Global Warming Standup Comedy
gcaveman1

Bay Springs, MS

#2964 Nov 15, 2013
mememine69 wrote:
Deniers do not believe 30 years of science NEVER agreeing it WILL happen and nothing beyond just "could be" a crisis is good enough to condemn our children to a CO2 hell on Earth but believers say "maybe" is ok to goose step their own children into their exaggerated greenhouse gas ovens.
You fear mongers make neocons look good.
Your maintenance guy says your house "might" have termites; you buy them a piano.

Your doctor says he's found something that could be cancer; you drink morewhiskey.

Your mechanic says you may have a bad water pump; you take a 700 mile trip.

Deniers fail to understand the English language.
gcaveman1

Bay Springs, MS

#2965 Nov 15, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
There have always been typhoons; what lasts longer, the ocean or the mountain?
We can't just wait, burn fossil fuel now. Turn up the heather, open the refrigerator and plan a nice road trip or flight. Mother Nature will adapted to our CO2 or die; fertilize her.
You are a poet of the absurd and an envoy of death.

“EnvironMENTAList ”

Since: Feb 07

Near Detroit

#2966 Nov 15, 2013
Climate change believers are like Rob Ford; they don’t even knew what the consensus is they are agreeing on because science had NEVER said or agreed it WILL be a crisis with their 30 year old consensus of nothing beyond just "could be" a crisis.
So what gives YOU the right say it WILL?

You remaining believers cannot say a crisis will happen,only could just as science has.
SpaceBlues

United States

#2967 Nov 15, 2013
mememine69 wrote:
Climate change believers are like Rob Ford; they don’t even knew what the consensus is they are agreeing on because science had NEVER said or agreed it WILL be a crisis with their 30 year old consensus of nothing beyond just "could be" a crisis.
So what gives YOU the right say it WILL?
You remaining believers cannot say a crisis will happen,only could just as science has.
You are the only science denier left because tina and company lost the fossil fuel contracts and their brain cells.

Self-interest and time perception may be the most significant obstacles to climate change action, according to a new study. Researchers at New York University (NYU) have determined that the long-term goals of preventive action are not sufficient incentives for nations who fail to cooperate in the face of global warming. The findings suggest that emphasizing the short-term gains may be the only way to spur a concerted effort against the climate shift that threatens to unravel infrastructures and economic systems worldwide.

P.S. Obviously, b_gone does not count as anything. It's just a nuisance bug, like a mosquito.
gcaveman1

Bay Springs, MS

#2968 Nov 15, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>You are the only science denier left because tina and company lost the fossil fuel contracts and their brain cells.
Self-interest and time perception may be the most significant obstacles to climate change action, according to a new study. Researchers at New York University (NYU) have determined that the long-term goals of preventive action are not sufficient incentives for nations who fail to cooperate in the face of global warming. The findings suggest that emphasizing the short-term gains may be the only way to spur a concerted effort against the climate shift that threatens to unravel infrastructures and economic systems worldwide.
P.S. Obviously, b_gone does not count as anything. It's just a nuisance bug, like a mosquito.
memememem6999 has the time perception problem, was it 31 years or 26 years or 24 years scientists have been lying? He doesn't know.

Anything "can" happen. But, they don't understand a 95% confidence by 97% of scientists that there is a 100% chance that we are going to change 90% of the world. He doesn't know.

Brian-G is an idiot. He doesn't know either.

It could be so bad that even I don't know how bad it "could" be. They want to gamble on that.

They don't know.
SpaceBlues

United States

#2969 Nov 15, 2013
Agreed. Reminds of an analogy of sinkholes.. you just don't where or when or even how the hole takes hold...
litesong

Everett, WA

#2970 Nov 15, 2013
gcaveman1 wrote:
brian-g is an idiot.
Why do you say that? Just because I've delineated its errors of 1 million TIMES, 1000 TIMES, 3000 TIMES, 73 million TIMES, & 2.5+ trillion TIMES doesn't give you the right to call him an idiot. Its IQ is much lower.
SpaceBlues

