Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Glo...

Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics

There are 35 comments on the The Daily Caller story from Sep 17, 2015, titled Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics. In it, The Daily Caller reports that:

The science on global warming is settled, so settled that 20 climate scientists are asking President Barack Obama to prosecute people who disagree with them on the science behind man-made global warming. Scientists from several universities and research centers even asked Obama to use the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act to prosecute groups that "have knowingly deceived the American people about the risks of climate change, as a means to forestall America's response to climate change."

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Daily Caller.

First Prev
of 2
Next Last
YouDidntBuildTha t

Rohnert Park, CA

#22 Sep 20, 2015
Michelle wrote:
<quoted text>
Good one! I love shit like that!
Yes, this way American liberals in our government can be prosecuted for undermining our Constitution.
District 9

Georgetown, TX

#23 Sep 21, 2015
Anyone who will not lick Obama's ass in public will be charged with racism and failure to comply and will be beheaded on the steps of the Supreme Court by Obama's gay pick to run the military.

Since: Aug 15

Seattle, WA

#24 Sep 21, 2015
Cat74 wrote:
I am ready to go to Court with those stupid people. I can match their Scientists behind their hoax Scientist for scientist, and then some.
You are presuming a fair trial with an unbiased judge.

Political prisoners don't see such trials.
IB DaMann

Chantilly, VA

#25 Sep 21, 2015
Denny CranesPlace wrote:
The supreme court is in violation of the constitution. States set the standards for marriage. It is not an issue given to the Federal government. The purpose of the constitution is to limit Federal power!
You are absolutely correct. The Supreme Court has no business mandating state legislation.

I would rather see marriage defined as a union between two people, but I would insist that state legislatures so define marriage for their respective states, not any brach of the Federal Government.

Any state would be within its rights of sovereignty to simply dismiss/ignore the Supreme Court's ruling on the matter.
MeltThis

Winnsboro, LA

#26 Sep 21, 2015
The old global warming scammers live on. Sucking at the government teet as always. Hey it beats being a real scientist that has to face honest peer reviews that aren't rigged. Global warmists have booked the books on their research for years - that part of their "science" is settled. Hippie science is neither accurate nor respected - global warming is a hippie political movement - not science. Joke science with the support of loud voices of the unproductive portion of society.
Make NASA Great Again

Minneapolis, MN

#27 Apr 20, 2018
Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:
We have a non science man appointed by the non science Republicans to run NASA. Now perhaps they can reverse global warming. Perhaps he along with denier Pruitt and industrial shill Zinke can make America great again.
Perhaps this new leadership can wrestle NASA away from carbon dioxide and greenhouse gas effects back to the study of aeronautics and space.
Make NASA Great Again

Minneapolis, MN

#28 Apr 20, 2018
Make NASA Great Again wrote:
<quoted text>

Perhaps this new leadership can wrestle NASA away from carbon dioxide and greenhouse gas effects back to the study of aeronautics and space.
I would like to edit my comment to:

Perhaps this new leadership can wrestle NASA away from carbon dioxide and climate change back to the study of aeronautics and space.
Fear of Flying

Peabody, MA

#29 Apr 20, 2018
Make NASA Great Again wrote:
<quoted text>

I would like to edit my comment to:

Perhaps this new leadership can wrestle NASA away from carbon dioxide and climate change back to the study of aeronautics and space.
Actually aeronatics is affected by climate trends. Jet stream and other air currents are changing. So keeping up with these changes is a logical step.
Make NASA Great Again

Minneapolis, MN

#30 Apr 20, 2018
Fear of Flying wrote:
<quoted text>

Actually aeronatics is affected by climate trends. Jet stream and other air currents are changing. So keeping up with these changes is a logical step.
Yes, of course. Those ARE important to aeronatics.

My point is ...NASA & GISS may be 'heading down a wrong path' and losing their focus on the big picture of space exploration by focusing on this idea that carbon dioxide driven climate change is a threat to life on Earth.
hojo

Minneapolis, MN

#31 Apr 20, 2018
Another Liberal Leftist Lie!
"Scientists ask Obama to Prosecute Global warming Skeptics"! Which scientists??? Name them!!
They can't because there (aren't) any!...20th century Global Cooling, 21st century Global Warming,
same senario, same hoax, same government scam, same slogan....."If we don't first succeed, try and lie again!!!

Since: Aug 15

Seattle, WA

#32 Apr 20, 2018
Make NASA Great Again wrote:
<quoted text>

I would like to edit my comment to:

Perhaps this new leadership can wrestle NASA away from carbon dioxide and climate change back to the study of aeronautics and space.
Would certainly be nice.
hojo

Rock Island, IL

#33 Apr 21, 2018
MeltThis wrote:
The old global warming scammers live on. Sucking at the government teet as always. Hey it beats being a real scientist that has to face honest peer reviews that aren't rigged. Global warmists have booked the books on their research for years - that part of their "science" is settled. Hippie science is neither accurate nor respected - global warming is a hippie political movement - not science. Joke science with the support of loud voices of the unproductive portion of society.
But what about "Silencing the oppostion"! It is the liberal leftist Socialist Communist way of suppressing (any and all opposing views) in order for them to continue their Marxist one world government subversive dictatorship agenda.
whiney beech

Bloomingdale, IN

#35 May 15, 2018
Heck yes! Diversity of thought is highly overrated.
hojo

Rock Island, IL

#36 May 16, 2018
Earthling-1 wrote:
The poll says it all:

Is Global Warming Real And Man-Made?
Yes - 2%
No it's not man-made but it's real - 23%
No it's neither real nor man-made - 72%
Not sure - 2%
----------
It may take a while, but when the truth comes out, it will be the climate catastrophist crusaders who'll be worrying about prosecution.
I would imagine that this is what as referred to as "settled science" or is it "consensus"!!!

Since: Aug 15

Seattle, WA

#38 May 16, 2018
hojo wrote:
<quoted text>

I would imagine that this is what as referred to as "settled science" or is it "consensus"!!!
To the Church of Global Warming, they are the same.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Global Warming Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Global Warming Standup Comedy (Apr '07) 2 hr Patriot AKA Bozo 5,795
News Government climate report contradicts Trump, wa... 9 hr Uncle tony 28
News Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say (Jul '10) 14 hr Anti-Know Nothing... 42,349
News Inslee wants 100 percent clean energy in Washin... Dec 14 ThomasA 2
What role do you think humans play in global wa... (Sep '14) Dec 12 hojo 12,455
News Government Climate Report Warns of Worsening U.... Dec 11 whiney beech 56
The Pseudoscience of Global Warming (Mar '18) Dec 11 Into The Night 507