Global warming scientists cooling it ...

Global warming scientists cooling it on CO2

There are 78 comments on the Examiner.com story from Feb 13, 2013, titled Global warming scientists cooling it on CO2. In it, Examiner.com reports that:

Libertarian News Examiner has long argued against human-caused climate disruption nee climate change nee global warming on the basis that the science has been corrupted through politicization.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Examiner.com.

First Prev
of 4
Next Last
SpaceBlues

United States

#1 Feb 13, 2013
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#2 Feb 13, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
There you have it folks the spaced out spacedoutblues got its crystal ball out and made another prediction.
litesong

Everett, WA

#3 Feb 13, 2013
phud fetid feces face fiend wrote:
Spaceblues got its crystal ball out and made another prediction.
"phud fetid feces face fiend" has no mathematics or science degrees, has no upper class science, chemistry, astronomy, physics, algebra, or pre-calc for its poorly earned hi skule deegreee & has a no clear crystal ball because it is covered with fetid feces.
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#4 Feb 14, 2013
litesong wrote:
<quoted text>
"phud fetid feces face fiend" has no mathematics or science degrees, has no upper class science, chemistry, astronomy, physics, algebra, or pre-calc for its poorly earned hi skule deegreee & has a no clear crystal ball because it is covered with fetid feces.
In addition, you think topix does not know what you publish. Attacks on me will not delete or erase what you are and what you do. You should stop making an ASSumption of your---self before you know the facts. Do contact topix to satisfy your accusations of the reprint BS your posting of what I said. You are a dumbASSumption of your---self again.
Fun Facts

Huntsville, AL

#5 Feb 14, 2013
"On the one hand, as scientists we are ethically bound to the scientific method. On the other hand, we are not just scientists but human beings as well. To do that we need to get some broad based support, to capture the publicís imagination. That, of course, means getting loads of media coverage. So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements, and make little mention of any doubts we might have. Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest." Dr Stephen Schneider, of Stanford University

The article supporting this thread was published in the politics section, appropriate for scientists such as the one quoted above.
SpaceBlues

Cypress, TX

#6 Feb 14, 2013
Fun Facts wrote:
"On the one hand, as scientists we are ethically bound to the scientific method. On the other hand, we are not just scientists but human beings as well. To do that we need to get some broad based support, to capture the publicís imagination. That, of course, means getting loads of media coverage. So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements, and make little mention of any doubts we might have. Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest." Dr Stephen Schneider, of Stanford University
The article supporting this thread was published in the politics section, appropriate for scientists such as the one quoted above.
So what? The subject was also in the sou address.
SpaceBlues

Cypress, TX

#7 Feb 14, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
This is not a cartoon but a scientific reference, folks.
LessHypeMoreFact

Toronto, Canada

#8 Feb 14, 2013
Fun Facts wrote:
"On the one hand, as scientists we are ethically bound to the scientific method. On the other hand, we are not just scientists but human beings as well. To do that we need to get some broad based support, to capture the publicís imagination. That, of course, means getting loads of media coverage. So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements, and make little mention of any doubts we might have. Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest." Dr Stephen Schneider, of Stanford University
The article supporting this thread was published in the politics section, appropriate for scientists such as the one quoted above.
The problems of 'messaging' to get the facts understood by a range of people without the proper background in endemic to ALL communications.

And the problem with distorted messaging such as yours is endemic to any public communications media. That is why 'useful idiots', trolls, Astro-turf and 'spammers', etc terms are developed. To be able to define what form of nonsense is being spouted from Fun Farts and his ilk.

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#9 Feb 14, 2013
"recent figures suggest that climate sensitivity is drastically less than the IPCC's old estimate" based on "

No, that's a lie.

Recent figures confirm the IPCC estimate.

If you want an example of the politization of politics, look at the way libertarians lie and twist what scientists say.

Deniers are liars.

Libertarians are liars.

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#10 Feb 14, 2013
Correction: politicization.
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#11 Feb 14, 2013
Fun Facts wrote:
"On the one hand, as scientists we are ethically bound to the scientific method. On the other hand, we are not just scientists but human beings as well. To do that we need to get some broad based support, to capture the publicís imagination. That, of course, means getting loads of media coverage. So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements, and make little mention of any doubts we might have. Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest." Dr Stephen Schneider, of Stanford University
The article supporting this thread was published in the politics section, appropriate for scientists such as the one quoted above.
Careful you are scarring those scientific science fiction loonies out there.
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#12 Feb 14, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>This is not a cartoon but a scientific reference, folks.
Can you fathom standing alone making a fool of your---self? No for many years you solicit the help of "pinheadlitesout" to make a bigger fool of your---self.
LessHypeMoreFact

Toronto, Canada

#13 Feb 14, 2013
PHD wrote:
<quoted text>Can you fathom standing alone making a fool of your---self? No for many years you solicit the help of "pinheadlitesout" to make a bigger fool of your---self.
You have that market cornered. Nobody can compete with you any more. There used to be Earthling, and a few really clueless boobs but they gave up as the evidence mounted.
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#15 Feb 14, 2013
LessHypeMoreFact wrote:
<quoted text>
You have that market cornered. Nobody can compete with you any more. There used to be Earthling, and a few really clueless boobs but they gave up as the evidence mounted.
I did not know this was a competition. I was under the belief the topic was global warming. If it is a competition than you certainly don not have a chance.I also did not know you were a clueless boob but thanks for the update.

Since: Jan 13

Fairfax, VA

#16 Feb 14, 2013
Fun Facts wrote:
"On the one hand, as scientists we are ethically bound to the scientific method. On the other hand, we are not just scientists but human beings as well.
Too bad, you don't even go with the scientific method... or truth.

Since: Jan 13

Fairfax, VA

#17 Feb 14, 2013
LessHypeMoreFact wrote:
<quoted text>
You have that market cornered. Nobody can compete with you any more. There used to be Earthling, and a few really clueless boobs but they gave up as the evidence mounted.
PennyHD is so clueless, she apparently hasn't notice EVERY ONE votes her down/doesn't want to be associated with her.
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#18 Feb 15, 2013
Wallop10 wrote:
<quoted text>
PennyHD is so clueless, she apparently hasn't notice EVERY ONE votes her down/doesn't want to be associated with her.
More BS from the commander TROLL!!!
Fun Facts

Huntsville, AL

#19 Feb 15, 2013
PHD wrote:
<quoted text>Careful you are scarring those scientific science fiction loonies out there.
That's part of the fun.
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#20 Feb 15, 2013
Fun Facts wrote:
<quoted text>
That's part of the fun.
Yes it is, and free entertainment.

Since: Jan 13

Fairfax, VA

#21 Feb 15, 2013
Fun Facts wrote:
<quoted text>
That's part of the fun.
You're getting REALLY desparate FF, if Troll PennyHD is the only person you can find as an ally.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 4
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Global Warming Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warmin... (Sep '15) 11 min hojo 32
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 46 min STEAMY FARTS 64,570
What is Science...........and a Scientific Method 2 hr hojo 1
The Pseudoscience of Global Warming 2 hr Into The Night 56
global warming keeps on keeping on (Apr '17) 2 hr Into The Night 267
Global Cooling (Apr '15) 2 hr hojo 2,609
Poll What is the most STUPID post made by an AGW'er.... (Sep '09) 6 hr hojo 1,438