United States

#2971 Nov 16, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>You speak for yourself, self disclosure.
.
<quoted text> http://motherboard.vice.com/blog/solar-plants...
Solar Plants Are Burning Birds' Wings
By Lex Berko
Two months ago, 34 birds were found dead or injured on the site of the Ivanpah solar plant owned by BrightSource Energy in east San Bernardino County, California. Almost half suffered from singed feathers after running afoul of the plant’s reflected beams of sunlight, according to a report from The Desert Sun. This was not an isolated incident: another 19 were found dead at the 500-megawatt Desert Sunlight plant, which is also located in California.
So what’s going on here? Why are birds dropping like their winged-brethren, flies, around these plants and what can we do?
The Californian desert has become a popular place to build solar energy plants because of the abundant space and, of course, the sun. However, the region also serves as one of the four major north-to-south trajectories for migratory birds: the Pacific Flyway. So while it seems like an ideal locale, birds who fly over these structures face some new and unusual hazards.
When it comes to death by solar farm, birds typically die in one of two ways. In the first, the glimmering sheer of solar panels might trick birds into thinking they are actually part of a body of water. And so the birds, especially waterfowl in this scenario, dive towards the panels, looking for moisture and food, only to find themselves, bones broken, dying in the middle of the arid California sand....
Mosquito heart speaks with disease...
SpaceBlues

United States

#2972 Nov 16, 2013
litesong wrote:
<quoted text>To another:

Why do you say that? Just because I've delineated its errors of 1 million TIMES, 1000 TIMES, 3000 TIMES, 73 million TIMES, & 2.5+ trillion TIMES doesn't give you the right to call him an idiot. Its IQ is much lower.
Mosquito iq?

hahahaha

“EnvironMENTAList ”

Since: Feb 07

Near Detroit

#2973 Nov 25, 2013
You climate blame believer are like Rob Ford; you don't even know what it is you are agreeing on and think science had a consensus that it WILL be a crisis despite 30 years of nothing beyond "could be" a crisis and then you have the nerve to tell their own kids it WILL be a crisis.
Did Bush issue CO2 death threats to billions of innocent children just to make sure they stayed environmentally aware and turned the ^%$$#in lights out more often?
Climate change belief is a war crime for the history books and they only crisis you remaining climate blame believers have to worry about is how your grand kids will explain how at the mere grunt of a headline of a meaningless consensus of "maybe a crisis" was good enough to condemn them all to their CO2 deaths in a climate crisis.
gcaveman1

Carrollton, TX

#2974 Nov 25, 2013
litesong wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do you say that? Just because I've delineated its errors of 1 million TIMES, 1000 TIMES, 3000 TIMES, 73 million TIMES, & 2.5+ trillion TIMES doesn't give you the right to call him an idiot. Its IQ is much lower.
Yes, you're right.

I have apparently insulted idiots.
gcaveman1

Carrollton, TX

#2975 Nov 25, 2013
mememine69 wrote:
You climate blame believer are like Rob Ford; you don't even know what it is you are agreeing on and think science had a consensus that it WILL be a crisis despite 30 years of nothing beyond "could be" a crisis and then you have the nerve to tell their own kids it WILL be a crisis.
Did Bush issue CO2 death threats to billions of innocent children just to make sure they stayed environmentally aware and turned the ^%$$#in lights out more often?
Climate change belief is a war crime for the history books and they only crisis you remaining climate blame believers have to worry about is how your grand kids will explain how at the mere grunt of a headline of a meaningless consensus of "maybe a crisis" was good enough to condemn them all to their CO2 deaths in a climate crisis.
This is definitely the forum for you. You are the master of global warming stand-up comedy.

“EnvironMENTAList ”

Since: Feb 07

Near Detroit

#2976 Nov 26, 2013
Science’s “threat to the planet” as they say is THE ultimate crisis!
A crisis of climate is a comet hit of an emergency but science won't say their own CO2 climate change crisis is as real as they love to say a comet hit is.
What part of "maybe is not WILL be" don't you remaining believers get? We now see in the headlines that science is “95%” sure after 30 years so do the math and who said it was a crime to say "maybe a crisis" for 30 years? The real crime was you believers and media and politicians saying that science had a consensus that it WILL be a crisis when it was nothing beyond "could be" a crisis. Science didn't commit any hoax or scam, you believers did. If "maybe" is good enough for you then we can agree to disagree on that fact alone. But ask yourself how sustainable “maybe” is, not for another 30 years. Oil doesn't feed denial, science’s almost comical and meaningless consensus of “maybe” feeds all doubt and denial. We deniers are real liberals who doubt, question and challenge ALL authority especially one’s that condemn billions of innocent children to a “catastrophic” crisis.
Prove us wrong. Prove to us that science agrees it WILL be a crisis and can you squeeze another 5% off them so we can make it a nice even one hundred percent consensus? We are oh so close!
You wanted this misery to have been real? We hope not.
B as in B S as in S

Minneapolis, MN

#2977 Nov 26, 2013
THE TRUTH...

One UNDENIABLE FACT to which every Science Academy agrees:
NEVER has any Climatologist claimed an extreme weather event was caused by Carbon Dioxide Driven ClImate Change.

