House Republicans push to give Keysto...

House Republicans push to give Keystone pipeline approval authority to Congress

There are 4 comments on the The Miami Herald story from Apr 10, 2013, titled House Republicans push to give Keystone pipeline approval authority to Congress. In it, The Miami Herald reports that:

Promoters of the Keystone XL pipeline are agitating for its fast approval now that the State Department has downplayed the project's impact on global warming.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Miami Herald.


Toronto, Canada

#1 Apr 11, 2013
They keep trying to frame the question into giving the pipeline company free reign to do what it wants or we'll punish you instead of "what is required to make the pipeline 'safe enough'".

Right wingers especially like to foist costs onto the public while running the game close to 'criminal' irresponsibility. And fighting pipeline standards, regulation and inspection at the political level.

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

#2 Jul 27, 2013
"Jeb Bush and Interior Secretary Gale Norton told reporters after a brief meeting with the president that the actions will help preserve the Florida Panhandle's pristine coastline."

"It just didn't seem right that 25 miles off that coast there would be the possibility of drilling, and today that possibility no longer exists," Bush said...

didnt seem right Mr.Jeb??

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

#3 Jul 27, 2013
'..we care about the small people..' BP Carl Henric Svanberg

your engineers were lieing about the magnitude of this problem is caring?

'I want my life back' Tony Hayward CEO of BP..please be gone sir, what about the lives of the 11 oil rig workers who were terminated in the disaster?

Etobicoke, Canada

#4 Jul 27, 2013
Environmental impact statement (SEIS, ) is now available. It was written BY Dues Paying Members of the American Petroleum Institute. API has spent $22 million lobbying on behalf of its members on KXL and tar sands since its initial June 2008 proposal, on top of the cash it has spent on its relentless public relations and advertising efforts. Conflict of interest anyone?

Even worse, they won't release the exact ROUTE of the pipeline which makes their entire analysis BULL of the highest order. They can say ANYTHING and nobody can check it because they can just say 'that's not on the pipeline route'. Not that they say anything. The language is so vague and lacking details they do not support ANY of their claims.

The pipeline dangerous for the length and lack of industry accountability.

Now we see the manipulation behind the scenes disabling actual public accountability for environmental impacts, foreseen or not.

It will raise the cost of gasoline to US Midwest customers.

And the oil is for EXPORT, not even benefiting the US gulf coast.

If this isn't veto'd then Obama is not doing his job to protect the PUBLIC good.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Global Warming Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 20 min jenny 64,455
News Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say (Jul '10) 43 min Into The Night 38,322
News White House will override Obama's climate plan 2 hr Into The Night 3,259
What role do you think humans play in global wa... (Sep '14) 8 hr Into The Night 12,187
News Sea ice cover at both poles at lowest point of ... (Mar '17) 12 hr Real Science 60
Poll What is the most STUPID post made by an AGW'er.... (Sep '09) 20 hr Fugooo 1,386
News Scott Pruitt asks whether global warming 'neces... Sat hojo 2
More from around the web