn't it just be easier to admit that Obama did the right thing? Your friends will still let you into the tearoom.

“Hillary, thirty years of lying”

Since: Nov 08

Paris

#23 Jun 11, 2014
Responsibility wrote:
So much fantasy and obsession about the first lady from you folks, so little time! Believe you must have blown up dolls in your prison beds? loll
BY: Washington Free Beacon Staff
June 11, 2014 2:26 pm
The terrible week continues for Hillary Clinton.
At Wednesday’s Rahm Emanuel-Hillary Clinton show for her book tour, she was responsible for another unforced error.
“I actually write about Rahm in the book,” Clinton said.“I asked him not to read it before we sat and did our interview! But it was in the very first chapter, the chapter I rightly call ‘Team of Rivals’ because that’s what it was in the beginning. A senator from Illinois ran against a senator from New York just as had happened way back with a senator from Illinois named Lincoln and a senator from New York named Seward. And it turned out the same way.”
Maybe Hillary is not ‘ready’ as Lincoln was never a senator because he lost that election to Stephen A. Douglas

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 4
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Guantanamo Bay Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Largest transfer of Gitmo detainees under Obama... Aug 17 ima-Ilis Myka Ash... 4
News Obama releases two Guantanamo detainees with al... Jul '16 joj svrbi 2
News US frees Yemeni prisoner from Guantanamo, sends... Jul '16 USA Today 5
News Press Releases: Serbia Offers Two Former Guanta... Jul '16 joj svrbi 1
News More than 70% of Texas prisons don't have air-c... Jul '16 Ben Ghazi 1
News Republicans claiming Guantanamo victory under O... May '16 serfs up 3
News Bergdahl to be court-martialed under new comman... May '16 Three Days 1
More from around the web