The above statement speaks to the fundamental truth about Climatology.

Just find one Science Academy that states: a single extreme weather event was caused by Anthropogenic Carbon Dioxide Pollution and the above statement would not be

... THE TRUTH

“EnvironMENTAList ”

Since: Feb 07

Near Detroit

#2978 Nov 27, 2013
B as in B S as in S wrote:
THE TRUTH...
One UNDENIABLE FACT to which every Science Academy agrees:
NEVER has any Climatologist claimed an extreme weather event was caused by Carbon Dioxide Driven ClImate Change.
The above statement speaks to the fundamental truth about Climatology.
Just find one Science Academy that states: a single extreme weather event was caused by Anthropogenic Carbon Dioxide Pollution and the above statement would not be
... THE TRUTH
Yes! Climate blame believers are war criminals for 30 years of needless CO2 panic.

“EnvironMENTAList ”

Since: Feb 07

Near Detroit

#2979 Nov 27, 2013
Will the arrival of unstoppable warming force science to say; “inevitable” and “eventual” and “unavoidable” instead of nothing beyond “could be”? 30 years of "maybe" proves it "won't be" a crisis.
“Climate change is real and is happening and could lead to unstoppable warming”; is a consensus of nothing and science could end this debate with a real warning for a real “inescapable” crisis.
YOU remaining climate blame believers cannot tell our children a crisis WILL happen until science does!
Cut n Paste

Minneapolis, MN

#2980 Nov 29, 2013
We all can see which side has no basis in logic, reason, or science to support their dogma... and which side speaks to the truth.

Every science academy agrees that: The climate changes.
Every science academy agrees that: CO2 is a GHG.
Every science academy agrees that: Man's burning of fossil fuels releases CO2.
Every science academy agrees that: the Earth is warmer than it was before.
Thus... Every science academy agrees with a high level of confidence: the indisputable, unequivocal conclusions from this evidence clearly indicates it is likely the planet is at risk of almost certainly being affected by Anthropogenic Carbon Dioxide Driven Global Climate Change.

There. Now you know which side to believe.

“EnvironMENTAList ”

Since: Feb 07

Near Detroit

#2981 Nov 29, 2013
Cut n Paste wrote:
We all can see which side has no basis in logic, reason, or science to support their dogma... and which side speaks to the truth.
Every science academy agrees that: The climate changes.
Every science academy agrees that: CO2 is a GHG.
Every science academy agrees that: Man's burning of fossil fuels releases CO2.
Every science academy agrees that: the Earth is warmer than it was before.
Thus... Every science academy agrees with a high level of confidence: the indisputable, unequivocal conclusions from this evidence clearly indicates it is likely the planet is at risk of almost certainly being affected by Anthropogenic Carbon Dioxide Driven Global Climate Change.
There. Now you know which side to believe.
Ya as in:Help my house could possibly be on fire maybe!

“EnvironMENTAList ”

Since: Feb 07

Near Detroit

#2982 Nov 29, 2013
You believers say it WILL while science says it "might" so how do you doomers sleep at night?
And like a mob of Rob Fords soon to be forgotten and gone, you doomers didn't even know what it was you were agreeing on.
It's not what is being said it's who is saying it? How much closer to bible thumpers can you doomers get.
Science is the word, science is the way as you goosestep like Greenzis obeying as they say.
Ozone, plastic bags lasting forever, acid rain, Y2Kyoto, Gulf oil spill damage exaggerations were all wrong but real planet lovers know the smoggy seventies are long gone.
Roses are still red violets are still blue but with you doomers holding the spear of fear to our backs, who knew?
Air quality "alerts, watches and advisories are only predictions of a possible smog warning. Ya sure it doesn't ryme but and can't think of one every time.

“EnvironMENTAList ”

Since: Feb 07

Near Detroit

#2983 Nov 30, 2013
How do we stop these remaining climate blame believers from telling our kids it WILL be a crisis when science has only agreed on nothing beyond just; "could be" a crisis?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Global Warming Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News White House will override Obama's climate plan 28 min Quirky 411
1800 months of 'adjusted' data are irrelevant a... 5 hr Can t Have It Bot... 34
global warming keeps on keeping on 7 hr Into The Night 45
What role do you think humans play in global wa... (Sep '14) 7 hr No fun 11,654
News Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say (Jul '10) 12 hr Into The Night 37,499
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 19 hr Can t Have It Bot... 64,007
News Griffith's agenda includes rules for Congress, ... (Sep '10) Sun Goonie 55
More from around the web